Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Br J Radiol ; 94(1119): 20201031, 2021 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33529057

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study dosimetric impact of random spot positioning errors on the clinical pencil beam scanning proton therapy plans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: IMPT plans of 10 patients who underwent proton therapy for tumors in brain or pelvic regions representing small and large volumes, respectively, were included in the study. Spot positioning errors of 1 mm, -1 mm or ±1 mm were introduced in these clinical plans by modifying the geometrical co-ordinates of proton spots using a script in the MATLAB programming environment. Positioning errors were simulated to certain numbers of (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%) randomly chosen spots in each layer of these treatment plans. Treatment plans with simulated errors were then imported back to the Raystation (Version 7) treatment planning system and the resultant dose distribution was calculated using Monte-Carlo dose calculation algorithm.Dosimetric plan evaluation parameters for target and critical organs of nominal treatment plans delivered for clinical treatments were compared with that of positioning error simulated treatment plans. For targets, D95% and D2% were used for the analysis. Dose received by optic nerve, chiasm, brainstem, rectum, sigmoid, and bowel were analyzed using relevant plan evaluation parameters depending on the critical structure. In case of intracranial lesions, the dose received by 0.03 cm3 volume (D0.03 cm3) was analyzed for optic nerve, chiasm and brainstem. In rectum, the volume of it receiving a dose of 65 Gy(RBE) (V65) and 40 Gy(RBE) (V40) were compared between the nominal and error introduced plans. Similarly, V65 and V63 were analyzed for Sigmoid and V50 and V15 were analyzed for bowel. RESULTS: The maximum dose variation in PTV D95% (1.88 %) was observed in a brain plan in which the target volume was the smallest (2.7 cm3) among all 10 plans included in the study. This variation in D95% drops down to 0.3% for a sacral chordoma plan in which the PTV volume is significantly higher at 672 cm3. The maximum difference in OARs in terms of absolute dose (D0.03 cm3) was found in left optic nerve (9.81%) and the minimum difference was observed in brainstem (2.48%). Overall, the magnitude of dose errors in chordoma plans were less significant in comparison to brain plans. CONCLUSION: The dosimetric impact of different error scenarios in spot positioning becomes more prominent for treatment plans involving smaller target volume compared to plans involving larger target volumes. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Provides information on the dosimetric impact of various possible spot positioning errors and its dependence on the tumor volume in intensity modulated proton therapy.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Pelvic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Proton Therapy/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Humans , Monte Carlo Method , Radiotherapy Dosage , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Radiation Oncology Journal ; : 207-216, 2020.
Article | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-837110

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To standardize the technique; evaluate resources requirements and analyze our early experience of total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) as part of the conditioning regimen before allogenic bone marrow transplantation using helical tomotherapy. @*Methods@#Computed tomography (CT) scanning and treatment were performed in head first supine (HFS) and feet first supine (FFS) orientations with an overlap at mid-thigh. Patients along with the immobilization device were manually rotated by 180° to change the orientation after the delivery of HFS plan. The dose at the junction was contributed by a complementary dose gradient from each of the plans. Plan was to deliver 95% of 12 Gy to 98% of clinical target volume with dose heterogeneity <10% and pre-specified organs-at-risk dose constraints. Megavoltage-CT was used for position verification before each fraction. Patient specific quality assurance and in vivo film dosimetry to verify junction dose were performed in all patients. @*Results@#Treatment was delivered in two daily fractions of 2 Gy each for 3 days with at least 8-hour gap between each fraction. The target coverage goals were met in all the patients. The average person-hours per patient were 16.5, 21.5, and 25.75 for radiation oncologist, radiation therapist, and medical physicist, respectively. Average in-room time per patient was 9.25 hours with an average beam-on time of 3.32 hours for all the 6 fractions. @*Conclusion@#This report comprehensively describes technique and resource requirements for TMLI and would serve as a practical guide for departments keen to start this service. Despite being time and labor intensive, it can be implemented safely and robustly.

3.
South Asian J Cancer ; 8(2): 73-79, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31069181

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer has been the most common cancer in the world for several decades. The non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes approximately about 80% of the total cases of lung cancer. Therapeutic interventions in NSCLC have shifted to the target-based approach from histology-based approach, and this has completely changed the face of the management of NSCLC. Developing countries, such as India, have very limited data compiled about the prevalence and treatment practices of lung cancer, despite a large burden of the disease. However, in recent times, there has been a lot of data generated in this regard. This article is an attempt to collate and shine light on the available data for the first-line treatment of NSCLC in India keeping in mind the current standards of care in this area.

4.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 82(3): 1278-84, 2012 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21489706

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate, with a dosimetric and clinical feasibility study, RapidArc (a volumetric modulated arc technique) for hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy treatment of large arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine patients were subject to multimodality imaging (magnetic resonance, computed tomography, and digital subtraction angiography) to determine nidus and target volumes, as well as involved organs at risk (optical structures, inner ear, brain stem). Plans for multiple intensity-modulated arcs with a single isocenter were optimized for a fractionation of 25 Gy in 5 fractions. All plans were optimized for 6-MV photon beams. Dose-volume histograms were analyzed to assess plan quality. Delivery parameters were reported to appraise technical features of RapidArc, and pretreatment quality assurance measurements were carried out to report on quality of delivery. RESULTS: Average size of AVM nidus was 26.2 cm(3), and RapidArc plans provided complete target coverage with minimal overdosage (V(100%) = 100% and V(110%) < 1%) and excellent homogeneity (<6%). Organs at risk were highly spared. The D(1%) to chiasm, eyes, lenses, optic nerves, and brainstem (mean ± SD) was 6.4 ± 8.3, 1.9 ± 3.8, 2.3 ± 2.2, 0.7 ± 0.9, 4.4 ± 7.2, 12.2 ± 9.6 Gy, respectively. Conformity index (CI(95%)) was 2.2 ± 0.1. The number of monitor units per gray was 277 ± 45, total beam-on time was 2.5 ± 0.3 min. Planning vs. delivery γ pass rate was 98.3% ± 0.9%. None of the patients developed acute toxicity. With a median follow-up of 9 months, 3 patients presented with deterioration of symptoms and were found to have postradiation changes but responded symptomatically to steroids. These patients continue to do well on follow-up. One patient developed headache and seizures, which was attributed to intracranial bleed, confirmed on imaging. CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy can be successfully delivered using the RapidArc form of volumetric arc technology for intracranial AVMs. The quality of delivery and calculated parameters are in agreement with each other and are in line with published reports for other sites.


Subject(s)
Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations/surgery , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Adult , Angiography, Digital Subtraction , Brain Stem/radiation effects , Ear, Inner/radiation effects , Eye/radiation effects , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Radiation Injuries/drug therapy , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Steroids/therapeutic use , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Young Adult
5.
J Clin Neurosci ; 16(2): 325-8, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19056274

ABSTRACT

Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor of childhood, with a propensity for neuraxial spread via the cerebrospinal fluid. However, systemic metastases can occur in a small minority of patients. Very rarely such metastases can involve the mandible and present with intra-oral swelling. One such occurrence in a patient with medulloblastoma in the setting of disseminated disease is reported with a review of the relevant literature. The treatment options for patients with extra-neuraxial metastases are limited and their prognosis continues to remain poor.


Subject(s)
Cerebellar Neoplasms/pathology , Mandibular Neoplasms/secondary , Medulloblastoma/pathology , Adolescent , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL