One-year outcomes after successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: The impact of dissection re-entry techniques.

We aimed to determine clinical outcomes 1 year after successful chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI and, in particular, whether use of dissection and re-entry strategies affects clinical outcomes. Hybrid approaches have increased the procedural success of CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but longer-term outcomes are unknown, particularly in relation to dissection and re-entry techniques. Data were collected for consecutive CTO PCIs performed by hybrid-trained operators from 7 United Kingdom (UK) centres between 2012 and 2014. The primary endpoint (death, myocardial infarction, unplanned target vessel revascularization) was measured at 12 months along with angina status. One-year follow up data were available for 96% of successful cases (n = 805). In total, 85% of patients had a CCS angina class of 2-4 prior to CTO PCI. Final successful procedural strategy was antegrade wire escalation 48%; antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) 21%; retrograde wire escalation 5%; retrograde dissection and re-entry (RDR) 26%. Overall, 47% of CTOs were recanalized using dissection and re-entry strategies. During a mean follow up of 11.5 ± 3.8 months, the primary endpoint occurred in 8.6% (n = 69) of patients (10.3% (n = 39/375) in DART group and 7.0% (n = 30/430) in wire-based cases). The majority of patients (88%) had no or minimal angina (CCS class 0 or 1). ADR and RDR were used more frequently in more complex cases with greater disease burden, however, the only independent predictor of the primary endpoint was lesion length. CTO PCI in complex lesions using the hybrid approach is safe, effective and has a low one-year adverse event rate. The method used to recanalize arteries was not associated with adverse outcomes. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Hybrid approach improves success of chronic total occlusion angioplasty.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment options for coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) are limited, with low historical success rates from percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We report procedural outcomes of CTO PCI from 7 centres with dedicated CTO operators trained in hybrid approaches comprising antegrade/retrograde wire escalation (AWE/RWE) and dissection re-entry (ADR/RDR) techniques. METHODS: Clinical and procedural data were collected from consecutive unselected patients with CTO between 2012 and 2014. Lesion complexity was graded by the Multicentre CTO Registry of Japan (J-CTO) score, with ≥2 defined as complex. Success was defined as thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3 flow with <30% residual stenosis, subclassified as at first attempt or overall. Inhospital complications and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs, death/myocardial infarction/unplanned target vessel revascularisation) were recorded. RESULTS: 1156 patients were included. Despite high complexity (mean J-CTO score 2.5±1.3), success rates were 79% (first attempt) and 90% (overall) with 30-day MACE of 1.6%. AWE was highly effective in less complex lesions (J-CTO ≤1 94% success vs 79% in J-CTO score ≥2). ADR/RDR was used more commonly in complex lesions (J-CTO≤1 15% vs J-CTO ≥2 56%). Need for multiple approaches during each attempt increased with lesion complexity (17% J-CTO ≤1 vs 48% J-CTO ≥2). Lesion modification ('investment procedures') at the end of unsuccessful first attempts increased the chance of subsequent success (96% vs 71%). CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid-trained operators can achieve overall success rates of 90% in real world practice with acceptable MACE. Use of dissection re-entry and investment procedures maintains high success rates in complex lesions. The hybrid approach represents a significant advance in CTO treatment.

Impact of proctoring on success rates for percutaneous revascularisation of coronary chronic total occlusions.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of proctoring for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in six UK centres. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 587 CTO procedures from six UK centres and compared success rates of operators who had received proctorship with success rates of the same operators before proctorship (pre-proctored) and operators in the same institutions who had not been proctored (non-proctored). There were 232 patients in the pre-proctored/non-proctored group and 355 patients in the post-proctored group. Complexity was assessed by calculating the Japanese CTO (JCTO) score for each case. RESULTS: CTO PCI success was greater in the post-proctored compared with the pre-proctored/non-proctored group (77.5% vs 62.1%, p<0.0001). In more complex cases where JCTO≥2, the difference in success was greater (70.7% vs 49.5%, p=0.0003). After proctoring, there was an increase in CTO PCI activity in centres from 2.5% to 3.5%, p<0.0001 (as a proportion of total PCI), and the proportion of very difficult cases with JCTO score ≥3 increased from 15.3% (35/229) to 29.7% (105/354), p<0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: Proctoring resulted in an increase in procedural success for CTO PCI, an increase in complex CTO PCI and an increase in total CTO PCI activity. Proctoring may be a valuable way to improve access to CTO PCI and the likelihood of procedural success.

Cardiovascular collapse post chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention due to a compressive left atrial hematoma managed with percutaneous drainage.

This case illustrates a potential complication of the retrograde approach using epicardial collaterals for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Hypotension post CTO PCI in a patient who has undergone previous cardiac surgery can have multiple causes, one of which is chamber compression from a localized hematoma due to coronary perforation as occurred in this case. This report is the first description of successful nonsurgical management of a left atrial hematoma causing cardiovascular collapse with percutaneous drainage.

Urgent in-patient coronary angiography: a comparison of centres with and without cardiac catheter facilities.

OBJECTIVES: To review the referral of patients to a tertiary centre for urgent angiography and to determine if there are differences in invasive treatment strategies for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: There were 2 parts to the study, a retrospective part over 3.5 years from a computerised cardiac laboratory booking data base and a prospective part over 3 months. RESULTS: There were 1190 urgent in-patient angiograms performed with 499 (42%) admitted initially to the tertiary centre while the remaining 691 (58%) were admitted to district general hospitals (DGH), with no on-site access to a cardiac laboratory, and subsequently transferred to the tertiary centre. Once referred, DGH patients waited longer for their angiogram (2.7 +/- 3.2 vs 2.0 +/- 2.8 days, p < 0.0001). Interestingly, DGH patients appear to spend an average of 4 days in hospital prior to referral for angiography. DGH patients were more likely to have a higher Thrombosis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score at presentation and following angiography were more likely to have coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and less likely to have angiographically normal arteries. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are consistent with previous studies demonstrating that access to coronary angiography varies considerably between hospitals. However, we have demonstrated that patients in DGHs wait on average 4 days before referral for coronary angiography suggesting that there may be triage based on initial responses to medical therapy. Further research is needed to determine whether this has a direct effect on outcomes.

Direct comparison of selective endothelin A and non-selective endothelin A/B receptor blockade in chronic heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential differential effects of selective endothelin (ET) A and dual ET-A/B receptor blockade in patients with chronic heart failure. METHODS: Nine patients with chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association class II-III) each received intravenous infusions of BQ-123 alone (selective ET-A blockade) and combined BQ-123 and BQ-788 (dual ET-A/B blockade) in a randomised, placebo controlled, three way crossover study. RESULTS: Selective ET-A blockade increased cardiac output (maximum mean (SEM) 33 (12)%, p < 0.001) and reduced mean arterial pressure (maximum -13 (4)%, p < 0.001) and systemic vascular resistance (maximum -26 (8)%, p < 0.001), without changing heart rate (p = 0.38). Dual ET-A/B blockade significantly reduced the changes in all these haemodynamic variables compared with selective ET-A blockade (p < 0.05). Selective ET-A blockade reduced pulmonary artery pressure (maximum 25 (7)%, p = 0.01) and pulmonary vascular resistance (maximum 72 (39)%, p < 0.001). However, there was no difference between these effects and those seen with dual ET-A/B blockade. Unlike selective ET-A blockade, dual ET-A/B blockade increased plasma ET-1 concentrations (by 47 (4)% with low dose and 61 (8)% with high dose, both p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: While there appeared to be similar reductions in pulmonary pressures with selective ET-A and dual ET-A/B blockade, selective ET-A blockade caused greater systemic vasodilatation and did not affect ET-1 clearance. In conclusion, there are significant haemodynamic differences between selective ET-A and dual ET-A/B blockade, which may determine responses in individual patients.

Systemic ETA receptor antagonism with BQ-123 blocks ET-1 induced forearm vasoconstriction and decreases peripheral vascular resistance in healthy men.

