ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term survival and success rates of implants placed in reconstructed areas using microvascularized or non-microvascularized extraoral bone grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search was performed in five databases and in gray literature for articles published until June, 2023. The eligibility criteria comprised observational studies (prospective or retrospective) and clinical trials, reporting survival and success rates of implants placed in extraoral bone grafts. A meta-analysis (implant failure) was categorized into subgroups based on the type of bone graft used. The risk of bias within studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up time was 92 months. The summary estimate of survival rate at the implant level were 94.9% (CI: 90.1%-97.4%) for non-vascularized iliac graft, 96.5% (CI: 91.4%-98.6%) for non-vascularized calvaria graft, and 92.3% (CI: 89.1%-94.6%) for vascularized fibula graft. The mean success rate and marginal bone loss (MBL) were 83.2%; 2.25 mm, 92.2%; 0.93 mm, and 87.6%; 1.49 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Implants placed in areas reconstructed using extraoral autogenous bone graft have high long-term survival rates and low long-term MBLs. The data did not demonstrate clinically relevant differences in the survival, success, or MBL of grafts from different donor areas or with different vascularization. This systematic review was registered in INPLASY under number INPLASY202390004.
Subject(s)
Bone Transplantation , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Dental Implants , Humans , Bone Transplantation/methods , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Dental Restoration Failure , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methodsABSTRACT
Objective: Empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy is commonly prescribed for patients hospitalized with diabetic foot infections (DFI) and lower extremity osteomyelitis (OM). The primary objective was to evaluate the concordance between empiric antibiotic therapy, microbiologic results, and definitive antibiotic therapy with a focus on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and resistant gram-negative organisms. The secondary objective was to evaluate the negative predictive values (NPV) of select risk factors for MRSA and resistant gram-negative organisms for microbiologic results with these organisms. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Safety-net health system in Ohio. Patients: Adults hospitalized and receiving antibiotic therapy for DFI or lower extremity OM in 2021. Results: For 259 unique patients, empiric therapies with activity against MRSA and resistant gram-negative organisms were administered to 224 (86.5%) and 217 (83.8%) patients, respectively. Definitive therapies with activity against MRSA and resistant gram-negative organisms were administered to 91 (35%) and 74 (28.6%) patients, respectively. Of 234 patients with microbiologic testing, 29 (12.4%) had positive cultures with MRSA and 41 (17.5%) with resistant gram-negative organisms. The NPVs of risk factors for MRSA and resistant gram-negative organisms for the absence of these organisms in culture were 91% and 85%, respectively. Conclusions: For patients hospitalized with DFI and lower extremity OM, our data suggest opportunities for substantial reductions in empiric therapies with activity against MRSA and resistant gram-negative organisms. The absence of risk factors for these organisms was reasonably good at predicting negative cultures with these organisms.
ABSTRACT
During the 4 years after implementation of the 2-step Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) testing algorithm, 70% to 78% of patients with suspected CDI and a positive nucleic acid amplification test but a negative toxin test (NAAT+/TOX-) received CDI treatment. Overall, 73% of NAAT+/TOX- patients were classified as having probable or possible CDI.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Toxins , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Humans , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , AlgorithmsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of dentists with different levels of expertise in computer-aided design (CAD) and prosthodontics to digitally design single crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This in vitro study was conducted on 12 prepared teeth in 2 reference dental study models. The models were scanned using an intraoral scanner. Four dentists with different levels of clinical and CAD expertise (PROS: clinicians experienced in prosthodontics [n = 2]; CAD: experts in CAD [n = 2]) performed digital waxing on all prepared teeth using the same CAD software program. The resulting digital crown designs were compared to STL files of the original teeth to assess 3D deviations. The total cervical, distal, mesial, and occlusal surface deviations of the crowns from both groups were compared using paired t and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (α = .05). RESULTS: The total median 3D deviation was 0.10 mm (range: 0.03 to 0.61 mm) for the PROS group and 0.14 mm (range: 0.07 to 0.58 mm) for the CAD group. The PROS group presented significantly smaller total 3D (P = .021) and cervical margin (P = .001) deviations. There were no significant differences between groups on the distal, mesial, or occlusal surfaces (P > .05). The CAD group performed digital waxing significantly faster (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the present findings suggest that clinical experience has a higher impact on the accuracy of digital wax patterns of single crowns than CAD experience.
