Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Infect ; 89(4): 106238, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39121971

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and infection differs considerably among individuals. We investigate the critical pathways that influence vaccine-induced cross-variant serological immunity among individuals at high-risk of COVID-19 complications. METHODS: Neutralizing antibodies to the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 virus and its variants (Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron) were analyzed in patients with autoimmune diseases, chronic comorbidities (multimorbidity), and healthy controls. Antibody levels were assessed at baseline and at different intervals up to 12 months following primary and booster vaccination with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. Immunity induced by vaccination with and without infection (hybrid immunity) was compared with that of unvaccinated individuals with recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Plasma cytokines were analyzed to investigate variations in antibody production following vaccination. RESULTS: Patients with autoimmune diseases (n = 137) produced lesser antibodies to the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 virus and its variants compared with those in the multimorbidity (n = 153) and healthy groups (n = 229); antibody levels were significantly lower in patients with neuromyelitis optica and those on prednisolone, mycophenolate or rituximab treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified neuromyelitis optica (odds ratio 8.20, 95% CI 1.68-39.9) and mycophenolate (13.69, 3.78-49.5) as significant predictors of a poorer antibody response to vaccination (i.e, neutralizing antibody <40%). Infected participants exhibited antibody levels that were 28.7% higher (95% CI 24.7-32.7) compared to non-infected participants six months after receiving a booster vaccination. Individuals infected during the Delta outbreak generated cross-protective neutralizing antibodies against the Omicron variant in quantities comparable to those observed after infection with the Omicron variant itself. In contrast, unvaccinated individuals recently infected with the wild-type (n = 2390) consistently displayed lower levels of neutralizing antibodies against both the wild-type virus and other variants. Pathway analyses suggested an inverse relationship between baseline T cell subsets and antibody production following vaccination. CONCLUSION: Hybrid immunity confers a robust protection against COVID-19 among immunocompromised individuals.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 , Immunocompromised Host , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Male , Female , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Middle Aged , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Immunocompromised Host/immunology , Adult , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Aged , BNT162 Vaccine/immunology , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273/immunology , Vaccination , Cross Protection/immunology , Immunization, Secondary , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Autoimmune Diseases/immunology , Cytokines/blood
2.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 65: 104003, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35803084

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In pre-vaccinated people with multiple sclerosis (MS), certain disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), particularly the anti-CD20 treatments, appear to be associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 infection and indeed with severe infection. It is still not known if such observations extend to vaccinated individuals and there have been considerably fewer studies in aquaporin-4-antibody neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-antibody associated disease (MOGAD) patients. In this study, we investigated the rates of symptomatic COVID-19 infection in adult patients with MS, AQP4-NMOSD and MOGAD who had received 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted at the 2 main neuroimmunology referral centres in Singapore. Only patients on active follow-up were recruited to ensure robust data collection. Data on demographics, disease history, DMTs and SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations were recorded, and for those infected with COVID-19, data on COVID-19 infection was collected. RESULTS: Nineteen (13 MS, 5 AQP4-NMOSD, 1 MOGAD) out of 365 (231 MS, 106 AQP4-NMOSD, 28 MOGAD) patients had COVID-19 infection despite 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Amongst the infected patients, 11 patients were on DMTs (3 rituximab, 2 interferons, 1 azathioprine, 1 mycophenolate, 1 prednisolone, 1 cladribine, 1 alemtuzumab, 1 fingolimod), while 8 patients were untreated. The crude infection rate was calculated using time-at-risk analysis, revealing that rituximab had the highest infection rate amongst all the DMTs. A lower crude infection rate was observed in patients who received a third vaccination. The majority of infections were mild and no patients required oxygen supplementation. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that patients on rituximab are still at risk of COVID-19 infection after 2 vaccinations and the receipt of a third vaccination may help to prevent infection. Future large scale studies will be required to better delineate the infection risk of different DMTs after the second and subsequent vaccinations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Sclerosis , Neuromyelitis Optica , Aquaporin 4 , Autoantibodies , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Rituximab/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccines, Synthetic , mRNA Vaccines
3.
Singapore Med J ; 59(8): 399-406, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30175370

ABSTRACT

Headaches are common in primary care. For safe assessment and management of the patient with headache, a focused history and physical examination are important to identify secondary headache, and find out whether an immediate referral to the emergency department or a non-emergent referral to the neurologist is warranted. The majority of patients with primary headache may be safely managed in the outpatient setting. Key steps include proper categorisation of the primary headache, attention to lifestyle and psychosocial factors, prescription of analgesics for acute pain relief, and the use of preventive medication when indicated. The patient with a cluster headache, a headache of uncertain diagnosis and/or poor response to preventive strategies or a migraine with persistent aura, or a headache with associated motor weakness, should be referred to a neurologist. Secondary headache and the diagnosis of medication overuse headache should be considered in a patient on long-term analgesics with unremitting headache.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine/methods , Headache/diagnosis , Headache/therapy , Analgesics/adverse effects , Cluster Headache/diagnosis , Cluster Headache/therapy , Humans , Migraine Disorders/diagnosis , Migraine Disorders/therapy , Neurology/methods , Prescription Drug Overuse , Primary Health Care/methods , Referral and Consultation , Tension-Type Headache/diagnosis , Tension-Type Headache/therapy
4.
Singapore Med J ; 57(12): 658-663, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27995263

ABSTRACT

Stroke is a significant cause of death and disability in Singapore; in 2014, it was the fourth most common cause of death. Transient ischaemic attack (TIA) is defined as a transient episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal brain, spinal cord or retinal ischaemia without evidence of acute infarction. The diagnosis of TIA/acute stroke needs to be considered in all patients who present with sudden focal neurological dysfunction. Prompt referral for assessment, neuroimaging and intervention provides the best chance for neurological recovery and/or minimising further neurological damage. Primary care physicians have a crucial role in TIA/stroke prevention and management. This includes referring patients with suspected acute TIA/stroke to hospitals with stroke treatment facilities immediately; managing the modifiable risk factors of cerebral ischaemia; continuing prescription of antiplatelet agents and/or anticoagulation where indicated; and teaching patients to recognise and respond to suspected cerebral ischaemia using the FAST (face, arm, speech, time) acronym.


Subject(s)
Ischemic Attack, Transient/diagnosis , Stroke/diagnosis , Clinical Competence , Humans , Ischemic Attack, Transient/drug therapy , Medical History Taking , Outpatients , Patient Education as Topic , Plasminogen Activators/therapeutic use , Referral and Consultation , Risk Factors , Singapore , Stroke/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL