ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Spastic hemiplegia is one of the most common forms of cerebral palsy, in which one side of the body is affected to a greater extent than the other one. Hemiplegia severity (i.e. moderate vs mild forms) is currently used in some Para sports for classification purposes. This study evaluates the sensitivity of several tests of stability (e.g. one-legged stance test), dynamic balance (side-step test), coordination (rapid heel-toe placements), range of movement (backward stepping lunge), and lower limb power (the triple hop distance and the isometric peak force of the knee extensors) to discriminate between the impaired and unimpaired lower extremities' function in para-athletes with spastic hemiplegia. METHODS: A sample of 87 international para-athletes with cerebral palsy took part in the study, and their bilateral performance was measured for the abovementioned tests. The tests' sensitivity to discriminate between impaired vs unimpaired legs was assessed using Boruta's method. RESULTS: The triple hop distance, the magnitude of the mean velocity in the one-legged stance test and the time to perform the rapid heel-toe placement test are the most sensitive variables when performing random forest classifiers. In addition, the study confirms two optimal clusters by Gaussian finite mixture models to represent the athletes' performance. CONCLUSIONS: Reference scores for the clusters are provided, demonstrating that coordination, balance, and power of the lower limbs are relevant variables for classifying para-athletes with spastic hemiplegia.