ABSTRACT
Due to the elusive nature of invasive lobular carcinoma, mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging have their limitations in early detection. A 67-year-old woman presented for mammography and found retraction of breast parenchyma of the right breast. Magnetic resonance imaging and contrast mammography showed no contrast uptake in the region in question. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound were found to be superior for the detection of invasive lobular carcinoma, with a sensitivity of more than 90%. On ultrasound examination, invasive lobular carcinoma may occur only with posterior acoustic shadowing. On breast magnetic resonance imaging, it is commonly described as an irregular mass and less commonly as non-mass enhancement. An additional advantage of magnetic resonance imaging is the higher detection rate of multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral breast lesions. The reason for no contrast enhancement in this particular tumor before neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by enhancement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is most likely at the molecular and histologic level and requires further investigation in similar cases.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Studies show insufficient sensitivity of virtual non-contrast (VNC) reconstructions for stone detection in dual-energy CT urography (DE-CTU). The aim of this study was to investigate if side-by-side-evaluation of both VNC and post-contrast images could increase the sensitivity of single-phase split bolus DE-CTU. METHODS: Consecutive patients with haematuria who underwent split bolus DE-CTU on the same dual-source DE-CT scanner were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Intravenous furosemide and oral hydration were employed. Two readers, independently and then jointly in two separate sessions, recorded the location and the longest axial stone diameter on three randomised sets of images: separate VNC and post-contrast images, and side-by-side-reconstructions. True non-contrast (TNC) images served as the standard of reference. RESULTS: A total of 83 urinary stones were detected on TNC images. Independent reader side-by-side-evaluation of VNC and post-contrast images yielded higher stone detection sensitivity (76 and 84%, respectively) compared to evaluation of only VNC (71 and 81%, respectively) or post-contrast images (64 and 80%, respectively). The sensitivity of joint reader evaluation of side-by-side-images reached almost 86% and was not significantly different from TNC images (p = 0.77). All stones larger than 3 mm were correctly detected by side-by-side-evaluation. Dose reduction of 55% could be achieved by omitting TNC scans. CONCLUSION: Side-by-side-VNC and post-contrast image evaluation enable detection of clinically significant urolithiasis on single-phase split bolus DE-CTU with significant dose reduction. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study shows that single-phase DE-CTU is feasible if VNC imaging is simultaneously utilised with post-contrast images.