ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Direct Discharge protocols (DD) can alleviate strain on healthcare systems by reducing routine outpatient follow-up. These protocols include low-complex musculoskeletal injuries, such as isolated greenstick fractures or torus fractures of the wrist in children. While there is consensus on the effectiveness of DD, there is a lack of injury-specific powered studies. This study compares treatment satisfaction between DD and traditional treatment in children with a greenstick fracture or torus fractures of the wrist. METHODS: Children with isolated torus or greenstick fractures of the distal radius or ulna were eligible for inclusion before (pre-DD cohort) and after (DD cohort) the implementation of DD in four hospitals. Traditionally, patients receive a (soft) cast and minimally one routine outpatient follow-up appointment. With DD, patients are discharged directly from the ED after receiving a brace and information, summarized in a smartphone app and a helpline for questions during recovery. The primary outcome was patient or proxy treatment satisfaction (0 to 10), and a power analysis was performed to assess non-inferiority. Secondary outcomes included complications, functional outcomes measured in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (PROMIS UE), primary healthcare utilisation, and secondary healthcare utilisation (follow-up appointments and imaging). RESULTS: In total, 274 consecutive children were included to analyse the primary endpoint. Of these, 160 (58%) were male with a median age of 11 years (IQR 8 to 12). Pre-DD and DD treatment satisfaction did not vary statistically significantly for greenstick fractures (p = 0.09) and torus fractures (p = 0.93). No complications were observed. PROMIS UE showed no statistically significant differences before and after implementation of direct discharge protocol for torus (p = 0.99) or greenstick (p = 0.45) fractures. Secondary healthcare utilisation regarding follow-up was significantly lower in the DD-torus cohort compared to the pre-DD torus cohort, with a mean difference (MD) of - 1.00 follow-up appointments (95% Confidence Interval (CI) - 0.92 to - 1.13). Similar results were found in the pre DD-greenstick cohort compared to the pre-DD-greenstick cohort (MD): - 1.17 follow-up appointments, 95% CI - 1.09 to - 1.26). CONCLUSION: Direct Discharge is non-inferior to traditional treatment in terms of treatment satisfaction for paediatric patients with greenstick or torus fractures of the wrist compared to children treated with rigid immobilisation and routine follow-up. Furthermore, the results demonstrate no complications, comparable functional outcomes, and a statistically significant reduction of secondary healthcare utilisation, making DD a good solution to cope with strained resources for children with an isolated greenstick fracture or torus fracture of the wrist.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: There is currently no consensus on nonoperative management in adult patients after a stable type B ankle fracture. The aim of this review is to compare a removable orthosis versus a cast regarding safety and functional outcome in the NOM of stable type B ankle fractures. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using randomized clinical trials and observational studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed with the methodological index for non-randomized studies instrument. Nonoperative management was compared using the number of complications and functional outcome measured using the Olerud and Molander Score (OMAS) or the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Ankle Score. RESULTS: Five studies were included. Two were randomized clinical trials, and three were observational studies, including a total of 516 patients. A meta-analysis showed statistically significant higher odds of developing complications in the cast group [odds ratio (OR), 4.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-14.35)]. Functional outcome in OMAS did not vary significantly at 6 weeks, mean difference (MD) - 6.64 (95% CI - 13.72 to + 0.45), and at 12 weeks, MD - 6.91 (95% CI - 18.73 to + 4.91). The mean difference of functional outcome in OMAS at 26 weeks or longer was significantly better in the removable orthosis group; MD - 2.63 (95% CI - 5.01 to - 0.25). CONCLUSION: Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that a removable orthosis is a safe alternative type of NOM, as complication numbers are significantly lower in the orthosis group. In addition, no statistically significant differences were found in terms of functional outcome between a removable orthosis and a cast at 6 and 12 weeks. The 6-week and the 26-week OMAS results show that in patients with stable type B ankle fractures, a removable orthosis is non-inferior to a cast in terms of functional outcome.
Subject(s)
Ankle Fractures , Ankle Injuries , Adult , Humans , Ankle Fractures/therapy , Ankle , Orthotic Devices , Braces , Ankle Injuries/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore the experiences from the period after the choice was made for palliative, non-operative management for geriatric patients with a hip fracture, to the most important factors in the process, as reported by a proxy. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews were conducted between 1 August 2020 and 1 April 2021 to investigate by-proxy reported patient experiences of non-operative management after hip fracture. Interviews followed a topic guide, recorded and transcribed per word. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes in the data. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients were retrospectively identified from the electronic patient record. Relatives (proxies) of the patients who underwent palliative, non-operative management were contacted and were asked to participate in a semistructured interview and were named participants. The participants were proxies of the patients since patients were expected to be deceased during the timing of the interview. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were considered eligible for inclusion in this study. The median age of the patients was 88 years (IQR 83-94). The 90-day mortality rate was 92.3%, with a median palliative care period of 11 days (IQR 4-26). A total of 19 participants were subjected to the interview. After thematic analysis, four recurring themes were identified: (1) the decision-making process, (2) pain experience, (3) patient-relative interaction and (4) the active dying. CONCLUSIONS: With the introduction of shared decision-making in an acute setting for geriatric patients with hip fracture, proxies reported palliative, non-operative management as an acceptable and adequate option for patients with high risk of adverse outcomes after surgery. The emerged themes in palliative care for patients with hip fracture show great similarity with severe end-stage disease palliative care, with pain identified as the most important factor influencing comfort of the patient and their environment after hip fracture. Future research should focus on further improving targeted analgesia for these patients focusing on acute pain caused by the fracture.
