Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Surg Oncol ; 51: 101895, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36682944

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increasing data suggests that the combination of modern systemic therapies and Cytoreductive surgery with or without Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) may improve the outcome of patients with colon cancer with peritoneal metastases. Patient selection and sequence of treatments remains ill-defined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A working group, the State of Delaware Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Task Force (DE-PSM-TF), was created including representatives from medical and surgical oncology from the acute care hospitals in Delaware. An extensive review of all available literature was carried out. Virtual meetings were held, and interpretation and discussion of the data was conducted. RESULTS: A clinical pathway that includes a multidisciplinary evaluation at the time of diagnosis of colon cancer with peritoneal metastases and reflects a consensus from the Task Force on 7 key points that suggest the management of these patients based on the severity of their peritoneal metastases and incorporates all currently available therapies was created. The sequence of therapies of this multimodality treatment was determined by the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS) (Fig. 1). CONCLUSION: The current pathway represents a comprehensive, team effort that should improve the outcome of patients with Colon Cancer with peritoneal metastases in the state of Delaware by having multidisciplinary discussions at the time of diagnosis, selecting the best order of sequence of currently available therapies in order to maximize benefits and minimize morbidity.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Hyperthermia, Induced , Peritoneal Neoplasms , Humans , Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Critical Pathways , Delaware , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Colonic Neoplasms/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures
2.
Dela J Public Health ; 3(3): 80-87, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34466917

ABSTRACT

Studies have shown timely screening, diagnosis, and treatment of breast cancer reduces mortality rates. The objective of this study is to evaluate the overall timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment for Delawarean women using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program's (NBCCEDP) recommendations of 60 days maximum for screening to diagnosis and 60 days maximum for diagnosis to treatment. This study analyzed Delaware Cancer Registry (DCR) data for female Delawarean breast cancer patients diagnosed in 2010 who had valid screening, diagnosis, and treatment dates. Calculations of three time intervals were performed: screening to diagnosis (Time A), diagnosis to treatment (Time B), and screening to treatment (Time C). The mean and median for Time Intervals A (21.2 days, 17.0 days), B (27.8 days, 25.0 days), and C (49.0 days, 42.0 days) met CDC recommendations. Our results show most Delawarean women who had valid screening, diagnosis, and treatment dates received a diagnosis within 60 days of screening and first course of treatment occurred within 60 days of diagnosis and therefore met the NBCCEDP recommendations.

3.
J Registry Manag ; 43(2): 74-81, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27556841

ABSTRACT

Studies have shown timely screening, diagnosis, and treatment of breast cancer reduces mortality rates. The objective of this study was to evaluate the overall timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment for Delawarean women using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP)'s recommendations of 60 days maximum for screening to diagnosis and 60 days maximum for diagnosis to treatment. This study analyzed Delaware Cancer Registry data for female Delawarean breast cancer patients diagnosed in 2010 who had valid screening, diagnosis, and treatment dates. Calculations of 3 time intervals were performed: screening to diagnosis (time interval A), diagnosis to treatment (time interval B), and screening to treatment (time interval C). The mean and median for time intervals A (21.2 days, 17.0 days), B (27.8 days, 25.0 days), and C (49.0 days, 42.0 days) met CDC recommendations. Our results show most Delawarean women who had valid screening, diagnosis, and treatment dates received a diagnosis within 60 days of screening and first course of treatment occurred within 60 days of diagnosis and therefore met the NBCCEDP recommendations.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Data Collection/methods , Early Detection of Cancer , Registries , Time-to-Treatment , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Data Accuracy , Delaware/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Models, Theoretical , Neoplasm Staging
4.
J Registry Manag ; 40(4): 151-8, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24625767

ABSTRACT

Studies have shown that timely screening, diagnosis, and treatment of breast cancer reduces mortality rates. The objective of this study was to determine if data collected by the Delaware Cancer Registry (DCR) could be used to access the timeliness of diagnosis and treatment for breast cancer patients, using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations of 60 days maximum for screening to diagnosis and 60 days maximum for diagnosis to treatment. This study analyzed DCR data for female Delawarean breast cancer patients diagnosed in 2004; data were included that had a valid screening, diagnosis, and treatment date. Calculations of 3 time intervals were performed: screening to diagnosis (time interval A), diagnosis to treatment (time interval B), and screening to treatment (time interval C). Results of this study show that, while not captured as an independent variable, screening dates could be extracted from text fields to calculate appropriate time intervals. The mean and median for time intervals A (23.2 days, 20.0 days), B (2.1 days, 0.0 days), and C (40.1 days, 37.0 days) met CDC recommendations. This study shows that it is possible to utilize DCR data to conduct a timeliness of breast cancer treatment providing the ability to benchmark Delaware breast cancer treatment timelines to national recommendations.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Registries , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Carcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Carcinoma in Situ/surgery , Delaware/epidemiology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Time-to-Treatment/standards
5.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 20(1): 61-9, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20130504

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: An analysis of experience of surgical and gynecologic oncologists in the United States with the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: An Internet-based registry (HYPER-O) collected data from collaborating institutions. Eligibility included women with EOC treated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Borderline and nonepithelial cancers were excluded. RESULTS: As of July 1, 2008, 141 women were eligible for analysis treated at the following time points: frontline (n = 26), interval debulking (n = 19), consolidation (n = 12), and recurrence (n = 83). The mean perfusion temperatures were 38.5 to 43.6 degrees C (median, 41.9 degrees C) for inflow and 36.9 to 42.9 degrees C (median, 41 degrees C) for outflow for 30 to 120 minutes. Treatment was with a platinum agent (n = 72), mitomycin (n = 53), or a combination (n = 14). Median follow-up was 18 months (range, 0.3-140.5 months) and median overall survival 30.3 months (95% confidence interval, 23.0-37.6) with 2-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival probabilities of 49.1%, 25.4%, and 14.3%, respectively. Of the 141 patients, 110 (78%) experienced recurrence of ovarian cancer and 87 died, 3 (0.5%) dying within 30 days of surgery. In the multivariable analysis, the factors significant for increased survival were sensitivity to platinum response (P = 0.048), completeness of cytoreduction scores of 1 or 0 (P = 0.025), carboplatin alone or a combination of 2 or more chemotherapy agents used (P = 0.011), and duration of hospital stays of 10 days or less (P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is a viable additional treatment option for patients with invasive EOC and may extend life in selected groups. It warrants further study in randomized controlled trials.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Hyperthermia, Induced/methods , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Infusions, Parenteral , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/mortality , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Registries , Survival Analysis , Temperature , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL