ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Tenofovir and entecavir are nowadays the first-line treatment in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis. Both drugs were shown to be effective in HBV suppression and well tolerated. The effects of tenofovir on bone mineral density (BMD), however, were shown to worsen the rate of osteoporosis, which is already a common feature in cirrhosis. In contrast, entecavir seems to have no effect on mineral metabolism. The aim of our study was to compare the effects of nucleos(t)ide analogs on bone density in HBV-related cirrhosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourty-eight patients were treated with tenofovir and 22 patients were treated with entecavir, and were followed prospectively from 2008 to 2013. To evaluate BMD, laboratory examinations, dual-X-ray absorptiometry, and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool were assessed. RESULTS: During the study, no difference was found between the two groups in the plasmatic concentration of calcium, phosphate, vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, or creatinine. Dual-X-ray absorptiometry showed no difference in the T-score and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool showed no significant difference in the 10-year risk of osteoporotic fractures in the two groups. On univariate and multivariate analyses, the only predictors of osteoporosis development were the prognostic scores of liver disease and BMI. CONCLUSION: Both tenofovir and entecavir are effective in treating HBV in cirrhotic patients. The known effects of tenofovir on BMD do not worsen osteoporotic fractures risk compared with entecavir in these patients.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Liver Cirrhosis/virology , Osteoporosis/chemically induced , Tenofovir/adverse effects , Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density/drug effects , Female , Guanine/adverse effects , Guanine/therapeutic use , Hepatitis B, Chronic/complications , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/etiology , Osteoporosis/physiopathology , Osteoporotic Fractures/chemically induced , Parathyroid Hormone/blood , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment/methods , Tenofovir/therapeutic use , Vitamin D Deficiency/complications , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Patients with cirrhosis have a high risk of sepsis, which confers a poor prognosis. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria have several limitations in cirrhosis. Recently, new criteria for sepsis (Sepsis-3) have been suggested in the general population (increase of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) ≥2 points from baseline). Outside the intensive care unit (ICU), the quick SOFA (qSOFA (at least two among alteration in mental status, systolic blood pressure ≤100 mm Hg or respiratory rate ≥22/min)) was suggested to screen for sepsis. These criteria have never been evaluated in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of the study was to assess the ability of Sepsis-3 criteria in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with cirrhosis and bacterial/fungal infections. METHODS: 259 consecutive patients with cirrhosis and bacterial/fungal infections were prospectively included. Demographic, laboratory and microbiological data were collected at diagnosis of infection. Baseline SOFA was assessed using preadmission data. Patients were followed up until death, liver transplantation or discharge. Findings were externally validated (197 patients). RESULTS: Sepsis-3 and qSOFA had significantly greater discrimination for in-hospital mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC)=0.784 and 0.732, respectively) than SIRS (AUROC=0.606) (p<0.01 for both). Similar results were observed in the validation cohort. Sepsis-3 (subdistribution HR (sHR)=5.47; p=0.006), qSOFA (sHR=1.99; p=0.020), Chronic Liver Failure Consortium Acute Decompensation score (sHR=1.05; p=0.001) and C reactive protein (sHR=1.01;p=0.034) were found to be independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Patients with Sepsis-3 had higher incidence of acute-on-chronic liver failure, septic shock and transfer to ICU than those without Sepsis-3. CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis-3 criteria are more accurate than SIRS criteria in predicting the severity of infections in patients with cirrhosis. qSOFA is a useful bedside tool to assess risk for worse outcomes in these patients. Patients with Sepsis-3 and positive qSOFA deserve more intensive management and strict surveillance.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , Liver Cirrhosis , Organ Dysfunction Scores , Sepsis , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome , Aged , Area Under Curve , Bacterial Infections/complications , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Data Accuracy , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology , Male , Mental Status Schedule , Middle Aged , Physical Examination/methods , Prognosis , Reproducibility of Results , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/etiology , Sepsis/mortality , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/diagnosis , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/etiology , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/mortalityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: In patients with cirrhosis, infections represent a frequent trigger for complications, increasing frequency of hospitalizations and mortality rate. This study aimed to identify predictors of early readmission (30 days) and of mid-term mortality (6 months) in patients with liver cirrhosis discharged after a hospitalization for bacterial and/or fungal infection. METHODS: A total of 199 patients with cirrhosis discharged after an admission for a bacterial and/or fungal infection were included in the study and followed up for a least 6 months. RESULTS: During follow-up, 69 patients (35%) were readmitted within 30 days from discharge. C-reactive protein (CRP) value at discharge (odds ratio (OR)=1.91; P=0.022), diagnosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure during the hospital stay (OR=2.48; P=0.008), and the hospitalization in the last 30 days previous to the admission/inclusion in the study (OR=1.50; P=0.042) were found to be independent predictors of readmission. During the 6-month follow-up, 47 patients (23%) died. Age (hazard ratio (HR)=1.05; P=0.001), model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (HR=1.13; P<0.001), CRP (HR=1.85; P=0.001), refractory ascites (HR=2.22; P=0.007), and diabetes (HR=2.41; P=0.010) were found to be independent predictors of 6-month mortality. Patients with a CRP >10 mg/l at discharge had a significantly higher probability of being readmitted within 30 days (44% vs. 24%; P=0.007) and a significantly lower probability of 6-month survival (62% vs. 88%; P<0.001) than those with a CRP ≤10 mg/l. CONCLUSIONS: CRP showed to be a strong predictor of early hospital readmission and 6-month mortality in patients with cirrhosis after hospitalization for bacterial and/or fungal infection. CRP values could be used both in the stewardship of antibiotic treatment and to identify fragile patients who deserve a strict surveillance program.
