Effect of thymoquinone on acetic acid-induced visceral nociception in rats: role of central cannabinoid and α2-adrenergic receptors.

Thymoquinone (TQ) is the main biologically active substance of Nigella sativa (black seeds). It has anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, anti-oxidative and anti-nociceptive properties. This study was aimed to explore the effect of TQ on acetic acid-induced visceral nociception. The central mechanisms of the effect of TQ were investigated using cannabinergic (AM251) and α2-adrenergic (yohimbine [Yoh]) antagonists. The lateral ventricle of the brain was cannulated for intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections. Visceral nociception was induced by intra-peritoneal (IP) injection of acetic acid (1.00% in a volume of 1.00 mL). Measuring the latency time to the first writhing appearance and counting the number of writhing in 5-min intervals for a period of 60 min were performed. Locomotor activity was determined using an open-field test. Oral administration (PO) of 2.50 and 10.00 mg kg-1 TQ increased the latency time to the first writhing appearance and decreased the number of writhing. The AM251 (5.00 µg per rat; ICV) and Yoh (5.00 µg per rat; ICV) partially prevented TQ (10.00 mg kg-1; PO)-induced anti-nociception. Locomotor activity was not altered by these treatments. The results of the present study showed that TQ had the ability to reduce visceral nociception caused by IP injection of acetic acid. The central mechanisms of this action of TQ might be partially mediated by cannabinergic and α2-adrenegic receptors.

Exogenous histamine and H 2 receptor activation and H 3 receptor inhibition in nucleus accumbens modulate formalin-induced orofacial nociception through opioid receptors.

It has been demonstrated that the nucleus accumbens (NAc) plays an important role in modulation of nociception due to its extensive connections with different regions of the brain. In addition, this nucleus receives histaminergic projections from tuberomammillary nucleus. Considering the role of the central histaminergic system in nociception, the effect of histamine and its H 2 and H 3 receptors agonist and antagonist microinjections into the NAc on orofacial formalin nociception was investigated. In male Wistar rats, using stereotaxic surgery, two guide cannulas were bilaterally implanted into the right and left sides of the NAc. Diluted formalin solution (1.5%, 50 µl) injection into the vibrissa pad led to orofacial nociception. Immediately after injection, face rubbing was observed at 3-min blocks for 45 min. Orofacial formalin nociception was characterized by a biphasic nociceptive response (first phase: 0-3 min and second phase: 15-33 min). Microinjections of histamine (0.5 and 1 µg/site), dimaprit (1 µg/site, H 2 receptor agonist) and thioperamide (2 µg/site, H 3 receptor antagonist) attenuated both phases of formalin orofacial nociception. Prior microinjection of famotidine (2 µg/site) inhibited the antinociceptive effects of dimaprit (1 µg/site). Furthermore, comicroinjection of thioperamide (2 µg/site) and immepip (1 µg/site) prevented thioperamide (2 µg/site)-induced antinociception. Naloxone (2 µg/site) also prevented histamine, dimaprit- and thioperamide-induced antinociception. The results of this study demonstrate that at the level of the NAc, histamine and its H 2 and H 3 receptors are probably involved in the modulation of orofacial nociception with an opioid system-dependent mechanism.

Cerebellar fastigial nucleus histamine and its H2 but not H1 receptors might inhibit acetic acid-induced visceral nociception and improve motor coordination in rats: role of opioid system.

The cerebellum and its deep nuclei contribute to the regulation of important functions including motor coordination and pain. Histamine modulates some functions of the fastigial nucleus (FN) such as motor coordination. In this study, by application of histamine and activation of its H1 and H2 receptors, the FN processing of visceral pain, general locomotor activity and motor coordination were targeted. The possible mechanism of action was followed by the inhibition of opioid receptors. The right and left sides of the FN were surgically implanted with guide cannulas. Immediately after an intraperitoneal injection of acetic acid (1.00 mL, 1.00%), the first writhing onset latency and the writhing number over 60 min were recorded. Open-field and rotarod tests were applied for general locomotor and motor coordination assessment, respectively. Histamine and dimaprit (H2 receptor agonist) increased first writhing onset latency, decreased the writhing number and increased falling time from the rod. These effects were prevented by ranitidine (H2 receptor antagonist) pre-treatment. Significant alterations were not observed by histamine H1 receptor agonist (2-pyridylethylamine) and antagonist (mepyramine). Naloxone, with no effect on falling time from the rod, inhibited the antinociceptive effects of histamine and dimaprit. Beam break number was not affected by the above-mentioned treatments. Based on the results, it can be suggested that histamine H2, but not H1 receptors at the FN might have had an inhibitory role on acetic acid-induced visceral pain and improved motor coordination. The antinociception, but not motor coordination might be mediated by FN opioid receptors.

Histamine and its H 1 receptors in the ventral pallidum mediate formalin-induced pain-related behaviors through this region and spinal cord opioid receptors.

Many structures of the central nervous system recruit different neurotransmitters in pain processing. This study focused on the contribution of histamine and its H 1 receptors in the ventral pallidum (VP) in mediating pain-triggered behaviors. Intra-VP microinjection of histamine and 2-pyridylethylamine (2-PEA, a histamine H 1 receptor agonist) at the same doses of 0.5 and 1 µg/200 nl reduced both the first and second phases of licking/biting duration as well as flinching number induced by intra-plantar (ipl) injection of formalin (2.5%, 50 µl). Premicroinjection of mepyramine (a histamine H 1 antagonist, 2 µg/200 nl) into the VP antagonized the suppressive effects of 1 µg/200 nl histamine and 2-PEA on licking/biting and flinching behaviors. The possible mechanisms of the above-mentioned pain-reducing effects were followed by intra-VP and intrathecal administration of naloxone (an opioid receptor antagonist). Naloxone (2 µg/200 nl) preadministration into the VP inhibited attenuating effects of histamine and 2-PEA on both the licking/biting and flinching behaviors, whereas intrathecal injection of naloxone only inhibited their suppressing effects on flinching behavior. None of the treatments used in this study altered the animal's motor activity. The obtained results may reveal the role of histamine and its activated H 1 receptor in the VP in suppressing the pain behaviors caused by formalin. Opioid receptors in the VP and spinal cord may contribute to these functions.

