ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The optimal right ventricular pacing site for patients requiring pacemaker implantation for permanent atrioventricular block is a matter of debate. Long-term right ventricular apical pacing has been associated with left ventricular ejection fraction impairment and heart failure. Right ventricular septal pacing has been proposed as an alternative. AIM: The aim of this randomized prospective multicentre trial was to compare left ventricular remodelling and outcomes between right ventricular apical and septal pacing after mid-term follow-up. METHODS: Patients requiring pacemaker implantation for high-degree atrioventricular block were enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive a right ventricular apical or septal lead. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were included, 69 in the septal group and 72 in the apical group. Both groups exhibited similar left ventricular ejection fractions after 18 months of follow-up (septal 57.1±11.9% vs. apical 57.4±13.4%), and left ventricular ejection fraction variation was similar in the two groups at the end of follow-up (septal -1.5±13.2% vs. apical 0.3±13.3%). Additionally, left ventricular volume, quality of life and 6-minute walk distance were similar in the two groups. However, patients in the septal group were more likely to be asymptomatic, with a significantly lower concentration of N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide. Lastly, lead position did not impact 18-month survival. CONCLUSION: Pacing from the right ventricular apex does not have any detrimental effect on left ventricular systolic function compared with septal pacing over an 18-month period.
