A rare case of giant cell lung carcinoma with intracardiac extension via the pulmonary vein and thrombus formation.

A 61-year-old man presented with dyspnea, left thoracic pain and productive cough. Chest computed tomography demonstrated a solid mass of the left upper lobe, 2.9 × 1.8 cm2 in size, which had irregular borders and appeared to infiltrate and totally occlude the upper left pulmonary vein extending up to the left atrium (LA) with thrombus formation. The patient underwent median sternotomy and left pneumonectomy, combined with LA thrombus resection under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with bicaval cannulation. The LA was partially resected and the intracavitary thrombus was completely removed. The surgical margins were free of tumor cells. Episodes of embolism were not observed during surgery. The patient was successfully weaned from CPB. The postoperative course was uncomplicated. Pathological examination of the resected specimen revealed giant cell carcinoma.

Deep accidental hypothermia accompanied with cardiac arrest after alcohol and drug poisoning treated with extracorporeal life support.

Deep accidental hypothermia is an unusual clinical entity in developed countries. We report a case of a 30 year old male Caucasian patient with accidental severe hypothermia who was transferred to the emergency department of our hospital after prolonged exposure in the urban city's night environment cold as a result of alcohol and drugs abuse. The patient was found unconscious in the first early hours from onlookers. The time that the patient remained unconscious is unknown. During the transfer to the hospital because of cardiac arrest cardiopulmonary resuscitation began. In the emergency department an extracorporeal life support system (ECLS) was implanted under cardiopulmonary resuscitation in order to achieve hemodynamic stabilization and rapid and safe rewarming. The patient's rewarming lasted 6 hours. The patient was extubated the next day.

In elective arch surgery with circulatory arrest, does the arterial cannulation site really matter? A propensity score analysis of right axillary and innominate artery cannulation.

OBJECTIVE: The preferred arterial cannulation site for elective proximal aortic procedures requiring circulatory arrest varies, and different sites have been tried. We evaluated the relationships between arterial cannulation site and adverse outcomes, including stroke, in patients undergoing elective aortic arch surgery. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 938 patients who underwent elective hemiarch or total arch surgery with circulatory arrest between 2006 and 2016. Five cannulation sites were used: the right axillary (n = 515; 54.9%), innominate (n = 376; 40.1%), and right common carotid arteries (n = 15; 1.6%), each with a side graft; the ascending aorta (n = 19; 2.0%); and the femoral artery (n = 13; 1.4%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to model the effects of cannulation site on adverse outcomes for the entire cohort and for a subcohort of 891 patients who underwent innominate or axillary artery cannulation. Propensity-matching yielded 564 patients (282 pairs) from the right axillary and innominate artery groups. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, mortality, stroke, and composite adverse outcome (operative death or persistent stroke or renal failure at hospital discharge) rates were 7.0%, 4.1%, and 9.8%. In the multivariable analysis of the axillary/innominate subcohort, cannulation site did not independently predict operative mortality, persistent stroke, or composite adverse event. These results were confirmed with the propensity-matched analysis, where both axillary and innominate artery cannulation provided equivalent composite adverse event rates, operative death rates, and overall stroke rates. CONCLUSIONS: During elective arch surgery, right axillary artery cannulation and innominate artery cannulation (both via a side graft) produce excellent results and can be used interchangeably.

Management of expanding aortic arch aneurysm after hybrid endovascular and debranching repair.

Hybrid procedures are used to treat aneurysms of the transverse aortic arch (TAA), combining debranching of the brachiocephalic vessels with endovascular approaches. Continued enlargement of the aneurysmal sac is a late complication. A 60-year-old man presented with an expanding transverse aortic arch aneurysm after prior hybrid repair and underwent left posterolateral thoracotomy, partial excision of the previous stent graft and replacement with an interposition graft.

Successful treatment of postoperative massive pulmonary embolism with paradoxal arterial embolism through extracorporeal life support and thrombolysis.

Pulmonary embolism is a common clinical entity related to high mortality. About 200,000 to 300,000 patients die every year due to pulmonary embolism. The purpose of this article is to describe a case of a patient who on the second postoperative day after undergoing thromboembolectomy of the left femoral artery, manifested a massive pulmonary embolism. Due to cardiorespiratory collapse a combined treatment via extracorporeal life support (ECLS) and parallel catheter thrombolysis was decided and performed. By cardiorespiratory improvement and final stabilization the patient was successfully weaned from ECLS and the system was successfully removed. After a reasonable postoperative time the patient was dismissed in good overall condition.

Open descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic approaches for complications of endovascular aortic procedures: 19-year experience.

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular aortic repair is increasingly being used to treat aneurysms, dissections, and traumatic injuries, despite its unknown long-term durability. We describe our 19-year experience with open descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repair after endovascular aortic repair. METHODS: Between 1996 and 2015, 67 patients were treated with open distal arch, descending thoracic, or thoracoabdominal aortic repair, or extra-anatomic bypass repair with aortic extirpation for complications after endovascular repair of the thoracic (n = 45, 67%) or abdominal (n = 22, 33%) aorta. The median interval between procedures was 18.0 months (interquartile range, 3.9-44.9). Indications for open repair included expanding aneurysm (n = 56), infection (n = 11), fistula (n = 8), aneurysm rupture (n = 5), pseudoaneurysm (n = 2), and restenosis (n = 1). Open repair involved partial (n = 9, 13%) or complete (n = 56, 84%) device removal or device salvage (n = 2, 3%) through a thoracoabdominal (n = 58, 87%) or thoracotomy (n = 9, 13%) incision. Eight patients (12%) underwent emergency procedures. RESULTS: There were 3 early (operative) deaths (2 with preoperative device infection) and 19 late deaths during a median follow-up of 35.8 months (interquartile range, 16.8-52.8 months). Overall 1- and 5-year survivals were 85% ± 4% and 60% ± 8%, respectively. Four patients had open repair failures necessitating reoperation; 2 patients had preoperative infection, and both died (1 early and 1 late). CONCLUSIONS: Open repair for complications after endovascular procedures is not uncommon. Experienced centers can yield acceptable outcomes, especially in patients without infection. Close surveillance is mandatory after endovascular aortic repair.

Are outcomes of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair different in men versus women? A propensity-matched comparison.

OBJECTIVE: Women fare worse than men after many cardiovascular operations, including coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery. We sought to determine whether sex affects outcomes after open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: We evaluated data on 3353 consecutive patients (1281 women, 38.2%) who underwent open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair between October 1986 and July 2015. We compared preoperative characteristics, surgical variables, and outcomes between men and women in the overall group. A propensity-matching analysis was performed to adjust for preoperative and intraoperative differences. A multivariable analysis was conducted to identify predictors of poor outcomes using relevant preoperative and intraoperative factors. RESULTS: Men had a significantly higher prevalence of comorbid conditions, including coronary artery disease, and presented more often with dissection; women were slightly older than men (median age, 69 [62-74] years vs 67 [57-73] years; P < .001) and more often symptomatic. Men underwent extent II and IV repairs more often, whereas women more often had extent I and III repairs. The propensity analysis resulted in 958 matched pairs. Overall, women and men had similar early mortality (7.9% vs 7.2%, P = .5) and adverse event rates (14.8% vs 14.1%, P = .6), which were similar in propensity-matched groups. Multivariable analysis showed that predictors of operative death and adverse event differed between the sexes. Survival and freedom from repair failure were similar between the overall and matched groups. CONCLUSIONS: Men and women who undergo thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair have similar outcomes, but there are important differences in several perioperative factors and predictors of poor outcomes.

Repair of Intrapericardial Diaphragmatic Hernia during Aortic Surgery in a 78-Year-Old Woman.

Intrapericardial diaphragmatic hernias are reported very rarely. Those of congenital origin are most often diagnosed in neonates, and those caused by indirect blunt trauma occur chiefly in adults. The latter type can be asymptomatic; however, the results of a computed tomographic scan can yield a definitive diagnosis. Once discovered, these hernias should be corrected to avoid severe sequelae such as bowel strangulation and necrosis, peritonitis, mediastinitis, and cardiac tamponade. We report the case of a 78-year-old woman who presented for elective ascending aortic aneurysm repair. Computed tomographic angiograms incidentally revealed a large intrapericardial diaphragmatic hernia, which had probably developed years earlier, after a traffic accident. The patient underwent a median sternotomy and repair of the intrapericardial diaphragmatic hernia with use of a bovine pericardial patch, followed by ascending aortic and hemiarch repair, aortic valve repair, and aorto-right coronary artery bypass grafting. We discuss the details of these procedures and alternative treatment options. To our knowledge, this is the first report of concomitant aortic surgery and repair of a trauma-induced intrapericardial diaphragmatic hernia in an adult.

Aortic root surgery with circulatory arrest: Predictors of prolonged postoperative hospital stay.

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the outcomes of aortic root operations that involve inducing hypothermic circulatory arrest for relatively extensive proximal aortic surgery. We attempted to identify predictors of postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS) and factors that affect postoperative recovery. METHODS: During 2006-2014, 247 of 265 patients (93.2%) with disease extending into the aortic arch survived aortic root operations (206 elective, 41 urgent/emergent) in which hypothermic circulatory arrest with moderate hypothermia was used. Stepwise multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of LOS (as a continuous variable) and prolonged LOS (defined as LOS >9 days, the median for the cohort). By this definition, 111 patients (45%) had prolonged LOS and 136 (55%) did not. RESULTS: Preoperative factors that independently predicted longer LOS in the entire cohort included age (P = .0014), redo sternotomy (P = .0047), and intraoperative packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion (P = .0007). Redo sternotomy and intraoperative PRBC transfusion also predicted longer LOS in 3 subgroup analyses: one of elective cases, one from which total arch replacement procedures were excluded, and one limited to patients who were discharged home. Age predicted longer LOS in the non-total arch (hemiarch) replacement patients. Ventilator support >48 hours (P < .0001) was associated with longer LOS. Elective aortic valve-sparing root replacement predicted a shorter LOS than valve replacement in multivariate regression analysis (P = .028). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing aortic root surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest for disease extending into the aortic arch, reducing intraoperative PRBC transfusion except when absolutely necessary may reduce postoperative LOS and expedite recovery. Performing aortic valve-sparing root replacement, when feasible, may also reduce LOS.

Open aortic surgery after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

In the last decade, thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) has emerged as an appealing alternative to the traditional open aortic aneurysm repair. This is largely due to generally improved early outcomes associated with TEVAR, including lower perioperative mortality and morbidity. However, it is relatively common for patients who undergo TEVAR to need a secondary intervention. In select circumstances, these secondary interventions are performed as an open procedure. Although it is difficult to assess the rate of open repairs after TEVAR, the rates in large series of TEVAR cases (>300) have ranged from 0.4 to 7.9 %. Major complications of TEVAR that typically necessitates open distal aortic repair (i.e., repair of the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta) include endoleak (especially type I), aortic fistula, endograft infection, device collapse or migration, and continued expansion of the aneurysm sac. Conversion to open repair of the distal aorta may be either elective (as for many endoleaks) or emergent (as for rupture, retrograde complicated dissection, malperfusion, and endograft infection). In addition, in select patients (e.g., those with a chronic aortic dissection), unrepaired sections of the aorta may progressively dilate, resulting in the need for multiple distal aortic repairs. Open repairs after TEVAR can be broadly classified as full extraction, partial extraction, or full salvage of the stent-graft. Although full and partial stent-graft extraction imply failure of TEVAR, such failure is generally absent in cases where the stent-graft can be fully salvaged. We review the literature regarding open repair after TEVAR and highlight operative strategies.

Endovascular repair for blunt thoracic aortic injury: 11-year outcomes and postoperative surveillance experience.

OBJECTIVE: Surveillance for patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) varies. Annual chest computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is often recommended but concerns about the risks and costs have emerged. The aim of this study was to examine the optimal follow-up frequency based on 11-year outcomes and surveillance experience. METHODS: Seventy-six patients with BTAI received TEVAR from May 2002 to July 2013. Demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, Injury Severity Score (ISS), types, sizes, timing, and outcomes of stent grafts were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: Mean age was 39.7 years (range, 17-85 years); 8 (11%) were women. Mean ISS was 46.2 ± 18.5 (deceased, 61.0 ± 19.2; surviving, 44.2 ± 17.6; P = .023). Technical success was achieved in 71 patients (93.4%). All-cause mortality was 7 (9.2%), 1 (1.3%) of which was related to the procedure. Six were lost to follow-up (8%). To examine the effect of surveillance frequency on outcomes, after excluding the 2 most recent (<1 year) surviving patients, we arbitrarily divided the remaining 61 with stable repairs based on the timing of their follow-up: 36 underwent timely follow-up (within ± 6 months of the scheduled annual visit; clinical examination, CTA, magnetic resonance angiography, and echocardiography); 25 had delayed follow-up (>6 months after scheduled annual visit). No significant differences were found for survival, graft-related complications, need for reintervention, except for postoperative hypertension, which was higher in the first group. All surviving patients had excellent outcomes, with no cerebrovascular accidents, paraplegia, or paraparesis; the median follow-up for both groups was 3 years (interquartile range 2.0-3.5, 1.5-5.4 years). CONCLUSIONS: Midterm outcomes of TEVAR for patients with stable repair after BTAI are excellent, both with timely (1.0-1.5 years) and delayed (>1.5 years) follow-up intervals after a median surveillance period of 3 years. A larger prospective randomized study could lead to a more relaxed, but equally safe surveillance schedule for these patients, lowering risks and costs.

Does the mitral valve prosthesis adversely affect the hemodynamic performance of the aortic valve prosthesis in patients with double valve replacement?

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to examine the possible adverse effect of the mitral valve prosthesis on the hemodynamic performance of the aortic valve prosthesis in patients who have undergone double valve replacement. METHODS: Patients who underwent double valve replacement were matched for age, body surface area, left ventricular function, and size and type of aortic valve prosthesis with patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement. Two types of prosthetic valves were examined: the St Jude Medical mechanical valve (St Jude Medical, St Paul, Minn) and the Hancock II bioprosthesis (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn). Five patients for each size and type of aortic valve prosthesis in the double valve replacement group were matched at 1:2 with patients in the isolated aortic valve replacement group. Only valve sizes 21 to 27 were matched. Hemodynamic assessment of the aortic valve prosthesis was performed by transthoracic echocardiogram before hospital discharge. RESULTS: Matched patients had similar clinical profiles. There were no differences in the systolic gradients, effective aortic valve areas, or flow velocity across the aortic valve prostheses after isolated aortic valve replacement or double valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Early after surgery, the hemodynamic performance of aortic valve prostheses was not affected by the presence of mitral valve prostheses in patients who underwent combined aortic and mitral valve replacement.

Changing pattern of reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting: a 20-year study.

BACKGROUND: Fewer patients are undergoing reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We investigated the prevalence of redo vs primary CABG and previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), changing trends in preoperative risk profiles, and independent predictors of operative death. METHODS: Data on demographic characteristics, preoperative risk factors, and hospital outcomes were collected prospectively for patients undergoing isolated reoperative CABG from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2009. To examine the effect of time on the prevalence of redo CABG cases and previous PCI, we divided patients into four groups: 1990 through 1994, 470; 1995 through 1999, 415; 2000 through 2004, 240; and 2005 through 2009, 79. To examine risk profiles and outcomes, we created two groups: 1990 through 1999, 885; 2000 through 2009, 319. RESULTS: Redo CABG decreased from 7.2% (1990 through 1994) to 2.2% (2005 through 2009). PCI before redo CABG significantly increased from 14.5% (1990 through 1994) to 26.6% (2005 through 2009). Patients with diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and left main disease increased. In-hospital mortality did not change significantly, but postoperative low cardiac output syndrome dropped. Age (odds ratio [OR], 1.04), peripheral vascular disease (OR, 2), congestive heart failure (OR, 5.8), and preoperative shock (OR. 9.7) independently predicted higher operative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperative CABG has significantly decreased. The increased prevalence of PCI before redo CABG is one of the reasons. Despite an increasing risk profile, hospital outcomes have remained largely the same. Preoperative shock and congestive heart failure are the most important predictors of operative mortality.

Surgical management of a left anterior descending pseudoaneurysm related to Behcet's disease.

A 22-year-old woman suffering from Behcet's disease and severe angina was diagnosed with a left anterior descending coronary artery giant pseudoaneurysm. Preoperative investigations, surgical management, and its principles, as well as specific postoperative follow-up considerations are described.