Early effects of left bundle branch area pacing on ventricular activation by speckle tracking echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an emerging cardiac pacing modality that preserves fast electrical activation of the ventricles and provides very good electrical measures. Little is known on mechanical ventricular activation during this pacing modality. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients receiving LBBAP. Electrocardiographic and electrical parameters were evaluated at implantation, < 24 h and 3 months. Transthoracic echocardiography with strain analysis was performed at baseline and after 3 months, when ventricular mechanical activation and synchrony were analyzed by time-to-peak standard deviation (TPSD) of strain curves for both ventricles. Intraventricular left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony was investigated by LV TPSD and interventricular dyssynchrony by left ventricle-right ventricle TPSD (LV-RV TPSD). RESULTS: We screened 58 patients with permanent pacing indication who attempted LBBAP. Procedural success was obtained in 56 patients (97%). Strain data were available in 50 patients. QRS duration was 124.1 ± 30.7 ms at baseline, while paced QRS duration was 107.7 ± 13.6 ms (p < 0.001). At 3 months after LBBAP, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased from 52.9 ± 10.6% at baseline to 56.9 ± 8.4% (p = 0.004) and both intraventricular LV dyssynchrony and interventricular dyssynchrony significantly improved (LV TPSD reduction from 38.2 (13.6-53.9) to 15.1 (8.3-31.5), p < 0.001; LV-RV TPSD from 27.9 (10.2-41.5) to 13.9 (4.3-28.7), p = 0.001). Ameliorations with LBBAP were consistent in all subgroups, irrespective of baseline QRS duration, types of intraventricular conduction abnormalities, and LVEF. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiographic strain analysis shows that LBBAP determines a fast and synchronous biventricular contraction with a stereotype mechanical activation, regardless of baseline QRS duration, pattern, and LV function.

Impact of Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With TAVR Undergoing Permanent Pacemaker Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Long-term right ventricular pacing (VP) has been related to negative left ventricular remodeling and heart failure (HF), but there is a lack of evidence regarding the prognostic impact on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the PACE-TAVI registry is to evaluate the association of high percentage of VP with adverse outcomes in patients with pacemaker implantation after TAVR. METHODS: PACE-TAVI is an international multicenter registry of all consecutive TAVR patients who underwent permanent pacemaker implantation for conduction disturbances in the first 30 days after the procedure. Patients were divided into 2 subgroups according to the percentage of VP (<40% vs ≥40%) at pacemaker interrogation. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular mortality or hospitalization for HF. RESULTS: A total of 377 patients were enrolled, 158 with VP <40% and 219 with VP ≥40%. After multivariable adjustment, VP ≥40% was associated with a higher incidence of the primary endpoint (HR: 2.76; 95% CI: 1.39-5.51; P = 0.004), first HF hospitalization (HR: 3.37; 95% CI: 1.50-7.54; P = 0.003), and cardiovascular death (HR: 3.77; 95% CI: 1.02-13.88; P = 0.04), while the incidence of all-cause death was not significantly different (HR: 2.17; 95% CI: 0.80-5.90; P = 0.13). Patients with VP ≥ 40% showed a higher New York Heart Association functional class both at 1 year (P = 0.009) and at last available follow-up (P = 0.04) and a nonsignificant reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.18) on 1-year echocardiography, while patients with VP <40% showed significant improvement (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In TAVR patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation, a high percentage of right VP at follow-up is associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization. These findings suggest the opportunity to minimize right VP through dedicated algorithms in post-TAVR patients without complete atrioventricular block and to evaluate a more physiological VP modality in patients with persistent complete atrioventricular block.

Predictive Value of Echocardiographic Pulmonary to Left Atrial Ratio for In-Hospital Death in Patients with COVID-19.

