What Does Your PROMIS Score Mean? Improving the Utility of Patient-Reported Outcomes at the Point of Care.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. OBJECTIVES: Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has been validated for lumbar spine. Use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures can improve clinical decision making and health literacy at the point of care. Use of PROMIS, however, has been limited in part because clinicians and patients lack plain language understanding of the meaning of scores and it remains unclear how best to use them at the point of care. The purpose was to develop plain language descriptions to apply to PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) scores and to assess patient understanding and preferences in presentation of their individualized PRO information. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected PROMIS PF v1.2 and PI v1.1 for patients presenting to a tertiary spine center for back/lower extremity complaints was performed. Patients with missing scores, standard error >0.32, and assessments with <4 or >12 questions were excluded. Scores were categorized into score groups, specifically PROMIS PF groups were: <18, 20 ± 2, 25 ± 2, 30 ± 2, 35 ± 2, 40 ± 2, 45 ± 2, 50 ± 2, 55 ± 2, 60 ± 2, and >62; and PROMIS PI groups were: <48, 50 ± 2, 55 ± 2, 60 ± 2, 65 ± 2, 70 ± 2, 75 ± 2, 80 ± 2, and >82. Representative questions and answers from the PROMIS PI and PROMIS PF were selected for each score group, where questions with <25 assessments or representing <15% of assessments were excluded. Two fellowship-trained spine surgeons further trimmed the questions to create a streamlined clinical tool using a consensus process. Plain language descriptions for PROMIS PF were then used in a prospective assessment of 100 consecutive patients. Patient preference for consuming the score data was recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 12 712 assessments/5524 unique patients were included for PF and 14 823 assessments/6582 unique patients for PI. More than 90% of assessments were completed in 4 questions. The number of assessments and patients per scoring group were normally distributed. The mean PF score was 37.2 ± 8.2 and the mean PI was 63.3 ± 7.4. Plain language descriptions and compact clinical tool was were generated. Prospectively 100 consecutive patients were surveyed for their preference in receiving their T-score versus plain language description versus graphical presentation. A total of 78% of patients found receiving personalized PRO data helpful, while only 1% found this specifically not helpful. Overall, 80% of patients found either graphical or plain language more helpful than T-score alone, and half of these preferred plain language and graphical descriptions together. In total, 89% of patients found the plain language descriptions to be accurate. CONCLUSIONS: Patients at the point of care are interested in receiving the results of their PRO measures. Plain language descriptions of PROMIS scores enhance patient understanding of PROMIS numerical scores. Patients preferred plain language and/or graphical representation rather than a numerical score alone. While PROs are commonly used for assessing outcomes in research, use at point of care is a growing interest and this study clarifies how they might be utilized in physician-patient communication.

Cost analysis of primary single-level lumbar discectomies using the Value Driven Outcomes database in a large academic center.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Improving value is an established point of emphasis to reduce the rapidly rising health care costs in the United States. Back pain is a major driver of costs with a substantial fraction caused by lumbar radiculopathy. The most common surgical treatment for lumbar radiculopathy is microdiscectomy. Research is sparse regarding variables driving cost in microdiscectomies and often limited by cost data derived from payer-based Medicare data. PURPOSE: To identify targets for cost reduction by determining variables associated with significant cost variation in microdiscectomies, using cost data derived from the Value Driven Outcomes tool and actual system costs. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective study of prospectively collected registry data. PATIENT SAMPLE: Six hundred twenty-two patients identified by CPT code and manually screened for initial, unilateral, single-level lumbar discectomy performed between 2014 and 2018 at a single institution. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures include total direct cost, clinical length of stay, and OR minutes. Total Direct Cost was further differentiated into facility and nonfacility costs. METHODS: Univariate and multivariate generalized linear models (GLM) were used to identify variables associated with variation in primary outcome measures. Costs were normalized by mean cost for patients with normal body mass index (BMI) and a healthy American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification. Average marginal effects were reported as percentage of normalized costs. RESULTS: Advanced age, male gender, Hispanic, black, unemployment, obesity, higher ASA class, insurance status, and being retired were positively associated with costs in univariate analysis. Asian, Native American, outpatient procedures, and being a student were associated with decreases in costs. In multivariate analysis, we found that obesity led to higher average marginal total direct (9%), total facility (15%), and facility OR costs (22%), as well as 24 more OR minutes per surgery. While being overweight was not associated with greater total direct costs, it was associated with higher total facility (8%), and facility OR costs (12%), with 11 more OR minutes per surgery. Age was associated with a longer LOS but not with OR costs. As expected, outpatient surgical costs, LOS, and OR time were significantly lower than inpatient procedures. Severe systematic disease was associated with greater total and nonfacility costs. In addition, Medicare patients had higher facility costs (14%) compared to privately insured patients. CONCLUSIONS: Significant drivers of total direct cost in multivariate GLM analysis were obesity, severe systemic disease and inpatient surgery. Average LOS was increased due to age and inpatient status, conversely it was decreased by unemployment and retirement. Significant variables in OR time were male sex, Hispanic race and both obese and overweight BMIs.

Predictors of Readmission and Prolonged Length of Stay After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess which factors increase risk of readmission within 30 days of surgery or prolonged length of stay (LOS) (≥2 days) after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several studies have shown noninferiority at mid- and long-term outcomes after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion ACDF, but few have evaluated short-term outcomes regarding risk of readmission or prolonged LOS after surgery. METHODS: Demographics, comorbidities, operative details, postoperative complications, and perioperative outcomes were collected for patients undergoing single level CDA in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Patients with prolonged LOS, defined as >2 days, and readmission within 30 days following CDA were identified. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for prolonged LOS and readmission. RESULTS: A total of 3221 patients underwent single level CDA. Average age was 45.6 years (range 19-82) and 53% of patients were male. A total of 472 (14.7%) experienced a prolonged LOS and 36 (1.1%) patients were readmitted within 30 days following surgery. Predictors of readmission were postoperative superficial wound infection (odds ratio [OR] = 73.83, P < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (OR = 1.98, P = 0.048), and body mass index (BMI) (OR = 1.06, P = 0.02). Female sex (OR = 1.76, P < 0.001), diabetes (OR = 1.50, P = 0.024), postoperative wound dehiscence (OR = 13.11, P = 0.042), ASA class (OR = 1.43, P < 0.01), and operative time (OR = 1.01, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with prolonged LOS. CONCLUSION: From a nationwide database analysis of 3221 patients, wound complications are predictors of both prolonged LOS and readmission. Patient comorbidities, including diabetes, higher ASA classification, female sex, and higher BMI also increased risk of prolonged LOS or readmission.Level of Evidence: 3.

The Impact of Preoperative Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Postoperative Outcomes in Lumbar Spine Degenerative Disease: 3-Month and 12-Month Results of a Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported inpatient and 30-day postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of a controlled, noncrossover pilot study using preoperative mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) training for lumbar spine surgery. Our goal here was to assess 3-month and 12-month postoperative PROs of preoperative MBSR in lumbar spine surgery for degenerative disease. METHODS: Intervention group participants were prospectively enrolled in a preoperative online MBSR course. A comparison standard care only group was one-to-one matched retrospectively by age, sex, surgery type, and prescription opioid use. Three-month and 12-month postoperative PROs for pain, disability, quality of life, and opioid use were compared within and between groups. Regression models were used to assess whether MBSR use predicted outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-four participants were included in each group. At 3 months, follow-up was 87.5% and 95.8% in the comparison and intervention groups, respectively. In the intervention group, mean Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) was significantly higher, whereas mean Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) and Oswestry Disability Index were significantly lower. The change from baseline in mean PROMIS-PF and PROMIS-PI was significantly greater than in the comparison group. At 12 months, follow-up was 58.3% and 83.3% in the comparison and intervention groups, respectively. In the intervention group, mean PROMIS-PI was significantly lower and change in mean PROMIS-PI from baseline was significantly greater. MBSR use was a significant predictor of change in PROMIS-PF at 3 months and in PROMIS-PI at 12 months. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Three-month and 12-month results suggest that preoperative MBSR may have pain control benefits in lumbar spine surgery.

