Acute viral bronchiolitis: Physician perspectives on definition and clinically important outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Two key limitations hamper intervention research in bronchiolitis: the absence of a clear definition of disease, and the heterogeneous choice of outcome measures in current clinical trials. We assessed how paediatricians and general practitioners (GPs) perceived definition and clinically important outcomes in bronchiolitis. METHODS: A nationwide online survey (ABBA study) was conducted through the Portuguese Society of Paediatrics and GPs' mailing lists. We assessed agreement with statements on bronchiolitis definition, and participants were asked to score the relative importance of several outcomes. Principal component analysis (PCA) explored dimensions underlying disease definition. Outcomes were ranked by mean score and proportion given highest score. RESULTS: We included 514 paediatricians and 165 GPs (overall 59% were board-certified). Most paediatricians (76.5%) agreed with a definition based on coryza, wheezing and/or crackles/rales, compared to 38.1% GPs (P < 0.001). Less than 5% physicians agreed with a definition commonly used in clinical trials (<12 months, first episode of wheeze). We retained three dimensions on PCA: one based on coryza, rales/crepitations and no sudden onset; another on number of episodes and age; and a third on wheeze. Dimensions varied by physician specialization and training (P < 0.01). Hospital admission and respiratory distress were top rated outcomes by both groups of physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Physician definitions of bronchiolitis have considerable variability and often mismatch those of clinical trials. Rating of important outcomes was consistent. Our results highlight the need for a robust standardized definition of acute bronchiolitis in infants and support the development of a core outcome set for future clinical trials. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51:724-732. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Clima de segurança do paciente em um hospital especializado em oncologia / Patient safety climate in a hospital specialized in oncology

O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar o clima de segurança na perspectiva dos profissionais da equipe de saúde de um hospital especializado em oncologia. Estudo observacional, seccional, realizado com 66 profissionais da saúde, utilizando-se o Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. Para as análises foram utilizados teste t de Student e correlação de Sperman (α=0,05). O escore geral do instrumento foi 70,28. O domínio com melhor escore foi satisfação no trabalho (86,74) e os domínios com menor escore foram percepção da gerência (64,99) e percepção do estresse (61,74). Não houve diferenças estatisticamente significativa das médias entre os sexos, mas esta esteve presente entre os que realizaram ou não pós- graduação. Não houve correlação entre escores e tempo na especialidade de atuação na instituição. A avaliação final demonstrou fragilidades na percepção dos profissionais da saúde em relação às questões que envolvem o clima de segurança institucional.

The study's objective was to assess the safety climate from the perspective of a health team from a hospital specialized in oncology. An observational sectional study, conducted with 66 health professionals, using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. For analysis, Student's t test and Sperman's correlation (α=0.05) were used. The instrument's general score was 70.28. The domain with best score was satisfaction at work (86.74) and, the domains with lower scores were perception from management (64.99) and stress perception (61.74). There was no differences of means statistically significant between genders, but it was present between those who had gone through graduate school or not. There was no correlation between scores and career time in the specialty at the institution. The final assessment demonstrated fragilities in the perception of health professionals related to questions involving the institutional climate of safety.

Risk factors for the nasopharyngeal carriage of respiratory pathogens by Portuguese children: phenotype and antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Between 1997 and 2000 nasopharyngeal specimens were obtained from 466 children < or = 12 years old attending the Pediatric Emergency Department at S. Francisco Xavier Hospital, Lisbon, to evaluate risk factors for nasopharyngeal carriage of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae and to characterize their phenotype and antimicrobial susceptibility. The attending pediatrician completed written questionnaires about the children's demographic and clinical histories. Over half the children (52.8%) carried H. influenzae and/or S. pneumoniae. Forty-one percent of these children had H. influenzae, 22.8% had S. pneumoniae and 36.2% had both. Risk factors identified for carriage of respiratory pathogens were: age below 3 years (p < 0.05), black race (p < 0.01), attending a daycare center (p < 0.05), and having a lower respiratory infection (p < 0.05). Asthmatic children were less likely to be carriers (p = 0.004). About two-thirds of H. influenzae isolates were susceptible to all antibiotics tested, 7.9% were beta-lactamase producers, 16.4% were nonsusceptible to trimethoprim, and 6.9% were intermediately resistant to clarithromycin. Over half (57.1%) of S. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to all antibiotics tested, 21.1% were multiresistant, 23.3% were nonsusceptible to penicillin, and about 20% were resistant to macrolides. Low-level resistance to third-generation cephalosporins was detected in 2.3%. The data reflect the controversy surrounding risk factors of nasopharyngeal colonization. These may have significant implications on clinical practice and on antimicrobial strategies to prevent the appearance of further resistant strains. Our findings highlight the importance to investigate the relationship between asthma and carriage.