Control of a nosocomial measles outbreak among previously vaccinated adults in a population with high vaccine coverage: Korea, 2019.

We describe a measles outbreak among previously vaccinated healthcare workers (HCWs) and inpatients and the control measures implemented at a tertiary care hospital in 2019. Case-patients were laboratory-confirmed measles with throat swabs tested by quantitative polymerase chain reactions (PCR), during April-May 2019. Medical histories and documented immunization records were obtained. We compared attack rates (ARs) among HCWs by occupational subgroup and age and examined the outbreak-associated costs. The index case was not ascertained. Among 26 measles case-patients (22 HCWs, four inpatients) aged 18-28 years, 25 had previously received measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine (12/26, 46% (two doses); 13/26, 50% (one dose)), and 16 (62%) had positive results of measles IgG prior to measles diagnosis. ARs were higher among HCWs aged < 30 years (1.88%), especially in the subgroup under 25 years of age (2.22%). Control measures included work restrictions for seronegative HCWs (218/2320, 9.4%) in immunity verification, administration of the MMR vaccine (207 HCWs) or intravenous immunoglobulin (2 HCWs and 11 inpatients), enhanced health surveillance of HCWs, and mandatory assessment of patients with measles-like symptoms at the infectious diseases screening units. The hospital spent 90,417,132 Korean won (US $79,733) in response to the outbreak. Measles outbreaks can occur in healthcare settings despite high population immunity, highlighting the importance of stronger vaccination policies, particularly among young HCWs. Moreover, an effective outbreak response comprising immunization activities and enhanced surveillance of HCWs and patients to rapidly detect measles-like symptoms at a prodromal phase is essential to control nosocomial measles outbreaks.

Cross-sectional survey on home mechanical ventilator use: major deficiencies in a home care system in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increased use of home mechanical ventilation (HMV), data on home care services for HMV users in Asian countries are scarce. This study investigated the current status of HMV use in the Seoul metropolitan area. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved three university-affiliated hospitals. Subjects who were receiving HMV at home for >3 months were included, and door-to-door visits were done to collect data (e.g., on devices, caregivers, and healthcare service use) from the subjects or their families. RESULTS: Among the 140 individuals who were initially screened, 38 adults and 26 children were finally enrolled; the duration of HMV use was 14.5 (8.8-37.5) months and 20.5 (7.0-28.0) months, respectively. Tracheostomy ventilation was performed in 36.8% of the adults and 61.5% of the children, and life-support ventilator in 55.3% and 96.2%, respectively. Regarding ancillary devices, 42.1% of the adults and 80.8% of the children had an oxygen monitoring device, while only one member of each group had a cough assist device. Among those with a tracheostomy, 64.3% of adults and 81.3% of children had an AMBU-bag. Reliance on a family member for care was determined in 65.8% of adults and 88.5% of children, but a home visit by a hospital nurse during the previous year occurred in only 26.3% of the adults and 3.8% of the children. Emergency incidents at home occurred in 39.5% of the adults and 50.0% of the children, with dyspnea being the most common cause. Out-of-pocket expenses tended to be higher in the tracheostomy (vs. non-tracheostomy) group and in children (vs. adults). CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the challenges faced by adults and children dependent on HMV, and their families. There is an urgent need for nationwide standardization of care for patients receiving HMV at home.