Early recognition of aortitis of the aorta ascendens with ¹8F-FDG PET/CT: syphilitic?

We present the case of a 42-year-old woman known with a human leukocyte antigen B27 positive ankylosing spondylitis. Despite treatment with a tumor necrosis factor blocking agent, the patient was not pain free and inflammation markers remained elevated. An (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) was performed in an attempt to exclude possible other inflammatory processes. The (18)F-FDG PET/CT revealed increased metabolic activity in the ascending aortic wall, which appeared unexpectedly related to late syphilis. Based on this case and existing literature on this subject, we come to the conclusion that (18)F-FDG PET/CT can help in an early establishment of syphilitic aortitis before the possible life-threatening sequelae of syphilitic aortitis occur.

The relation between bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, and vitamin D status in ankylosing spondylitis patients with active disease: a cross-sectional analysis.

SUMMARY: Osteoporosis is a well recognized complication of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). This study indicates that increased bone turnover, inflammation, and low vitamin D levels are important in the pathophysiology of AS-related osteoporosis, and that bone turnover markers (BTM) are valuable markers to detect bone loss in AS. INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to elucidate the pathophysiology of AS-related osteoporosis by investigating the relation between bone mineral density (BMD), BTM, vitamin D, and clinical assessments of disease activity and physical function, as well as to identify parameters that are related to low BMD (osteopenia or osteoporosis) in AS patients with active disease. METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight consecutive Dutch AS outpatients were included in this cross-sectional study. Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein, ASAS-endorsed disease activity score (ASDAS), Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI), bone formation markers procollagen type 1 N-terminal peptide (PINP) and osteocalcin (OC), bone resorption marker serum C-telopeptides of type I collagen (sCTX), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHvitD), lumbar spine and hip BMD, and vertebral fractures were assessed. Z-scores of BTM were calculated using matched 10-year cohorts of a Dutch reference group to correct for the normal influence that age and gender have on bone turnover. RESULTS: sCTX Z-score, OC Z-score, BASDAI, age, and gender were independently related to low BMD. In addition, PINP Z-score, ESR, 25OHvitD, age, and gender were independently related to sCTX and/or OC Z-score. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that increased bone turnover, inflammation, and low vitamin D levels are important in the pathophysiology of AS-related osteoporosis. Furthermore, sCTX and OC Z-scores seem to be valuable markers to detect bone loss in AS patients in daily clinical practice where BMD of the lumbar spine, measured by DXA, may be overestimated due to osteoproliferation in patients with advanced AS.

The formation of autoantibodies and antibodies to TNF-α blocking agents in relation to clinical response in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of antibody formation to TNF-α blocking agents on the clinical response in AS patients treated with infliximab (IFX), etanercept (ETA), or adalimumab (ADA), and to investigate the development of ANA, ANCA, and anti-dsDNA antibodies in association with the formation of antibodies to TNF-α blocking agents. METHODS: Consecutive AS outpatients with active disease who started treatment with IFX (n=20), ETA (n=20), or ADA (n=20) were included in this longitudinal observational study. Clinical data were collected prospectively at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months of anti-TNF-α treatment. At the same time points, serum samples were collected. In these samples, antibodies to TNF-α blocking agents, serum TNF-α blocker levels, and ANA, ANCA, and anti-dsDNA antibodies were measured retrospectively. RESULTS: Anti-IFX, anti-ETA, and anti-ADA antibodies were induced in 20%, 0%, and 30% of patients, respectively. Although ANA, ANCA, and anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected during anti-TNF-α treatment, no significant association was found between the presence of these autoantibodies and the formation of antibodies to TNF-α blocking agents. Patients with anti-IFX or anti-ADA antibodies had significantly lower serum TNF-α blocker levels compared to patients without these antibodies. Furthermore, significant negative correlations were found between serum TNF-α blocker levels and assessments of disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that antibody formation to IFX or ADA is related to a decrease in efficacy and early discontinuation of anti-TNF-α treatment in AS patients. Furthermore, autoantibody formation does not seem to be associated with antibody formation to TNF-α blocking agents.

