Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 161(3): 755-761, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33888336

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Around 15% of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients (pts) harbor a germline BRCA1 or 2 mutation, showing different features than BRCA wild-type pts. The clinical and pathological features of an Italian BRCA mutated EOC cohort were described. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical, pathological and mutational data from a cohort of Italian BRCA mutated EOC pts. treated in 15 MITO centers between 1995 and 2017. RESULTS: Three-hundred thirty-one pts. were recorded. Two-hundred forty (72%) and 91 (27.5%) pts. harbored a BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation, respectively. Median age at diagnosis was 52 years. The most frequent diagnosis was a high grade serous FIGO III or IV EOC and platinum doublet in first-line was administered to almost all pts. Fifty-three % of them had no residual disease (R = 0) at surgery. Median progression-free-survival (mPFS) after first-line chemotherapy was 29 months. Expected percentage of pts. alive at 5 years was 72.5% (CI 60.2-80.8%) and R = 0 predicted a significantly longer overall survival (OS). Sixty-six pts. (19,9%) had both an EOC and a breast cancer (BC) diagnosis. The first diagnosis was BC in 81,8% of cases with a mean interval between the two diagnoses (IBTDs) of 132.4 months. Mutational data show that the founder mutation c.5266dupC in BRCA1 was the most frequently recorded. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest Italian BRCA mutEOC cohort. The only predictor of longer OS was R = 0. EOC pts. that developed subsequently a BC are long-term survivors.


Subject(s)
BRCA1 Protein/genetics , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/mortality , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/pathology , Demography , Female , Humans , Italy , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Progression-Free Survival , Retrospective Studies
2.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(5): 2435-2442, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32048043

ABSTRACT

Olaparib is the first poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor approved as maintenance therapy of recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) patients with a BRCA mutation. To achieve the maximum clinical benefit, adherence to olaparib must be persistent. However, in clinical practice, this is challenged by the frequent suboptimal management of toxicities. In view of the expanding use of olaparib also in Italy, physicians must learn how to adequately and promptly manage drug toxicities not to unnecessarily interrupt or reduce the dose. The experts agreed that nausea,vomiting, anemia, and fatigue are the most frequent events experienced by OC patients on olaparib, and that these toxicities usually develop early during treatment, are mainly of grade 1-2 and transient and can be managed with simple non-pharmacological interventions. By sharing their real-world experiences, the panel prepared, for each toxicity, an algorithm organized by grade and besides the procedures indicated in the local label, included supportive care interventions based also on nutritional and lifestyle modifications and psycho-oncology consultation. Moreover, in view of the tablet entry into the Italian market, the full and reduced dosages of capsules and tablets were compared. This practical guidance is intended to be a tool to support especially less-experienced physicians in the management of these complex patients, with the aim to help preventing the worsening of patients' conditions and the unnecessary interruption/reduction of olaparib dosage, which may jeopardize treatment efficacy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Phthalazines/adverse effects , Piperazines/adverse effects , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Anemia/chemically induced , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Fatigue/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Italy , Mutation , Nausea/chemically induced , Nausea/therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Phthalazines/therapeutic use , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Vomiting/chemically induced
3.
Clin Breast Cancer ; 19(2): 137-145.e4, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30584056

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 50% of locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients treated with first-line exemestane do not show objective response and currently there are no reliable biomarkers to predict the outcome of patients using this therapy. The constitutive genetic background might be responsible for differences in the outcome of exemestane-treated patients. We designed a prospective study to investigate the role of germ line polymorphisms as biomarkers of survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred two locally advanced or MBC patients treated with first-line exemestane were genotyped for 74 germ line polymorphisms in 39 candidate genes involved in drug activity, hormone balance, DNA replication and repair, and cell signaling pathways. Associations with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were tested with multivariate Cox regression. Bootstrap resampling was used as an internal assessment of results reproducibility. RESULTS: Cytochrome P450 19A1-rs10046TC/CC, solute carrier organic anion transporter 1B1-rs4149056TT, adenosine triphosphate binding cassette subfamily G member 2-rs2046134GG, fibroblast growth factor receptor-4-rs351855TT, and X-ray repair cross complementing 3-rs861539TT were significantly associated with PFS and then combined into a risk score (0-1, 2, 3, or 4-6 risk points). Patients with the highest risk score (4-6 risk points) compared with ones with the lowest score (0-1 risk points) had a median PFS of 10 months versus 26.3 months (adjusted hazard ratio [AdjHR], 3.12 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.18-4.48]; P < .001) and a median OS of 38.9 months versus 63.0 months (AdjHR, 2.41 [95% CI, 1.22-4.79], P = .012), respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study we defined a score including 5 polymorphisms to stratify patients for PFS and OS. This score, if validated, might be translated to personalize locally advanced or MBC patient treatment and management.


Subject(s)
Androstadienes/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Aromatase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aromatase Inhibitors/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , DNA Repair/genetics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polymorphism, Genetic , Prospective Studies , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Reproducibility of Results , Risk , Signal Transduction/genetics , Survival Analysis
4.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 15(8): 1063-74, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27120499

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women. Although therapeutic armamentarium like chemotherapy, endocrine and target agents have increased survival, cardiovascular side effects have been observed. A comprehensive risk assessment, early detection and management of cardiac adverse events is therefore needed. AREAS COVERED: In this review we focus on cardiotoxicity data deriving from Phase III randomized trials, systematic reviews and meta-analysis in BC patients. We provide insight into advances that have been made in the molecular mechanisms, clinical presentation and management of such adverse event. EXPERT OPINION: Despite the large number of data from Phase III trials about cardiac events incidence, there are poor evidences for detection, monitoring and management of cardiotoxicity during BC treatment. Future cardiotoxicity-oriented clinical cancer research can help to predict the risk of cardiac adverse events and improve patients' outcome. Multidisciplinary approach as well as integration of blood biomarkers with imaging will be desirable.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cardiotoxicity/etiology , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Biomarkers/blood , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Cardiotoxicity/diagnosis , Cardiotoxicity/epidemiology , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Female , Humans , Incidence , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Assessment/methods
5.
PLoS One ; 8(4): e59981, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23577077

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Neuropathic pain is commonly associated with cancer. Current treatments include combination opioid and adjuvant therapies, but no guidelines are available for dose escalation strategies. This phase II study compared the efficacy and tolerability of two dose escalation strategies for oxycodone and pregabalin combination therapy. METHODS: Patients (N = 75) with oncological neuropathic pain, previously untreated with pregabalin, were recruited in 5 Italian institutions between 2007 and 2010. Patients were randomised to two different dose escalation strategies (arm A; N = 38) oxycodone at a fixed dose with increasing pregabalin doses; (arm B; N = 37) pregabalin at a fixed dose with increasing oxycodone doses. Patients were evaluated from daily diaries and follow-ups at 3, 7, 10, and 14 days after beginning treatment with a numerical rating scale (NRS), neuropathic pain scale (SDN), and well-being scale (ESAS). The primary endpoint was a ≥1/3 reduction in pain (NRS); secondary endpoints included the time to analgesia and adverse effects. The study had a 90% probability of detecting the best strategy for a true difference of at least 15%. RESULTS: More patients in arm A (76%) than arm B (64%) achieved ≥1/3 overall pain reduction even after controlling for baseline factors (gender, baseline pain). Group A reported fewer side effects than group B; constipation 52.8% vs. 66.7%; nausea: 27.8% vs. 44.4%; drowsiness: 44.4% vs. 55.6%; confusion: 16.7% vs. 27.8%; itching: 8.3% vs. 19.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Both strategies effectively controlled neuropathic pain, but according to the adopted selection design arm A is preferable to arm B for pain control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00637975.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/complications , Neuralgia/complications , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Oxycodone/adverse effects , Oxycodone/therapeutic use , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuralgia/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Pregabalin , Treatment Outcome , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/adverse effects , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/therapeutic use
6.
Oncol Rep ; 17(1): 193-9, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17143498

ABSTRACT

The expansion of triplet repeat microsatellite sequences is the molecular correlate of anticipation in a number of rare Mendelian neurodegenerative disorders. This finding prompted us to study these sequences in primary breast cancer in which there is evidence of genetic anticipation. We used a PCR/silver stain method to determine whether triplet-repeat instability (TRI) was present in DNA from malignant breast tumors, and analyzed microsatellite instability (MSI) in triplets SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, HD, DRPLA and X25-GAA. We studied 54 consecutive primary breast cancers previously analyzed for dinucleotide instability (DI) at 9 loci. Microsatellite instability (TRI and/or DI) was found in 28/54 (52%) cases, ranging from 0 to 56% in each patient. Dinucleotide instability occurred at > or =2 loci in 19/54 (35%) cases and TRI in 6/54 (11%). Considering single locus instability, we found DI in 26/54 (48%) tumors and TRI in 13/54 (24%). Triplets DRPLA and X25-GAA were most frequently unstable (14% of cases); SCA2 instability was not detected. Interestingly, most tumors with TRI had DI (11/13, 85%). There was a correlation between TRI and DI in the same tumor (42 vs 7% in DI+ and DI- tumors respectively, p=0.0028). Furthermore, TRI appears more frequently associated with lymph node metastases and more advanced clinical stages and more frequent in patients <50 years old, with positive steroidal hormone receptor status, positive p185 and negative p53. These findings are of interest because they demonstrate a relationship between TRI and the clinicopathological characteristics of cancer aggressiveness. Triplet repeat alterations can interfere with gene expression and proteomic functions, which suggests they can play a role in the neoplastic progression of mammary cells. Furthermore, the association of TRI and DI in the same tumor suggests that alterations in the DNA repair gene could culminate in selective phenotypes and breast cancer progression in a considerable number of patients.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Microsatellite Instability , Trinucleotide Repeats , Adult , Aged , Alleles , Breast Neoplasms/blood , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , DNA, Neoplasm/blood , DNA, Neoplasm/genetics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
7.
Oncol Rep ; 11(4): 845-51, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15010883

ABSTRACT

Inactivation of DNA mismatch repair genes (MRG) is a recently described pathway of cancer development and progression resulting in genetic instability. Germline mutations in MRG have been studied predominantly in patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) where it is associated with microsatellite instability (MSI). The expression of MRG in primary breast cancer is still largely unexplored. The hMSH2 MRG encodes a protein that recognizes and binds to mismatch sequences of DNA. We investigated the relation-ship between hMSH2 expression and clinicopathological and biological characteristics, including p53 and p185 expression, in 44 primary invasive breast cancers. hMSH2 was not expressed in 11 cases (25%). Interestingly, p53 (p=0.05), p185 and steroidal receptor expression (p=0.07) were more frequent in tumors without hMSH2 expression. Furthermore, in 30 of 44 cases we analyzed hMSH2 expression in relation to MSI at 9 dinucleotide loci, and found that MRG expression was not significantly related to MSI. The presence of hMSH2 and p53 alterations in the same tumor suggests that the two oncoproteins act through a common mutational pathway, whereas the absence of a correlation between hMSH2 and MSI suggests that oncogenetic mechanisms of progression in primary breast cancer differ from those in HNPCC.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Genes, p53 , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/metabolism , DNA Repair , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Female , Humans , Immunochemistry , Male , Microsatellite Repeats/genetics , Middle Aged , MutS Homolog 2 Protein , Mutation , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...