Medial prefrontal cortex nitric oxide modulates neuropathic pain behavior through mu opioid receptors in rats.

Background: The neocortex, including the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), contains many neurons expressing nitric oxide synthase (NOS). In addition, increasing evidence shows that the nitric oxide (NO) and opioid systems interact in the brain. However, there have been no studies on the interaction of the opioid and NO systems in the mPFC. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of administrating L-arginine (L-Arg, a precursor of NO) and N(gamma)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, an inhibitor of NOS) into the mPFC for neuropathic pain in rats. Also, we used selective opioid receptor antagonists to clarify the possible participation of the opioid mechanism. Methods: Complete transection of the peroneal and tibial branches of the sciatic nerve was applied to induce neuropathic pain, and seven days later, the mPFC was cannulated bilaterally. The paw withdrawal threshold fifty percent (50% PWT) was recorded on the 14th day. Results: Microinjection of L-Arg (2.87, 11.5 and 45.92 nmol per 0.25 µL) increased 50% PWT. L-NAME (17.15 nmol per 0.25 µL) and naloxonazine (an antagonist of mu opioid receptors, 1.54 nmol per 0.25 µL) inhibited anti-allodynia induced by L-Arg (45.92 nmol per 0.25 µL). Naltrindole (a delta opioid receptor antagonist, 2.45 nmol per 0.25 µL) and nor-binaltorphimine (a kappa opioid receptor antagonist, 1.36 nmol per 0.25 µL) were unable to prevent L-Arg (45.92 nmol per 0.25 µL)-induced antiallodynia. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the NO system in the mPFC regulates neuropathic pain. Mu opioid receptors of this area might participate in pain relief caused by L-Arg.

Behavioral and receptor expression studies on the primary somatosensory cortex and anterior cingulate cortex oxytocin involvement in modulation of sensory and affective dimensions of neuropathic pain induced by partial sciatic nerve ligation in rats.

BACKGROUND: Brain cortical areas are involved in processing of sensory, affective and cognitive aspects of pain. In the present study, microinjection effects of oxytocin and L-368,899 (an oxytocin receptor antagonist) into the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) were investigated on sensory and affective aspects of neuropathic pain. METHODS: Neuropathic pain was induced by partial sciatic nerve ligation (PSNL). Seven days later, right and left sides of S1 and ACC were surgically implanted with guide cannulas. Sensory (day 14) and affective (day 17) dimensions were recorded using von Frey filaments and place escape avoidance paradigm, respectively. The S1 and ACC oxytocin receptor protein expression were also determined. RESULTS: The S1 and ACC oxytocin suppressed PSNL-induced mechanical allodynia, whereas PSNL-induced aversion was attenuated by ACC oxytocin. In the S1, alone L-368,899 with no effect on aversion increased mechanical allodynia, whereas, in the ACC, this treatment increased both mechanical allodynia and aversion. Pre-treatment with L-368,899 prevented oxytocin-induced anti-allodynia and anti-aversion. Oxytocin and L-368,899 did not alter mechanical allodynia in intact and sham groups. All the above-mentioned treatments did not change crossing number. The density of oxytocin receptors in the S1 and ACC of PSNL group was increased 1.5-2 folds in comparison to intact and sham groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study explained that the ACC and S1 oxytocin ameliorated sensory component of neuropathic pain, whereas affective component was attenuated only by ACC oxytocin. These effects might be related to the PSNL-increased oxytocin receptor expression in the S1 and ACC.

Ventrolateral periaqueductal gray exogenous and endogenous histamine attenuates sciatic nerve chronic constriction injury-induced neuropathic pain through opioid receptors.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of intra-ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG) microinjection of histamine and thioperamide (a histamine H3 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist) on neuropathic pain. To explore the possible mechanism, naloxone was microinjected alone or in combination with histamine and thioperamide. Neuropathic pain was induced by the left sciatic nerve chronic constriction injury. Both the right and left sides of vlPAG of the brain were surgically cannulated. Cold allodynia and mechanical hyperalgesia were recorded by acetone evaporation and von Frey filament tests. Areas under curve of allodynia and hyperalgesia were calculated. Histamine (0.50 and 2.00 µg per site), thioperamide (4.00 µg per site) and thioperamide (4.00 µg per site) before histamine (2.00 µg per site) suppressed cold allodynia and mechanical hyperalgesia after microinjection into the vlPAG. Microinjection of naloxone (0.25 and 1.00 µg per site) into the vlPAG had no effect on cold allodynia and mechanical hyperalgesia. The anti-allodynic and anti-hyperalgesic effects induced by microinjection of histamine (2.00 µg per site) and thioperamide (4.00 µg per site) into the vlPAG were inhibited by prior microinjection of naloxone (1.00 µg per site) into the same site. The above-mentioned agents did not alter locomotor activity. Based on our present results, it was concluded that exogenous (by histamine microinjection) and endogenous (by thioperamide microinjection) histamine of the vlPAG might contribute to the descending pain control mechanisms through a naloxone-sensitive mechanism.