Clinical Experience With a Dedicated Neurocritical Care Quality Improvement Program in an Academic Medical Center.

Background Managing neurocritical care patients encompasses many complex challenges, necessitating specialized care and continuous quality improvement efforts. In recent years, the focus on enhancing patient outcomes in neurocritical care may have led to the development of dedicated quality improvement programs. These programs are designed to systematically evaluate and refine care practices, aligning them with the latest clinical guidelines and research findings. Objective To describe the structure, processes, and outcomes of a dedicated Neurocritical Care Quality Improvement Program (NCC-QIP) at Harborview Medical Center, United States; a quaternary academic medical center, level I trauma, and a comprehensive stroke center. Materials and methods We describe the development of the NCC-QIP, its structure, function, challenges, and evolution. We examine our performance with several NCC-QI quality measures as proposed by the Joint Commission, the American Association of Neurology, and the Neurocritical Care Society, self-reported quality improvement (QI) concerns and QI initiatives undertaken because of the information obtained during our event/measure reporting process for patients admitted between 1/1/2014 and 06/30/2023. Results The NCC-QI reviewed data from 20,218 patients; mean age 57.9 (standard deviation 18.1) years, 56% (n=11,326) males, with acute ischemic stroke (AIS; 22.3%, n=4506), spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH; 14.8%, n=2,996), spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH; 8.9%, n=1804), and traumatic brain injury (TBI; 16.6%, n=3352) among other admissions, 37.4% (n=7,559) were mechanically ventilated, and 13.6% (n=2,753) received an intracranial pressure monitor. The median intensive care unit length of stay was two days (Quartile 1-Quartile 3: 2-5 days), and the median hospital length of stay was seven days (Quartile 1-Quartile 3: 3-14 days); 53.9% (n=10,907) were discharged home while 11.4% (2,309) died. The three most commonly reported QI concerns were related to care coordination/communication/handoff (40.4%, n=283), medication-related concerns (14.9%, n=104), and equipment/devices-related concerns (11.7%, n=82). Hospital-acquired infections were in the form of ventilator-associated pneumonia (16.3%, n=419/2562), ventriculostomy catheter-associated infections (4%, n=102/2246), and deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (3.2%, n=647). The quality metrics documentation was as follows: nimodipine after SAH (99.8%, 1802/1810), Hunt and Hess score (36%, n=650/1804), and ICH score (58.4% n=1752/2996). In comparison, 72% (n=3244/4506) of patients with AIS had a documented National Institute of Health Stroke Scale. Admission Glasgow Coma Score was recorded in 99% of patients with SAH, ICH, and TBI. Educational modules were implemented in response to event reporting. Conclusion A dedicated NCC-QIP can be successfully implemented at a quaternary medical medical center. It is possible to monitor and review a large volume of neurocritical care patients, The three most reported NCC-QI concerns may be related to care coordination-communication/handoff, medication-related concerns, and equipment/devices-related complications. The documentation of illness severity scores and stroke measures depends upon the type of measure and ability to reliably and accurately abstract and can be challenging. The quality improvement process can be enhanced by educational modules that reinforce quality and safety.

External Ventricular Drain Placement, Critical Care Utilization, Complications, and Clinical Outcomes after Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: To examine the association between external ventricular drain (EVD) placement, critical care utilization, complications, and clinical outcomes in hospitalized adults with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: A single-center retrospective study included SAH patients 18 years and older, admitted between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2022. The exposure variable was EVD. The primary outcomes of interest were (1) early mortality (<72 h), (2) overall mortality, (3) improvement in modified-World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (m-WFNSs) grade between admission and discharge, and (4) discharge to home at the end of the hospital stay. We adjusted for admission m-WFNS grade, age, sex, race/ethnicity, intraventricular hemorrhage, aneurysmal cause of SAH, mechanical ventilation, critical care utilization, and complications within a multivariable analysis. We reported adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The study sample included 1346 patients: 18% (n = 243) were between the ages of 18 and 44 years, 48% (n = 645) were between the age of 45-64 years, and 34% (n = 458) were 65 years and older, with other statistics of females (56%, n = 756), m-WFNS I-III (57%, n = 762), m-WFNS IV-V (43%, n = 584), 51% mechanically ventilated, 76% White (n = 680), and 86% English-speaking (n = 1158). Early mortality occurred in 11% (n = 142). Overall mortality was 21% (n = 278), 53% (n = 707) were discharged to their home, and 25% (n = 331) improved their m-WFNS between admission and discharge. Altogether, 54% (n = 731) received EVD placement. After adjusting for covariates, the results of the multivariable analysis demonstrated that EVD placement was associated with reduced early mortality (aOR 0.21 [0.14, 0.33]), an improvement in m-WFNS grade (aOR 2.06 [1.42, 2.99]) but not associated with overall mortality (aOR 0.69 [0.47, 1.00]) or being discharged home at the end of the hospital stay (aOR 1.00 [0.74, 1.36]). EVD was associated with a higher rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia (aOR 2.32 [1.03, 5.23]), delirium (aOR 1.56 [1.05, 2.32]), and a longer ICU (aOR 1.33 [1.29;1.36]) and hospital length of stay (aOR 1.09 [1.07;1.10]). Critical care utilization was also higher in patients with EVD compared to those without. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that EVD placement in hospitalized adults with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is associated with reduced early mortality and improved neurological recovery, albeit with higher critical care utilization and complications. These findings emphasize the potential clinical benefits of EVD placement in managing SAH. However, further research and prospective studies may be necessary to validate these results and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing clinical outcomes in SAH.

Delirium and Its Associations with Critical Care Utilizations and Outcomes at the Time of Hospital Discharge in Patients with Acute Brain Injury.

Background and Objectives: We analyzed delirium testing, delirium prevalence, critical care associations outcomes at the time of hospital discharge in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) due to acute ischemic stroke (AIS), non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), non-traumatic intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH), and traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to an intensive care unit. Materials and Methods: We examined the frequency of assessment for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit. We assessed delirium testing frequency, associated factors, positive test outcomes, and their correlations with clinical care, including nonpharmacological interventions and pain, agitation, and distress management. Results: Amongst 11,322 patients with ABI, delirium was tested in 8220 (726%). Compared to patients 18-44 years of age, patients 65-79 years (aOR 0.79 [0.69, 0.90]), and those 80 years and older (aOR 0.58 [0.50, 0.68]) were less likely to undergo delirium testing. Compared to English-speaking patients, non-English-speaking patients (aOR 0.73 [0.64, 0.84]) were less likely to undergo delirium testing. Amongst 8220, 2217 (27.2%) tested positive for delirium. For every day in the ICU, the odds of testing positive for delirium increased by 1.11 [0.10, 0.12]. Delirium was highest in those 80 years and older (aOR 3.18 [2.59, 3.90]). Delirium was associated with critical care resource utilization and with significant odds of mortality (aOR 7.26 [6.07, 8.70] at the time of hospital discharge. Conclusions: In conclusion, we find that seven out of ten patients in the neurocritical care unit are tested for delirium, and approximately two out of every five patients test positive for delirium. We demonstrate disparities in delirium testing by age and preferred language, identified high-risk subgroups, and the association between delirium, critical care resource use, complications, discharge GCS, and disposition. Prioritizing equitable testing and diagnosis, especially for elderly and non-English-speaking patients, is crucial for delivering quality care to this vulnerable group.

Neurological Pupillary Index and Disposition at Hospital Discharge following ICU Admission for Acute Brain Injury.

