Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Crit Care Nurs Q ; 45(2): 119-131, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35212652

ABSTRACT

Management of anticoagulation in individuals undergoing operative procedures is a complex situation. Each case should be assessed individually with proper risk assessment, monitoring, and plan for perioperative and postoperative anticoagulation. Clinical evidence for the management of these patients is relatively scarce, and clinicians are often assessing each individual case with minimal guidance. This review provides nurses with a summary of available literature on the assessment, laboratory monitoring, timing of adjusting anticoagulation, and bridging prior to procedures. In addition to general perioperative anticoagulation management, this review discusses perioperative management in special populations and provides a summary on principles when anticoagulation should be resumed following a procedure.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Perioperative Care , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Humans , Perioperative Care/methods , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
2.
J Natl Med Assoc ; 114(1): 56-68, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35012764

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent reports indicate that African Americans have higher mortality rates from SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) compared to Caucasians, with more marked differences in the Midwest region of the US. This study was performed to study differences in COVID-19 related mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS) between African Americans and Caucasians in Midwest setting, and identify factors associated with mortality and LOS. METHODS: Data were collected from the electronic health records (EHR) of patients admitted to hospitals in Midwest region of the US. EHR of 471 COVID-19 patients were reviewed. RESULTS: Approximately 63% were African Americans and 34% Caucasians. One hundred sixteen variables were tested. There was no significant difference in hospital mortality between African Americans and Caucasians (OR 1, 95% CI 0.48-1.94). Older age, Chronic kidney disease, mental status change, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor support, high neutrophil count, elevated AST and ALT, high lung involvement severity score and elevated CRP were associated with mortality in a univariate analysis (P < 0.05). Multivariable modeling indicated that mechanical ventilation was the only factor that predicted mortality (OR 6, 95% CI: 2.94-12.48). The LOS did not differ in African Americans and Caucasians. The use of oxygen via high flow nasal cannula (Survival Estimate 1.6, 95% CI: 1.20-2.26), low estimated glomerular filtration rate (Survival Estimate 1.4, 95% CI: 1.05-1.82) and mechanical ventilation (Survival Estimate 3.5, 95% CI: 2.72-4.37) were predictors of LOS. CONCLUSION: This study performed in Midwest setting in the US showed that race did not affect in-hospital mortality and LOS. Our analysis demonstrated new predictors of LOS.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Black or African American , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Hospitalization , Humans , Length of Stay , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , White People
3.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 46(3): 100736, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33218786

ABSTRACT

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes, and treatment strategies that impact cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in this population is an area of growing interest. Pharmacologic agents that reduce CVD risk have been developed, and data supporting their use have grown extensively. Glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors when added to metformin therapy provide the most CV benefit and should be considered in most patients. Data available suggest that sulfonylureas should be avoided in patients at risk for CVD and if a thiazolidinedione is utilized, pioglitazone may be preferred. When selecting an agent, the potential benefit, risk, and cost of each agent should be considered prior to initiation. The purpose of this review is to summarize the literature surrounding the CV effects of antidiabetic agents and to provide practical guidance on their use in patients with type 2 diabetes and CVD.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
4.
Crit Care Nurs Q ; 43(2): 122-137, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32084058

ABSTRACT

The antiplatelet landscape for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke has changed significantly over the past decade. Poststroke dual antiplatelet regimens are becoming increasingly routine as supported by recent literature and guideline recommendations. Dual antiplatelet therapy after stroke generally consists of aspirin and clopidogrel and is considered in the short term after stroke in select populations including those with mild stroke or transient ischemic attack and in patients with severe intracranial atherosclerosis. When initiating dual antiplatelet therapy, factors that may increase a patient's risk of bleeding must be weighed against the patient's risk of future ischemic events. This review focuses on antiplatelet medications available in the United States with the aim to provide a summary of the available literature on poststroke dual antiplatelet therapy, pharmacological nuances of the agents, and reversal of antiplatelets in the setting of intracerebral hemorrhage.


Subject(s)
Aspirin/therapeutic use , Brain Ischemia/drug therapy , Clopidogrel/therapeutic use , Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Stroke/drug therapy , Humans , Ischemic Attack, Transient/drug therapy , Secondary Prevention
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...