Measuring disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis: patient and physician have different perspectives.

OBJECTIVE: There is no "gold standard" to assess disease activity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). It is known that patients and physicians have different opinions about disease activity. The objective was therefore to investigate on which criteria patients with AS and physicians base their judgement on disease activity. METHODS: A cohort of 203 AS out-patients fulfilling the modified New York criteria included in the ongoing long-term follow-up was analysed. The Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) International Working Group has established different domains relevant for outcome in AS. Each domain includes a number of instruments for making assessments, and all these instruments are included in the Outcome in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Study and were made every 6 months for 2 yr. Disease activity from the patient perspective as well as from the physician perspective was analysed using the patient's or the physician's global assessment of disease activity [visual analogue scale (VAS): 0 (best)-10 (worst)] by dichotomizing into "high disease activity" (VAS > or = 6.0) and "low disease activity" (VAS < or = 4.0). Data reduction by principal components analysis (PCA) was performed to distinguish factors capturing correlated instruments. Discriminant analysis with the factor loadings was performed to discriminate between a low and a high disease activity state from both the patient's and the physician's perspective. Multiple regression analysis on the discriminant scores was performed to prioritize the instruments. RESULTS: PCA revealed four factors: spinal mobility, physician assessments, patient assessments and laboratory assessments (Cronbach's alpha 0.52-0.80; explained variance 61%). Discriminant function analysis showed that the factor "patient assessments" was most important (pooled correlation 0.85) in discriminating between a low and a high disease activity state as defined by the patient. The other three factors contributed marginally (pooled correlation <0.30). In contrast, the factors "physician's assessments" (pooled correlation 0.62), "spinal mobility" (pooled correlation 0.52) and "laboratory assessments" (pooled correlation 0.48) contributed most to the physician's perspective. The factor "patient assessments" did not contribute at all (pooled correlation 0.05). Multivariate analysis on the discriminant scores showed that the instruments "pain spine", "BASFI", "pain joints" and "BASDAI fatigue" explained more than 90% of variance in the case of the patient perspective. The instruments "cervical rotation", "swollen joint count", "CRP" and "intermalleolar distance" explained more than 90% of variance in case of physician perspective. CONCLUSION: AS patients rate disease activity on the basis of complaints while physicians rate disease activity on the basis of instruments related to disease severity and inflammation.

Scoring of radiographic progression in randomised clinical trials in ankylosing spondylitis: a preference for paired reading order.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the influence of the reading order (chronological v paired) on radiographic scoring results in ankylosing spondylitis. To investigate whether this method is sufficiently sensitive to change because paired reading is requested for establishing drug efficacy in clinical trials. METHODS: Films obtained from 166 patients (at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years) were scored by one observer, using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score. Films were first scored chronologically, and were scored paired 6 months later. RESULTS: Chronological reading showed significantly more progression than paired reading both at 1 year (mean (SD) progression 1.3 (2.6) v 0.5 (2.4) units) and at 2 years (2.1 (3.9) v 1.0 (2.9) units); between-method difference: p<0.001 at 1 year, and p<0.001 at 2 years. After 1 year, progression (>0 units) was found in 35/166 (21%) patients after paired reading and in 55/166 (33%) after chronological reading. After 2 years, these figures were 50/166 (30%) and 68/166 (41%), respectively. Sample size calculations showed that 94 patients in each treatment arm are required in a randomised clinical trial (RCT) to provide sufficient statistical power to detect a difference in 2 year progression if films are scored paired. CONCLUSION: Reading with chronological time order is more sensitive to change than reading with paired time order, but paired reading is sufficiently sensitive to pick up change with a follow up of 2 years, resulting in an acceptable sample size for RCTs.

Direct costs of ankylosing spondylitis and its determinants: an analysis among three European countries.

OBJECTIVE: To assess direct costs associated with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). To determine which variables, including country, predict costs. METHODS: 216 patients with AS from the Netherlands, France, and Belgium participated in a two year observational study and filled in bimonthly economic questionnaires. Disease related healthcare resource use was measured and direct costs were calculated from a societal perspective (true cost estimates) and from a financial perspective (country-specific tariffs). Predictors of costs were assessed using Cox's regression analysis. RESULTS: 209 patients provided sufficient data for cost analysis. Mean annual societal direct costs for each patient were euro;2640, of which 82% were direct healthcare costs. In univariate analysis costs were higher in the Netherlands than in Belgium, but this difference disappeared after adjusting for baseline differences in patients' characteristics among countries. Longer disease duration, lower education, worse physical function, and higher disease activity were predictors of costs. Mean annual direct costs from a financial perspective were euro;2122, euro;1402, and euro;941 per patient in the Netherlands, France, and Belgium, respectively. For each country, costs from a financial perspective were significantly lower than costs from a societal perspective. CONCLUSION: Direct costs for AS are substantial in three European countries but not significantly different after adjusting for baseline characteristics among countries. Worse physical function and higher disease activity are important determinants of costs, suggesting better disease control might reduce the costs of AS. The difference in costs from a societal and financial perspective emphasises the importance of an economic analysis.

Costs of ankylosing spondylitis in three European countries: the patient's perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To assess a patient's out of pocket costs, income loss, time consumption, and quality of life (QoL) due to ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in three European countries and to assess variables predicting these outcomes. METHODS: 216 patients with AS from the Netherlands, France, and Belgium participated in a two year study. Health resource use, days absent from work, time lost, and quality of life (EuroQol) were assessed by bimonthly questionnaires. AS related healthcare and non-healthcare expenditure and income loss were calculated taking into account country-specific regulations. Predictors of costs, time consumption, and QoL were analysed by Cox's regression. RESULTS: 209 patients provided data for cost analysis. Average annual healthcare and non-healthcare expenditure was euro;431 per patient and average annual income loss was euro;1371 per patient. Healthcare costs were highest for Belgian and lowest for French patients, while non-healthcare costs were highest for Dutch patients. A patient's total costs were associated with higher age and worse physical function. On average, patients with AS needed 75 minutes additional time a day because of AS. Worse physical function and higher disease activity predicted time consumption. After adjusting for baseline confounders, QoL was worse in Belgian and French than in Dutch patients. Peripheral arthritis, worse physical function, higher disease activity, and loss of income contributed to worse QoL. CONCLUSION: AS is time consuming and associated with substantial out of pocket costs. Belgian patients incur the highest healthcare payments. Poor physical function increases patient's costs and time consumption. Loss of income is associated with lower QoL.

Assessment of enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess, firstly, the validity of the enthesis index published by Mander (Mander enthesis index (MEI)) and, secondly, to investigate whether it is possible to define a new enthesis index that is less time consuming to perform with at least similar or better properties. METHODS: Data from the OASIS cohort, an international, longitudinal, observational study on outcome in ankylosing spondylitis, were used. In this study, measures of disease activity, including the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and the MEI, were assessed regularly in 217 patients. With the MEI, for each measurement period independently, a process of data reduction was performed to identify the entheses most commonly reported as painful by the patients. A more concise enthesis index was constructed with aid of the entheses found in this way. Correlations with measures of disease activity were used to test the validity of several entheses indices. RESULTS: Reduction of the number of entheses from 66 to 13 and omitting grading of the intensity of pain resulted in an index which was named the "Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score" (MASES). The MASES (range 0-13) has much greater feasibility than the MEI (range 0-90). However, up to 21% of patients with a score >0 on the MEI were not identified by a score on the MASES >0. Only 2.1% of the patients with an original enthesis score >0 had an original score on the MEI >3 (range 0-90) and it can be questioned whether a low score on the MEI index represents clinically important enthesitis. The Spearman correlation coefficient between the MASES score and the MEI was 0.90 and between the MASES and the BASDAI was 0.53 compared with a correlation of 0.59 between the MEI and the BASDAI. CONCLUSIONS: MASES seems to be a good alternative to the MEI with much better feasibility.

Assessment of disability with the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) whether the newly developed World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II) is a useful instrument for measuring disability, to assess its responsiveness in relation to other traditional disease specific instruments, and to identify factors that are associated with both short term and long term scores on the WHODAS II. METHODS: Patients with AS from a randomised controlled trial assessing the efficacy of spa treatment (n=117) and from a five year longitudinal observational study (n=97) participated. The patients completed several questionnaires, including the WHODAS II. After a three week course of spa treatment, 31 patients again completed all questionnaires to assess responsiveness. To determine to what degree the WHODAS II reflects some AS oriented measures on disease activity, functioning, and quality of life, correlation coefficients between the WHODAS II and these other questionnaires were calculated. Responsiveness was calculated by the effect size (ES) and standardised response mean (SRM). Linear regression analysis was performed to explore which factors might be associated with short term changes on the WHODAS II and to investigate (in the observational study) which factors of WHODAS II might predict disability five years later. RESULTS: Mean score on the WHODAS II was 23.9 (SD 15.5 (range 0.0-76.1)). Scores on the WHODAS II were significantly correlated with all disease specific questionnaires measured (all p<0.001). The WHODAS II showed a comparable short term responsiveness score (SRM 0.41; ES 0.39). In regression analysis these short term changes on the WHODAS II were significantly associated with changes in functioning (beta coefficient 4.25, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.24 to 7.26, p=0.007). In the observational study, disease activity (beta coefficient 0.35, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.53, p<0.000) as well as functioning (beta coefficient 0.23, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.38, p=0.002) seemed to significantly predict disability (WHODAS II) after five years. CONCLUSION: The WHODAS II is a useful instrument for measuring disability in AS in that it accurately reflects disease specific instruments and that it shows similar responsiveness scores. In AS, a short term change on the WHODAS II is associated with a change in physical function. At the group level, disease activity and physical functioning may predict disability after five years.

Development of the ASQoL: a quality of life instrument specific to ankylosing spondylitis.

BACKGROUND: Although disease-specific health status measures are available for ankylosing spondylitis (AS), no instrument exists for assessing quality of life (QoL) in the condition. OBJECTIVE: To produce an AS-specific QoL measure that would be relevant and acceptable to respondents, valid, and reliable. METHODS: The ASQoL employs the needs-based model of QoL and was developed in parallel in the UK and the Netherlands (NL). Content was derived from interviews with patients in each country. Face and content validity were assessed through patient field test interviews (UK and NL). A postal survey in the UK produced a more efficient version of the ASQoL, which was tested for scaling properties, reliability, internal consistency, and validity in a further postal survey in each country. RESULTS: A 41 item questionnaire was derived from interview transcripts. Field testing interviews confirmed acceptability. Rasch analysis of data from the first survey (n=121) produced a 26 item questionnaire. Rasch analysis of data from the second survey (UK: n=164; NL: n=154) showed some item misfit, but showed that items formed a hierarchical order and were stable over time. Problematic items were removed giving an 18 item scale. Both language versions had excellent internal consistency (alpha=0.89-0.91), test-retest reliability (r(s)=0.92 UK and r(s)=0.91 NL), and validity. CONCLUSIONS: The ASQoL provides a valuable tool for assessing the impact of interventions for AS and for evaluating models of service delivery. It is well accepted by patients, taking about four minutes to complete, and has excellent scaling and psychometric properties.

