Accuracy of Nonenhanced CT vs Contrast-Enhanced CT for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Adults.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain requiring emergency intervention. It is often difficult for the clinician to make an accurate diagnosis due to nonspecific and overlapping clinical symptoms. Computed tomography (CT) has become the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation of suspected acute appendicitis. The main purpose of our study was to compare nonenhanced CT (NECT) with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 140 patients were enrolled in the study. Two abdominal radiologists-masked to both the clinical information and the final diagnosis-retrospectively reviewed the computed tomographic findings and made an imaging diagnosis based on (1) NECT only, (2) CECT only, and (3) both NECT and CECT. With the final diagnosis as the reference standard, the accuracy of each CT technique was estimated. RESULTS: The respective sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for NECT, CECT, and NECT + CECT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis were 80.7%, 86.7%, and 84.3%; 86.0%, 81.9%, and 83.6%; and, 87.7%, 80.7%, and 83.6%. There was no significant difference in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis among the 3 techniques. In order to make a correct diagnosis, the presence of at least 3 imaging findings for NECT or at least 4 for CECT had the best diagnostic accuracy. We also found that 9.25 mm was the optimal cut-off threshold for the detection of patients with acute appendicitis. CONCLUSION: Our study allowed direct comparison between NECT, CECT, and NECT + CECT combined. There was no difference in the ability of each CT technique for diagnosing patients with acute appendicitis. For a patient whom iodinated contrast media is contraindicated or a patient who has an increased risk of severe adverse reaction, we would encourage the use of NECT because it provides comparable diagnostic accuracy without further exposing such patient to the contrast media.

Role of Ancillary Testing on Endoscopic US-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Samples from Cystic Pancreatic Neoplasms.

Pancreatic cysts are increasingly detected on imaging studies. Accurate determination of the cyst type is important to provide appropriate care for the patients. It is also very clear that not one single modality can provide adequate diagnostic information. A multidisciplinary approach is the key to the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts. In this setting, the role of ancillary testing, which includes biochemical testing (carcinoembryonic antigen and amylase levels in the cyst), molecular testing (e.g., KRAS, GNAS, VHL, and CTNB1), and/or immunohistochemical tests are very important to obtain an accurate diagnosis. This review will discuss helpful ancillary tests in common pancreatic cyst neoplasms and how to approach the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts.