Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(19): e33728, 2023 May 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37171339

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many studies have reported the use of simethicone before colonoscopy removes bubbles. However, guidelines weakly recommend simethicone administration before colonoscopy. The present study aimed to confirm the advantages of taking simethicone and determine the appropriate time for taking simethicone. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients to the following 5 groups according to the administration time: 4 groups were divided based on 2 parameters (the day before and on the day of colonoscopy and before and after bowel cleansing) and the remaining group was the control group. We compared bubble score (BS), number of simethicone solution irrigations when visually obscured, satisfaction score of the endoscopist, insertion time. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were included in the study. There was a difference in BS according to the timing of simethicone administration (P < .001). The group taking simethicone on the day of the test had a better BS than the group taking simethicone the day before (P < .001). The group taking simethicone on the previous day had a better BS than the control group (P = .001). In the group of taking simethicone on the examination day, the number of irrigations was lower, and satisfaction with the inspector was higher than group of taking simethicone on previous day and control group (both P < .001). The insertion time showed a non-significantly decreasing trend (P = .417). CONCLUSION: Administering simethicone reduced bubbles and facilitated effective colonoscopy, especially when administrating it on the day of examination. It needs to be administered on the day of the examination regardless of bowel preparation.


Subject(s)
Polyethylene Glycols , Simethicone , Humans , Single-Blind Method , Prospective Studies , Colonoscopy , Cathartics
2.
Nutrients ; 15(5)2023 Feb 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36904141

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of probiotic pretreatment on the alteration and recovery of gut microbiota after bowel preparation and its correlation with minor complications. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial that included participants 40-65 years of age. Participants were randomly provided probiotics (active group) or placebo (placebo group) for 1 month before the colonoscopy and their feces collected. A total of 51 participants were included in the present study (26 in the active group and 25 in the placebo group). In the active group, the microbial diversity, evenness, and distribution were not significantly changed between before and after bowel preparation, but did change in the placebo group. The number of gut microbiota that decreased after bowel preparation in the active group was lower than in the placebo group. On the seventh day after colonoscopy, the gut microbiota in the active group was restored to almost the same level as before bowel preparation. In addition, we identified that several strains were assumed as key microbiota in early colonization and some taxa were increased only in the active group after bowel preparation. In multivariate analysis, taking probiotics before bowel preparation was identified as a significant factor for decreasing the duration of minor complications (odds ratio 0.13, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.60, p = 0.027). Probiotic pretreatment had benefits on the alteration and recovery of gut microbiota and possible complications after bowel preparation. Probiotics may also aid in the early colonization of key microbiota.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Microbiota , Probiotics , Humans , Pilot Projects , Colonoscopy , Double-Blind Method
3.
Fish Shellfish Immunol ; 118: 155-159, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34461259

ABSTRACT

Eosinophils are granular leukocytes that are evolutionarily preserved in the innate immune system of some invertebrates and vertebrates, and these cells can directly remove invading microorganisms and secrete various cytokines, and are also involved in homeostasis. These eosinophils are made up of specific granular proteins that can be differentiated from other cells, and eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) is a peroxidase released only from eosinophils that plays an important role in maintaining the main function and homeostasis of eosinophils. We obtained the sequence information of EPX for the first time from the starry flounder (Platichthys stellatus), and predicted it by amino acid sequencing to confirm sequence alignment and phylogenetic characteristics with other species. Based on analysis of the expression characteristics of PsEPX mRNA in healthy P. stellatus, it was expressed at the highest level in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) and was also expressed at a relatively high level in the head kidney and intestine, which are immune-related tissues. After artificial infection with Streptococcus parauberis and viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus, which are the causes of major pathogenic diseases, the expression level of PsEPX was significantly regulated, which showed specific characteristics of pathogens or tissues. These results suggest that PsEPX is an important component of the immune system of P. stellatus and is considered a basic research case for the study of the immunological function of eosinophils in fish.


Subject(s)
Flounder , Novirhabdovirus , Animals , Eosinophil Peroxidase , Flounder/immunology , Gene Expression Profiling/veterinary , Phylogeny
4.
Korean J Gastroenterol ; 76(2): 78-82, 2020 08 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32839370

ABSTRACT

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune or antigen-mediated chronic inflammatory esophageal disorder that is relatively rare in Asian countries. The main symptoms of EoE are dysphagia and food impaction. Although chest pain is a symptom of EoE, it is also a symptom of coronary heart disease. This paper reports a case of EoE with angina pectoris in a 45-year-old male who was referred to the authors' hospital for chest pain. He was diagnosed with angina pectoris because of mild stenosis in the left coronary artery on coronary angiography. On the other hand, the symptoms did not improve with angina medication therapy. Therefore, he underwent a chest CT scan, which revealed esophageal thickening. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed. His endoscopic findings showed linear furrows with edema, and >90 eosinophils existed per high-power field on the histology findings. He was diagnosed with EoE. Through additional examinations, he was also diagnosed with asthma. The patient was treated with a proton pump inhibitor and a fluticasone inhaler. His symptoms and abnormal endoscopic findings disappeared after eight weeks of treatment. This case shows that physicians should consider the possibility of the symptoms for EoE when unexplained chest pain persists.


Subject(s)
Angina Pectoris/diagnosis , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/diagnosis , Angina Pectoris/complications , Asthma/complications , Asthma/diagnosis , Coronary Angiography , Endoscopy, Digestive System , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/complications , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/drug therapy , Eosinophils/cytology , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Thorax/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
5.
Korean J Gastroenterol ; 76(1): 42-45, 2020 07 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32703919

ABSTRACT

Although not as common as foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract, rectal foreign body insertion is often encountered in emergency departments. The diverse types of rectal foreign bodies have led to various removal methods. When removing a foreign body, the first thing to consider is which method is the least invasive and safest for the patient. This paper reports the successful removal of a rectal foreign body from the rectum using the Valsalva maneuver without anesthesia in a patient.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy/methods , Foreign Bodies , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Rectal Diseases/diagnosis , Valsalva Maneuver
6.
Korean J Gastroenterol ; 75(6): 351-355, 2020 06 25.
Article in Korean | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32581207

ABSTRACT

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a common treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The most common complications after TACE are non-specific symptoms called post-embolization syndrome, such as abdominal pain or fever. Rare complications, such as liver failure, liver abscess, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, cholecystitis, can also occur. On the other hand, gallbladder perforation is quite rare. This paper reports a case of gallbladder perforation following TACE. A 76-year-old male with a single 9-cm-sized HCC underwent TACE. Five days after TACE, he developed persistent right upper quadrant pain and ileus. An abdomen CT scan confirmed gallbladder perforation with bile in the right paracolic gutter and pelvic cavity. Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage was performed with the intravenous administration of antibiotics. After 1 month, the patient underwent right hemihepatectomy and cholecystectomy. Physicians should consider the possibility of gallbladder perforation, which is a rare complication after TACE, when unexplained abdominal pain persists.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Cholecystitis/etiology , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Cholecystitis/diagnosis , Gallbladder , Humans , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Sorafenib/administration & dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...