Background: Echocardiographic Pulmonary to Left Atrial Ratio (ePLAR) represents an accurate and sensitive non-invasive tool to estimate the trans-pulmonary gradient. The prognostic value of ePLAR in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of ePLAR on in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19. Methods: One hundred consecutive patients admitted to two Italian institutions for COVID-19 undergoing early (<24 h) echocardiographic examination were included; ePLAR was determined from the maximum tricuspid regurgitation continuous wave Doppler velocity (m/s) divided by the transmitral E-wave: septal mitral annular Doppler Tissue Imaging e'-wave ratio (TRVmax/E:e'). The primary outcome measure was in-hospital death. Results: patients who died during hospitalization had at baseline a higher prevalence of tricuspid regurgitation, higher ePLAR, right-side pressures, lower Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE)/ systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure (sPAP) ratio and reduced inferior vena cava collapse than survivors. Patients with ePLAR > 0.28 m/s at baseline showed non-significant but markedly increased in-hospital mortality compared to those having ePLAR ≤ 0.28 m/s (27% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.055). Multivariate Cox regression showed that an ePLAR > 0.28 m/s was independently associated with an increased risk of death (HR 5.07, 95% CI 1.04−24.50, p = 0.043), particularly when associated with increased sPAP (p for interaction = 0.043). Conclusions: A high ePLAR value at baseline predicts in-hospital death in patients with COVID-19, especially in those with elevated pulmonary arterial pressure. These results support an early ePLAR assessment in patients admitted for COVID-19 to identify those at higher risk and potentially guide strategies of diagnosis and care.

Safety and efficacy of very low LDL-cholesterol intensive lowering: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized trials.

AIMS: We performed a study-level meta-analysis to provide more robust evidence on safety of very low LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. BACKGROUND: Concerns on the safety of LDL-C values achieved with potent lipid-lowering therapies have been raised. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched randomized trials reporting clinical outcomes with intensive lipid-lowering treatments leading to very low (<40 mg/dL) LDL-C levels vs. a control group with higher LDL-C levels. Only studies with follow-up duration ≥ 3 months were considered. Primary endpoint was the incidence of various safety measures. A total of 10 randomized trials were overall included, with 38 427 patients being in the very low LDL-C group vs. 70 668 in the control group. Median follow-up duration was 28.8 months. The incidence of all safety outcomes was similar in the two groups: non-cardiovascular death: OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.87-1.45; P = 0.36; any adverse events: OR 1.00, 0.90-1.11, P = 0.94; adverse events leading to drug discontinuation: OR 1.00, 0.87-1.15, P = 0.99; cancer: OR 1.02, 0.95-1.10, P = 0.57; haemorrhagic stroke OR 0.89, 0.66-1.20, P = 0.44; new-onset diabetes: OR 1.16, 0.91-1.47, P = 0.23; neurocognitive disorders: OR 0.97, 0.91-1.04, P = 0.41; haepatobiliary disorders: OR 0.99, 0.83-1.18, P = 0.93; muscle disorders: OR 0.94, 0.77-1.13, P = 0.49; cataract: OR 1.28, 0.78-2.10, P = 0.34. The rates of major adverse cardiovascular events were significantly lower in the very low LDL-C group: OR 0.82, 0.72-0.94, P = 0.005. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis indicates that very low LDL-C levels on intensive lipid-lowering treatments are not associated with any adverse event and maintain a persistent reduction of cardiovascular events.

Safety and Efficacy of Selective, Clopidogrel-Based Strategies in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Study-Level Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate outcomes with selective, clopidogrel-based therapies versus conventional treatment in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially for acute coronary syndrome. BACKGROUND: Safety and efficacy of alternative, selective, clopidogrel-based therapies after PCI are not robustly established. METHODS: We performed a study-level meta-analysis on six randomized trials investigating selective clopidogrel-based therapies (three on unguided de-escalation, N = 3,473; three on guided clopidogrel therapy, N = 7,533). Control groups received ticagrelor or prasugrel treatment. Main endpoints were major bleeding, any bleeding, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and net clinical endpoint. RESULTS: The incidence of major bleeding and MACE was similar in the selective, clopidogrel-based therapy versus the conventional treatment arm (odds ratio [OR]: 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-1.01, p = 0.06; OR: 0.93, 0.72-1.20, p = 0.58; respectively). The rates of any bleeding were lower in the selective, clopidogrel-based therapy versus conventional treatment group (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.40-0.80, p = 0.001); this greater safety was significant for unguided de-escalation (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.32-0.58, p = 0.00001) and nonsignificant for guided clopidogrel therapy (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.51-1.02, p = 0.07; p for interaction: 0.03). The incidence of the net clinical endpoint was fewer in the selective, clopidogrel-based therapy versus the conventional treatment arm (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41-0.85, p = 0.004); this benefit was significant for unguided de-escalation (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.39-0.64, p < 0.00001) and nonsignificant for guided clopidogrel therapy (OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.62-1.16, p = 0.30; p for interaction: 0.01). CONCLUSION: As compared with prasugrel/ticagrelor treatment, alternative, selective, clopidogrel-based approaches provide a similar protection from cardiovascular events, reduce the risk of any bleeding, and are associated with a greater net benefit. These beneficial effects were prevalent with unguided de-escalation to clopidogrel.

