Drugs, Delirium, and Trauma: Substance Use and Incidence of Delirium After Traumatic Brain Injury.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of data on the effect of preinjury substance (alcohol, drugs) abuse on the risk of delirium in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aimed to assess the incidence of delirium among patients with blunt TBI in association with different substances. METHODS: We analyzed the 2020 American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program. We included all adult (≥18 y) patients with blunt TBI who had a recorded substance (drugs and alcohol) screening. Our primary outcome was the incidence of delirium. RESULTS: A total of 72,901 blunt TBI patients were identified. The mean (standard deviation) age was 56 (20) years and 68.0% were males. The median (interquartile range) injury severity score was 17 (10-25). Among the study population, 23.1% tested positive for drugs (Stimulants: 3.0%; Depressants: 2.9%, hallucinogens: 5.1%, Cannabinoids: 13.4%, TCAs: 0.1%), and 22.8% tested positive for Alcohol. Overall, 1856 (2.5%) experienced delirium. On univariate analysis, patients who developed delirium were more likely to have positive drug screening results. On multivariable regression analyses, positive screen tests for isolated stimulants (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.340, P = 0.018), tricyclic antidepressants (aOR: 3.107, P = 0.019), and cannabinoids (aOR: 1.326, P ≤ 0.001) were independently associated with higher odds of developing delirium. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-fourth of adult patients with blunt TBI had an initial positive substance screening test. Patients with positive results for isolated stimulants, tricyclic antidepressants, and cannabinoids were at a higher risk of developing delirium, whereas this association was not evident with other drugs and alcohol-positive tests. These findings emphasize the need for early drug screening in TBI patients and close monitoring of patients with positive screening tests.

Less is More: Dissecting Trauma Centers by Procedural Volume.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the relationship between procedural volume and annual trauma volume (ATV) of ACS Level I trauma centers (TC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although ATV is a hard criterion for TC verification, importance of procedural interventions as a potential quality indicator is understudied. METHODS: Patients managed at ACS level I TCs were identified from ACS-TQIP 2017-2021. TCs were identified using facility keys and stratified into quartiles based on ATV into low, low-medium, medium-high, and high volume. TCs were also stratified into tertiles (low [LV], medium [MV], high [HV]) based on procedural volume by assessing annual number of laparotomies, thoracotomies, craniotomies/craniectomies, angioembolizations, vascular repairs, and long bone fixations performed at each center. Cohen's κ statistic was used to assess concordance between ATV and procedural volume. RESULTS: 182 Level I TCs were identified: 76 low, 47 low-medium, 35 high-medium, and 24 high volume. Long bone fixation, laparotomy, and craniotomy/craniectomy were the most performed procedures with a median of 65, 59, and 46 cases/center/year respectively. 31% of HV laparotomy centers, 31% of HV thoracotomy centers, 22% of HV craniotomy/craniectomy centers, 22% of HV vascular repair centers, 32% of HV long bone fixation centers, and 33% of HV angioembolization centers contributed to the overall number of low-medium and low volume TCs. Cohen's κ statistic demonstrated poor concordance between ATV and procedural volumes for all procedures (Overall procedural volume-κ=0.378, laparotomy-κ=0.270, thoracotomy-κ=0.202, craniotomy/craniectomy- κ=0.394, vascular repair-κ=0.298, long bone fixation-κ=0.277, angioembolization-κ=0.286). CONCLUSION: ATV does not reflect the procedural interventions performed. Combination of procedural and ATV may provide a more accurate picture of the clinical experience at any given TC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Predicting the time of mortality among older adult trauma patients: Is frailty the answer?

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate the temporal trends of mortality among frail versus non-frail older adult trauma patients during index hospitalization. METHODS: We performed a 3-year (2017-2019) analysis of ACS-TQIP. We included all older adult (age ≥65 years) trauma patients. Patients were stratified into two groups (Frail vs. Non-Frail). Outcomes were acute (<24 â€‹h), early (24-72 â€‹h), intermediate (72 hours-1 week), and late (>1 week) mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1,022,925 older adult trauma patients were identified, of which 19.7 â€‹% were frail. The mean(SD) age was 77(8) years and 57.4 â€‹% were female. Median[IQR] ISS was 9[4-10] and both groups had comparable injury severity (p â€‹= â€‹0.362). On multivariable analysis, frailty was not associated with acute (aOR 1.034; p â€‹= â€‹0.518) and early (aOR 1.190; p â€‹= â€‹0.392) mortality, while frail patients had independently higher odds of intermediate (aOR 1.269; p â€‹= â€‹0.042) and late (aOR 1.835; p â€‹< â€‹0.001) mortality. On sub-analysis, our results remained consistent in mild, moderate, and severely injured patients. CONCLUSION: Frailty is an independent predictor of mortality in older adult trauma patients who survive the initial 3 days of admission, regardless of injury severity.

