ABSTRACT
Serum biomarkers are promising minimally invasive outcome measures in clinical studies in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). However, biomarkers strongly associated with clinical progression and predicting performance decline are lacking. In this study we aimed to identify serum biomarkers associated with clinical performance and able to predict clinical milestones in DMD. Towards this aim we present a retrospective multi-center cohort study including serum samples and clinical data collected in research participants with DMD as part of a natural history study at the University of Florida (UF) and real-world observations at Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) between 2009-2022. The 7K SomaScan® assay was used to analyse protein levels in in individual serum samples. Serum biomarkers predicted age at loss of ambulation (LoA), age at loss of overhead reach (OHR) and age at loss of hand to mouth function (HTM). Secondary outcomes were the association of biomarkers with age, corticosteroid (CS) usage, and clinical performance based on the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA), 10 meter run velocity (10mrv), 6 minute walk (6MWT) and Performance of the Upper Limb (PUL2.0). A total of 716 serum samples were collected in 79 participants at UF and 74 at LUMC (mean[SD] age; 10.9[3.2] vs 8.4[3.4]). 244 serum proteins showed an association with CS usage in both cohorts independent of CS type and regimen, including MMP3 and IGLL1. 318 probes (corresponding to 294 proteins) showed significant associations with NSAA, 10mrv, 6MWT and/or PUL2.0 across both cohorts. The expression of 38 probes corresponding to 36 proteins such as RGMA, EHMT2, ART3, ANTXR2 and DLK1 was associated with risk of both lower and upper limb clinical milestones in both the LUMC and UF cohort. In conclusion, multiple biomarkers were associated with CS use, motor function and upper lower and upper limb disease milestones in DMD. These biomarkers were validated across two independent cohorts, increasing their likelihood of translation for use within the broader DMD population.
ABSTRACT
Duchenne muscular dystrophy is caused by mutations in the DMD gene, leading to lack of dystrophin. Chronic muscle damage eventually leads to histological alterations in skeletal muscles. The identification of genes and cell types driving tissue remodeling is a key step to developing effective therapies. Here we use spatial transcriptomics in two Duchenne muscular dystrophy mouse models differing in disease severity to identify gene expression signatures underlying skeletal muscle pathology and to directly link gene expression to muscle histology. We perform deconvolution analysis to identify cell types contributing to histological alterations. We show increased expression of specific genes in areas of muscle regeneration (Myl4, Sparc, Hspg2), fibrosis (Vim, Fn1, Thbs4) and calcification (Bgn, Ctsk, Spp1). These findings are confirmed by smFISH. Finally, we use differentiation dynamic analysis in the D2-mdx muscle to identify muscle fibers in the present state that are predicted to become affected in the future state.
Subject(s)
Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne , Animals , Mice , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/metabolism , Transcriptome , Mice, Inbred mdx , Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Dystrophin/genetics , Dystrophin/metabolism , Disease Models, AnimalABSTRACT
Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) is the milder allelic variant of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, with higher dystrophin levels. To anticipate on results of interventions targeting dystrophin expression it is important to know the natural variation of dystrophin expression between different muscles and over time. Dystrophin was quantified using capillary Western immunoassay (Wes) in the anterior tibial (TA) muscle of 37 BMD patients. Variability was studied using two samples from the same TA biopsy site in nine patients, assessing nine longitudinal TA biopsies, and eight simultaneously obtained vastus lateralis (VL) muscle biopsies. Measurements were performed in duplicate with two primary antibodies. Baseline dystrophin levels were correlated to longitudinal muscle strength and functional outcomes. Results showed low technical variability and high precision for both antibodies. Dystrophin TA levels ranged from 4.8 to 97.7%, remained stable over a 3-5 year period, and did not correlate with changes in longitudinal muscle function. Dystrophin levels were comparable between TA and VL muscles. Intra-muscle biopsy variability was low (5.2% and 11.4% of the total variability of the two antibodies). These observations are relevant for the design of clinical trials targeting dystrophin production, and may urge the need for other biomarkers or surrogate endpoints.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Dystrophin/metabolism , Gene Expression , Immunoassay , Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/genetics , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Biopsy , Child , Child, Preschool , Dystrophin/genetics , Humans , Immunoassay/methods , Infant , Middle Aged , Muscle, Skeletal/pathology , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/diagnosis , Mutation , Young AdultABSTRACT
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is caused by the expression of DUX4 in skeletal muscles. A number of therapeutic approaches are being developed to antagonize the events preceding and following DUX4 expression that leads to muscular dystrophy. Currently, the possibility to evaluate treatment response in clinical trials is hampered by the lack of objective molecular biomarkers connecting the disease cause to clinical performance. In this study we employed RNA-seq to examine gene expression in PAXgene tubes obtained from two independent cohorts of FSHD patients. Analysis of gene expression profiles did not lead to the identification of genes or pathways differentially expressed in FSHD patients, or associated with disease severity. In particular, we did not find evidence that the DUX4 and PAX7 signatures were differentially expressed. On the other hand, we were able to improve patient classification by including single genes or groups of genes in classification models. The best classifier was ROPN1L, a gene known to be expressed in testis, coincidentally the typical location of DUX4 expression. These improvements in patient classification hold the potential to enrich the FSHD clinical trial toolbox.
