ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Alveolar echinococcosis, an orphan zoonosis affecting the liver, is of increasing concern worldwide. Most symptomatic cases present at an advanced and inoperable stage, sometimes with biliary obstruction prompting biliary tract interventions. These are, however, associated with a high risk of infectious complications. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of conservative and interventional treatment approaches in patients with newly diagnosed alveolar echinococcosis and biliary obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Alveolar echinococcosis patients treated at two referral centres in Switzerland, presenting with hyperbilirubinaemia (total bilirubin >1.5 Upper Limit of Normal) at diagnosis were included, unless another underlying aetiology, i.e. common bile duct stones or decompensated cirrhosis, was identified. Patients were divided into two groups, according to whether they initially received a biliary tract intervention. The primary endpoint was normalisation of bilirubin levels within a 6-month period. Secondary endpoints included, among others, the occurrence of early and late biliary complications, the need for biliary tract interventions during follow-up and overall duration of hospital stays for treatment initiation and for biliary complications. RESULTS: 28 patients were included in this study, of whom 17 received benzimidazole therapy alone and 11 additionally received a biliary tract intervention. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. All but one patient in each group achieved the primary endpoint (p=0.747). Biliary tract intervention was associated with faster laboratory improvement (t1/2 1.3 vs 3.0 weeks), but also with more frequent early biliary complications (7/11 vs 1/17, p=0.002) and longer initial hospital stay (18 days vs 7 days, p=0.007). CONCLUSION: Biliary obstruction in patients with newly diagnosed alveolar echinococcosis can be treated effectively with benzimidazole therapy alone. Biliary tract intervention, on the other hand, is associated with a high complication rate and should probably be reserved for patients with insufficient response to benzimidazole therapy.
Subject(s)
Cholestasis , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Switzerland , Treatment Outcome , Cholestasis/etiology , Cholestasis/therapy , Bilirubin , BenzimidazolesABSTRACT
Protein losing enteropathy (PLE) refers to excessive intestinal protein loss, resulting in hypoalbuminemia. Underlying pathologies include conditions leading to either reduced intestinal barrier or lymphatic congestion. We describe the case of a patient with long-lasting diffuse abdominal problems and PLE. Repetitive endoscopies were normal with only minimal lymphangiectasia in biopsies. Further evaluations revealed an indolent marginal zone lymphoma with minor bone marrow infiltration. Monotherapy with rituximab decreased bone marrow infiltration of the lymphoma but did not relieve PLE. Additional treatments with steroids, octreotide, a diet devoid of long-chain fatty-acids, and parenteral nutrition did not prevent further clinical deterioration with marked weight loss (23 kg), further reduction in albumin concentrations (nadir 8 g/L), and a pronounced drop in performance status. Finally, immunochemotherapy with rituximab and bendamustine resulted in hematological remission and remarkable clinical improvement. 18 months after therapy the patient remains free of gastrointestinal complaints and has regained his body weight with normal albumin levels. We demonstrate a case of PLE secondary to indolent marginal zone lymphoma. No intestinal pathologies were detected, contrasting a severe and almost lethal clinical course. Immunochemotherapy relieved lymphoma and PLE, suggesting that a high suspicion of lymphoma is warranted in otherwise unexplained cases of PLE.
Subject(s)
Helicobacter Infections/diagnosis , Helicobacter pylori , Adult , Biopsy , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Gastric Mucosa/pathology , Gastroscopy , General Practice , Helicobacter Infections/epidemiology , Helicobacter Infections/pathology , Humans , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Precancerous Conditions/epidemiology , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
The role of involved field radiation therapy (IF-RT) after high dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) has not been conclusively defined. It has been hypothesized that HDC might obviate the need of consolidative IF-RT. A retrospective matched-pair analysis of patients undergoing HDC and ASCT with or without consolidative IF-RT has been performed. Fifteen patients treated with IF-RT after ASCT were compared with 15 patients without IF-RT, identical for histology, stage and treatment response to HDC/ASCT as well as comparable for international prognostic index (IPI) score, age and gender. After a mean follow-up time of 65 +/- 45 months, none of the patients with consolidative IF-RT following HDC and ASCT relapsed within the involved field compared to six patients without consolidative IF-RT (IF-failure risk at 5 years: 0% vs. 40%; p < 0.005). In most of the cases, local relapse was seen in patients with bulky disease. The 5-year risk for loco-regional failure was 7% after consolidative IF-RT and 38% in patients without IF-RT (p = 0.02) while the 5-year risk for developing distant recurrences was similar in both groups (30% with IF-RT vs. 35% non-IF-RT; p = 0.7). Overall survival at 5 years was similar with 79% (IF-RT) and 65% (non-IF-RT), respectively (p = 0.2). Acute toxicity due to consolidative IF-RT was mild in most cases and severe acute toxicity was noticed in only one patient (7%). Long-term toxicities observed after IF-RT were coronary artery disease, secondary malignancy unrelated to the RT-field, angina abdominalis, hypothyroidism and teeth decay. Recurrence of NHL at sites of macroscopic disease remains common despite HDC. IF-RT achieves excellent local regional control and consolidative IF-RT after ASCT seems indicated, particularly in patients with bulky disease. In the absence of a prospective randomized trial and proven impact on survival rates, IF-RT can be recommended as an option post-ASCT to enhance local disease control.