We examined the associations between the Neurological Pupillary Index (NPi) and disposition at hospital discharge in patients admitted to the neurocritical care unit with acute brain injury (ABI) due to acute ischemic stroke (AIS), spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and traumatic brain injury (TBI). The primary outcome was discharge disposition (home/acute rehabilitation vs. death/hospice/skilled nursing facility). Secondary outcomes were tracheostomy tube placement and transition to comfort measures. Among 2258 patients who received serial NPi assessments within the first seven days of ICU admission, 47.7% (n = 1078) demonstrated NPi ≥ 3 on initial and final assessments, 30.1% (n = 680) had initial NPI < 3 that never improved, 19% (n = 430) had initial NPi ≥ 3, which subsequently worsened to <3 and never recovered, and 3.1% (n = 70) had initial NPi < 3, which improved to ≥3. After adjusting for age, sex, admitting diagnosis, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, craniotomy/craniectomy, and hyperosmolar therapy, NPi values that remained <3 or worsened from ≥3 to <3 were associated with poor outcomes (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 2.58, 95% CI [2.03; 3.28]), placement of a tracheostomy tube (aOR 1.58, 95% CI [1.13; 2.22]), and transition to comfort measures only (aOR 2.12, 95% CI [1.67; 2.70]). Our study suggests that serial NPi assessments during the first seven days of ICU admission may be helpful in predicting outcomes and guiding clinical decision-making in patients with ABI. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential benefit of interventions to improve NPi trends in this population.

Anesthesiology Performance Improvement and Reporting Exchange (ASPIRE) Quality Metrics in Patients Undergoing Decompressive Craniectomy and Endoscopic Clot Evacuation after Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: We report adherence to 6 Anesthesiology Performance Improvement and Reporting Exchange (ASPIRE) quality metrics (QMs) relevant to patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy or endoscopic clot evacuation after spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we describe adherence to the following ASPIRE QMs: acute kidney injury (AKI-01); mean arterial pressure < 65 mm Hg for less than 15 minutes (BP-03); myocardial injury (CARD-02); treatment of high glucose (> 200 mg/dL, GLU-03); reversal of neuromuscular blockade (NMB-02); and perioperative hypothermia (TEMP-03). RESULT: The study included 95 patients (70% male) with median (interquartile range) age 55 (47 to 66) years and ICH score 2 (1 to 3) undergoing craniectomy (n=55) or endoscopic clot evacuation (n=40) after sICH. In-hospital mortality attributable to sICH was 23% (n=22). Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class 5 (n=16), preoperative reduced glomerular filtration rate (n=5), elevated cardiac troponin (n=21) and no intraoperative labs with high glucose (n=71), those who were not extubated at the end of the case (n=62) or did not receive a neuromuscular blocker given (n=3), and patients having emergent surgery (n=64) were excluded from the analysis for their respective ASPIRE QM based on predetermined ASPIRE exclusion criteria. For the remaining patients, the adherence to ASPIRE QMs were: AKI-01, craniectomy 34%, endoscopic clot evacuation 1%; BP-03, craniectomy 72%, clot evacuation 73%; CARD-02, 100% for both groups; GLU-03, craniectomy 67%, clot evacuation 100%; NMB-02, clot evacuation 79%, and; TEMP-03, clot evacuation 0% with hypothermia. CONCLUSION: This study found variable adherence to ASPIRE QMs in sICH patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy or endoscopic clot evacuation. The relatively high number of patients excluded from individual ASPIRE metrics is a major limitation.

A Review of Practices Around Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria by an Organ Procurement Organization in the WAMI Region.

Background and Objective: To examine the verification of a referring hospital's practice of determining death by neurologic criteria (DNC) by an organ procurement organization (OPO) pursuant to the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services rule §486.344(b). Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we examined prevalence and factors associated with deviations from acceptable DNC standards, the performance of additional ancillary testing requested by the OPO, resolution of concerns about deviations between referring hospitals and the OPO, and interactions between referring hospitals and the OPO. Results: The OPO reviewed DNC processes for 645 adult potential organ donors from 64 referral hospitals. Concerns about practice deviations from acceptable standards were identified by the OPO's medical director (also a practicing neurointensivist) on call in 19% (n = 120) and were related to clinical prerequisites (27.2%, n = 49), clinical examination (23.9%, n = 67), and apnea testing (25.3%, n = 97). The top 3 concerns were apnea test results not meeting PCO2 targets (6.7%, n = 43), errors in documentation of the clinical examination (5.3%, n = 34), and potential confounding effects of CNS depressants (2.5%, n = 16). Compared with the "no medical director concerns" group which includes all patients, where the coordinator felt that DNC determination met all the conditions on the checklist, medical director concerns were less likely to occur in hospitals with a dedicated neurocritical care unit (odds ratio [OR] 0.33, 95% CI 0.17-0.66, p < 0.001), prevalent across hospitals independent of whether their policies conformed to updated DNC guidelines (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.57-1.45, p = 0.720). The OPO requested additional ancillary testing (6%, n = 41) when clinical prerequisites were not met (OR 12.7, 95% CI 4.29-33.5), p < 0.001). Resolution of concerns and organ donation was achieved in 99.4% (n = 641). Four patients were rejected as brain-dead donors because of the presence of cerebral blood flow on the nuclear medicine perfusion test. Referring hospitals requested support from the OPO regarding the determination of DNC (10%, n = 64) and declaring physicians were reported to lack knowledge about the institutional DNC policy (4%, n = 23). Discussion: Ongoing review of institutional DNC standards and adherence to those standards is an urgent unmet need. Both referring hospitals and OPOs jointly carry responsibility for preventing errors in DNC leading up to organ recovery.

Understanding Research Methods: Up-and-down Designs for Dose-finding.

SUMMARY: For the task of estimating a target benchmark dose such as the ED50 (the dose that would be effective for half the population), an adaptive dose-finding design is more effective than the standard approach of treating equal numbers of patients at a set of equally spaced doses. Up-and-down is the most popular family of dose-finding designs and is in common use in anesthesiology. Despite its widespread use, many aspects of up-and-down are not well known, implementation is often misguided, and standard, up-to-date reference material about the design is very limited. This article provides an overview of up-and-down properties, recent methodologic developments, and practical recommendations, illustrated with the help of simulated examples. Additional reference material is offered in the Supplemental Digital Content.

Anesthetic Management of Brain-dead Adult and Pediatric Organ Donors: The Harborview Medical Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: The exposure of anesthesiologists to organ recovery procedures and the anesthetic technique used during organ recovery has not been systematically studied in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all adult and pediatric patients who were declared brain dead between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2019, and who progressed to organ donation at Harborview Medical Center. We describe the frequency of directing anesthetic care by attending anesthesiologists, anesthetic technique, and donor management targets during organ recovery. RESULTS: In a cohort of 327 patients (286 adults and 41 children), the most common cause of brain death was traumatic brain injury (51.1%). Kidneys (94.4%) and liver (87.4%) were the most common organs recovered. On average, each year, an attending anesthesiologist cared for 1 (range: 1 to 7) brain-dead donor during organ retrieval. The average anesthetic time was 127±53.5 (mean±SD) minutes. Overall, 90% of patients received a neuromuscular blocker, 63.3% an inhaled anesthetic, and 33.9% an opioid. Donor management targets were achieved as follows: mean arterial pressure ≥70 mm Hg (93%), normothermia (96%), normoglycemia (84%), urine output >1 to 3 mL/kg/h (61%), and lung-protective ventilation (58%). CONCLUSIONS: During organ recovery from brain-dead organ donors, anesthesiologists commonly administer neuromuscular blockers, inhaled anesthetics, and opioids, and strive to achieve donor management targets. While infrequently being exposed to these cases, it is expected that all anesthesiologists be cognizant of the physiological perturbations in brain-dead donors and achieve physiological targets to preserve end-organ function. These findings warrant further examination in a larger multi-institutional cohort.

Hypothermic machine perfusion utilization and outcomes for deceased-donor kidneys: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) has been established as an efficacious method for preserving kidney allografts from deceased donors in clinical trials, but little data are available on the effectiveness of HMP in real-world settings. We examined factors associated with HMP use and clinical outcomes in a real-world organ procurement organization setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of the Lifecenter Northwest organ procurement database from 2010 to 2015, linked to the United Network of Organ Sharing outcomes database. We examined HMP utilization, and our primary outcomes were delayed graft function (DGF) and graft survival, using multivariable Poisson and Cox regression models. RESULTS: Among 1729 deceased-donor kidneys, 797 (46%) were preserved with HMP. Higher donor age, region of procurement, and donation type were associated with HMP use. HMP was associated with a 37% decreased risk of DGF (adjusted relative risk 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.78), with no effect on 1-year graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI: 0.38-1.80). CONCLUSION: Variation exists in the utilization of HMP for deceased donor kidneys. HMP reduced the risk for DGF, but was not associated with improvements in long-term graft survival.

Brain death: optimizing support of the traumatic brain injury patient awaiting organ procurement.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Increasing numbers of deaths on the transplant waiting list is associated with an expanding supply-demand deficit in transplantable organs. There is consequent interest in reviewing both donor eligibility after death from traumatic brain injury, and subsequent management, to minimize perimortem insult to donatable organs. RECENT FINDINGS: Recipient outcomes are not worsened when transplanting organs from donors who were declared dead after traumatic brain injury. Protocolized donor management improves overall organ procurement rates and subsequent organ function. Longer periods of active management (up to 48 h) are associated with improved outcomes in renal, lung, and heart transplantation. Several empirically derived interventions have been shown to be ineffective, but there are increasing numbers of structured trials being performed, offering the possibility of improving transplant numbers and recipient outcomes. SUMMARY: New studies have questioned previous considerations of donor eligibility, demonstrating the ability to use donated organs from a wider pool of possible donors, with less exclusion for associated injury or comorbid conditions. There are identifiable benefits from improved donor resuscitation and bundled treatment approaches, provoking systematic assessments of effect and new clinical trials in previously overlooked areas of clinical intervention.

Enhanced Perioperative Care for Major Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: The enhanced perioperative care (EPOC) program is an institutional quality improvement initiative. We used a historically controlled study design to evaluate patients who underwent major spine surgery before and after the implementation of the EPOC program. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether multidisciplinary EPOC program was associated with an improvement in clinical and financial outcomes for elective adult major spine surgery patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs successfully implemented in hip and knee replacement surgeries, and improved clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. METHODS: We compared 183 subjects in traditional care (TRDC) group to 267 intervention period (EPOC) in a single academic quaternary spine surgery referral center. One hundred eight subjects in no pathway (NOPW) care group was also examined to exclude if the observed changes between the EPOC and TRDC groups might be due to concurrent changes in practice or population over the same time period. Our primary outcome variables were hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay and the secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, 30-day hospital readmission and cost. RESULTS: In this highly complex patient population, we observed a reduction in mean hospital length of stay (HLOS) between TRDC versus EPOC groups (8.2 vs. 6.1 d, standard deviation [SD] = 6.3 vs. 3.6, P < 0.001) and intensive care unit length of stay (ILOS) (3.1 vs. 1.9 d, SD = 4.7 vs. 1.4, P = 0.01). The number (rate) of postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admissions was higher for the TRDC n = 109 (60%) than the EPOC n = 129 (48%) (P = 0.02). There was no difference in postoperative complications and 30-day hospital readmissions. The EPOC spine program was associated with significant average cost reduction-$62,429 to $53,355 (P < 0.00). CONCLUSION: The EPOC program has made a clinically relevant contribution to institutional efforts to improve patient outcomes and value. We observed a reduction in HLOS, ILOS, costs, and variability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Organ Donor Management: Part 1. Toward a Consensus to Guide Anesthesia Services During Donation After Brain Death.