Subject(s)
Ceramics , Dental Prosthesis Design , Dental Prosthesis Design/methods , Crowns , Computer-Aided Design , SoftwareABSTRACT
AIM: There is controversy in the literature regarding clinical outcomes of CAD/CAM laminate veneers. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of different levels of CAD expertise and different software programs on the reliability and reproducibility of digital wax patterns of laminate veneers and single crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present preliminary in vitro study was performed on 10 prepared maxillary central incisors available in dental study models. Of the total, five central incisors were prepared with shoulder finish lines for single crowns, whereas the other five underwent incisal shoulder preparation for laminate veneers. The models were scanned using an intraoral scanner. Four dentists (group DENT) and four CAD dental technicians (group CAD) with expertise in different software programs performed digital diagnostic waxing on all prepared teeth. The resulting digital wax patterns (n = 80) were exported as standard tessellation language (STL) files and superimposed on gold standard digital wax patterns (obtained from the original shape of the teeth before preparations). 3D mesh deviations at the cervical margins as well as distal, mesial, and incisal/palatal surfaces between each STL and the gold standard digital wax patterns were calculated in millimeters using a CAD software program. The mean time required by each operator to perform digital waxing was also recorded. Paired comparisons between groups DENT and CAD as well as between nondental and dental software programs were performed for the crowns and laminate veneers using the Wilcoxon signed-rank and paired t tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS: For group DENT, median deviations for single crowns were 0.15 mm (range: 0.08 to 1.05 mm) and for laminate veneers they were 0.15 mm (range: 0.08 to 0.76 mm). For group CAD, median deviations for single crowns were 0.16 mm (range: 0.09 to 0.73 mm) and for laminate veneers they were 0.10 mm (range: 0.06 to 0.53 mm). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed a statistically significant difference between groups DENT and CAD (P = 0.041) and between the software programs (P = 0.029) for laminate veneers, but not for single crowns (P > 0.05). Furthermore, mean times required for group CAD and for dental software programs were significantly shorter than those for group DENT (P = 0.001) and for nondental software programs (P = 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the present study, the findings suggest that CAD expertise and the software program significantly affect digital wax patterns for laminate veneers, but not for single crowns. (Int J Comput Dent 2022;25(4):361-0; doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b3555819).
Subject(s)
Dental Prosthesis Design , Dental Veneers , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Dental Prosthesis Design/methods , Dental Porcelain , Computer-Aided Design , CrownsABSTRACT
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The digital waxing of single crowns can be affected by the quality of intraoral scans and use of computer-aided design (CAD) software programs. However, clinical outcomes of the resulting crowns are also affected by computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) methodologies. Studies on the effect of different levels of expertise on digital waxing are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the impact of different levels of expertise on the reliability and reproducibility of margin outlining during digital waxing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty analogs of implant stock abutments (Ø4.8×4 mm) were embedded into resin blocks. To simulate different clinical situations, abutments were divided into 3 groups: 10 abutments (group GOS) received artificial gingiva and were scanned with an open system intraoral scanner, while 10 abutments with (group GIS) and 10 abutments without artificial gingiva (group IS) were scanned with an intraoral scanner within an integrated CAD-CAM system. All resulting standard tessellation language (STL) files were used by 2 different observers (an experienced CAD professional and a clinician with basic CAD knowledge) to digitally design a left mandibular central incisor in the same software program. All resulting digital crown designs were exported to STL files to assess crown margin accuracy at the coupling interface by superimposition with the control STL file of the scan body designed for the same abutment by the manufacturer. For this purpose, a CAD software program was used to automatically calculate median, minimum, and maximum deviations of margins in millimeters. Statistically significant pairwise differences among groups and between observers were assessed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (α=.05). RESULTS: For the CAD professional, median deviations between designed crown STL files and the control STL of the scan body were 0.08 mm (range: 0.04 to 0.15) for group GOS; 0.10 mm (range: 0.06 to 0.18) for group GIS; and 0.05 mm (range: 0.03 to 0.08) for group IS. For the clinician, median deviations were 0.08 mm (range: 0.04 to 0.12) for group GOS; 0.11 mm (range: 0.07 to 0.17) for group GIS; and 0.05 mm (range: 0.04 to 0.11) for group IS. There were no significant differences between observers (P>.05). However, statistically significant differences were found between group IS and the other 2 groups (P=.001) but not between groups GOS and GIS (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that a digital wax pattern made with a dental CAD software program is not affected by varying levels of expertise but might be affected by subgingival margins.
Subject(s)
Computer-Aided Design , Crowns , Dental Prosthesis Design , Gingiva , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
In a tertiary-care hospital and affiliated long-term care facility, a stewardship intervention focused on patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) was associated with a significant reduction in unnecessary non-CDI antibiotic therapy. However, there was no significant reduction in total non-CDI therapy or in the frequency of CDI recurrence.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antimicrobial Stewardship/standards , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Antimicrobial Stewardship/organization & administration , Humans , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Recurrence , Tertiary Care CentersABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Fluoroquinolones are often prescribed unnecessarily and are an important risk factor for infection with fluoroquinolone-resistant gram-negative bacilli and Clostridioides difficile. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental study to determine the impact of sequential syndrome-specific stewardship interventions on use of and resistance to fluoroquinolones in a tertiary care hospital. An initial 2-year intervention focused on reducing treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria and ensuring concordance of urinary tract infection treatment with guidelines. A second 5-year intervention focused on limiting overuse of fluoroquinolones for health care-associated pneumonia in conjunction with a formal stewardship program. The primary outcomes were fluoroquinolone use and changes in use over time analyzed by segmented regression analysis. RESULTS: The asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infection intervention resulted in a significant reduction in fluoroquinolone use, with a significant change from an increasing to a decreasing rate of use (change in slope of quarterly defined daily doses/1,000 patient days -15.3, P < .01). The health care-associated pneumonia intervention resulted in a continued significant reduction in fluoroquinolone use (rate ratioâ¯=â¯0.68, P < .01). During the interventions, fluoroquinolone susceptibility increased significantly in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but not in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., or C difficile. CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial stewardship interventions focused on specific syndromes may be effective in reducing fluoroquinolone use. In our hospital, reduction in fluoroquinolone use resulted in increased fluoroquinolone susceptibility in P aeruginosa, but not other Enterobacteriaceae or C difficile.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Clostridioides difficile/drug effects , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Fluoroquinolones/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Humans , Inappropriate Prescribing , Infection Control/methods , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate adherence to uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTI) guidelines and UTI diagnostic accuracy in an emergency department (ED) setting before and after implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention. METHODS: The intervention included implementation of an electronic UTI order set followed by a 2 month period of audit and feedback. For women age 18-65 with a UTI diagnosis seen in the ED with no structural or functional abnormalities of the urinary system, we evaluated adherence to guidelines, antimicrobial use, and diagnostic accuracy at baseline, after implementation of the order set (period 1), and after audit and feedback (period 2). RESULTS: Adherence to UTI guidelines increased from 44% (baseline) to 68% (period 1) to 82% (period 2) (P≤.015 for each successive period). Prescription of fluoroquinolones for uncomplicated cystitis decreased from 44% (baseline) to 14% (period 1) to 13% (period 2) (P<.001 and Pâ=â.7 for each successive period). Unnecessary antibiotic days for the 200 patients evaluated in each period decreased from 250 days to 119 days to 52 days (P<.001 for each successive period). For 40% to 42% of cases diagnosed as UTI by clinicians, the diagnosis was deemed unlikely or rejected with no difference between the baseline and intervention periods. CONCLUSIONS: A stewardship intervention including an electronic order set and audit and feedback was associated with increased adherence to uncomplicated UTI guidelines and reductions in unnecessary antibiotic therapy and fluoroquinolone therapy for cystitis. Many diagnoses were rejected or deemed unlikely, suggesting a need for studies to improve diagnostic accuracy for UTI.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cystitis/drug therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital , Guideline Adherence , Pyelonephritis/drug therapy , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Cystitis/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Pyelonephritis/diagnosis , Urinary Tract Infections/diagnosisABSTRACT
Aim: To determine the clinical changes occurred in chronic periodontitis patients presentinguncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus after a supragingival plaque control period. Methods:Subjects presenting generalized chronic periodontitis were divided into two groups: Non-diabetics(n=20) healthy subjects presenting chronic periodontitis; and Diabetics (n=14) subjects withuncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus presenting chronic periodontitis. All subjects went through 28days of supragingival plaque control - ST - (including prophylaxis, calculus removal, extractionof hopeless teeth and oral hygiene instructions) and were evaluated at baseline and after 28 daysby the following parameters: Full-Mouth Plaque Score (FMPS) and Full-Mouth Bleeding Scores(FMBS), Periodontal Probing Depth (PPD), Gingival Recession (GR) and Clinical AttachmentLevel (CAL). ANOVA/Tukeys test and Students t test were used for data analysis. Results: Nostatistically significant differences (p>0.05) between groups were observed at baseline for anyparameter. Both groups presented a significant reduction in FMPS and FMBS after 28 days(p<0.05), but no statistically significant difference was found (p>0.05) between groups. Clinically,only the Non-diabetic group showed a significant improvement after ST, in PPD of initially deeppockets (p<0.05). However, no change in the clinical parameters was observed in the diabeticsubjects (p>0.05). Conclusions: It may be concluded that uncontrolled diabetes mellitus reducesperiodontal changes in the supragingival plaque control regimen of subjects presenting withchronic periodontitis.