ABSTRACT
The current demographic change means that young psychotherapists and older patients will increasingly come into contact. Unique for this constellation is the intergenerational therapeutic relationship, which forms the basis of psychotherapy, but has not yet been the focus of empirical research. This qualitative study provides preliminary insights into how older patients (aged over 65) experience and perceive the therapeutic relationship with young psychotherapists (aged in their mid-20s to mid-30s). We conducted semi-structured interviews with twelve older patients (8 women, 4 men) and analysed their data using the grounded theory approach. We found a connection between the type of transference a participant demonstrated and their biographical as well as social experiences, desires, and fantasies. Overall, a tendency to seek harmony was observed among the participants, which was reflected in their behaviour towards young psychotherapists: (a) conflict avoidance, (b) (fantasised) therapy discontinuation, (c) adaption/subordination, and (d) solidarity, support, and protection. Our findings demonstrated that various intergenerational transference phenomena, including the roles in which young therapists are perceived, are associated with certain particularities and challenges, such as the topic of sexuality. It can be valuable for young psychotherapists to become aware of a potential role reversal that may result in older patients trying to support them.
Subject(s)
Psychotherapists , Psychotherapy , Humans , Female , Male , Aged , Adult , Psychotherapists/psychology , Psychotherapy/methods , Professional-Patient Relations , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Anxiety disorders, most notably panic disorders and agoraphobia, are common mental disorders, and there is a high comorbidity with personality disorders. Randomized controlled trails addressing this highly relevant group of patients are missing. DESIGN: The multicenter Anxiety and Personality Disorders (APD) study investigates 200 patients with panic disorder and/or agoraphobia with comorbid personality disorder in a randomized control-group comparison of psychoanalytic therapy (PT) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), including 100 patients in each group. Each patient will be examined over a period of six years, regardless of the duration of the individual treatment. The main issues that are addressed in this study are the comparison of the efficacy of PT and CBT in this special patient population, the comparison of the sustainability of the effects of PT and CBT, the comparison of the long-term cost-benefit-ratios of PT and CBT as well as the investigation of prescriptive patient characteristics for individualized treatment recommendations (differential indication). DISCUSSION: The APD study compares efficacy, sustainability, and cost-benefit-ratios of CBT and PT for anxiety plus personality disorders in a randomized controlled trail. The study design meets the requirements for an efficacy study for PT, which were recently defined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12449681.
Subject(s)
Agoraphobia/therapy , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Panic Disorder/therapy , Personality Disorders/therapy , Psychoanalytic Therapy , Agoraphobia/diagnosis , Agoraphobia/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Comorbidity , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Panic Disorder/diagnosis , Panic Disorder/psychology , Personality Disorders/diagnosis , Personality Disorders/psychologyABSTRACT
Interpersonal problems were studied in 121 patients treated with psychoanalytic therapy using the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Four characteristic subtypes were identified, which differed in the quality and flexibility of their interpersonal behavior. Independent of the predominant type of interpersonal problems, the psychotherapy treatment led to strong decreases in interpersonal distress and increases in interpersonal differentiation. Psychoanalytic therapy was highly effective for all identified interpersonal subtypes and seems to help patients achieve more satisfactory relationships.
Subject(s)
Interpersonal Relations , Psychoanalytic Therapy , Social Behavior Disorders/therapy , Adult , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Cluster Analysis , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Social Behavior Disorders/diagnosis , Social Behavior Disorders/psychology , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: In the present paper, data from four German studies on the efficacy of outpatient psychoanalytic long-term psychotherapy were examined for symptom reduction (SCL-90-R) and reduction of interpersonal problems (IIP-D). Specifically, the research question addressed the efficacy of long-term therapy in specific diagnostic groups and was was compared with that of a parallel group who underwent shorter-term psychodynamic therapy. METHODS: Data from four German studies addressing the efficacy of outpatient psychoanalytic long-term therapy were collected. Evaluation of these data was carried for specific diagnostic groups allowing for comorbid diagnoses. The effects of psychoanalytic therapy were assessed by pre-post and pre-follow-up comparisons using paired t-tests. Additionally, effect sizes were calculated. Psychoanalytic long-term psychotherapy and shorter-term psychodynamic therapy were compared by using a repeated measure ANOVA: Pretreatment vs. posttreatment/follow-up (two-levels) with the between subject factor "therapy conditions" (two levels). RESULTS: The results showed that in terms of improvement of symptoms and interpersonal problems, psychoanalytic long-term therapy was at least as effective as shorter term psychodynamic therapy with regard to the following ICD-10 diagnostic groups: affective disorders (F3), anxiety disorders (F40; F41; F42), personality disorders (F60; F61; F62), and a group of mixed neurotic disorders (F43; F50; F51; F1; F55). Effect sizes were large and remained stable at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The authors emphasize the clinical relevance of the examined diagnostic groups and relatively large effects achieved by the psychoanalytic treatment. Furthermore, the occurrence of comorbid diagnoses and their consequences are discussed. The authors stress that the specific effects of psychoanalytic therapy can only be very insufficiently tapped by the outcome measures referring to symptoms and interpersonal problems.
Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Interpersonal Relations , Long-Term Care , Mood Disorders/therapy , Neurotic Disorders/therapy , Personality Disorders/therapy , Psychoanalytic Therapy , Adult , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany , Humans , Male , Mood Disorders/diagnosis , Mood Disorders/psychology , Neurotic Disorders/diagnosis , Neurotic Disorders/psychology , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Personality Disorders/diagnosis , Personality Disorders/psychology , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Results of a naturalistic study of the effectiveness of psychoanalytic therapy are reported. Outcome data are presented for a sample of N = 36 patients who were treated with psychoanalytic therapy. For a sample of n = 23 of these patients, data for 1-year follow-up are available at present. According to the results, psychoanalytic therapy yielded significant improvements in symptoms (Symptom Checklist 90-R, SCL-90-R and rating of psychoanalysts), in interpersonal problems (Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, IIP), in quality of life (Questionnaire of Quality of Life, FLZ), in well-being (Questionnaire of Changes in Experience and Behaviour VEV) and in target problems defined by the patients (Goal Attainment Scaling, GAS). Large effect sizes between 1.28 and 2.48 were found in symptoms (GSI of the SCL-90-R), interpersonal problems (IIP-total), quality of life (FLZ-total), well-being (VEV) and target problems (GAS). At 1-year follow-up, all improvements proved to be stable or even increased. The self-reported improvements in symptoms were corroborated by the ratings of the psychoanalysts. At the end of therapy, 77% of the patients showed clinically significant improvements. In the 1-year follow-up group, this was true for 80%. Further results are presented and discussed.
Subject(s)
Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Psychoanalytic Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Surveys , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Long-Term Care , Male , Patient Satisfaction , Personality Tests/statistics & numerical data , Problem Solving , Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life/psychology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
It was the aim of the study to investigate different factors of group experience in relation to therapy effects and to prove the predictive validity of the Group Experience Questionnaire (GEQ); for this purpose for each scale of the GEQ the values of later "Responders" and "Non Responders" were compared. The sample consisted of 50 patients with psychosomatic diseases who where treated with outpatient integrated psychodynamic group therapy. We found that the GEQ is able to differentiate between successful and less successful patients. Especially the therapeutic factors "autonomy and optimism" as well as "well-being" are of high predictive value. Contrary to former investigations the therapeutic factor "cohesion" was less important, which could hint at the fact that a medium amount of cohesion might be sufficient for an effective process of treatment.
Subject(s)
Psychotherapy, Group/standards , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Research has demonstrated that men and women differ considerably on a wide variety of variables. However, the effect of gender on the psychotherapy experience is little understood. This article provides a brief review of the current research literature on gender effects in psychotherapy and reports findings of gender differences in outcome for two different treatment modalities. Literature was collected using Medline and PsycLit search engines. Results from a randomized trial on supportive and interpretive short-term individual psychotherapy were used to investigate interaction effects between patient gender and form of treatment in 88 female and 56 male patients. Gender of the patient, therapist, or their interaction has minimal impact on treatment outcome. However, when gender is compared with the form of therapy, the success of the therapy differs between men and women. The findings suggest that for research on gender effects in psychotherapy to be productive, investigators need to consider how gender interacts with other conceptually meaningful variables.
Subject(s)
Gender Identity , Psychotherapy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health CareABSTRACT
This study, carried out at three different university centers contributes to validating the valence dimension of the CCRT-method. Working on the state of the CCRT-research on affective evaluation of relationship narratives, the connection between the valence dimension of the responses from others (RO), responses of the self (RS) and the severity of the psychic disorder has been analysed with the help of two different samples (n = 266 resp. n = 32) taken from female patients. Both, therapists as well as patients themselves, evaluated the severity of the impairment similarly. The more the patients were impaired, the more negatively they describes both their own reactions and those of their interaction partners as shown in the relationship episodes.
