ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To understand health professionals' perceptions about vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) in the Santa Mônica rural settlement in Terenos, Mato Grosso do Sul. METHODS: Quantitative and qualitative methodologies, consultations on vaccination cards, records of community health agents and the focus group technique were used. The main factors of hesitation and vaccine refusal were analyzed, as well as the health team's strategies for the process of immunization against HPV, from June to August 2018. RESULTS: Of 121 children and adolescents, 81 (66.94%) received the complete vaccination schedule. Complete vaccination coverage for women was 73.17% (60/82) and for men, 53.8% (21/39). It was observed that, although strategies are adopted for vaccine promotion, such as mobile actions, the public is resistant due to superficial knowledge about the vaccine and its use in an early age group, showing itself to be susceptible to the negative influence of the media and to society's taboos. In addition, difficulties regarding the use of the Unified Health System card and the shortage of professionals were also observed. CONCLUSION: The results explain the immunization coverage below the target and reinforce the need to strengthen the family health strategy, as well as the permanent and continuing education of professionals, in order to increase parental confidence and adherence to vaccination.
Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Male , Child , Adolescent , Humans , Female , Human Papillomavirus Viruses , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Immunization Programs , Brazil , Vaccination , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Patient Acceptance of Health CareABSTRACT
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To understand health professionals' perceptions about vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) in the Santa Mônica rural settlement in Terenos, Mato Grosso do Sul. METHODS Quantitative and qualitative methodologies, consultations on vaccination cards, records of community health agents and the focus group technique were used. The main factors of hesitation and vaccine refusal were analyzed, as well as the health team's strategies for the process of immunization against HPV, from June to August 2018. RESULTS Of 121 children and adolescents, 81 (66.94%) received the complete vaccination schedule. Complete vaccination coverage for women was 73.17% (60/82) and for men, 53.8% (21/39). It was observed that, although strategies are adopted for vaccine promotion, such as mobile actions, the public is resistant due to superficial knowledge about the vaccine and its use in an early age group, showing itself to be susceptible to the negative influence of the media and to society's taboos. In addition, difficulties regarding the use of the Unified Health System card and the shortage of professionals were also observed. CONCLUSION The results explain the immunization coverage below the target and reinforce the need to strengthen the family health strategy, as well as the permanent and continuing education of professionals, in order to increase parental confidence and adherence to vaccination.
RESUMO OBJETIVO Compreender as percepções dos profissionais de saúde acerca da vacinação contra o papilomavírus humano (HPV) no Complexo de assentamentos Santa Mônica, em Terenos, Mato Grosso do Sul. MÉTODOS Foram utilizadas metodologias quanti-qualitativas, consultas em cartões vacinais, registros de agente comunitários de saúde e a técnica de grupo focal. Foram analisados os principais fatores de hesitação e recusa vacinal, bem como as estratégias da equipe de saúde para o processo de imunização contra o HPV, de junho a agosto de 2018. RESULTADOS De 121 crianças e adolescentes, 81 (66,94%) receberam o esquema vacinal completo. A cobertura vacinal completa feminina foi de 73,17% (60/82) e a masculina de 53,8% (21/39). Observou-se que, embora sejam adotadas estratégias para a promoção da vacina, como ações volantes, o público encontra-se resistente devido ao conhecimento superficial sobre a vacina e sua utilização em faixa etária precoce, mostrando-se suscetível à influência negativa da mídia e aos tabus da sociedade. Além disso, dificuldades quanto ao uso do cartão do Sistema Único de Saúde e a escassez de profissionais também foram observadas. CONCLUSÃO Os resultados justificam a cobertura vacinal abaixo da meta e reforçam a necessidade de fortalecimento da estratégia de saúde da família, bem como da educação permanente e continuada dos profissionais, a fim de aumentar a confiança dos pais e a adesão à vacinação.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Rural Population , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Family Health , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Vaccination Coverage , Vaccination RefusalABSTRACT
RESUMO As tecnologias de informação e comunicação têm-se disseminado globalmente. Elas estão cada vez mais presentes em quase todos os aspectos da vida humana, incluindo a saúde. Em meio à ampla disseminação de informações falsas, a questão da qualidade da informação tem assumido grande importância, especialmente em contexto de pandemia. Entre julho e agosto de 2020, foi realizada uma avaliação da qualidade da informação em sites sobre Covid-19 de quatro secretarias de saúde do estado de Mato Grosso do Sul. Essa avaliação participativa utilizou cinco critérios, acompanhando a literatura internacional, a saber: Técnico, Interatividade, Abrangência, Legibilidade e Acurácia, subdivididos em 46 indicadores. Os resultados apontam que os sites avaliados apresentaram baixo grau de conformidade com os indicadores e critérios utilizados e não divulgam as principais evidências científicas sobre o tema, disponíveis no site do Ministério da Saúde. A pandemia de Covid-19 tem sido marcada pela alta circulação de fake news. Nesse contexto, é imprescindível que páginas de secretarias de saúde apresentem informação sobre a doença com qualidade e legibilidade. Só assim, oferecerão um conteúdo informativo confiável e baseado em evidências científicas, contribuindo para o enfrentamento de notícias falsas e seus impactos negativos.
ABSTRACT Information and communication technologies have spread worldwide and are increasingly present in almost every aspect of human life, including health. The issue of information quality has assumed great importance amid the widespread dissemination of false knowledge, especially in a pandemic. We evaluated the quality of information on Covid-19 websites of four Health Secretariats in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, from July to August 2020. This participatory evaluation employed five criteria, following the international literature, namely: Technical, Interactivity, Comprehensiveness, Readability, and Accuracy, subdivided into 46 indicators. The results of the evaluated websites point to a low level of compliance with the indicators and criteria adopted and fail to disclose the primary scientific evidence on the topic, available on the Ministry of Health's website. The high circulation of fake news has marked the Covid-19 pandemic. In this context, Health Secretariats' pages should display quality and intelligible information about the disease. Only then will they offer reliable informational content based on scientific evidence, contributing to the fight against fake news and its adverse impacts.