Characterization of Infants with Idiopathic Transient and Persistent T Cell Lymphopenia Identified by Newborn Screening-a Single-Center Experience in New York State.

PURPOSE: Newborn screening (NBS) quantifies T cell receptor excision circles (TREC) and identifies infants with T cell lymphopenia (TCL). This study elucidates the demographics, laboratory characteristics, genetics, and clinical outcomes following live viral vaccine administration of term infants with transient or persistent idiopathic TCL. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was performed from September 2010 through June 2018. Laboratory variables were compared with Mann-Whitney tests. Correlations between initial TREC levels and T cell counts were determined by Spearman tests. RESULTS: Twenty-two transient and 21 persistent TCL infants were identified. Males comprised 68% of the transient and 52% of the persistent TCL cohorts. Whites comprised 23% of the transient and 29% of the persistent cohorts. Median initial TREC levels did not differ (66 vs. 60 TRECs/µL of blood, P = 0.58). The transient cohort had higher median initial CD3+ (2135 vs. 1169 cells/µL, P < 0.001), CD4+ (1460 vs. 866 cells/µL, P < 0.001), and CD8+ (538 vs. 277 cells/µL, P < 0.001) counts. The median age of resolution for the transient cohort was 38 days. Genetic testing revealed 2 genes of interest which warrant further study and several variants of uncertain significance in immunology-related genes in the persistent cohort. 19 transient and 14 persistent subjects received the initial rotavirus and/or MMRV immunization. No adverse reactions to live viral vaccines were reported in either cohort. CONCLUSION: Transient and persistent TCL infants differ by demographic, laboratory, and clinical characteristics. Select transient and persistent TCL patients may safely receive live attenuated viral vaccines, but larger confirmatory studies are needed.

A Simple Allergist-Led Intervention Improves Resident Training in Anaphylaxis.

Physicians underrecognize and undertreat anaphylaxis. Effective interventions are needed to improve physician knowledge and competency regarding evidence-based anaphylaxis diagnosis and management (ADAM). We designed and evaluated an educational program to improve ADAM in pediatrics, internal medicine, and emergency medicine residents from two academic medical centers. Anonymous questionnaires queried participants' demographics, prior ADAM clinical experience, competency, and comfort. A pretest assessing baseline knowledge preceded a 45-minute allergist-led evidence-based presentation, including practice with epinephrine autoinjectors, immediately followed by a posttest. A follow-up test assessed long-term knowledge retention twelve weeks later. 159 residents participated in the pretest, 152 participated in the posttest, and 86 participated in the follow-up test. There were no significant differences by specialty or site. With a possible score of 10, the mean pretest score (7.31 ± 1.50) was lower than the posttest score (8.79 ± 1.29) and follow-up score (8.17 ± 1.72) (P < 0.001 for both). Although participants' perceived confidence in diagnosing or managing anaphylaxis improved from baseline to follow-up (P < 0.001 for both), participants' self-reported clinical experience with ADAM or autoinjector use was unchanged. Allergist-led face-to-face educational intervention improves residents' short-term knowledge and perceived confidence in ADAM. Limited clinical experience or reinforcement contributes to the observed decreased knowledge.

Device-based nonspecific immunomodulation therapy (Celacade), and its potential role in the treatment of chronic heart failure.

Chronic heart failure (CHF) remains a leading cause of mortality and morbidity, despite the use of optimal standard-of-care medical therapies. Although the role of the immune system in the pathogenesis and progression of CHF has been well-appreciated, attempts to modify specific systemic immune mediators have been unsuccessful. Building on the modest successes of more broad-spectrum immune therapies, Celacade therapy was developed, a device that induces apoptosis in an ex vivo blood sample. Upon reinjection into the body, the treated blood sample has been shown to have an anti-inflammatory effect. Celacade has been successful in several animal models of disease where inflammation plays an important pathogenic role. Two phase III clinical trials of Celacade have been undertaken. A trial on the use of Celacade in peripheral arterial disease with intermittent claudication was terminated early due to a lack of clinical effect, and a larger trial of Celacade treatment in CHF (ACCLAIM) was completed in 2006. ACCLAIM did not reach the primary end point for the overall study population; however, the study results demonstrated a reduced risk of death or first cardiovascular hospitalization by 39% in patients with New York Heart Association class II CHF and a 26% reduction in patients with class II, III, and IV disease who had no prior history of myocardial infarction. Celacade has been approved for treatment of CHF in these groups of patients in the European Union, and an FDA-mandated confirmatory study of Celacade for possible approval in the United States is in progress.