Worldwide 715 482 patients have received a lifesaving organ transplant since 1988. During this time, there have been advances in donor management and in the perioperative care of the organ transplant recipient, resulting in marked improvements in long-term survival. Although the number of organs recovered has increased year after year, a greater demand has produced a critical organ shortage. The majority of organs are from deceased donors; however, some are not suitable for transplantation. Some of this loss is due to management of the donor. Improved donor care may increase the number of available organs and help close the existing gap in supply and demand. In order to address this concern, The Organ Donation and Transplantation Alliance, the Association of Organ Procurement Organizations, and the Transplant and Critical Care Committees of the American Society of Anesthesiologists have formulated evidence-based guidelines, which include a call for greater involvement and oversight by anesthesiologists and critical care specialists, as well as uniform reporting of data during organ procurement and recovery.

Intraoperative Secondary Insults During Orthopedic Surgery in Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Secondary insults worsen outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, data on intraoperative secondary insults are sparse. The primary aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of intraoperative secondary insults during orthopedic surgery after moderate-severe TBI. We also examined the impact of intraoperative secondary insults on postoperative head computed tomographic scan, intracranial pressure (ICP), and escalation of care within 24 hours of surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed medical records of TBI patients 18 years and above with Glasgow Coma Scale score <13 who underwent single orthopedic surgery within 2 weeks of TBI. Secondary insults examined were: systemic hypotension (systolic blood pressure<90 mm Hg), intracranial hypertension (ICP>20 mm Hg), cerebral hypotension (cerebral perfusion pressure<50 mm Hg), hypercarbia (end-tidal CO2>40 mm Hg), hypocarbia (end-tidal CO2<30 mm Hg in absence of intracranial hypertension), hyperglycemia (glucose>200 mg/dL), hypoglycemia (glucose<60 mg/dL), and hyperthermia (temperature >38°C). RESULTS: A total of 78 patients (41 [18 to 81] y, 68% male) met the inclusion criteria. The most common intraoperative secondary insults were systemic hypotension (60%), intracranial hypertension and cerebral hypotension (50% and 45%, respectively, in patients with ICP monitoring), hypercarbia (32%), and hypocarbia (29%). Intraoperative secondary insults were associated with worsening of head computed tomography, postoperative decrease of Glasgow Coma Scale score by ≥2, and escalation of care. After Bonferroni correction, association between cerebral hypotension and postoperative escalation of care remained significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative secondary insults were common during orthopedic surgery in patients with TBI and were associated with postoperative escalation of care. Strategies to minimize intraoperative secondary insults are needed.

Recommendations for the Critical Care Management of Devastating Brain Injury: Prognostication, Psychosocial, and Ethical Management : A Position Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society.

Devastating brain injuries (DBIs) profoundly damage cerebral function and frequently cause death. DBI survivors admitted to critical care will suffer both intracranial and extracranial effects from their brain injury. The indicators of quality care in DBI are not completely defined, and despite best efforts many patients will not survive, although others may have better outcomes than originally anticipated. Inaccuracies in prognostication can result in premature termination of life support, thereby biasing outcomes research and creating a self-fulfilling cycle where the predicted course is almost invariably dismal. Because of the potential complexities and controversies involved in the management of devastating brain injury, the Neurocritical Care Society organized a panel of expert clinicians from neurocritical care, neuroanesthesia, neurology, neurosurgery, emergency medicine, nursing, and pharmacy to develop an evidence-based guideline with practice recommendations. The panel intends for this guideline to be used by critical care physicians, neurologists, emergency physicians, and other health professionals, with specific emphasis on management during the first 72-h post-injury. Following an extensive literature review, the panel used the GRADE methodology to evaluate the robustness of the data. They made actionable recommendations based on the quality of evidence, as well as on considerations of risk: benefit ratios, cost, and user preference. The panel generated recommendations regarding prognostication, psychosocial issues, and ethical considerations.

