Assessing Choroidal Nevi, Melanomas and Indeterminate Melanocytic Lesions Using Multimodal Imaging-A Retrospective Chart Review.

Using multimodal imaging, the literature proposed the following risk factors for choroidal nevus growth into melanoma: increased tumor thickness, subretinal fluid, decreased visual acuity, presence of orange pigment, ultrasound acoustic hollowness, and increased tumor diameter. This study investigated the presence of the mentioned risk factors in choroidal nevi, choroidal melanomas, and indeterminate choroidal melanocytic lesions. This retrospective, single-center chart review assessed choroidal melanocytic tumors with multimodal imaging. We defined our primary outcome as the cumulative presence of mentioned risk factors. Further, we evaluated various optical coherence tomography (OCT), ultrasound, and autofluorescence findings. We analyzed 51 tumors from 49 patients during the period from April 2008 to June 2021. The median (IQR) age was 64.0 (56.0 to 70.5) years, with 23 of 49 (46.9%) patients being female. The follow-up time for all tumors was median (IQR) 25.0 (12.0 to 39.0) months. The choroidal nevi had a median (range) risk score of 0.0 (0.0 to 3.0), and the choroidal melanoma of 5.0 (3.0 to 6.0), with statistically significant different ratings (p < 0.001). Multimodal imaging creates a score that may help to distinguish choroidal nevi from choroidal melanomas objectively.

OUTCOMES OF RETROPUPILLARY IRIS CLAW INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION COMBINED WITH PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY.

PURPOSE: To report 12-month visual outcomes, incidence of intraocular pressure (IOP) changes and postoperative complications after pars plana vitrectomy with retropupillary implantation of an iris claw intraocular lens (IOL) in aphakic eyes after complicated cataract surgery and eyes with a dislocation of the IOL. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of eyes undergoing implantation of an iris claw IOL combined with pars plana vitrectomy from 1st of January 2009 until 30th of June 2018 after complicated cataract extraction with capsular loss (Group A) or dislocation of an IOL (Group B). Corrected distance visual acuity was analyzed in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units, IOP was recorded in mmHg. RESULTS: Eyes in Group A (n = 49) improved from a preoperative median visual acuity of 0.523 logMAR (Snellen 20/65) to 0.201 logMAR (Snellen 20/30), P < 0.01. Eyes in Group B (n = 126) showed stable median visual acuity, preoperative 0.301 logMAR (Snellen 20/40) versus postoperative 0.222 logMAR (Snellen 20/30), P > 0.05. During 12 months in Group A, IOP >21 mmHg occurred in 9 (18.4%) eyes; no eye had an IOP <6 mmHg. In Group B, IOP >21 mmHg occurred in 15 (11.9%) eyes, IOP <6 mmHg in 5 (4%) cases. None of the eyes in Group A and B had IOP >21 mmHg or <6 mmHg at 12 months follow-up. CONCLUSION: The retropupillary implantation of an iris claw IOL with pars plana vitrectomy provides adequate visual rehabilitation and seems to be safe in IOP changes.

SAVE-AMD: Safety of VEGF Inhibitors in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intraocular treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors change systemic endothelial function (EF) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, 2-center, double-masked controlled interventional trial, patients with neovascular and dry AMD were enrolled. Eligible neovascular AMD patients received 2 intravitreal loading doses of either ranibizumab 0.5 mg or bevacizumab 1.25 mg at 4-week intervals and were subsequently followed every 4 weeks and treated according to a pro re nata regime for up to 1 year. Patients with dry AMD served as controls. The primary endpoint was the change in EF assessed by flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) after 2 months of treatment with VEGF inhibitors in patients with AMD compared to patients with dry AMD. FMD was assessed with B-mode high-resolution ultrasonography of the left brachial artery. RESULTS: 24 patients with neovascular AMD and 26 patients with dry ADM were included in the trial. Treatment with VEGF inhibitors did not significantly change FMD (from 4.7 ± 2.4 to 3.9 ± 1.9% after 8 weeks, p = 0.07, and to 5.1 ± 2.0% after 1 year; p = 0.93 vs. baseline, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: EF did not significantly differ between patients with neovascular AMD treated with intravitreal VEGF inhibition and patients with dry AMD.