The impact of the lordosis distribution index on failure after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Proximal junctional failure (PFJ) is a common and dreaded complication of adult spinal deformity. Previous research has identified parameters associated with the development of PJF and the search for radiographic and clinical variables continues in an effort to decrease the incidence of PFJ. The lordosis distribution index (LDI) is a parameter not based on pelvic incidence. Ideal values for LDI have been established in prior literature with demonstrated association with PJF. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is compare PJF and mechanical failure rates between patients with ideal and nonideal LDI cohort. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective, single-center case-controlled study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients who underwent surgical treatment for spinal deformity as defined by the SRS-Schwab criteria between 2001 and 2016 were included. Furthermore, fusion constructs spanned at least four vertebral segments with the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) T9 or caudal. Patients who were under the age of 18, those with radiographic data less than 1 year, and those with neoplastic or trauma etiologies were excluded. Prior thoracolumbar spine surgery was not an exclusion criterion. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures were physiologic in nature: The primary outcome was defined as PFJ. The International Spine Study Group (ISSG) definition for PJF was used, which includes postoperative fracture of the UIV or UIV+1, instrumentation failure at UIV, PJA increase greater than 15° from preoperative baseline or extension of the construct needed within 6 months. Secondary outcomes included extension of the construct after 6 months or revision due to instrumentation failure, pseudarthrosis or distal junctional failure. METHODS: A portion of this project was funded through National Institute of Health Grant 5UL1TR001067-05. The authors have no conflict of interest related to this study. The records of patients meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed. Clinical and radiographic data were extracted and analyzed. Univariate cox proportional hazard models were used to identify factors associated with mechanical failure and included in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: There were 187 patients that met the inclusion criteria. Univariate analysis demonstrated the number of levels fused, instrumentation to the sacrum or pelvis, PI-LL difference between pre- and postoperative states, T1-SPI, T9-SPI, and postoperative LDI (treated as a continuous variable). When LDI was treated as a categorical variable using an LDI cutoff of less than 0.5 for hypolordotic, 0.5 to 0.8 for aligned and greater than 0.8 for hyperlordotic, there was no difference in failure rates between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar lordosis is an important parameter in adult deformity. However, the LDI is an imperfect variable and previously developed categories did not show differences in failure rates in this cohort.

Outcomes of Nonsurgical Treatments for Symptomatic Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of nonsurgical treatments in symptomatic adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS). DESIGN: A systematic literature review. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library were searched to identify research published since 1988. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies were eligible if they featured symptomatic ADS patients aged ≥50 who received nonsurgical treatment. Minimum follow-up was six weeks, and outcomes of interest were pain, disability, quality of life, and Cobb angle. Evidence quality per intervention was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: Six studies were included. Of these, four focused specifically on injections, bracing, or yoga; two involved multiple treatments. One RCT provided evidence for greater effectiveness of transforaminal epidural steroid injection over anesthetic alone in reducing radiating pain and disability. Two single-group retrospective cohort studies lent support for bracing to slow curve progression. One retrospective single-group cohort study suggested an association between yoga and reduced curve progression. Evidence for injections to reduce ADS symptoms was rated as low quality; evidence for bracing and yoga was rated as very low quality. No specific evidence was identified regarding other treatments, including physical therapy and analgesics. CONCLUSIONS: Literature describing the effectiveness of nonoperative treatments in symptomatic ADS is scarce. The quantity and quality of the evidence regarding injections, bracing, and yoga are insufficient to advise for or against the use of these methods to improve outcomes in symptomatic ADS. For these and other nonoperative treatment forms, further research is needed.

Examining the relationship between epidural steroid injections and patient satisfaction.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Hospitals and policy makers have placed increasing importance on patient satisfaction with medical care. Minimal research exists on patient satisfaction in the context of epidural steroid injections (ESIs) for radicular pain. PURPOSE: Describe patient satisfaction with ESIs for the treatment of radicular pain and identify patient demographic and clinical characteristics associated with patient satisfaction. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This was a retrospective study conducted at a large, academic medical center. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of prospectively collected registry data including patients treated with ESIs from August 2006 to May 2018. The primary outcomes were: overall Press Ganey (PG) score, patient satisfaction with the physician, and likelihood to recommend both the physician and the practice. Age, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, immediate change in pain, sex, spinal segmental level of injection, prior opioid use, insurance status, and ethnicity were compared with the four PG measures of satisfaction using both univariable and multivariable regression analysis. No sources of funding were used for this project. The authors report no conflict of interest in relation to this manuscript. RESULTS: Two-hundred ninety patients underwent 377 injections. Overall, patients were highly satisfied; 86% recommend their physician and 85% recommend the practice, each with the highest possible PG score. The median overall PG score was 97.2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 89.3, 100), and the median physician satisfaction score was 100 (IQR: 95, 100). The median immediate reduction in pain was 3 points (IQR: -5,-2) on the numerical rating scale scale postinjection. Increased age was associated with increased satisfaction with the physician (reported rate ratios [Relative Risk (RR)] for dissatisfaction: 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58, 0.93, p=.011) and increased likelihood to recommend the physician (odds ratio: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.06, 2.01, p=.022) in multivariable analysis. Medicare as opposed to private insurance was associated with higher dissatisfaction with the physician (RR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.15, 3.61, p=.014) and decreased likelihood to recommend the practice (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.94, p=.037). CONCLUSIONS: The present data, based on PG scores, demonstrated that ESIs are associated with greater patient satisfaction with increasing age, but lower satisfaction in patients with Medicare compared with private insurance when controlling for other demographic factors. Satisfaction was not associated with the degree of pain relief.

Coagulation Laboratory Testing Is Predictive of Wound Complications Following Microdiscectomy.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether abnormal preoperative testing is associated with postoperative complications in patients undergoing a microdiscectomy. METHODS: Patients undergoing a microdiscectomy between 2006 and 2013 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database based on appropriate current procedural terminology coding. Thirty-day postoperative complications were analyzed in addition to patient demographics, comorbidities, and abnormal preoperative laboratory values. A series of over 650 univariate analyses to determine which independent variables to include for each complication were completed. Based on those analyses, 12 logistic regression models were built, one for each specific complication. Each model adjusted for age, gender, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, as well as operative time. RESULTS: A total of 5947 patients undergoing a microdiscectomy were included in the study. Abnormal preoperative international normalized ratio (odds ratio [OR] = 5.85, P < .05) was associated with any wound infection, superficial or deep, and abnormal partial thromboplastin time was significantly associated with wound dehiscence (OR = 6.80, P < .05). Postoperative urinary tract infections were associated with abnormal preoperative hematocrit (OR = 8.00, P < .05). None of the identified preoperative labs were independently associated with pulmonary embolism, organ space surgical site infections, or intubation. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal preoperative coagulation labs were significantly associated with postoperative wound complications. However, the majority of tests were not associated with adverse events following microdiscectomy. Further study is necessary to conclude whether these tests provide information that can modify perioperative management and whether widespread testing is cost-effective.