Pediatric Acute Compartment Syndrome in Long Bone Fractures: Who is at Risk?

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of large-scale data on the factors that suggest an impending or underlying extremity pediatric acute compartment syndrome (ACS). In addition, literature regarding the timing of operative fixation and the risk of ACS is mixed. We aimed to describe the factors associated with pediatric ACS. METHODS: Analysis of 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program. We included patients aged <18 y diagnosed with upper extremity (UE) and lower extremity (LE) fractures. Burns and insect bites/stings were excluded. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors of ACS. RESULTS: 61,537 had LE fractures, of which 0.5% developed ACS. 76,216 had UE fractures, of which 0.16% developed ACS. Multivariable regression analyses identified increasing age, male gender, motorcycle collision, and pedestrian struck mechanisms of injury, comminuted and open fractures, tibial and concurrent tibial and fibular fractures, forearm fractures, and operative fixation as predictors of ACS (P value <0.05). Among LE fractures, 34% underwent open reduction internal fixation (time to operation = 14 [8-20] hours), and 2.1% underwent ExFix (time to operation = 9 [4-17] hours). Among UE fractures, 54% underwent open reduction internal fixation (time to operation = 11 [6-16] hours), and 1.9% underwent ExFix (time to operation = 9 [4-14] hours). Every hour delay in operative fixation of UE and LE fractures was associated with a 0.4% increase in the adjusted odds of ACS (P value <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results may aid clinicians in recognizing children who are "at risk" for ACS. Future studies are warranted to explore the optimal timing for the operative fixation of long bone fractures to minimize the risk of pediatric ACS.

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures: The impact of volume and the need for standardized indications.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to examine impact of trauma center (TC) surgical stabilization of rib fracture (SSRF) volume on outcomes of patients undergoing SSRF. METHODS: Blunt rib fracture patients who underwent SSRF were included from ACS-TQIP2017-2021. TCs were stratified according to tertiles of SSRF volume:low (LV), middle, and high (HV). Outcomes were time to SSRF, respiratory complications, prolonged ventilator use, mortality. RESULTS: 16,872 patients were identified (LV:5470,HV:5836). Mean age was 56 years, 74% were male, median thorax-AIS was 3. HV centers had a lower proportion of patients with flail chest (HV41% vs LV50%), pulmonary contusion (HV44% vs LV52%) and had shorter time to SSRF(HV58 vs LV76 â€‹h), less respiratory complications (HV3.2% vs LV4.5%), prolonged ventilator use (HV15% vs LV26%), mortality (HV2% vs LV2.6%) (all p â€‹< â€‹0.05). On multivariable regression analysis, HV centers were independently associated with reduced time to SSRF(ߠ​= â€‹-18.77,95%CI â€‹= â€‹-21.30to-16.25), respiratory complications (OR â€‹= â€‹0.67,95%CI â€‹= â€‹0.49-0.94), prolonged ventilator use (OR â€‹= â€‹0.49,95%CI â€‹= â€‹0.41-0.59), but not mortality. CONCLUSIONS: HV SSRF centers have improved outcomes, however, there are variations in threshold for SSRF and indications must be standardized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. STUDY TYPE: Therapeutic/Care Management.

Predictors of Receiving Mental Health Services in Trauma Patients With Positive Drug Screen.

