Critical Appraisal of the Impact of Oesophageal Stents in the Management of Oesophageal Anastomotic Leaks and Benign Oesophageal Perforations: An Updated Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic placement of oesophageal stents may be used in benign oesophageal perforation and oesophageal anastomotic leakage to control sepsis and reduce mortality and morbidity by avoiding thoracotomy. This updated systematic review aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of oesophageal stents in these two scenarios. METHODS: A systematic literature search of all published studies reporting use of metallic and plastic stents in the management of post-operative anastomotic leaks, spontaneous and iatrogenic oesophageal perforations were identified. Primary outcomes were technical (deploying ≥ 1 stent to occlude site of leakage with no evidence of leakage of contrast within 24-48 h) and clinical success (complete healing of perforation or leakage by placement of single or multiple stents irrespective of whether the stent was left in situ or was removed). Secondary outcomes were stent migration, perforation and erosion, and mortality rates. Subgroup analysis was performed for plastic versus metallic stents and anastomotic leaks versus perforations separately. RESULTS: A total of 66 studies (n = 1752 patients) were included. Technical and clinical success rates were 96% and 87%, respectively. Plastic stents had significantly higher migration rates (24% vs 16%, p = 0.001) and repositioning (11% vs 3%, p < 0.001) and lower technical success (91% vs 95%, p = 0.032) than metallic stents. In patients with anastomotic leaks, plastic stents were associated with higher stent migration (26% vs 15%, p = 0.034), perforation (2% vs 0%, p = 0.013), repositioning (10% vs 0%, p < 0.001), and lower technical success (95% vs 100%, p = p = 0.002). In patients with perforations only, plastic stents were associated with significantly lower technical success (85% vs 99%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Covered metallic oesophageal stents appear to be more effective than plastic stents in the management of oesophageal perforation and anastomotic leakage. However, quality of evidence of generally poor and high-quality randomised trial is needed to further evaluate best management option for oesophageal perforation and anastomotic leakage.

Oesophageal Stents for Potentially Curable Oesophageal Cancer - A Bridge to Surgery?

For oesophageal cancer patients with potentially curative disease, treatment usually comprises neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Several methods are currently used for nutritional support while patients are undergoing neoadjuvant treatment but these do not relieve dysphagia. Stenting as a bridge to curative surgery has been explored in several case series and a case control study. This is a review of the current literature on the topic. Some small series have shown it to be safe and effective in relieving dysphagia and malnutrition without adverse effect on surgical outcomes, perioperative complications or delay in surgical resection post neoadjuvant therapy. However, there are sufficient concerns about its adverse impact on oncological outcomes such as a reduction in the R0 resection rates, median time to recurrence and 2 - 3 year overall survival, to not currently recommend its routine use in resectable cancers.

A systematic review of the association between a single strenuous event and the development of an inguinal hernia: A medicolegal grey area.

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia is a common surgical presentation. Evidence for its causation regarding occupational and recreational physical exposures is limited. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review objectively evaluating the evidence for a causal link between a single strenuous event and the development of an inguinal hernia. METHOD: A systematic review was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Ovid Embase, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library were searched. In addition, the ISRCTN register, ClinicalTrials.gov, ICTR Platform, and EU Clinical Trials Register were searched. Identified publications were collated and both reviewers independently reviewed their contents. FINDINGS: 5508 records were identified, resulting in 5 studies being selected. These 5 studies were all case series. Of 957 patients identified, 1003 hernias were described, of which 983 were inguinal hernias which 255 (26%) were attributed by patients to a single strenuous event. Only two of these studies applied Smith's Criteria (causation of a hernia from a single strenuous event): officially reported, severe pain at the time of the event, no prior history of inguinal hernia, and the diagnosis was made by a doctor within 30 days (preferably 3 days). Only 2 of 54 patients (4%) met all four criteria and so could be considered as having an inguinal hernia relating to a single strenuous event. CONCLUSION: Many patients associate hernias to a single episode, however upon application of more stringent criteria such as Smith's, a much smaller proportion are deemed to be actually attributable to a single strenuous event.

The role of esophageal stents in the management of esophageal anastomotic leaks and benign esophageal perforations.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to assess the safety and effectiveness of esophageal stents in the management of benign esophageal perforation and in the management of esophageal anastomotic leaks. BACKGROUND: Benign esophageal perforation and postoperative esophageal anastomotic leak are often encountered. Endoscopic placement of esophageal stent across the site of leakage might help control the sepsis and reduce the mortality and morbidity. METHODS: All the published case series reporting the use of metallic and plastic stents in the management of postoperative anastomotic leaks, spontaneous esophageal perforations, and iatrogenic esophageal perforations were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed (1990-2012). Primary outcomes assessed were technical success rates and complete healing rates. Secondary outcomes assessed were stent migration rates, stent perforation rates, duration of hospital stay, time to stent removal, and mortality rates. A pooled analysis was performed and subgroup analysis was performed for plastic versus metallic stents and anastomotic leaks versus perforations separately. RESULTS: A total of 27 case series with 340 patients were included. Technical and clinical success rates of stenting were 91% and 81%, respectively. Stent migration rates were significantly higher with plastic stents than with metallic stents (40/148 vs 13/117 patients, respectively; P = 0.001). Patients with metallic stents had significantly higher incidence of postprocedure strictures (P = 0.006). However, patients with plastic stents needed significantly higher number of reinterventions (P = 0.005). Mean postprocedure hospital stay varied from 8 days to 51 days. There was no significant difference in the primary or secondary outcomes when stenting was performed for anastomotic leaks or perforations. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic management of esophageal anastomotic leaks and perforations with the use of esophageal stents is technically feasible. It seems to be safe and effective when performed along with mediastinal or pleural drainage. Esophageal stent can, therefore, be considered as a treatment option in the management of patients who present early after esophageal perforation or anastomotic leak with limited mediastinal or pleural contamination.