The Impact of Preoperative Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Postoperative Patient-Reported Pain, Disability, Quality of Life, and Prescription Opioid Use in Lumbar Spine Degenerative Disease: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Prescription opioid medications negatively affect postoperative outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. Furthermore, opioid-related overdose death rates in the United States increased by 200% between 2000 and 2014. Thus, alternatives are imperative. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), a mind-body therapy, has been associated with improved activity and mood in opioid-using patients with chronic pain. This study assessed whether preoperative MBSR is an effective adjunct to standard postoperative care in adult patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery for degenerative disease. METHODS: The intervention group underwent a preoperative online MBSR course. The comparison group was matched retrospectively in a 1:1 ratio by age, sex, type of surgery, and preoperative opioid use. Prescription opioid use during hospital admission and at 30 days postoperatively were compared with preoperative use. Thirty-day postoperative patient-reported outcomes for pain, disability, and quality of life were compared with preoperative patient-reported outcomes. Dose-response effect of mindfulness courses was assessed using Mindful Attention Awareness Scale scores. RESULTS: In this pilot study, 24 participants were included in each group. Most intervention patients (70.83%) completed 1 session, and the mean Mindful Attention Awareness Scale score was 4.28 ± 0.71 during hospital admission. At 30 days, mean visual analog scale back pain score was lower in the intervention group (P = 0.004) but other patient-reported outcomes did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: During hospital admission, no significant dose-response effect of mindfulness techniques was found. At 30 days postoperatively, MBSR use was associated with less back pain. Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness of preoperative MBSR on postoperative outcomes in lumbar spine surgery for degenerative disease.

Trends in Lumbar Fusion Procedure Rates and Associated Hospital Costs for Degenerative Spinal Diseases in the United States, 2004 to 2015.

STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of National Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2004 to 2015. OBJECTIVE: Describe recent trends in US rates of lumbar fusion procedures and associated costs, by surgical indication. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal fusion is appropriate for spinal deformity and instability, but evidence of effectiveness is limited for primary disc herniation and spinal stenosis without instability. It remains controversial for treatment of axial pain secondary to degenerative disc disease. There are potential non-instability, non-deformity indications for fusion surgery, including but not limited to severe foraminal stenosis and third-time disc herniation. METHODS: Elective lumber fusion trends were reported using Poisson regression, grouped by indication as degenerative scoliosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, disc herniation, and disc degeneration. Generalize linear regression was used to estimate trends in hospital costs, adjusted for age, sex, indication, comorbidity, and inflation. RESULTS: Volume of elective lumbar fusion increased 62.3% (or 32.1% per 100,000 US adults), from 122,679 cases (60.4 per 100,000) in 2004 to 199,140 (79.8 per 100,000) in 2015. Increases were greatest among age 65 or older, increasing 138.7% by volume (73.2% by rate), from 98.3 per 100,000 (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.2, 99.3) in 2004 to 170.3 (95% CI 169.2, 171.5) in 2015. Although the largest increases were for spondylolisthesis (+47,390 operations, 111%) and scoliosis (+16,129 operations, 186.6%), disc degeneration, herniation, and stenosis combined to accounted for 42.3% of total elective lumbar fusions in 2015. Aggregate hospital costs increased 177% during these 12 years, exceeding $10 billion in 2015, and averaging more than $50,000 per admission. CONCLUSION: While the prevalence of spinal pathologies is not known, the rate of elective lumbar fusion surgery in the United States increased most for spondylolisthesis and scoliosis, indications with relatively good evidence of effectiveness. The proportion of fusions coded for indications with less evidence of effectiveness has slightly decreased in the most recent years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Fenestrated Screws Augmented With PMMA Increase the Pullout Strength of Sacral Pedicle Screws.

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanics. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the fixation in osteoporotic specimens of a bicortical sacral pedicle screw to the following constructs: a unicortical solid screw augmented with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) (TRACT), a unicortical fenestrated screw augmented with PMMA (FEN), and a bicortical screw/sacral alar screw combination (PED/ALA). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Rigid posterior sacral fixation of osteoporotic spines is problematic due to poor bone quality. Options to improve fixation include bicortical or tricortical screw trajectory, addition of S2 alar screws, or PMMA augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven osteoporotic cadaveric sacra were potted in 2-part filler compound. As a baseline fixation method, a 6.5-mm bicortical pedicle screw was placed into 1 pedicle of each sacra. The contralateral side was randomly assigned to receive a unicortical fenestrated 6.5-mm pedicle screw augmented with PMMA, a unicortical solid 6.5-mm pedicle screw augmented with PMMA, or a bicortical pedicle screw/alar screw construct. Pedicle screws were failed in cantilever pullout using a materials testing machine. Data were normalized into a test index by taking the ratio of the test screw pullout strength to the intraspecimen bicortical control screw pullout strength. RESULTS: The fixation strengths as expressed by the test index of the TRACT, FEN, and PED/ALA groups were 101%, 157%, and 167%, respectively. Although there was no statistical difference detected between the FEN and PED/ALA groups, the TRACT group had a trend toward lower pullout strength than the FEN (P=0.06) or PED/ALA (0.06) groups. Although underpowered, this study did not detect biomechanical inferiority for any of the 3 test configurations when compared with standard bicortical S1 screws. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that the fixation strength of a fenestrated, PMMA-augmented construct or a combined S1 pedicle/S2 alar screw construct may be better than either standard bicortical or unicortical PMMA screw-tract augmented screws.

Remote Cerebellar Hemorrhage after Revision Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Study Design Case report. Objective To report a case of remote cerebellar hemorrhage (RCH) without intraoperative dural tear after revision lumbar spine surgery. RCH is a rare postoperative complication following spine surgery. RCH has previously been reported only in cases with intraoperative dural tear or durotomy. Methods Case report and literature review. Results A 58-year-old woman underwent removal of L4-S1 posterior spinal instrumented fusion (PSIF) implants and L3-L4 decompressive laminectomy with PSIF. There was no intraoperative dural tear. After doing well initially, the patient developed new neurologic symptoms and was found to have RCH. Lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a large dural defect. After repair of the dura, the patient had dramatic improvement of her neurologic symptoms. At 1-year follow-up, the patient continued to have no neurologic sequelae. Conclusion This report demonstrates that RCH can occur without intraoperative dural tear. Although rare, any patient with new onset of declining neurologic symptoms following spine surgery should have a brain MRI and should have RCH on the differential diagnosis.

The Fate of L5-S1 With Low-Dose BMP-2 and Pelvic Fixation, With or Without Interbody Fusion, in Adult Deformity Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative case series. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate L5-S1 fusion rates when lower dose of bone morphogenic protein-2 (BMP-2) (average 3.2 mg) and pelvic fixation were used, with or without interbody fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pseudarthrosis at L5-S1 is one of the most common complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult deformity surgery. Strategies for decreasing pseudarthrosis include interbody fusion, use of BMP-2 at the lumbosacral junction, and the use of sacropelvic fixation, individually or in combination. High-dose BMP-2 (20-40 mg) placed posterolaterally has shown comparable fusion rates with interbody fusion. METHODS: Retrospective review of 61 consecutive patients with minimum 2-year follow-up at a single institution. All patients had an isolated posterior approach, 5 or more levels fused including L5-S1, use of pelvic fixation, and no prior L5-S1 procedures. The patients were divided in 2 groups for comparison on the basis of the use of an interbody cage/fusion at the L5-S1 level. Revision rates and implant-related complications were also reported. RESULTS: The fusion rate at L5-S1 was 97% (59/61), with no difference between the interbody and no interbody fusion groups (97% vs. 96%, P = 1.0). There were no significant differences in the radiographical parameters or deformity correction between the groups. The mean amount of BMP-2 used in the interbody group was 4.1 mg (2-10), 2.5 mg (0-8) in the disc space, and 1.6 mg (0-4) in the interbody cage, whereas there was no difference in the amount of recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 placed posterolaterally between the 2 groups (interbody fusion = 1.6 vs. non-interbody fusion = 2.0 mg, P = 0.08) along with autograft and allograft. The overall revision rate for L5-S1 nonunion was 1.6%. CONCLUSION: The use of low dose of BMP-2 at the L5-S1 level in combination with sacropelvic fixation achieved satisfactory fusion rates in adult deformity surgery. No additional benefit was encountered by adding an interbody cage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Predictive factors for acute proximal junctional failure after adult deformity surgery with upper instrumented vertebrae in the thoracolumbar spine.

Study Type Retrospective cohort study. Introduction Acute proximal junctional failure (APJF) was recently defined by the International Spine Study Group as: postoperative fracture of the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) or UIV + 1; UIV implant failure; proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) increase > 15 degrees; or need for proximal extension of the fusion within 6 months of surgery.1 The incidence and revision rates of APJF have been reported to be higher when the UIV is located in the lower thoracolumbar (TL) spine mostly because of high incidence of UIV or UIV + 1 fractures.2 Sagittal deformity overcorrection has been considered as a potential risk factor.34 Objective The purpose of this study is to assess independent predictive factors and timing for revisions of APJF in adult deformity patients with UIV in the TL (T9-L2) spine. Methods Retrospective review of 135 consecutive patients with minimum 2-year follow-up, treated at a single institution for adult spinal deformity, all with UIV in the TL spine (T9-L2). Fusions were divided into three cohorts based on the UIV location (T9-T10 vs. T11-T12 vs. L1-L2). Demographic data were reviewed and radiographic parameters were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, at 6 months and at the final follow-up. Incidence and failure modes of APJF, as well as timing for APJF revision are reported. Risk factors for APJF were assessed with univariate and multivariate regression analysis models. Results A total of 135 consecutive patients were reviewed, with mean follow-up 42 months (24-126). Mean age was 66 years (24-86). There were no differences in the preoperative radiographic parameters between patients in any of the three cohorts with APJF. The incidence of APJF was 38.5%, with a trend toward higher APJF in the T9-T10 group (p = 0.07) (Table 1). When UIV was at T10, the incidence of APJF was 57.1%, significantly higher than the adjacent vertebrae, T9 and T11 (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01, respectively). The overall revision rate for APJF was 17%, most often for UIV fracture, while PJK > 15 degrees alone had the highest 2 and 5 years survival (100%) (Fig. 1). Univariate analysis revealed preoperative sagittal vertical axis > 5 cm, postoperative PJA > 5 degrees and thoracic kyphosis > 30 degrees, and instrumentation to the pelvis as risk factors for APJF (Table 2). Multivariate regression analysis confirmed postoperative PJA > 5 degrees, and greater correction of lumbar lordosis (LL) as independent risk factors for APJF (Table 3). Conclusion The incidence of APJF in adult deformity patients is high if the UIV is in the lower thoracic or lumbar spine, with a trend toward higher rates when the UIV is at T10. Fracture at the UIV lead to the highest revision rate, while PJK > 15 degrees without fracture or hardware failure had the longest revision-free survival. Postoperative PJA > 5 degrees and greater correction of LL are independent risk factors for APJF.

Retroperitoneal lymphocele after anterior spinal surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Case report; Review of Literature. OBJECTIVE: To present an uncommon complication after anterior lumbar surgery as well as a treatment option and a review of the literature. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A number of complications have been reported after anterior lumbar surgery. Common complications include vascular, ureteral, and neurologic injuries. The development of a retroperitoneal lymphocele has been previously been described, but details regarding evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment options are lacking in the literature. METHODS: The case of a single patient with a postoperative retroperitoneal lymphocele was identified and retrospectively reviewed. Permission was obtained from the patient to review and publish this information. A review of literature on lymphoceles and anterior lumbar complications was also performed using PubMed and Ovid databases. RESULTS: A 76-year-old woman underwent anterior interbody fusion from L2-L3-L4-L5, followed by posterior T11-L5 fusion for degenerative scoliosis and spinal stenosis. Six weeks after surgery, she presented with severe abdominal pain, nausea, and emesis. Examination revealed a retroperitoneal lymphocele, which was confirmed after aspiration. The patient was treated with a laparoscopic marsupialization procedure without recurrence. At 12 months, the patient had no further abdominal symptoms, noted improvements in back and leg pain scores, and had stable radiographic findings. CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneal lymphocele is a rare complication after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. The different diagnosis should include infectious abscess, ureteral injury with urinoma, pancreatic injury with pseudocyst formation, and spinal fluid leak with pseudomeningocele. Diagnosis can be guided by serum and cyst fluid analysis. Although treatment options exist, surgical treatment may provide the most reliable results.