Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 17(1): 290, 2017 04 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28427377

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gonorrhoea, caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), can cause reproductive morbidity, is increasingly becoming resistant to antibiotics and is frequently asymptomatic, which shows the essential role of NG test practice. In this study we wanted to compare NG diagnostic testing procedures between different STI care providers serving a defined geographic Dutch region (280,000 inhabitants). METHODS: Data on laboratory testing and diagnosis of urogenital and extragenital (i.e. anorectal and oropharyngeal) NG were retrieved from general practitioners (GPs), an STI clinic, and gynaecologists (2006-2010). Per provider, we assessed their contribution regarding the total number of tests performed and type of populations tested, the proportion of NG positives re-tested (3-12 months after treatment) and test-of-cure (TOC, within 3 months post treatment). RESULTS: Overall, 17,702 NG tests (48.7% STI clinic, 38.2% GPs, 13.1% gynaecologists) were performed during 15,458 patient visits. From this total number of tests, 2257 (12.7%) were extragenital, of which 99.4% were performed by the STI clinic. Men were mostly tested at the STI clinic (71%) and women by their GP (43%). NG positivity per visit was 1.6%; GP 1.9% (n = 111), STI clinic 1.7% (n = 131) and gynaecology 0.2% (n = 5). NG positivity was associated with Chlamydia trachomatis positivity (OR: 2.06, 95% confidence interval: 1.46-2.92). Per anatomical location, the proportion of NG positives re-tested were: urogenital 20.3% (n = 36), anorectal 43.6% (n = 17) and oropharyngeal 57.1% (n = 20). NG positivity among re-tests was 16.9%. Proportions of NG positives with TOC by anatomical location were: urogenital 10.2% (n = 18), anorectal 17.9% (n = 7) and oropharyngeal 17.1% (n = 6). CONCLUSIONS: To achieve best practice in relation to NG testing, we recommend that: 1) GPs test at extragenital sites, especially men who have sex with men (MSM), 2) all care providers consider re-testing 3 to 12 months after NG diagnosis and 3) TOC is performed following oropharyngeal NG diagnosis in settings which provide services to higher-risk men and women (such as STI clinics).


Subject(s)
Gonorrhea/diagnosis , Pharyngeal Diseases/microbiology , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia trachomatis/pathogenicity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Female Urogenital Diseases/diagnosis , Female Urogenital Diseases/microbiology , General Practitioners , Gonorrhea/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Male Urogenital Diseases/diagnosis , Male Urogenital Diseases/microbiology , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/isolation & purification , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/pathogenicity , Netherlands/epidemiology , Pharyngeal Diseases/diagnosis , Physicians , Rectal Diseases/diagnosis , Rectal Diseases/microbiology , Young Adult
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 21(7): 1183-8, 2015 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26277798

ABSTRACT

Chronic Q fever, caused by Coxiella burnetii, has high mortality and morbidity rates if left untreated. Controversy about the diagnosis of this complex disease has emerged recently. We applied the guideline from the Dutch Q Fever Consensus Group and a set of diagnostic criteria proposed by Didier Raoult to all 284 chronic Q fever patients included in the Dutch National Chronic Q Fever Database during 2006­2012. Of the patients who had proven cases of chronic Q fever by the Dutch guideline, 46 (30.5%)would not have received a diagnosis by the alternative criteria designed by Raoult, and 14 (4.9%) would have been considered to have possible chronic Q fever. Six patients with proven chronic Q fever died of related causes. Until results from future studies are available, by which current guidelines can be modified, we believe that the Dutch literature-based consensus guideline is more sensitive and easier to use in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Q Fever/diagnosis , Expert Testimony , Humans , Netherlands , Practice Guidelines as Topic
3.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 15(5): 727-34, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19402958

ABSTRACT

Because the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) differs among the 3 countries forming the Euregio Meuse-Rhin (EMR) region (Belgium, Germany, and the Netherlands), cross-border healthcare requires information about the spread of MRSA in the EMR. We investigated the emergence, dissemination, and diversity of MRSA clones in the EMR by using several typing methods. MRSA associated with clonal complexes 5, 8, 30, and 45 was disseminated throughout the EMR. Dutch isolates, mainly associated with sequence types (ST) ST5-MRSA-II, ST5-MRSA-IV, ST8-MRSA-IV, and ST45-MSRA-IV had a more diverse genetic background than the isolates from Belgium and Germany, associated with ST45-MRSA-IV and ST5-MRSA-II, respectively. MRSA associated with pigs (ST398-MRSA-IV/V) was found in the Dutch area of the EMR. Five percent of the MRSA isolates harbored Panton-Valentine leukocidin and were classified as community-associated MRSA associated with ST1, 8, 30, 80, and 89.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/transmission , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Belgium/epidemiology , Cloning, Molecular , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/transmission , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Netherlands/epidemiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Prevalence , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Virulence Factors/genetics
4.
BMC Infect Dis ; 7: 53, 2007 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17553132

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An accurate, practical laboratory test is needed to confirm clinical diagnosis of pertussis in adults during the first 3 symptomatic weeks, when treatment is effective and transmission can be interrupted. METHODS: The sensitivity and specificity of single IgA and IgG levels were assessed in a cohort study of a pertussis epidemic in 99 adults in a closed community. Sensitivities were assessed in the sera of 46 laboratory confirmed clinical pertussis cases during the first 3 weeks. Specificities were calculated in sera of 35 asymptomatic controls without clinical symptoms or laboratory confirmed infections from the same community (internal controls). We compared these specificities with the specificities of single IgA and IgG levels in 4275 external controls from a cross-section of the general Dutch population aged 21-79 years who had not coughed for more than 2 weeks in the past year, and without pertussis diagnoses. The study was done in the Netherlands when whole-cell pertussis vaccine was used in the national vaccination programme. RESULTS: Levels of 24 U/ml for IgA and 27 U/ml for IgG gave sensitivities of 100% and 75%, respectively, in the first 2 weeks, 100% in the third week, and 97% after the fourth week. The levels were reached within 2 days after onset of increase, and remained above these levels for roughly 7.2 and 5.1 months, respectively. Specificity was 82% for IgA and 89% for IgG in the internal controls and 90% in the external controls, respectively. CONCLUSION: We suggest levels of 24 U/ml for IgA level and 27 U/ml (= 27 International Units (IU)/ml) for IgG as sensitive, specific, and practical for laboratory confirmation of clinical pertussis in adults in the first 3 weeks of outbreak management.


Subject(s)
Bordetella pertussis/immunology , Disease Outbreaks , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Whooping Cough/immunology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Serologic Tests/methods , Whooping Cough/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL