ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: No consensus exists on how molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) should be covered by the undergraduate dental curricula. AIM: To assess the current teaching and assessment of MIH in the UK. DESIGN: A piloted questionnaire regarding the teaching and assessment of MIH was disseminated to paediatric, restorative and orthodontic teaching leads in each UK dental school (n = 16). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Response rates from paediatric, restorative and orthodontic teams were 75% (n = 12), 44% (n = 7) and 54% (n = 8), respectively. Prevention of caries, preformed metal crowns, anterior resin composites and vital bleaching were taught significantly more by paediatric teams (p = .006). Quality of life and resin infiltration were absent from restorative teaching. Orthodontic teaching focussed on the timing of first permanent molar extractions. Paediatric teams were mainly responsible for assessment. Risk factors, differential diagnoses for MIH and defining clinical features were more likely to be assessed by paediatric teams than by others (p = .006). All specialities reported that students were prepared to manage MIH. CONCLUSION: Molar incisor hypomineralisation is primarily taught and assessed by paediatric teams. No evidence of multidisciplinary or transitional teaching/assessment existed between specialities. Developing robust guidance regarding MIH learning in the UK undergraduate curricula may help improve consistency.
Subject(s)
Curriculum , Education, Dental , Molar Hypomineralization , Humans , Molar Hypomineralization/diagnosis , Molar Hypomineralization/therapy , Pediatric Dentistry/education , Surveys and Questionnaires , United KingdomABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess associations between neutrophil-related primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) and the presence of periodontal disease and other oral diseases and response to periodontal treatment. BACKGROUND: Presence of neutrophil-related PIDs is thought to be a major risk factor for development of periodontitis. METHODS: This study had both a cross-sectional and cohort design. Twenty-four children (age 4-16) with PIDs and 24 age-matched systemically healthy subjects received a dental clinical examination, including measures of probing pocket depths (PPD), clinical attachment loss (CAL) and bleeding on probing (BOP). Those found to be affected by periodontal disease were offered periodontal treatment and reassessed 6 months later. RESULTS: Diagnosis of PIDs was associated with increased odds of presence of periodontal disease (p = .008 adjusted for age, gender, plaque, OR = 10.0, 95% CI = 1.83-54.38) and with continuous measures of periodontal disease such as number of PPDs >4 mm, mean PPD and mean CAL (all p < .001) and BOP (p = .001). However, only 7 out of 24 children were diagnosed with periodontitis. PIDs were also associated with a history of oral ulcers (p = .001, OR 12.47, 95% CI 2.71-57.29). An improvement in periodontal parameters (PPD and CAL) was detected following oral hygiene instructions and non-surgical periodontal therapy. CONCLUSION: Although children affected by neutrophil-associated PIDs exhibited a higher prevalence of periodontal disease compared with systemically healthy children, severe periodontitis was rarely seen. This suggests that good systemic control of the PIDs may reduce their impact on the periodontium.