Subject(s)
Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure , Bacterial Infections , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Liver Cirrhosis , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure/diagnosis , Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure/epidemiology , Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure/etiology , Aged , Ascites/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/complications , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology , Liver Cirrhosis/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is the most life-threatening complication of cirrhosis. Prevalence and outcomes of ACLF have recently been described in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. However, no data is currently available on the prevalence and the risk factors of ACLF in outpatients with cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate incidence, predictors and outcomes of ACLF in a large cohort of outpatients with cirrhosis. METHODS: A total of 466 patients with cirrhosis consecutively evaluated in the outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital were included and followed up until death and/or liver transplantation for a mean of 45±44months. Data on development of hepatic and extrahepatic organ failures were collected during this period. ACLF was defined and graded according to the EASL-CLIF Consortium definition. RESULTS: During the follow-up, 118 patients (25%) developed ACLF: 57 grade-1, 33 grade-2 and 28 grade-3. The probability of developing ACLF was 14%, 29%, and 41% at 1year, 5years, and 10years, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, baseline mean arterial pressure (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96; p=0.012), ascites (HR 2.53; p=0.019), model of end-stage liver disease score (HR 1.26; p<0.001) and baseline hemoglobin (HR 0.07; p=0.012) were found to be independent predictors of the development of ACLF at one year. As expected, ACLF was associated with a poor prognosis, with a 3-month probability of transplant-free survival of 56%. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatients with cirrhosis have a high risk of developing ACLF. The degree of liver failure and circulatory dysfunction are associated with the development of ACLF, as well as low values of hemoglobin. These simple variables may help to identify patients at a high risk of developing ACLF and to plan a program of close surveillance and prevention in these patients. LAY SUMMARY: There is a need to identify predictors of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) in patients with cirrhosis in order to identify patients at high risk of developing ACLF and to plan strategies of prevention. In this study, we identified four simple predictors of ACLF: model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, ascites, mean arterial pressure and hemoglobin. These variables may help to identify patients with cirrhosis, at a high risk of developing ACLF, that are candidates for new strategies of surveillance and prevention. Anemia is a potential new target for treating these patients.
Subject(s)
Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure/epidemiology , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure/blood , Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure/etiology , Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure/mortality , Adult , Aged , Female , Hemoglobins/analysis , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , OutpatientsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In patients with cirrhosis of the liver, acute kidney injury (AKI) is classified into 3 stages. Recent studies indicate that there are 2 subgroups of stage 1 disease, associated with different outcomes and serum levels of creatinine (SCr): stage 1A (SCr <1.5 mg/dL) and stage 1B (SCr ≥1.5 mg/dL). We performed a prospective study to validate, in a large series of patients with cirrhosis, the association between this new description and patient outcomes, and assess the relationship between AKI stage and the presence of acute-on-chronic liver failure. METHODS: We collected data from 547 consecutive patients admitted for cirrhosis with acute decompensation to 2 tertiary hospitals (Italy and Spain), from February 2011 through June 2015. A total of 290 patients had AKI (53%; 197 had stage 1 disease); AKI stages were determined based on levels of SCr at diagnosis. Patients were followed up until death, liver transplantation, or for 90 days. The primary outcome was 90-day survival; secondary outcomes were progression and resolution of AKI and association with acute-on-chronic liver failure. RESULTS: Based on level of sCr at diagnosis, 58 patients had stage 1A disease and 139 had stage 1B disease. Of patients with stage 1A disease, 82% survived for 90 days; of patients with stage 1B disease, 55% survived for 90 days (P = .001). Hepatorenal syndrome and acute tubular necrosis were the most common causes of stage 1B AKI, and hypovolemia was the most common cause of stage 1A AKI. AKI progressed in a higher proportion of patients with 1B than 1A AKI (31% vs 15%; P = .017) and resolved in a higher proportion of patients with 1A disease (90% vs 52% of patients with stage 1B; P < .001). Stage 1B disease, but not 1A, was an independent predictor of AKI progression and mortality. ACLF developed in a significantly greater proportion of patients with stage 1B disease (76%) than stage 1A disease (22%; P < .001), which could account for the poor outcomes of patients with stage 1B disease. CONCLUSIONS: In a large group of patients with decompensated cirrhosis, we validated the association between AKI stages IA and IB (based on level of sCR) with survival times and AKI progression. We also associated these subgroups of AKI with development of acute-on-chronic liver failure. These findings are important for management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis.
Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Acute Kidney Injury/pathology , Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Severity of Illness Index , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Spain , Survival Analysis , Tertiary Care CentersABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: In patients with cirrhosis and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), terlipressin has been used either as continuous intravenous infusion or as intravenous boluses. To date, these two approaches have never been compared. The goal of this study was to compare the administration of terlipressin as continuous intravenous infusion versus intravenous boluses in the treatment of type 1 HRS. Seventy-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive either continuous intravenous infusion (TERLI-INF group) at the initial dose of 2 mg/day or intravenous boluses of terlipressin (TERLI-BOL group) at the initial dose of 0.5 mg every 4 hours. In case of no response, the dose was progressively increased to a final dose of 12 mg/day in both groups. Albumin was given at the same dose in both groups (1 g/kg of body weight at the first day followed by 20-40 g/day). Complete response was defined by decrease of serum creatinine (sCr) from baseline to a final value ≤133 µmol/L, partial response by a decrease ≥50% of sCr from baseline to a final value >133 µmol/L. The rate of adverse events was lower in the TERLI-INF group (35.29%) than in the TERLI-BOL group (62.16%, P < 0.025). The rate of response to treatment, including both complete and partial response, was not significantly different between the two groups (76.47% versus 64.85%; P value not significant). The mean daily effective dose of terlipressin was lower in the TERLI-INF group than in the TERLI-BOL group (2.23 ± 0.65 versus 3.51 ± 1.77 mg/day; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Terlipressin given by continuous intravenous infusion is better tolerated than intravenous boluses in the treatment of type 1 HRS. Moreover, it is effective at doses lower than those required for intravenous bolus administration.
Subject(s)
Hepatorenal Syndrome/drug therapy , Lypressin/analogs & derivatives , Vasoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage , Aged , Female , Hepatorenal Syndrome/mortality , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Italy/epidemiology , Lypressin/administration & dosage , Lypressin/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Terlipressin , Vasoconstrictor Agents/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: A moderate sodium restriction diet should be indicated in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Nevertheless, there is a lack of specific investigation on its correct application. To evaluate the adherence of patients with cirrhosis and ascites to a moderately low-salt diet and the impact on intake of total calories and serum sodium concentration. METHODS: A total of 120 outpatients with cirrhosis and ascites were interviewed with a pre-established questionnaire. A quantitative assessment of nutrient and salt intake was performed. RESULT: A moderately low-salt diet was followed by 37 patients (Group A). Of the 83 patients who did not follow the diet (Group B), 54 thought that they were following it. The mean daily sodium intake was 79.5 ± 5.5 mmol/day (Group A) and 205.9 ± 14.1 mmol/day (Group B), P < 0.0001. The adherence to diet was related to the severity of cirrhosis, and was higher among candidates for liver transplantation and in patients followed through the Care Management Program. Patients of Group A had reduced the mean daily calorie intake by 20% compared with Group B patients (P < 0.0005), while there was no difference on the occurrence of hyponatraemia. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a poor adherence of patients with cirrhosis and ascites to a moderate dietary sodium restriction. Adherence to a diet seems to increase with the worsening of liver disease, probably because of the reduction of alternative therapeutic options. In addition, a deficiency in the educational process can lead the patient to follow a sodium-reduced diet by means of dangerous tools, such as reducing the overall daily food intake.
Subject(s)
Ascites/diet therapy , Diet, Sodium-Restricted , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Outpatients , Recommended Dietary AllowancesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The development of ascites in patients with cirrhosis is associated with a high rate of health care utilization. New models of specialized caregiving support are necessary to optimize its management. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and financial sustainability of the "Care management check-up" as a new model of specialized caregiving support based on a series of diagnostic facilities performed in real time and on the integrated activity of consultant hepatologists at the hospital unit for outpatients, dedicated nurses, physicians in training and primary physicians, compared to standard care in outpatients with cirrhosis and ascites. METHODS: 100 cirrhotic patients admitted to our hospital were allocated, after discharge, to the "Care management check-up" group (group 1), or to the "Standard outpatient care" group (group 2), and followed prospectively as outpatients up to death or for at least 12 months. Patients of the two groups could also access to a "Day hospital" when an invasive procedure was required. In group 1, the "Care management check-up" and the "Day hospital" taken together defined the "Care management program". RESULTS: Twelve-month mortality was higher in group 2 than in group 1 (45.7% vs. 23.1%, p<0.025). The rate of 30-day readmission was also higher in group 2 (42.4% vs. 15.4%, p<0.01). The global cost attributable to the management per patient-month of life was lower (1479.19 ± 2184.43 ) in group 1 than (2816.13 ± 3893.03 ) in group 2 (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that this new model of specialized caregiving reduces 12-month mortality in patients with cirrhosis and ascites as well as the global health care costs for their management.