Access Site Bleeding Complications with NOACs versus VKAs in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Cardiac Implantable Device Intervention.

There are no data on procedure-related bleeding outcome with non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) intervention. Our aim was to evaluate whether NOACs have a safety benefit even in terms of fewer hemorrhagic complications at the site of CIED implant. Consecutive AF patients receiving NOACs or VKAs at the time of CIED procedure were included in this observational, retrospective, and monocentric investigation. Primary endpoint was the incidence of post-intervention pocket hematoma. A total of 311 patients were enrolled, 146 on NOACs, and 165 on VKAs. The incidence of pocket hematoma was 3.4% in the NOAC versus 13.3% in the VKA group (p = 0.002). Primary outcome-free survival at 30-days was 96.6% in patients on NOACs and 86.0% in those on VKAs (p = 0.019). Multivariate analysis, adjusted by propensity-score calculation of inverse-probability-weighting, showed a significantly lower occurrence of pocket hematoma in patients receiving NOACs versus VKAs (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.96, p = 0.042). Such NOACs benefit was confirmed versus patients on VKAs without peri-procedural bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.11-0.99, p = 0.048). The incidence of pocket infection, surgical pocket evacuation, ischemic events, and major bleeding complications at 30 days (secondary endpoints) was similar in the two groups. In conclusion, our data suggest that, among patients with AF undergoing implantable cardiac defibrillator or pacemaker intervention, the use of NOACs versus VKAs may be associated with significant reduction of post-procedural pocket hematoma, regardless of bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin in the VKA group. These results are hypothesis generating and need to be confirmed in a specific randomized study.

Predictors of Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcome at 6 Months after Hospitalization for COVID-19.

Clinical outcome data of patients discharged after Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are limited and no study has evaluated predictors of cardiovascular prognosis in this setting. Our aim was to assess short-term mortality and cardiovascular outcome after hospitalization for COVID-19. A prospective cohort of 296 consecutive patients discharged after COVID-19 from two Italian institutions during the first wave of the pandemic and followed up to 6 months was included. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The co-primary endpoint was the incidence of the composite outcome of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, acute heart failure, or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes). The mean follow-up duration was 6 ± 2 months. The incidence of all-cause death was 4.7%. At multivariate analysis, age was the only independent predictor of mortality (aHR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16). MACCE occurred in 7.2% of patients. After adjustment, female sex (aHR 2.6, 95% CI 1.05-6.52), in-hospital acute heart failure during index hospitalization (aHR 3.45, 95% CI 1.19-10), and prevalent atrial fibrillation (aHR 3.05, 95% CI 1.13-8.24) significantly predicted the incident risk of MACCE. These findings may help to identify patients for whom a closer and more accurate surveillance after discharge for COVID-19 should be considered.

Safety and Efficacy of Different Antithrombotic Strategies after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal pharmacological therapy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains uncertain. We compared efficacy and safety of various antiplatelet and anticoagulant approaches after TAVI by a network meta-analysis. METHODS: A total of 14 studies (both observational and randomized) were considered, with 24,119 patients included. Primary safety endpoint was the incidence of any bleeding complications during follow-up. Secondary safety endpoint was major bleeding. Efficacy endpoints were stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular mortality. A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted with a random-effects model. The following strategies were compared: dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), oral anticoagulation (OAC), and OAC + SAPT. The mean follow-up was 15 months. RESULTS: In comparison to DAPT, SAPT was associated with a 44% risk reduction of any bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 0.56 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.39-0.80]). SAPT was ranked as the safest strategy for the prevention of any bleeding (p-score: 0.704), followed by OAC alone (p-score: 0.476) and DAPT (p-score: 0.437). Consistent results were observed for major bleeding. The incidence of cardiovascular death and secondary ischemic endpoints did not differ among the tested antithrombotic approaches. In patients with indication for long-term anticoagulation, OAC alone showed similar rates of stroke (OR: 0.92 [95% CI: 0.41-2.05], p = 0.83) and reduced occurrence of any bleeding (OR: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.37-0.66], p < 0.01) versus OAC + SAPT. CONCLUSION: The present network meta-analysis supports after TAVI the use of SAPT in patients without indication for OAC and OAC alone in those needing long-term anticoagulation.

Usefulness of a multiparametric evaluation including global longitudinal strain for an early diagnosis of acute myocarditis.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) represents the main imaging modality for diagnosing acute myocarditis. However, its limited availability could entail missing or delayed diagnosis. A reduction of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) correlates with amount of oedema in acute myocarditis and here may be early detected. Aim was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic role of 3-layers LV GLS in patients with acute myocarditis. Out of 122 patients with suspected acute myocarditis, a total of 86 consecutive patients with CMRI-confirmed acute myocarditis admitted in two Italian institutions were retrospectively screened. Exclusion criteria were met in 29 patients because of poor acoustic window or missing data. A total of 57 patients were then included. Clinical characteristics, laboratory examinations, transthoracic echocardiography data and STE parameters were collected early after hospitalization. In the study population, mean age was 38.8 ± 15.6 years, the prevalence of male gender was 90%. On admission, 22 patients (39%) had fever (body temperature > 37.5 °), mean white blood cell (WBC) count was 10.9 ± 1.7/10^3 and overall LV ejection fraction was 50.1% ± 11.2. An epicardial LV GLS < 18% was present in 74% of patients, and a model including at least one of LV GLS < 18% (absolute value), fever and WBC > 10.0/10^3 was able to identify all patients with CMRI-diagnosed acute myocarditis. An epicardial LV GLS < 15.3% (absolute value) at baseline significantly predicted the lack of myocarditis resolution during follow-up (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.58-0.93, p = 0.02). A multiparametric model including epicardial LV GLS, fever and elevated WBC count on admission could be useful for early diagnosing an acute myocarditis, especially when CMRI is not promptly available. Baseline epicardial LV GLS may also identify patients with less-likely myocarditis resolution.

Infective endocarditis complicating COVID-19 pneumonia: a case report.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 outbreak, cardiovascular imaging, especially transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE), may expose healthcare personnel to virus contamination and should be performed only if strictly necessary. On the other hand, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and TOE represent the first-line imaging exams for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE). To date, this is the first case of COVID-19 complicated by IE. CASE SUMMARY: We present the case of a 57-year-old man with severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation. During the intensive care unit (ICU) stay, he developed fever and positive haemocoltures for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. TTE did not identify endocardial vegetations. TOE was then performed and outlined IE of the aortic valve on the non-coronary cusp. Antibiotic therapy was given with progressive resolution of the septic state and improvement of inflammatory signs. After 30 days of ICU stay, the patient was transferred to the Sub-ICU and then to a rehabilitation hospital. A close follow-up has been scheduled: after full recovery, a new echocardiography will be performed (TTE and TOE, if the former is non-conclusive) to consider surgical valve repair in the case of persistence/progression of the valvular lesion or deterioration of the valve function. DISCUSSION: In COVID-19 patients, echocardiography remains the leading imaging exam for the diagnosis of IE. If the suspicion of IE is high, even in this setting of patients, TTE or TOE (if TTE is non-conclusive) are mandatory. A high degree of attention must be paid and appropriate preventive measures taken to avoid contamination of healthcare personnel.