INCREASED INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE IS A RISK FACTOR FOR UNEXPLAINED VISUAL LOSS DURING SILICONE OIL ENDOTAMPONADE.

PURPOSE: To identify the incidence rate and risk factors for unexplained visual loss associated with silicone oil endotamponade used during primary repair of macula-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for primary surgical repair of macula-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in whom silicone oil endotamponade was used. The primary outcome measure was the incidence rate of unexplained visual loss and identification of risk factors associated with vision loss. RESULTS: Of 1,218 eyes undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for primary retinal detachment repair, 44 eyes were included for analysis. In 9 eyes (20%), an unexplained vision loss occurred. Logistic regression identified increased intraocular pressure (IOP) (prospectively defined as IOP readings during silicone oil endotamponade ≥21 mmHg on two consecutive visits or ≥25 mmHg at any time during this period) as significant predictor (odds ratio = 4.9; P = 0.04) and a classification tree ranked IOP as the most important variable for vision loss. Incidence rate of vision loss in eyes experiencing IOP increase was 4.5 vision loss events per 1,000 days at risk compared with 1 event per 1,000 days in eyes without IOP increase, yielding an incidence rate ratio of 4.5 (95% confidence interval: 1.1-17.9; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Sufficient control of IOP during silicone oil endotamponade for primary retinal detachment repair is warranted to reduce the probability of vision loss.

SYSTEMIC INTERLEUKIN 1ß INHIBITION IN PROLIFERATIVE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY: A Prospective Open-Label Study Using Canakinumab.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of systemic interleukin 1ß inhibition using canakinumab (Ilaris) on retinal neovascularizations in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: Patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy were enrolled in a prospective uncontrolled pilot study. Canakinumab (150 mg) was given 3 times subcutaneously. The primary end point was the change in the area of neovascularization from baseline to Week 24. Secondary end points were the change in retinal edema measured and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), as well as systemic safety evaluation, HbA1c, and systemic inflammatory parameters. RESULTS: Systemic canakinumab treatment was well tolerated. None of the 8 eyes showed progression of neovascularizations within 24 weeks. Their mean size remained unchanged comparing 0.60 mm at baseline with 0.62 mm at Week 24 (P = 0.944). Median BCVA remained stable with 80 ETDRS letters at baseline and 82 ETDRS letters at Week 24. A not statistically significant reduction in retinal edema was detectable for the foveal central subfield thickness (mean, 313-295 µm). Mean HbA1c improved significantly from 7.92% to 7.30% within the 24 weeks (P = 0.046). Systemic inflammatory parameters remained overall unchanged. CONCLUSION: Systemic canakinumab showed no change in neovascularizations in diabetic retinopathy. Promising effects were seen on diabetic macular edema.

Effects of gevokizumab on glycemia and inflammatory markers in type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Metabolic activation of the innate immune system governed by interleukin (IL)-1ß contributes to ß-cell failure in type 2 diabetes. Gevokizumab is a novel, human-engineered monoclonal anti-IL-1ß antibody. We evaluated the safety and biological activity of gevokizumab in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study, a total of 98 patients were randomly assigned to placebo (17 subjects) or gevokizumab (81 subjects) at increasing doses and dosing schedules. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety profile of gevokizumab in type 2 diabetes. The secondary objectives were to assess pharmacokinetics for different dose levels, routes of administration, and regimens and to assess biological activity. RESULTS: The study drug was well tolerated with no serious adverse events. There was one hypoglycemic event whereupon concomitant insulin treatment had to be reduced. Clearance of gevokizumab was consistent with that for a human IgG(2), with a half-life of 22 days. In the combined intermediate-dose group (single doses of 0.03 and 0.1 mg/kg), the mean placebo-corrected decrease in glycated hemoglobin was 0.11, 0.44, and 0.85% after 1, 2 (P = 0.017), and 3 (P = 0.049) months, respectively, along with enhanced C-peptide secretion, increased insulin sensitivity, and a reduction in C-reactive protein and spontaneous and inducible cytokines. CONCLUSIONS: This novel IL-1ß-neutralizing antibody improved glycemia, possibly via restored insulin production and action, and reduced inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes. This therapeutic agent may be able to be used on a once-every-month or longer schedule.