Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 207(4): 745-754, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27440524

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this article are to review available data regarding the range of protection devices and garments with a focus on eye protection and to summarize techniques for reducing scatter radiation exposure. CONCLUSION: Fluoroscopy operators and staff can greatly reduce their radiation exposure by wearing properly fitted protective garments, positioning protective devices to block scatter radiation, and adhering to good radiation practices. By understanding the essentials of radiation physics, protective equipment, and the features of each imaging system, operators and staff can capitalize on opportunities for radiation protection while minimizing ergonomic strain. Practicing and promoting a culture of radiation safety can help fluoroscopy operators and staff enjoy long, productive careers helping patients.


Subject(s)
Fluoroscopy/instrumentation , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Protective Clothing , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Safety Management , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Risk Assessment , United States
2.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 207(4): 737-744, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28829623

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Recent articles discussing cases of brain cancer in interventionalists have raised concerns regarding the hazards of occupational exposure to ionizing radiation. We review the basics of radiation dose and the potential radiation effects, particularly as they pertain to the operator. Then we present the data regarding the risk of each type of radiation effect to the fluoroscopy operator and staff, with special attention on cancer induction, radiation-induced cataracts, and the pregnant operator. CONCLUSION: Although the evidence overwhelmingly shows that exposure to higher doses of radiation carries a risk of cancer and tissue reactions, the risks of chronic exposure to low-level radiation are less clear. Many studies examining occupational exposure to radiation fail to show an increased risk of stochastic effects of radiation, but the positive results raise concern that the studies are underpowered to consistently detect the small risk. The lack of information in these studies about radiation doses and adherence to radiation protection further confound their interpretation. Large prospective studies of populations with occupational exposure to low-level radiation might clarify this issue. More clearly established are the risks of radiation to the fetus and the risk of cataracts in interventional cardiologists and interventional radiologists. Interventionalists can mitigate these risks by following established radiation safety practices.


Subject(s)
Fluoroscopy/instrumentation , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Protective Clothing , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Safety Management , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Risk Assessment , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...