ABSTRACT
AIMS: Conflicting results have been reported in the literature on the potential antiarrhythmic effect of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The objectives of this study were: 1- to evaluate the long term effects of sacubitril/valsartan on arrhythmic burden in HFrEF patients; 2- to evaluate the correlation between the reduction of premature ventricular complexes during f-up and reverse remodelling. METHODS: We identified 255 consecutive HFrEF patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan between March 2017 and May 2020 and followed by the Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant Unit of IRCCS San Matteo Hospital in Pavia (Italy). Within this subgroup, 153 patients underwent 24 h-Holter-ECG or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) interrogation at baseline, at 12 months (t1) and at 24 months (t2) and transthoracic echocardiography at baseline and after 12 months after the beginning of sacubitril/valsartan. Cardiac-related hospitalizations were analyzed in the 12 months preceding and during 24 months following the drug starting date. RESULTS: Global burden of 24-h premature ventricular complexes (PVC) was significantly reduced at 12 months (t1) and at 24 months (t2) as compared to the same period before treatment (1043 [304-3360] vs 768 [82-2784] at t1 vs 114 [9-333] at t2, P = 0.000). In the subgroup of patients implanted with biventricular ICD (n = 30), the percentage of biventricular pacing increased significantly (96% [94-99] vs 98% [96-99] at t1 vs 98%[97-100] at t2; P = 0.027). The burden of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia and sustained ventricular tachycardia did not change from baseline to t1 and t2, but a reduction of patients with at least one ICD appropriate shock was reported. The correlations between reduction in 24 h PVC and reduction in LV-ESVi or improvement in LVEF were not statistically significant (respectively R = 0.144, P = 0.197 and R = -0.190, P = 0.074). Heart failure related hospitalizations decreased during follow up (11.1% in the year before treatment vs 4.6% at t1 and 4.6% at t2; P = 0.040). CONCLUSION: Sacubitril/valsartan reduced the number of premature ventricular complexes and increased the percentage of biventricular pacing in a cohort of HFrEF patients already on optimal medical therapy. PVC reduction did not correlate with reverse left ventricular remodelling. Whether sacubitril/valsartan has any direct antiarrhythmic effects is an issue to be better explored in future studies.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Tachycardia, Ventricular , Humans , Heart Failure/diagnostic imaging , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Ventricular Remodeling , Ventricular Function, Left , Tetrazoles/adverse effects , Stroke Volume , Treatment Outcome , Valsartan/adverse effects , Biphenyl Compounds/pharmacology , Biphenyl Compounds/therapeutic use , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/drug therapy , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/chemically induced , Tachycardia, Ventricular/chemically induced , Tachycardia, Ventricular/drug therapy , Drug Combinations , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Different genes have been associated with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF); however, there are no studies correlating genotype with phenotype. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to define the genetic background of probands with IVF using large gene panel analysis and to correlate genetics with long-term clinical outcomes. METHODS: All consecutive probands with a diagnosis of IVF were included in a multicenter retrospective study. All patients had: 1) IVF diagnosis throughout the follow-up; and 2) genetic analysis with a broad gene panel. All genetic variants were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P+), variants of unknown significance (VUS) or no variants (NO-V), following current guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. The primary endpoint was occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (VA). RESULTS: Forty-five consecutive patients were included. A variant was found in 12 patients, 3 P+ and 9 VUS carriers. After a mean follow-up time of 105.0 months, there were no deaths and 16 patients (35.6%) experienced a VA. NO-V patients had higher VA free survival during the follow-up, compared with both VUS (72.7% vs 55.6%, log-rank P < 0.001) and P+ (72.7% vs 0%, log-rank P = 0.013). At Cox analysis, P+ or VUS carrier status was a predictor of VA occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In probands with IVF, undergoing genetic analysis with a broad panel, the diagnostic yield for P+ is 6.7%. P+ or VUS carrier status is a predictor of VA occurrence.