Alternative clinical trial design in neurocritical care.

Neurocritical care involves the care of highly complex patients with combinations of physiologic derangements in the brain and in extracranial organs. The level of evidence underpinning treatment recommendations remains low due to a multitude of reasons including an incomplete understanding of the involved physiology; lack of good quality, prospective, standardized data; and the limited success of conventional randomized controlled trials. Comparative effectiveness research can provide alternative perspectives and methods to enhance knowledge and evidence within the field of neurocritical care; these include large international collaborations for generation and maintenance of high quality data, statistical methods that incorporate heterogeneity and individualize outcome prediction, and finally advanced bioinformatics that integrate large amounts of variable-source data into patient-specific phenotypes and trajectories.

Cardiac dysfunction following brain death in children: prevalence, normalization, and transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiac dysfunction has been reported to occur in as much as 42% of adults with brain death, and may limit cardiac donation after brain death. Knowledge of the prevalence and natural course of cardiac dysfunction after brain death may help to improve screening and transplant practices but adequately sized studies in pediatric brain death are lacking. The aims of our study are to describe the prevalence and course of cardiac dysfunction after pediatric brain death. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING/SUBJECTS: We examined an organ procurement organization database (Life Center Northwest) of potential pediatric cardiac donors diagnosed with brain death between January 2011 and November 2013. INTERVENTION: Transthoracic echocardiograms were reviewed for cardiac dysfunction (defined as ejection fraction <50% or the presence of regional wall motion abnormalities). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze clinical characteristics and describe longitudinal echocardiogram findings in a subgroup of patients. We examined for heterogeneity between cardiac dysfunction with respect to cause of brain death. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 60 potential pediatric cardiac donors (age ≤ 18 yr) with at least one transthoracic echocardiogram following brain death. Cardiac dysfunction was present in 23 patients (38%) with brain death. Mean ejection fraction (37.6% vs 62.2%) and proportion of procured hearts (56.5% vs 83.8%) differed significantly between the groups with and without cardiac dysfunction, respectively. Of the 11 subjects with serial transthoracic echocardiogram data, the majority of patients with cardiac dysfunction (73%) improved over time, leading to organ procurement. No heterogeneity between cardiac dysfunction and particular causes of brain death was observed. CONCLUSION: The frequency of cardiac dysfunction in children with brain death is high. Serial transthoracic echocardiograms in patients with cardiac dysfunction showed improvement of cardiac function in most patients, suggesting that initial decisions to procure should not solely depend on the initial transthoracic echocardiogram examination results.

Temporal Changes in Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Use of Echocardiography in Adult Heart Donors.

BACKGROUND: One reason for refusal of donor hearts is the development of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, a condition reported to occur in up to 42 % of adults with brain death. Prior studies have suggested that appropriate donor management and evaluation of cardiac dysfunction with serial echocardiography (TTE) can improve organ procurement. The aims of our study are to examine the prevalence and describe longitudinal changes in cardiac dysfunction after brain death. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed using the Life Center Northwest organ database to identify potential adult heart donors diagnosed with brain death between January 2011 and November 2013. 246 potential donors with at least one TTE following brain death were identified. 58 donors received serial TTEs. Echocardiograms were reviewed for cardiac dysfunction, defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) <50 % and/or presence of regional wall motion abnormalities. RESULTS: Cardiac dysfunction was present in 74 (30 %) patients. Age, body mass index, EF, and proportion of harvested organs differed significantly between the groups with and without cardiac dysfunction. Among patients receiving serial TTEs, 29 patients had cardiac dysfunction on initial TTE, with 15 (52 %) of these patients demonstrating resolved cardiac dysfunction over time leading to organ harvest. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, the present study is the largest study describing the use of serial TTE and its utilization in adult donors. The prevalence of cardiac dysfunction after adult brain death is high, but given enough time and support, many of these donors have improvement in cardiac function, ultimately leading to transplantation.