ABSTRACT
Functioning describes how well a person handles life, but the constituents of functioning and its measurement remain subjects of debate among researchers. However, approaches investigating how the concept of functioning is understood among laypeople and practitioners have received less attention. The present study uses a bottom-up approach to explore the concept of functioning among laypeople and mental health professionals in a Scandinavian context. Participants were asked to describe a person doing well in life and a person not doing well in life, resulting in a total of 2,345 statements from 128 laypeople and 78 mental health professionals. Initially, statements were rated according to the meta-concepts of Agency and Communion. This analysis revealed a dominant prevalence of Agency across groups, with laypeople demonstrating a heightened emphasis on Agency when characterizing an individual not doing well in life, suggesting an intensified focus on personal responsibility and achievement when describing dysfunction. Next, an independent semantic domain analysis was used to elucidate and identify distinctive features of functioning within the statements. This revealed a shared conceptualization of functioning among both laypeople and mental health professionals based on three main domains: (1) thriving; (2) daily activities and social roles; and (3) personality features. The findings underscore the importance of considering subjective experiences of thriving, efficacy in managing daily tasks and roles, and personality traits in attaining a comprehensive understanding of functioning levels.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization defines end-of-life palliative care as "prevention and relief of suffering, by means of early identification and impeccable assessment and treatment of pain and other problems, physical, psychosocial and spiritual." Over 20 million people worldwide are in need of palliative care. In Denmark, palliative care is given at a general and a specialist level. The general level comprises health care professionals (HCPs) who do not perform palliative care full-time. The specialist level comprises specialized palliative care (SPC), where HCPs perform palliative care full-time. In total, 20%-30% of patients who need palliative care are referred to SPC. Challenges with SPC include a short time span from referral to end of life, patients who are very ill and may therefore find it hard to travel to an outpatient clinic, and the SPC unit having a relatively small staff. The need for SPC is expected to rise, as the number of patients dying from terminal diseases is increasing. Telehealth has been successfully implemented in different home care settings, including palliative care. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to present the research design of the clinical testing of a telepalliation program by the use of a digital platform for patients in palliative care and their relatives. METHODS: The telepalliation program will be conducted as a multimethod randomized controlled trial. The intervention group will follow the telepalliation program, while the control group will follow the traditional standard of care program for palliative care. The primary outcome of the study is increased quality of life. Secondary outcomes include enhanced sense of security; reduced experience of pain; satisfactory experiences of patients and relatives with the TelePal platform and degree of satisfaction in being a part of the program; experiences with the use of the TelePal platform on the part of HCPs and the professionals' experiences of being a part of the program; the use of a cross-sector communication platform and the telepalliation program by patients, relatives, and HCPs; and the projected lower cost of health care services. These outcomes will be assessed using questionnaires, data generated by digital technologies, and semistructured interviews. RESULTS: The collection of data began in May 2021 and will be completed in August 2024. The results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences. Results from the telepalliation program are expected to be published by fall 2024. CONCLUSIONS: The expected outcomes of the study are increased quality of life and increased sense of security. We also expect that the study will have a clinical impact on future telepalliation for those patients who are referred to a palliative team. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04995848; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04995848. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/49946.
ABSTRACT
Background: Heart failure is a global problem affecting millions of people worldwide. Current care of heart failure patients follows standard protocols and often overlooks the patients' specific needs, which leads to low compliance in the rehabilitation phase. Telerehabilitation, where the patients communicate with health care professionals about their rehabilitation program and monitor their vital signs, aims to increase the degree of compliance as well as enhancing their quality of life. Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate whether application of the Future Patient Telerehabilitation Program II can improve the health-related quality of life for patients with heart failure. Methods: A randomized controlled trial will be conducted. A total of 70 patients will be enrolled, 35 in the intervention group, 35 in the control group. The intervention group will follow an add-on to traditional care, while the control group will follow the conventional Danish cardiac rehabilitation program, which is based on periodic visits to the clinic. The patients will be followed for a period of six months. The intervention group will have access to an online HeartPortal and will use various home-based devices for self-monitoring. The primary outcome to be investigated is health-related quality of life as measured by the EuroQol-5 Dimension. Secondary outcomes are the number of visits to the outpatient clinic, number of readmissions and number of tele-communications contacts (phone and video) with health care professionals. The primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed using questionnaires and through the data generated by digital technologies for self-monitoring. Results: Enrolment began in August 2020. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Results from the Future Patient II Telerehabilitation program are expected to be published in 2024. Discussion: This study is a further development of the Future Patient Telerehabilitation I study, and it is expected to explore the use of video consultation and a weight calculator in relation to telerehabilitation as well as the quality of life for heart failure patients. Conclusion: The expected outcomes are increased quality of life, increased number of phone- and video-consultations with health-care professionals, and the enhanced ability of patients to manage their own disease with the use of a calculator for weight.