1. The effect on systemic haemodynamics of BQ-123, a selective endothelin A (ETA) receptor antagonist, was investigated in healthy men by giving, on separate occasions, ascending intravenous doses of 100, 300, 1000 and 3000 nmol min(-1) BQ-123, each for 15 min, in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. The response of forearm blood flow to brachial artery infusion of endothelin-1 (ET-1; 5 pmol min(-1) for 90 min) was also studied using bilateral forearm plethysmography, after systemic pre-treatment, on separate occasions, with one of two doses of BQ-123 (300 and 1000 nmol min(-1) for 15 min) or placebo. 2. Systemic BQ-123 dose-dependently decreased systemic vascular resistance (P<0.01 for all doses vs placebo) and mean arterial pressure (P<0.05 for 300 nmol min(-1) and P<0.01 for 1000 and 3000 nmol min(-1)) during the 60 min following infusion. There were concurrent increases in heart rate and cardiac index. BQ-123, when infused systemically for 15 min, appeared to reach a maximum effect at 1000 nmol min(-1). 3. Intra-brachial ET-1 infusion, after pre-treatment with placebo, caused a slow onset progressive forearm vasoconstriction without systemic effects. This vasoconstriction was attenuated by pre-treatment with BQ-123 at 300 nmol min(-1) and abolished by BQ-123 at 1000 nmol min(-1) (P<0.01 vs placebo). 4. These effects occurred at concentrations of BQ-123 in the plasma (510+/-64 nmol l(-1)) that were ETA receptor selective, and were not accompanied by an increase in plasma ET-1 that would have indicated ETB receptor blockade. 5. We conclude that ETA-mediated vascular tone contributes to the maintenance of basal systemic vascular resistance and blood pressure in healthy men.

Effects of candesartan on cardiac and arterial structure and function in hypertensive subjects.

OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of candesartan cilexetil on left ventricular mass index (LVMI), left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, arterial structure and function and blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients (n=35), aged >20 years, with hypertension and average baseline LVMI of 89 g/m2 were treated for 24 weeks with candesartan, 16 mg o.d., following a four-week placebo run-in period. If diastolic BP remained above 95 mmHg, hydrochlorothiazide, 12.5 mg o.d.,was added. Left ventricular structure and function were assessed using transthoracic echocardiography. Arterial function and structure were assessed using pulse wave analysis to calculate augmentation index (AIx) and forearm plethysmography to calculate minimum vascular resistance. BP was measured in the office and by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). RESULTS: The mean reduction in LVMI was 4.4 g/m2(p=0.022). Left ventricular systolic function was not significantly altered from baseline, but diastolic function significantly improved: the mean change in diastolic time was 54 ms (p=0.037), in peak velocity filling 6.3 cm/s (p=0.023); E:A ratio improved by 0.08 (p=0.049). The mean reduction in forearm vascular resistance was 15 units at rest (p=0.001) and 1.3 units after limb ischaemia (p=0.006). AIx decreased significantly, with a mean reduction of 9% (p<0.001). Central BP also significantly reduced(systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure 31/20 mmHg; p<0.001). BP was significantly reduced, both in the office (22/16 mmHg; p<0.001) and by 24-hourABPM (18/12 mmHg; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with candesartan, 16 mg o.d., with or without hydrochlorothiazide, for 24 weeks, significantly reduced left ventricular mass and arterial hypertrophy in patients with hypertension. In parallel, there were significant improvements in left ventricular diastolic function and arterial function.

Systemic blockade of the endothelin-B receptor increases peripheral vascular resistance in healthy men.

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is an important mediator of vascular tone in humans, and a number of endothelin receptor antagonists are currently in clinical development as vasodilator agents. While the vasoconstrictor role of the ETA receptor is undisputed, the role of the ETB receptor remains unclear. Hemodynamic effects of systemic doses of the ETB-selective antagonist BQ-788 were investigated in 5 healthy male volunteers (age range, 33 to 48 years) in a placebo-controlled, four-way crossover study. After a 15-minute infusion of BQ-788 (3, 30, or 300 nmol/min) or placebo, plasma ET-1 and big ET-1, blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac index, and stroke index were measured. Total peripheral vascular resistance was calculated from cardiac index and mean arterial pressure. Hemodynamic data are expressed as maximum, placebo-corrected, percentage change from baseline following BQ-788 (300 nmol/min) and were examined by ANOVA. Plasma ET-1 increased by 3.7+/-1.2 pg/mL (maximum at 15 minutes, P=0.02), whereas there was no significant change in plasma big ET-1. Although BQ-788 had no effect on mean arterial pressure, there was a reduction in heart rate (13+/-7% at 50 minutes; P=0.002), cardiac index (17+/-5% at 40 minutes; P<0. 0001), and stroke index (8+/-4% at 40 minutes; P=0.002) and an increase in total peripheral vascular resistance (24+/-5% at 40 minutes; P<0.0001). The selective ETB receptor antagonist BQ-788 causes peripheral vasoconstriction in healthy volunteers, suggesting that the overall balance of effects of endogenous ET-1 at the vascular ETB receptor favors vasodilatation. Further investigation is now clearly required to address whether selective ETA or combined ETA/ETB receptor blockade will be more effective in the clinical setting.

Inhibition of neutral endopeptidase causes vasoconstriction of human resistance vessels in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Neutral endopeptidase (NEP) degrades vasoactive peptides, including the natriuretic peptides, angiotensin II, and endothelin-1. Systemic inhibition of NEP does not consistently lower blood pressure, even though it increases natriuretic peptide concentrations and causes natriuresis and diuresis. We therefore investigated the direct effects of local inhibition of NEP on forearm resistance vessel tone. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four separate studies were performed, each with 90-minute drug infusions. In the first study, 10 healthy subjects received a brachial artery infusion of the NEP inhibitor candoxatrilat (125 nmol/min), which caused a slowly progressive forearm vasoconstriction (12+/-2%; P=0.001). In a second two-phase study, 6 healthy subjects received, 4 hours after enalapril (20 mg) or placebo, an intra-arterial infusion of the NEP inhibitor thiorphan (30 nmol/min). Thiorphan caused similar degrees of local forearm vasoconstriction (P=0.6) after pretreatment with both placebo (13+/-1%, P=0.006) and enalapril (17+/-6%, P=0.05). In a third three-phase study, 8 healthy subjects received intra-arterial thiorphan (30 nmol/min), the endothelin ETA antagonist BQ-123 (100 nmol/min), and both combined. Thiorphan caused local forearm vasoconstriction (13+/-1%, P=0.0001); BQ-123 caused local vasodilatation (33+/-3%, P=0.0001). Combined thiorphan and BQ-123 caused vasodilatation (32+/-1%, P=0.0001) similar to BQ-123 alone (P=0.98). In a fourth study, 6 hypertensive patients (blood pressure >160/100 mm Hg) received intra-arterial thiorphan (30 nmol/min). Thiorphan caused a slowly progressive forearm vasoconstriction (10+/-2%, P=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of local NEP causes vasoconstriction in forearm resistance vessels of both healthy volunteers and patients with hypertension. The lack of effect of ACE inhibition on the vasoconstriction produced by thiorphan and its absence during concomitant ETA receptor blockade suggest that it is mediated by endothelin-1 and not angiotensin II. These findings may help to explain the failure of systemic NEP inhibition to lower blood pressure.

Reproducibility of pulse wave velocity and augmentation index measured by pulse wave analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the reproducibility of pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx) measured using pulse wave analysis (PWA), prior to its use in large-scale clinical trials. METHODS: Arterial pressure waveforms were recorded and analysed using an established technique (Sphygmocor). Subjects with and without a range of recognized cardiovascular risk factors were studied to provide a wide range of values. Measurements were made after a brief introduction to the technique in a clinical setting. Two observers recorded aortic and brachial PWV in 24 subjects, each on two occasions, in a random order. In a separate study, two different observers used PWA to determine AIx in 33 subjects, each on two occasions, in a random order. Data were analysed using Bland-Altman plots and presented as mean +/- SD. RESULTS: Brachial PWV was 8.65+/-1.58 m/s (range 6.16-10.95 m/s) and aortic PWV was 8.15+/-3.01 m/s (5.01-17.97 m/s). Within-observer variability was 0.14+/-0.82 m/s for brachial PWV and 0.07+/-1.17 m/s for aortic PWV. Corresponding between-observer values were -0.44+/-1.09 m/s and -0.30+/-1.25 m/s. AIx ranged from -15.0 to +45.0%, with a group mean of +19.6+/-12.0%. The within-observer difference was 0.49+/-5.37% and between-observer difference 0.23+/-3.80%. CONCLUSION: PWA is a simple and reproducible technique with which to measure PWV and AIx. Reproducibility accords with that reported by other workers using different methodologies. PWA may, therefore, be suitable for large-scale population and intervention studies investigating the clinical relevance of vascular stiffness.