Reliability of self assessed joint counts in ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability of self reported joint counts to assess pain or swelling in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: 217 outpatients fulfilling the modified New York criteria for AS were asked to mark painful joints and swollen joints on two mannequins presenting 44 and 40 joints respectively. A doctor or research nurse assessed the same joints for pain and swelling on the same day, after completion by the patient, without information on the results of the patient's assessment. RESULTS: Forty six (21%) patients reported one or more swollen joints (mean number of swollen joints 0.5, range 0-8); the doctor found one or more swollen joints in 54 (25%) of the patients (mean number of swollen joints 0.8, range 0-31). The overall agreement on the number of swollen joints between patients and doctor was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.53). Agreement on individual swollen joints was poor to moderate (kappa 0.1-0.64). 128 (60%) patients reported tender joints (mean number of joints 2.4, range 0-26). The doctors reported one of more tender joints in 50% of the patients (mean number of tender joints 2.2, range 0-34). The overall agreement was also moderate (ICC 0.71). The agreement on individual tender joints was again poor to moderate (kappa 0.19-0.43). There was only high concordance between doctors and patients on the absence of swollen joints (82%). The concordance on the presence of monoarthritis, oligoarthritis, or polyarthritis was low (17-22%). CONCLUSION: Owing to these discrepancies in assessment of individual joints and total number of affected joints, joint counts in AS assessed by doctors cannot be replaced by joint counts reported by the patients. Patients are only able to judge if their joints are not swollen.

Work status and productivity costs due to ankylosing spondylitis: comparison of three European countries.

OBJECTIVE: To compare work disability, sick leave, and productivity costs due to ankylosing spondylitis (AS) of three European countries. METHODS: 216 patients with AS from the Netherlands, France, and Belgium participated in a two year observational study. Employment and work disability rates at baseline were adjusted for age and sex. Productivity costs were calculated by both the friction cost method and the human capital approach. The adjusted contributions of country to employment, work disability, and having an episode of sick leave were assessed by logistic regression and the contribution of the country to days of sick leave and costs by Cox proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS: 209 patients completed the two years' follow up with sufficient data for cost analysis. Adjusted employment was 55% in the Netherlands as compared with 72% in both other countries and only in the Netherlands was it lower than expected in the general population. Adjusted work disability was 41%, 23%, and 9% in the Netherlands, France, and Belgium and in all countries was higher than expected in the general population. In those with a paid job, the mean number of days of sick leave per patient per year because of AS was 19 (range 0-130), six (range 0-77), and nine (range 0-60 ) in the Netherlands, France, and Belgium respectively. Applying the friction cost method to those with a paid job resulted in mean costs per patient per year of 1257 euros (range 0-7356), 428 euros (range 0-5979), and 476 euros (range 0-2354) in the Netherlands, France, and Belgium. Applying the human capital approach to the whole group resulted in mean costs per patient per year of 8862 euros (range 0-46 818), 3188 euros (range 0-43 550), and 3609 euros (range 0-34 320) in the three countries, respectively. After adjusting for sociodemographic and disease characteristics, living in the Netherlands, as compared with both other countries, was associated with a higher chance of being work disabled (odds ratio (OR)=3.82; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33 to 11.01), but not with the risk of having an episode of sick leave. Similarly, living in the Netherlands contributed independently to the number of days sick leave (OR=0.65; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.97), a higher amount of friction costs (OR=0.63; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.96), and a higher amount of human capital costs (OR=0.46; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.68). CONCLUSION: There are remarkable differences in work status and productivity costs between the three European countries. This has implications for the generalisability of health economic studies.

A comparative study of the usefulness of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index and the Dougados Functional Index in the assessment of ankylosing spondylitis.

To determine whether the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI, score 0-10) or Dougados Functional Index (DFI, score 0-40) is superior in measuring physical function in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) we studied 191 consecutive outpatients with AS in the Netherlands, France, and Belgium. The participating centers are secondary and tertiary referral centers. The external criterion for disease activity (DA) was: both patient and physician assessment of disease activity on a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). The external criterion for damage was 2 radiological scores of the spine; BASRI-s (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index-spine) and a modified SASSS (Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score). Median scores for BASFI and DFI were 2.5 (range 0-10) and 8.5 (range 0-35), respectively. Spearman correlation coefficient between both indexes was 0.89. The average correlation with disease activity variables was 0.42 for BASFI and 0.41 for DFI. For both BASFI and DFI the correlation with BASRI-s was 0.42 and with SASSS 0.36. When distinguishing between patients with high and low disease activity, sensitivity for both indexes was between 76 and 94%, while specificity was between 66 and 87% for all 3 DA measures. Average misclassification between BASFI, DFI and DA was 23 and 27%, respectively. Both BASFI and DFI correlate equally well with disease activity and damage.

Relative value of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein in assessment of disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis.

Our aim was to determine whether C-reactive protein (CRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is more appropriate in measuring disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). We studied 191 consecutive outpatients with AS in The Netherlands, France, and Belgium. Patients were attending secondary and tertiary referral centers. The external criterion for disease activity was: physician and patient assessment of disease activity on a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). In each measure we defined 3 levels of disease activity: no activity, ambiguous activity, and definite disease activity. The patients with AS (modified New York criteria) were divided into 2 groups: those with spinal involvement only (n=149) and those who also had peripheral arthritis and/or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (n=42). For each criterion of disease activity, the patients with no activity and with definite activity were included in receiver operator curves and used to determine cutoff values with the highest sensitivity and specificity. We also calculated Spearman correlations. The median CRP and ESR were 16 mg/l and 13 mm/h, respectively, in the spinal group and 25 mg/l and 21 mm/h, respectively, in the peripheral/IBD group. In both groups the Spearman correlation coefficients between CRP and ESR were around 0.50. There was moderate to poor correlation between CRP, ESR, and the 3 disease activity variables (0.06-0.48). Sensitivity for both ESR and CRP was 100% for physician assessment and between 44 and 78% for patient assessment of disease activity and the BASDAI, while specificity was between 44 and 84% for all disease activity measures. The positive predictive values of CRP and ESR in our setting were low (0.15-0.69). We conclude that neither CRP nor ESR is superior to assess disease activity.

Plain radiographs as an outcome measure in ankylosing spondylitis.

Radiographic evidence of sacroiliitis is a prerequisite for classification according to the (modified) New York criteria. Structural damage is also an important endpoint in the assessment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, little research has been done on the development, validation, and application of scoring methods for radiographic changes in AS. Methodological issues that can be addressed concerning radiographic scoring methods are discussed in detail. A short introduction to the available scoring methods is presented.

Radiological scoring methods in ankylosing spondylitis: reliability and sensitivity to change over one year.

Our aim was to compare reliability and sensitivity to change of different radiological scoring methods in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Two trained observers scored 30 AS radiographs twice with an interval of 4 weeks. The same two observers scored 187 AS radiographs in pairs, at baseline and after one year followup, to measure change and agreement on change. The sacroiliac (SI) joints were scored in 5 grades by the New York method and the SASSS (Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score). Hips were graded 0-5 (according to Larsen). Cervical and lumbar spine were graded (0-4, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiological Index, BASRI), and scored in detail (0-72, SASSS). SASSS of the cervical and lumbar spine scored on the anterior sites of the vertebrae proved most reliable, with both intra and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between 0.87 and 0.97. BASRI was only moderately reliable, with Cohen's kappa ranging between 0.50 and 0.82 for intra, and 0.38-0.64 for interobserver reliability. Similarly, SI joint scores (New York, SASSS) showed intraobserver kappa between 0.56 and 0.84, and interobserver reliability with kappa between 0.37 and 0.47. Larsen hip scores proved unreliable: moderate intraobserver kappa of 0.47-0.58 and low interobserver kappa of 0.29. After retraining, interobserver kappa did not improve (0.45 and 0.17). In retrospect, a one year period was too short to measure sensitivity to change. Observers agreed that no change occurred in up to 89% of cases. A measurable change of deterioration or improvement occurred rarely. We conclude that in AS, only the SASSS method for the spine and the BASRI reached good reliability. Other methods for spine, SI joints, and hips were moderately reliable at best. There was moderate to good agreement on no change between the observers. No method showed change over a period of one year in a considerable number of patients.