Outcome of patients treated with molecular adsorbent recirculating system albumin dialysis: A national multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) is the most widely used device to treat liver failure. Nevertheless, data from widespread real-life use are lacking. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study conducted in all French adult care centers that used MARS between 2004 and 2009. The primary objective was to evaluate patient survival according to the liver disease and listing status. Factors associated with mortality were the secondary objectives. RESULTS: A total of 383 patients underwent 393 MARS treatments. The main indications were acute liver failure (ALF, 32.6%), and severe cholestasis (total bilirubin >340 µmol/L) (37.2%), hepatic encephalopathy (23.7%), and/or acute kidney injury-hepatorenal syndrome (22.9%) most often among patients with chronic liver disease. At the time of treatment, 34.4% of the patients were listed. Overall, the hospital survival rate was 49% (95% CI: 44-54%) and ranged from 25% to 81% depending on the diagnosis of the liver disease. In listed patients versus those not listed, the 1-year survival rate was markedly better in the setting of nonbiliary cirrhosis (59% vs 15%), early graft nonfunction (80% vs 0%), and late graft dysfunction (72% vs 0%) (all P < 0.001). Among nonbiliary cirrhotic patients, hospital mortality was associated with the severity of liver disease (HE and severe cholestasis) and not being listed for transplant. In ALF, paracetamol etiology and ≥3 MARS sessions were associated with better transplant-free survival. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that MARS should be mainly used as a bridge to liver transplantation. Survival was correlated with being listed for most etiologies and with the intensity of treatment in ALF.

Outcomes of patients with acute respiratory failure after abdominal surgery treated with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the physiologic and clinical effects of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in patients who have acute respiratory failure (ARF) after abdominal surgery. We evaluated our clinical experience with the use of NPPV in the treatment of ARF after abdominal surgery. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated NPPV use during a 2-year period in a medical-surgical ICU of a university hospital. We documented demographic and diagnostic data, gas exchange, and clinical outcomes. We compared patients who were not intubated to those who were intubated after a trial of NPPV. RESULTS: Of 72 patients with ARF after abdominal surgery who were treated with NPPV, 48 patients avoided intubation (67%). Patients in the intubated and nonintubated groups had similar demographic characteristics, and similar American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and simplified acute physiology score II scores at admission. The intubated group had a significantly lower Pa(O2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (Fi(O2)) ratio (123 +/- 62 mm Hg vs 194 +/- 76 mm Hg, p < 0.01) and more extended bilateral alveolar infiltrates (67% vs 31%, p < 0.01) than the non-intubated group. Within the first NPPV observation period, the Pa(O2)/Fi(O2) increased (+ 36 +/- 29% [+/- SD], p = 0.04) and the respiratory rate decreased (28.2 +/- 3.4 breaths/min vs 23.1 +/- 3.8 breaths/min, p < 0.01) significantly only in the non-intubated group. The non-intubated group had significantly lower length of ICU stay (17.3 +/- 10.9 days vs 34.1 +/- 28.5 days, p < 0.01) and mortality rate (6% vs 29%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: NPPV may be an alternative to conventional ventilation in selected patients with ARF after abdominal surgery who require ventilatory support.

Cytomegalovirus infection in critically ill patients: associated factors and consequences.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, associated findings, and consequences of cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia in critically ill patients. DESIGN: A retrospective, case-control clinical study. SETTING: A 12-bed university hospital medical-surgical ICU. PATIENTS: Two hundred thirty-seven patients with fever for > 72 h, without proven evidence of bacteriologic and/or fungal origin, and whose pp65 antigenemia assays were studied. Patients with HIV infection and transplant recipients were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: CMV antigenemia was diagnosed within 20 +/- 12 days (mean +/- SD) after ICU admission in 17% patients in whom the pathology was suspected. The 40 patients in the CMV group were matched with 40 other patients in the control group. CMV infection was linked to renal failure (58% vs 33%, respectively; p = 0.02) and steroid use (55% vs 33%, respectively; p = 0.04). Patients with CMV had a significantly longer stay in the ICU (41 +/- 28 days vs 31 +/- 22 days, respectively; p = 0.04), a longer duration of mechanical ventilation (35 +/- 27 days vs 24 +/- 20 days, respectively; p = 0.03), a higher rate of nosocomial infection (75% vs 50%, respectively; p = 0.04), and a higher mortality (50% vs 28%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: CMV antigenemia is not an uncommon diagnosis in critically ill ICU patients with unexplained prolonged fever after 10 days of hospitalization, regardless of their immune system status. Although associated with a higher morbidity and mortality, the clinical significance of CMV is unknown. Further prospective studies should evaluate the impact on ICU outcome and whether CMV is truly a pathogen or simply another indicator of immunosuppression.

Post-extubation stridor in intensive care unit patients. Risk factors evaluation and importance of the cuff-leak test.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and identify factors associated with the occurrence of post-extubation stridor and to evaluate the performance of the cuff-leak test in detecting this complication. DESIGN: Prospective, clinical investigation. SETTING: Intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Hundred twelve extubations were analyzed in 112 patients during a 14-month period. INTERVENTION: A cuff-leak test before each extubation. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The incidence of stridor was 12%. When we chose the thresholds of 130 ml and 12% to quantify the cuff-leak volume, the sensitivity and the specificity of the test were, respectively, 85% and 95%. The patients who developed stridor had a cuff leak significantly lower than the others, expressed in absolute values (372+/-170 vs 59+/-92 ml, p<0.001) or in relative values (56+/-20 vs 9+/-13%, p<0.001). Stridor was associated with an elevated Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II), a medical reason for admission, a traumatic or difficult intubation, a history of self-extubation, an over-inflated balloon cuff at admission to ICU and a prolonged period of intubation. These results provide a framework with which to identify patients at risk of developing a stridor after extubation. CONCLUSION: A low cuff-leak volume (<130 ml or 12%) around the endotracheal tube prior to extubation is useful in identifying patients at risk for post-extubation stridor.

Comparison of the effects of heat and moisture exchangers and heated humidifiers on ventilation and gas exchange during non-invasive ventilation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term effects of a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) and a heated humidifier (HH) during non-invasive ventilation (NIV). DESIGN: Prospective, clinical investigation. SETTING: Intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-four patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). INTERVENTION: Each patient was studied with a HME and a HH in a random order during two consecutive 20min periods of NIV. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Respiratory rate (RR), expiratory tidal volume (VTe) and expiratory minute ventilation (VE) were measured during the last 5 min of each period and blood gases were measured. Mean pressure support and positive end-expiratory pressure levels were, respectively, 15+/-4 and 6+/-2 cmH(2)O. VE was significantly greater with HME than with HH (14.8+/-4.8 vs 13.2+/-4.3 l/min; p<0.001). This increase in VE was the result of a greater RR for HME than for HH (26.5+/-10.6 vs 24.1+/-9.8 breaths/min; p=0.002), whereas the VT for HME was similar to that for HH (674+/-156 vs 643+/-148 ml; p=0.09). Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)) was significantly higher with a HME than with a HH (43.4+/-8.9 vs 40.8+/-8.2 mmHg; p<0.005), without significantly changing oxygenation. CONCLUSION: During NIV the increased dead space of a HME can negatively affect ventilatory function and gas exchange. The effect of HME dead space may decrease efficiency of NIV in patients with ARF.