Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 84(7): ajpe7648, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32773823

ABSTRACT

Objective. To evaluate a clinical documentation rubric for pharmacotherapy problem-based learning (PBL) courses using inter-rater reliability (IRR) among different evaluators. Methods. A rubric was adapted for use in grading student pharmacists' clinical documentation in pharmacotherapy PBL courses. Multiple faculty evaluators used the rubric to assess student pharmacists' clinical documentation. The mean rubric score given by the evaluators and the standard deviation were calculated. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the rubric. Results. Three hundred seventeen clinical documentation submissions were scored twice by multiple evaluators using the rubric. The mean initial evaluation score was 9.1 (SD=0.9) and the mean second evaluation score was 9.1 (SD=0.9), with no significant difference found between the two. The overall ICC was 0.7 across multiple graders, indicating good IRR. Conclusion. The clinical documentation rubric demonstrated overall good IRR between multiple evaluators when used in pharmacotherapy PBL courses. The rubric will undergo additional evaluation and continuous quality improvement to ensure that student pharmacists are provided with the formative feedback they need.


Subject(s)
Documentation/standards , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/standards , Education, Pharmacy/methods , Educational Measurement/standards , Problem-Based Learning/standards , Faculty/standards , Formative Feedback , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Students, Pharmacy
2.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 84(7): ajpe7803, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32773833

ABSTRACT

Objective. To describe the landscape of teaching and learning curriculum (TLC) programs sponsored by US schools and colleges of pharmacy and evaluate their adoption of best practice recommendations. Methods. A 28-item electronic survey instrument was developed based on best practice recommendations published by the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP), American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP), and American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) for the conduct of TLC programs. The survey instrument was electronically distributed to 137 accredited colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States. Results. Eighty-eight institutions responded, resulting in a response rate of 64%. Sixty-one TLC programs were included in the final analysis. Seventy-five percent of TLC programs reported using best practice recommendations; however, 10% of respondents indicated they were not aware of the published recommendations. Inconsistencies among programs were noted in required teaching experiences, participant evaluation, and ongoing programmatic assessment. Conclusion. Most institutions offering TLC programs are aware of published best practice guidelines and have adopted a majority of the published best practices. However, considerable variability exists across the country. Development of a formal external validation process for TLC programs is necessary to ensure consistent quality.


Subject(s)
Curriculum/statistics & numerical data , Education, Pharmacy, Graduate/methods , Education, Pharmacy, Graduate/statistics & numerical data , Schools, Pharmacy/statistics & numerical data , Universities/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Internship, Nonmedical/methods , Internship, Nonmedical/statistics & numerical data , Learning , Pharmacists/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacy/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Teaching/statistics & numerical data , United States
3.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 10(4): 427-432, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29793703

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate participants' satisfaction with their teaching mentor relationship in a teaching and learning curriculum (TLC) and determine characteristics that are associated with high mentee satisfaction. METHODS: A 31-item survey instrument was administered to all 2015-2016 participants of the Teaching Certificate Program. RESULTS: Seventy percent of program participants (n = 60/86) responded to the survey. Overall, 80% of program participants were satisfied or very satisfied with their mentor relationship. Characteristics associated with participants reporting that they were very satisfied with their teaching mentor relationship included mentor availability for face-to-face contact and affiliation with the same institution. Mentor actions associated with high mentee satisfaction included reviewing lecture slides, providing midpoint feedback, providing career advice, and attending mentee lectures. CONCLUSIONS: Teaching certificate program participants perceive increased mentor accessibility and frequent interaction as key factors to a satisfying mentor-mentee relationship. Optimizing and standardizing mentorship programs are essential to the success of postgraduate teaching curriculums.


Subject(s)
Attitude , Curriculum , Faculty, Pharmacy/education , Mentoring , Mentors , Personal Satisfaction , Teaching/education , Adult , Certification , Education, Pharmacy , Feedback , Female , Humans , Learning , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
4.
Innov Pharm ; 9(2): 1-5, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34007705

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the transition of a pharmacy residency and fellowship (PRF) elective course to a hybrid online platform. INNOVATION: In 2016, the 1-credit hour PRF elective was transitioned from a live, synchronous course to a hybrid online platform. Over the course of the semester, students completed eight modules along with assignments that pertained to a different component of PRF. Course grades and evaluations, as well as PRF placement rates, were compared between 2015 (live, synchronous course) and 2016 (hybrid online course). There were no differences in overall course grades or student evaluations of individual relevant course objectives between the two course formats. However, more students rated the course as excellent during the 2015 live, synchronous course. Placement rates were similar between students who took the course in 2015 and 2016. CRITICAL ANALYSIS: Following the transition of a PRF elective to a hybrid online platform, course grades, evaluation of individual relevant course objectives, and PRF placement rates remained similar to previous years. Creative educational venues can help meet the student demand while simultaneously allowing faculty to manage their time. However, instructors should balance this with desire of students to have more face-to-face in class time.

5.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 80(3): 42, 2016 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27170813

ABSTRACT

Objective. To assess teaching certificate program (TCP) participants' perceptions of mentor-mentee relationships. Methods. A 15-item survey instrument was administered to all 2014-2015 participants of the Indiana Pharmacy Teaching Certificate (IPTeC) program. Results. One hundred percent of IPTeC program participants (83/83) responded to the survey. The majority of participants indicated that having a professional mentor was either very important (52%) or important (47%) to their professional development and preferred to choose their own professional mentor (53%). Mentor characteristics rated as highly important by mentees included having similar clinical practice interests (82%), having similar research interests (66%), and being available to meet face-to-face (90%). Age, race, and gender of the mentor were not rated by mentees as important. Conclusion. Teaching certificate program participants place high importance on having a professional mentor. Mentorship of pharmacists completing TCPs should be a priority for current pharmacy faculty members so adequate guidance is available to future pharmacy educators.


Subject(s)
Certification/standards , Faculty, Pharmacy/psychology , Mentors/psychology , Perception , Pharmacy Residencies/standards , Students, Pharmacy/psychology , Certification/methods , Education, Pharmacy/methods , Education, Pharmacy/standards , Humans , Pharmacy Residencies/methods , Program Evaluation/methods , Program Evaluation/standards , Teaching/psychology
7.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 77(4): 79, 2013 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23716747

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To identify and assess changes made to the Indiana Pharmacy Resident Teaching Certificate program over 10 years to adapt to the growing number and changing needs of pharmacy educators in the next generation. DESIGN: In 2011, all resident program participants and directors were sent an electronic survey instrument designed to assess the perceived value of each program component. ASSESSMENT: Since 2003, the number of program participants has tripled, and the program has expanded to include additional core requirements and continuing education. Participants generally agreed that the speakers, seminar topics, seminar video recordings, and seminar offerings during the fall semester were program strengths. The program redesign included availability of online registration; a 2-day conference format; retention of those seminars perceived to be most important, according to survey results; implementation of a registration fee; electronic teaching portfolio submission; and establishment of teaching mentors. CONCLUSION: With the growing number of residents and residency programs, pharmacy teaching certificate programs must accommodate more participants while continuing to provide quality instruction, faculty mentorship, and opportunities for classroom presentations and student precepting. The Indiana Pharmacy Resident Teaching Certificate program has successfully evolved over the last 10 years to meet these challenges by implementing successful programmatic changes in response to residency program director and past program participant feedback.


Subject(s)
Certification/standards , Education, Pharmacy, Graduate/standards , Faculty/standards , Internship, Nonmedical/standards , Teaching/standards , Curriculum/standards , Feedback , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Indiana , Mentors , Preceptorship/standards , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Schools, Pharmacy/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...