Long-term follow-up of immunocytochemical analysis of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and its two receptors, VEGF-R1 (Flt-1) and VEGF-R2 (Flk-1/KDR), in oesophagogastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of immunocytochemical analysis of tumour vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its 2 receptors, VEGF-R1 and VEGF-R2, remains incompletely investigated in patients with oesophagogastric cancer.
 METHODS: Patients undergoing surgical resection were prospectively recruited between February 1999 and August 2000. Immunocytochemical analysis of VEGF, VEGF-R1 (Flt-1) and VEGF-R2 (Flk-1/KDR) was undertaken using validated techniques. Patients were followed up over a 10-year period using the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry.
 RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were recruited (male=45, 73.8%) with a median age of 66.0 years (range 39-83). Forty-seven (77.0%) adenocarcinomas and 14 (23.0%) squamous cell carcinomas were resected. UICC tumour staging was: stage I=14.7%, II=24.6%, III=54.1% and IV=6.6%. VEGF, VEGF-R1 and VEGF-R2 were over-expressed in tumour epithelial cells. VEGF-R2 expression was decreased in the presence of lymphovascular invasion and higher tumour grade. The 10-year survival rate was 19.7% (n=12) with a median follow-up of 808 (IQR 356-2313) days. On univariate analysis only lymphovascular invasion significantly predicted poor prognosis in this cohort (p=0.05). 
 CONCLUSION: VEGF, VEGF-R1 and VEGF-R2 were over-expressed in tumour epithelial cells. VEGF-R2 expression was decreased in the presence of more aggressive pathological variables. Larger studies are required to assess the prognostic significance of these biomarkers in oesophagogastric cancer.

Single center prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic Nissen versus anterior 90 degrees fundoplication.

Although Nissen fundoplication is a very effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux, it is associated with a small incidence of troublesome postoperative side effects. To prevent this, progressive modification of surgical techniques has led to the development of an anterior 90 degrees fundoplication. We undertook a prospective randomized trial to compare this procedure with Nissen fundoplication to determine whether it would achieve a better clinical outcome. Patients presenting to a single center for primary laparoscopic antireflux surgery were randomized to undergo either an anterior 90 degrees fundoplication (n = 40) or a Nissen fundoplication without division of the short gastric vessels (n = 39). Clinical questionnaires were used to assess outcome at 1 month, 3-6 months, and 12 months. Both patients and the clinical interviewer were masked as to which procedure was performed. Follow-up with endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and pH monitoring was also undertaken. Operating time was similar for the two procedures (60 minutes for anterior vs. 55 minutes for Nissen fundoplication). Early postoperative complications were more common after Nissen fundoplication (18% vs. 5%). Two patients underwent laparoscopic reoperation for recurrent reflux after anterior 90 degrees fundoplication, and four underwent laparoscopic reoperation after Nissen fundoplication (dysphagia, 3 patients; acute hiatus hernia, 1 patient). One year after surgery, dysphagia and other wind-related side effects were less common after anterior 90 degrees fundoplication. Control of reflux symptoms and satisfaction with the overall outcome was similar for the two procedures. Anterior 90 degrees fundoplication is followed by fewer side effects than Nissen fundoplication. This advantage is offset by a greater likelihood of reflux recurrence. However, this does not diminish patient satisfaction.

Bone marrow micrometastases and markers of angiogenesis in esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Tumor angiogenesis is critical for metastasis development. The detection of bone marrow micrometastases may indicate a metastatic phenotype. We aim to establish if the detection of bone marrow micrometastases associates with elevated markers of angiogenesis and adverse histopathologic features of esophageal cancer. METHODS: Bone marrow aspirates from 49 patients with esophageal cancer were assessed and assigned to be positive or negative for micrometastases. Routine histologic assessment of the primary tumor was also undertaken. Circulating and tumor levels of the angiogenic cytokine vascular endothelial growth factor were determined in plasma and tumor homogenate. Intratumor microvessel density was evaluated by counting anti-CD34 positive neovessels. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were positive for bone marrow micrometastases (44.9%). The detection of micrometastases was associated with advanced T stage (T3/4 vs T1/2; p = 0.023), circumferential margin involvement (p = 0.002) and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.024). Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor was significantly more elevated in micrometastatic-positive patients than in those without micrometastases (p = 0.018). No difference was noted in tumor vascular endothelial growth factor expression. For adenocarcinomas alone, intratumor microvessel density was significantly higher in micrometastatic positive cases (p = 0.03). This was not the case for squamous cell carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of bone marrow micrometastases is associated with esophageal tumors of advanced T stage and specifically for adenocarcinomas with tumor vascularity. Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor is elevated in micrometastatic positive cases and might be derived from sources other than the primary tumor.