Subject(s)
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/blood , Homeodomain Proteins/blood , Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Muscular Dystrophy, Facioscapulohumeral/blood , PAX7 Transcription Factor/blood , Adult , Aged , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Expression Regulation , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscular Dystrophy, Facioscapulohumeral/genetics , RNA-SeqABSTRACT
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is a severe muscle disorder caused by lack of dystrophin. Predictive biomarkers able to anticipate response to the therapeutic treatments aiming at dystrophin re-expression are lacking. The objective of this study is to investigate Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) as predictive biomarker for Duchenne. Two natural history cohorts were studied including 168 longitudinal samples belonging to 66 patients. We further studied 1536 samples obtained from 3 independent clinical trials with drisapersen, an antisense oligonucleotide targeting exon 51: an open label study including 12 patients; a phase 3 randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study involving 186 patients; an open label extension study performed after the phase 3. Analysis of natural history cohorts showed elevated MMP-9 levels in patients and a significant increase over time in longitudinal samples. MMP-9 decreased in parallel to clinical stabilization in the 12 patients involved in the open label study. The phase 3 study and subsequent extension study clarified that the decrease in MMP-9 levels was not predictive of treatment response. These data do not support the inclusion of serum MMP-9 as predictive biomarker for DMD patients.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood , Matrix Metalloproteinase 9/blood , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/blood , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/genetics , Oligonucleotides, Antisense/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Double-Blind Method , Dystrophin/genetics , Exons/genetics , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Young AdultABSTRACT
DMD gene exons duplications account for up to 5-10 % of Duchenne (DMD) and up to 5-19% of Becker (BMD) muscular dystrophies; as for the more common deletions, the genotype-phenotype correlation and the genetic prognosis are generally based on the "reading frame rule". Nevertheless, the transcriptional profile of duplications, abridging the genomic configuration to the eventual protein effect, has been poorly studied. We describe 26 DMD gene duplications occurring in 33 unrelated patients and detected among a cohort of 194 mutation-positive DMD/BMD patients. We have characterized at the RNA level 16 of them. Four duplications (15%) behave as exception to the reading frame rule. In three BMD cases with out-of-frame mutations, the RNA analysis revealed that exon skipping events occurring in the duplicated region represent the mechanism leading to the frame re-establishment and to the milder phenotype. Differently, in a DMD patient carrying an in-frame duplication the RNA behaviour failed to explain the clinical phenotype which is probably related to post-transcriptional-translational mechanisms. We conclude that defining the RNA profile in DMD gene duplications is mandatory both for establishing the genetic prognosis and for approaching therapeutic trials based on hnRNA modulation.
Subject(s)
Dystrophin/genetics , Gene Duplication , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/genetics , Transcription, Genetic , Base Sequence , DNA Mutational Analysis , Humans , Male , Molecular Sequence Data , Open Reading Frames/geneticsABSTRACT
Dystrophin mutations occurring at the 5' end of the gene frequently behave as exceptions to the "frame rule," their clinical severity being variable and often not related to the perturbation of the translation reading frame. The molecular mechanisms underlying the phenotypic variability of 5' dystrophin mutations have not been fully clarified. We have characterized the genomic breakpoints within introns 2, 6 and 7 and identified the splicing profiles in a cohort of DMD/BMD patients with deletion of dystrophin exons 3-7, 3-6 and duplication of exons 2-4. Our findings indicate that the occurrence of intronic cryptic promoter as well as corrective splicing events are unlikely to play a role in exons 3-7 deleted patients phenotypic variability. Our data suggest that re-initiation of translation could represent a major mechanism responsible for the production of a residual dystrophin in some patients with exons 3-7 deletion. Furthermore, we observed that the out-of-frame exon 2a is almost constantly spliced into a proportion of the dystrophin transcripts in the analysed patients. In the exons 2-4 duplicated DMD patient, producing both in-frame and out-of-frame transcripts, this splicing behaviour might represent a critical factor contributing to the severe phenotype. In conclusion, we suggest that multiple mechanisms may have a role in modulating the outcome of 5' dystrophin mutations, including recoding mechanisms and unusual splicing choices.