INTRODUCTION: Initial interaction with health care system presents an important opportunity to provide substance use disorder (SUD) rehabilitation in the form of mental health services (MHSs). This study aims to identify predictors of receipt of MHSs among adult trauma patients with SUD and positive drug screen. METHODS: In this analysis of 2017-2021 American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS TQIP), adult(≥18 y) patients with SUD and positive drug screen who survived the hospital admission were included. Outcomes measure was the receipt of MHS. Poisson regression analysis with clustering by facility was performed to identify independent predictors of receipt of MHS. RESULTS: 128,831 patients were identified of which 3.4% received MHS. Mean age was 41 y, 76% were male, 63% were White, 25% were Black, 12% were Hispanic, and 82% were insured. Median injury severity score was 9, and 54% were managed at an ACS level I trauma center. On regression analysis, female gender (aOR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.09-1.25), age ≥65 y (aOR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97-0.99), White race (aOR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.28-1.47), Hispanic ethnicity (aOR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.76-0.93), insured status (aOR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.13-1.33), and management at ACS level I trauma centers (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.38-1.57) were independent predictors of receipt of MHS. CONCLUSIONS: Race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors predict the receipt of MHS in trauma patients with SUD and positive drug screens. It is unknown if these disparities affect the long-term outcomes of these vulnerable patients. Further research is warranted to expand on the contributing factors leading to these disparities and possible strategies to address them.

Defining the Problem: 53 Years of Firearm Violence Afflicting America's Schools.

BACKGROUND: Firearm violence and school shootings remain a significant public health problem. This study aimed to examine how publicly available data from all 50 states might improve our understanding of the situation, firearm type, and demographics surrounding school shootings. STUDY DESIGN: School shootings occurring in the US for 53 years ending in May 2022 were analyzed, using primary data files that were obtained from the Center for Homeland Defense and Security. Data analyzed included situation, injury, firearm type, and demographics of victims and shooters. We compared the ratio of fatalities per wounded after stratifying by type of weapon. Rates (among children) of school shooting victims, wounded, and fatalities per 1 million population were stratified by year and compared over time. RESULTS: A total of 2,056 school shooting incidents involving 3,083 victims were analyzed: 2,033 children, 5 to 17 years, and 1,050 adults, 18 to 74 years. Most victims (77%) and shooters (96%) were male individuals with a mean age of 18 and 19 years, respectively. Of the weapons identified, handguns, rifles, and shotguns accounted for 84%, 7%, and 4%, respectively. Rifles had a higher fatality-to-wounded ratio (0.45) compared with shooters using multiple weapons (0.41), handguns (0.35), and shotguns (0.30). Linear regression analysis identified a significant increase in the rate of school shooting victims (ß = 0.02, p = 0.0003), wounded (ß = 0.01, p = 0.026), and fatalities (ß = 0.01, p = 0.0003) among children over time. CONCLUSIONS: Despite heightened public awareness, the incidence of school shooting victims, wounded, and fatalities among children has steadily and significantly increased over the past 53 years. Understanding the epidemic represents the first step in preventing continued firearm violence in our schools.

Effect of PCC on outcomes of severe traumatic brain injury patients on preinjury anticoagulation.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate effect of 4-factor PCC on outcomes of severe TBI patients on preinjury anticoagulants undergoing craniotomy/craniectomy. METHODS: In this analysis of 2018-2020 ACS-TQIP, patients with isolated blunt severe TBI (Head-AIS≥3, nonhead-AIS<2) using preinjury anticoagulants who underwent craniotomy/craniectomy were identified and stratified into PCC and No-PCC groups. Outcomes were time to surgery and mortality. Multivariable binary logistic and linear regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: 1598 patients were identified (PCC-107[7 %], No-PCC-1491[93 %]). Mean age was 74(11) years, 65 % were male, median head AIS was 4. Median time to PCC administration was 109 â€‹min. On univariable analysis, PCC group had shorter time to surgery (PCC-341, No-PCC-620 â€‹min, p â€‹= â€‹0.002), but higher mortality (PCC35 %, No-PCC21 %,p â€‹= â€‹0.001). On regression analysis, PCC was independently associated with shorter time to surgery (ߠ​= â€‹-1934,95 %CI â€‹= â€‹-3339to-26), but not mortality (aOR â€‹= â€‹0.70,95 %CI â€‹= â€‹0.14-3.62). CONCLUSION: PCC may be a safe adjunct for urgent reversal of coagulopathy in TBI patients using preinjury anticoagulants.

Geriatric trauma, frailty, and ACS trauma center verification level: Are there any correlations with outcomes?

INTRODUCTION: It remains unclear whether geriatrics benefit from care at higher-level trauma centers (TCs). We aimed to assess the impact of the TC verification level on frail geriatric trauma patients' outcomes. We hypothesized that frail patients cared for at higher-level TCs would have improved outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Patients ≥65 years were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database (2017-2019). Patients transferred, discharged from emergency department (ED), and those with head abbreviated injury scale >3 were excluded. 11-factor modified frailty index was utilized. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed. Outcomes included discharge to skilled nursing facility or rehab (SNF/rehab), withdrawal of life-supporting treatment (WLST), mortality, complications, failure-to-rescue, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hospital length of stay (LOS), and ventilator days. RESULTS: 110,680 patients were matched (Frail:55,340, Non-Frail:55,340). Mean age was 79 (7), 90% presented following falls, and median ISS was 5 [2-9]. Level-I/II TCs had lower rates of discharge to SNF/rehab (52.6% vs. 55.8% vs. 60.9%; p < 0.001), failure-to-rescue (0.5% vs. 0.4% vs. 0.6%;p = 0.005), and higher rates of WLST (2.4% vs. 2.1% vs. 0.3%; p < 0.001) compared to level-III regardless of injury severity and frailty. Compared to Level-III centers, Level-I/II centers had higher complications among moderate-to-severely injured patients (4.1% vs. 3.3% vs. 2.7%; p < 0.001), and lower mortality only among frail patients regardless of injury severity (1.8% vs. 1.5% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.001). Patients at Level-I TCs were more likely to be admitted to ICU, and had longer hospital LOS and ventilator days compared to Level-II and III TCs (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Frailty may play an important role when triaging geriatric trauma patients. In fact, the benefit of care at higher-level TCs is particularly evident for patients who are frail. Level III centers may be underperforming in providing access to palliative and end-of-life care.

What Is Going on in Our Schools? Review of Injuries Among School Children Across the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Children spend most of their time at school and participate in many activities that have the potential for causing injury. This study aims to describe the nationwide epidemiology of pediatric trauma sustained in school settings in the United States. METHODS: In the 3-y analysis of 2017-2019 American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Program, all pediatric trauma patients (≤18 y) injured in a school setting were included and stratified based on place of injury, into elementary, middle, and high school (HS) groups. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to identify the independent predictors of intentional injuries. RESULTS: 23,215 pediatric patients were identified, of which 15,264 patients were injured at elementary (57.6%), middle (17.5%), and high (25%) schools. The mean age was 9.5 y, 66.9% were male, 63.9% were white, the median injury severity score was 2 [1-4], and 95.6% had a blunt injury. Elementary school students were more likely to sustain falls (85%) and humerus fractures (43%) whereas HS students were more likely to be injured by assaults (17%). Overall, 7% of the students sustained intentional injuries. On multivariable logistic regression, male gender (odds ratio [OR] 1.54), Black race (OR 2.94), American Indian race (OR 1.88), Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.77), positive drug screen (OR 4.9), middle (OR 5.2), and HSs (OR 10.6) were identified as independent predictors of intentional injury (all P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Injury patterns vary across elementary, middle, and HSs. Racial factors appear to influence intentional injuries along with substance abuse. Further studies to understand these risk factors and efforts to reduce school injuries are warranted to provide a safe learning environment for children.

When is it safe to start venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after blunt solid organ injury? A prospective American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal time to initiate venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis (VTEp) after blunt solid organ injury remains controversial, as VTE mitigation must be balanced against bleeding promulgation. Evidence from primarily small, retrospective, single-center work suggests that VTEp ≤48 hours is safe and effective. This study was undertaken to validate this clinical practice. METHODS: Blunt trauma patients presenting to 19 participating trauma centers in North America were screened over a 1-year study period beginning between August 1 and October 1, 2021. Inclusions were age older than 15 years; ≥1 liver, spleen, or kidney injury; and initial nonoperative management. Exclusions were transfers, emergency department death, pregnancy, and concomitant bleeding disorder/anticoagulation/antiplatelet medication. A priori power calculation stipulated the need for 1,158 patients. Time of VTEp initiation defined study groups: Early (≤48 hours of admission) versus Late (>48 hours). Bivariate and multivariable analyses compared outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 1,173 patients satisfied the study criteria with 571 liver (49%), 557 spleen (47%), and 277 kidney injuries (24%). The median patient age was 34 years (interquartile range, 25-49 years), and 67% (n = 780) were male. The median Injury Severity Score was 22 (interquartile range, 14-29) with Abbreviated Injury Scale Abdomen score of 3 (interquartile range, 2-3), and the median American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade of solid organ injury was 2 (interquartile range, 2-3). Early VTEp patients (n = 838 [74%]) had significantly lower rates of VTE (n = 28 [3%] vs. n = 21 [7%], p = 0.008), comparable rates of nonoperative management failure (n = 21 [3%] vs. n = 12 [4%], p = 0.228), and lower rates of post-VTEp blood transfusion (n = 145 [17%] vs. n = 71 [23%], p = 0.024) when compared with Late VTEp patients (n = 301 [26%]). Late VTEp was independently associated with VTE (odd ratio, 2.251; p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Early initiation of VTEp was associated with significantly reduced rates of VTE with no increase in bleeding complications. Venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis initiation ≤48 hours is therefore safe and effective and should be the standard of care for patients with blunt solid organ injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic and Care Management; Level III.

It is not all black and white: The effect of increasing severity of frailty on outcomes of geriatric trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is associated with poor outcomes in trauma patients. However, the spectrum of physiologic deficits, once a patient is identified as frail, is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the dynamic association between increasing frailty and outcomes among frail geriatric trauma patients. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the American Association of Surgery for Trauma Frailty Multi-institutional Trial. Patients 65 years or older presenting to one of the 17 trauma centers over 3 years (2019-2022) were included. Frailty was assessed within 24 hours of presentation using the Trauma-Specific Frailty Index (TSFI) questionnaire. Patients were stratified by TSFI score into six groups: nonfrail (<0.12), Grade I (0.12-0.19), Grade II (0.20-0.29), Grade III (0.30-0.39), Grade IV (0.40-0.49), and Grade V (0.50-1). Our Outcomes included in-hospital and 3-month postdischarge mortality, major complications, readmissions, and fall recurrence. Multivariable regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: There were 1,321 patients identified. The mean (SD) age was 77 years (8.6 years) and 49% were males. Median [interquartile range] Injury Severity Score was 9 [5-13] and 69% presented after a low-level fall. Overall, 14% developed major complications and 5% died during the index admission. Among survivors, 1,116 patients had a complete follow-up, 16% were readmitted within 3 months, 6% had a fall recurrence, 7% had a complication, and 2% died within 3 months postdischarge. On multivariable regression, every 0.1 increase in the TSFI score was independently associated with higher odds of index-admission mortality and major complications, and 3 months postdischarge mortality, readmissions, major complications, and fall recurrence. CONCLUSION: The frailty syndrome goes beyond a binary stratification of patients into nonfrail and frail and should be considered as a spectrum of increasing vulnerability to poor outcomes. Frailty scoring can be used in developing guidelines, patient management, prognostication, and care discussions with patients and their families. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Beyond the short-term relief: Outcomes of geriatric rib fracture patients receiving paravertebral nerve blocks and epidural analgesia.

BACKGROUND: Adequate pain control is a critical component of rib fracture management. Our study aimed to evaluate the in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes of geriatric rib fracture patients who received paravertebral nerve block (PVNB) versus epidural analgesia (EA) on a national level. METHODS: We performed a 5-year (2011-15) retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Readmission database. We included all the geriatric (≥65 years) blunt trauma patients with rib fractures who received a paravertebral nerve block (PVNB) or Epidural analgesia (EA) for chest injuries. We excluded patients who were dead on arrival, those with head AIS≥3, spine AIS >0, and those with cognitive impairment. Patients were stratified into two groups (PVNB and EA). A propensity score matching (1:2) was performed, and the two groups were compared. Our outcomes included delirium, hospital length of stay (LOS), 90-day readmissions, 90-day mechanical ventilation, and initial and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 2,855 geriatric rib fracture patients were identified, out of which 352 (12 %) received PVNB and 2,503 (87 %) received EA. The mean (SD) age was 78 (8) years and 53 % were female. A total of 1,041 patients were matched (PVNB=347, EA=694 patients). The median [IQR] Injury severity score was 9 [3-15], median chest AIS was 3 [2-4], and 70 % had ≥3 rib fractures. The total mortality during index admission was 6 %, 13 % experienced delirium, and the median hospital LOS was 6 [4-10] days. There was no difference in the primary outcomes of the two groups including rates of index admission mortality (PVNB: 5.2% vs. EA:6.3 %, p = 0.548) and delirium (PVNB: 12.4% vs. EA:12.9 %, p = 0.862). We also found no statistically significant difference between these groups in terms of 90-day respiratory complications (p = 1.000), 90-day readmission (p = 0.111), 90-day mortality (p = 0.718), and 90-day need for mechanical ventilation (p = 1.000). CONCLUSION: The use of PVNB in geriatric trauma patients with multiple rib fractures is associated with comparable in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes relative to EA. PVNB is relatively easy to perform and has a better side effect profile. The use of PVNB as part of rib fracture management protocols warrants further consideration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III STUDY TYPE: Therapeutic/Care Management.

Local Antibiotic Therapy for Open Long Bone Fractures: Appropriate Prophylaxis or Unnecessary Exposure for the Orthopedic Trauma Patient?

INTRODUCTION: Prophylactic local antibiotic therapy (LAbT) to prevent infection in open long bone fracture (OLBF) patients has been in use for many decades despite lack of definitive evidence confirming a beneficial effect. We aimed to evaluate the effect of LAbT on outcomes of OLBF patients on a nationwide scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of 2017-2018 American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program database, all adult (≥18 years) patients with isolated OLBF (non-extremity-Abbreviated Injury Scale < 3) were included. We excluded early deaths (<24 h) and those who had burns or non-extremity surgery. Outcomes were infectious complications (superficial surgical site infection, deep superficial surgical site infection, osteomyelitis, or sepsis), unplanned return to operating room, and hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (LOS). Patients were stratified into two groups: those who received LAbT and those who did not receive LAbT (No-LAbT). Propensity score matching (1:3) and chi-square tests were performed. RESULTS: A total of 61,337 isolated OLBF patients were identified, among whom 2,304 patients were matched (LAbT: 576; No-LAbT: 1,728). Both groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics. Mean age was 43 ± 17 years, 75% were male, 14% had penetrating injuries, and the median extremity-Abbreviated Injury Scale was 1 (1-2). Most common fracture locations were tibia (66%), fibula (49%), femur (24%), and ulna (11%). About 52% of patients underwent external fixation, 79% underwent internal fixation, and 86% underwent surgical debridement. The median time to LAbT was 17 (5-72) h, and the median time to debridement was 7 (3-15) h (85% within 24 h). The LAbT group had similar rates of infectious complications (3.5% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.24) and unplanned return to the operating room (2.3% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.74) compared to the No-LAbT group. Patients who received LAbT had longer hospital LOS (16 [10-29] vs. 14 [9-24] days, P < 0.001) but similar intensive care unit LOS (4 [3-9] vs. 4 [2-7] days, P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that prophylactic LAbT for OLBF may not be beneficial over well-established standards of care such as early surgical debridement and systemic antibiotics. Prospective studies evaluating the efficacy, risks, costs, and indications of adjuvant LAbT for OLBF are warranted.

Delayed versus early hepatic resection among patients with severe traumatic liver injuries undergoing damage control laparotomy.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to assess the effect of time to hepatic resection on the outcomes of patients with high-grade liver injuries who underwent damage control laparotomy (DCL). METHODS: This is a 4-year (2017-2020) analysis of the ACS-TQIP. Adult trauma patients with severe liver injuries (AAST-OIS grade â€‹≥ â€‹III) who underwent DCL and hepatic resection were included. We excluded patients with early mortality (<24 â€‹h). Patients were stratified into those who received hepatic resection within the initial operation (Early) and take-back operation (Delayed). RESULTS: Of 914 patients identified, 29% had a delayed hepatic resection. On multivariable regression analyses, although delayed resection was not associated with mortality (aOR:1.060,95%CI[0.57-1.97],p â€‹= â€‹0.854), it was associated with higher complications (aOR:1.842,95%CI[1.38-2.46],p â€‹< â€‹0.001), and longer hospital (ß: +0.129, 95%CI[0.04-0.22],p â€‹= â€‹0.005) and ICU (ß:+0.198,95%CI[0.14-0.25],p â€‹< â€‹0.001) LOS, compared to the early resection. CONCLUSION: Delayed hepatic resection was associated with higher adjusted odds of major complications and longer hospital and ICU LOS, however, no difference in mortality, compared to early resection.

From surveillance to surgery: The delayed implications of non-operative and operative management of pancreatic injuries.

BACKGROUND: Our study compares the delayed outcomes of operative versus nonoperative management of pancreatic injuries. METHODS: We analyzed the 2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database on adult (≥18 years) trauma patients with pancreatic injuries. Patients who died on index admission were excluded. Patients were stratified into operative (OP) and non-operative (NOP) groups and compared for outcomes within 90 days of discharge. Multivariable regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: We identified 1553 patients (NOP â€‹= â€‹1092; OP â€‹= â€‹461). The Mean (SD) age was 39 (17.0) years, 31% of patients were female, and 77% had blunt injuries. Median ISS was 17 [9-25] and 74% had concomitant non-pancreatic intraabdominal injuries. On multivariable analysis, operative management was independently associated with increased odds of 90-day readmissions (aOR â€‹= â€‹1.47; p â€‹= â€‹0.03), intraabdominal abscesses (aOR â€‹= â€‹2.7; p â€‹< â€‹0.01), pancreatic pseudocyst (aOR â€‹= â€‹2.4; p â€‹= â€‹0.04), and need for percutaneous or endoscopic management (aOR â€‹= â€‹5.8; p â€‹< â€‹0.001). CONCLUSION: Operative management of pancreatic injuries is associated with higher rates of delayed complications compared to non-operative management. Surgically treated pancreatic trauma patients may need close surveillance even after discharge.

Emergency Department Shock Index Outperforms Prehospital and Delta Shock Indices in Predicting Outcomes of Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple shock indices (SIs), including prehospital, emergency department (ED), and delta (ED SI - Prehospital SI) have been developed to predict outcomes among trauma patients. This study aims to compare the predictive abilities of these SIs for outcomes of polytrauma patients on a national level. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2018). We included adult (≥18 y) trauma patients and excluded patients who were transferred, had missing vital signs, and those with severe head injuries (Head-Abbreviated Injury Scale>3). Outcome measures were 24-h and in-hospital mortality, 24-h packed red blood cells transfusions, and intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. Predictive performances of these SIs were evaluated by the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics for the entire study cohort and across all injury severities. RESULTS: A total of 750,407 patients were identified. Meanstandard deviation age and lowest systolic blood pressure were 53 ± 21 y, and 81 ± 32 mmHg, respectively. Overall, 24-h and in-hospital mortality were 1.2% and 2.5%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, all three SIs were independently associated with higher rates of 24-h and in-hospital mortality, blood product requirements, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (P < 0.001). ED SI was superior to prehospital and delta SIs (P < 0.001) for all outcomes. On subanalysis of patients with moderate injuries, severe injuries, and positive delta SI, the results remained the same. CONCLUSIONS: ED SI outperformed both prehospital and delta SIs across all injury severities. Trauma triage guidelines should prioritize ED SI in the risk stratification of trauma patients who may benefit from earlier and more intense trauma activations.

Does preinjury anticoagulation worsen outcomes among traumatic hemothorax patients? A nationwide retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Up to a quarter of all traumatic deaths are due to thoracic injuries. Current guidelines recommend consideration of evacuation of all hemothoraces with tube thoracostomy. The aim of our study was to determine the impact of pre-injury anticoagulation on outcomes of traumatic hemothorax patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a 4-year (2017 - 2020) analysis of the ACS-TQIP database. We included all adult trauma patients (age ≥18 years) presenting with hemothorax and no other severe injuries (other body regions <3). Patients with a history of bleeding disorders, chronic liver disease, or cancer were excluded from this study. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the history of preinjury anticoagulant use (AC, preinjury anticoagulant use: No-AC, no preinjury anticoagulant use). Propensity score matching (1:1) was done by adjusting for demographics, ED vitals, injury parameters, comorbidities, thromboprophylaxis type, and trauma center verification level. Outcome measures were interventions for hemothorax (chest tube, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery [VATS]), reinterventions (chest tube > once), overall complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), and mortality. RESULTS: A matched cohort of 6,962 patients (AC, 3,481; No-AC, 3,481) was analyzed. The median age was 75 years, and the median ISS was 10. The AC and No-AC groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics. Compared to the No-AC group, AC group had higher rates of chest tube placement (46% vs 43%, p = 0.018), overall complications (8% vs 7%, p = 0.046), and longer hospital LOS (7[4-12] vs 6[3-10] days, p ≤ 0.001). Reintervention and mortality rates were similar between the groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of preinjury anticoagulants in hemothorax patients negatively impacts patient outcomes. Increased surveillance is required while dealing with hemothorax patients on pre-injury anticoagulants, and consideration should be given to earlier interventions for such patients.

There Is No Such Thing as Too Soon: Long-Term Outcomes of Early Cholecystectomy for Frail Geriatric Patients with Acute Biliary Pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Early cholecystectomy (CCY) for acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is recommended but there is a paucity of data assessing this approach in frail geriatric patients. This study compares outcomes of frail geriatric ABP patients undergoing index admission CCY vs nonoperative management (NOM) with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2017). All frail geriatric (65 years or older) patients with ABP were included. Patients were grouped by treatment at index admission: CCY vs NOM with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:2 ratio. Primary outcomes were 6-month readmissions, mortality, and length of stay. Secondary outcomes were 6-month failure of NOM defined as readmission for recurrent ABP, unplanned pancreas-related procedures, or unplanned CCY. Subanalysis was performed to compare outcomes of unplanned CCY vs early CCY. RESULTS: A total of 29,130 frail geriatric patients with ABP were identified and 7,941 were matched (CCY 5,294; NOM 2,647). Patients in the CCY group had lower 6-month rates of readmission for pancreas-related complications, unplanned readmissions for pancreas-related procedures, overall readmissions, and mortality, as well as fewer hospitalized days (p < 0.05). NOM failed in 12% of patients and 7% of NOM patients were readmitted within 6 months to undergo CCY, of which 56% were unplanned. Patients who underwent unplanned CCY had higher complication rates and hospital costs, longer hospital lengths of stay, and increased mortality compared with early CCY (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For frail geriatric patients with ABP, early CCY was associated with lower 6-month rates of complications, readmissions, mortality, and fewer hospitalized days. NOM was unsuccessful in nearly 1 of 7 within 6 months; of these, one-third required unplanned CCY. Early CCY should be prioritized for frail geriatric ABP patients when feasible.

The Association Between the Timing of Initiation of Pharmacologic Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis with Outcomes in Burns Patients.

Hospitalized burn patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Guidelines regarding thromboprophylaxis in burn patients are unclear. This study aims to compare the outcomes of early versus late thromboprophylaxis initiation in burn patients. In this 3-year analysis of 2017-2019 ACS-TQIP, adult(18-64years) burn patients were identified after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria and stratified based on timing of initiation of VTE prophylaxis: Early(<24 hours of admission); Late(>24 hours). Outcomes were deep venous thrombosis(DVT), pulmonary embolism(PE), unplanned return to operating room (OR), unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission, post-prophylaxis packed red blood cells (PRBC) transfusion, and mortality. Nine thousand two hundred and seventy-two patients were identified. Overall, median age was 41years, 71.5% were male, and median[IQR] injury severity score was 3[1-8]. 53% had second-degree burns, and 80% had less than 40% of total body surface area affected. Median time to thromboprophylaxis initiation was 11[6-20.6]hours. Overall VTE rate was 0.9% (DVT-0.7%, PE-0.2%). On univariable analysis, early prophylaxis group had lower rates of DVT(0.6% vs 1.1%, P = .025), and PE(0.1% vs 0.6%, P < .001). On multivariable regression, late prophylaxis was associated with 1.8 times higher odds of DVT (aOR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.04-3.11, P = .03), 4.8 times higher odds of PE(aOR = 4.8, 95% CI = 1.9-11.9, P < .001), and 2 times higher odds of unplanned ICU admission(aOR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.4-3.1, P < .001). Furthermore, early thromboprophylaxis was not associated with increased odds of post-prophylaxis PRBC transfusion(aOR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.8-1.4, P = .4), and mortality(aOR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.4-1.1, P = .13). Early VTE prophylaxis in burn patients is associated with decreased rates of DVT and PE, without increasing the risk of bleeding and mortality. VTE prophylaxis may be initiated within 24 hours of admission to reduce VTE in this high-risk patient population.