Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Avian Dis ; 60(1 Suppl): 202-9, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27309056

ABSTRACT

A highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N8 (clade 2.3.4.4) virus, circulating in Asia (South Korea, Japan, and southern China) since the beginning of 2014, reached the European continent in November 2014. Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Italy, and Hungary confirmed H5N8 infection of poultry farms of different species and of several wild bird species. Unlike the Asian highly pathogenic (HP) H5N1, this HP H5N8 also went transatlantic and reached the American West Coast by the end of 2014, affecting wild birds as well as backyard and commercial poultry. This strain induces high mortality and morbidity in Galliformes, whereas wild birds seem only moderately affected. A recombinant turkey herpesvirus (rHVT) vector vaccine expressing the H5 gene of a clade 2.2 H5N1 strain (rHVT-H5) previously demonstrated a highly efficient clinical protection and reduced viral excretion against challenge with Asian HP H5N1 strains of various clades (2.2, 2.2.1, 2.2.1.1, 2.1.3, 2.1.3.2, and 2.3.2.1) and was made commercially available in various countries where the disease is endemic. To evaluate the protective efficacy of the rHVT-H5 vaccine against the first German H5N8 turkey isolate (H5N8 GE), a challenge experiment was set up in specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens, and the clinical and excretional protection was evaluated. SPF chickens were vaccinated subcutaneously at 1 day old and challenged oculonasally at 4 wk of age with two viral dosages, 10(5) and 10(6) 50% egg infective doses. Morbidity and mortality were monitored daily in unvaccinated and vaccinated groups, whereas viral shedding by oropharyngeal and cloacal routes was evaluated at 2, 5, 9, and 14 days postinoculation (dpi). Serologic monitoring after vaccination and challenge was also carried out. Despite its high antigenic divergence of the challenge H5N8 strain, a single rHVT-H5 vaccine administration at 1 day old resulted in a full clinical protection against challenge and a significant reduction of viral shedding in the vaccinated birds.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H5N8 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza in Birds/immunology , Animals , Chickens/immunology , Chickens/virology , Europe , Galliformes/immunology , Galliformes/virology , Genetic Vectors/genetics , Genetic Vectors/metabolism , Herpesvirus 1, Meleagrid/genetics , Herpesvirus 1, Meleagrid/metabolism , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/genetics , Influenza A Virus, H5N8 Subtype/genetics , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/genetics , Influenza in Birds/prevention & control , Influenza in Birds/virology , Vaccination , Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Synthetic/genetics , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology
2.
Avian Dis ; 60(1 Suppl): 387-93, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27309083

ABSTRACT

Active monitoring of avian influenza (AI) viruses in wild birds was initiated in Belgium in 2005 in response to the first highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 outbreaks occurring in Europe. In Belgium, active wild bird surveillance that targeted live-ringed and hunter-harvested wild birds was developed and maintained from 2005 onward. After one decade, this program assimilated, analyzed, and reported on over 35,000 swabs. The 2009-2014 datasets were used for the current analysis because detailed information was available for this period. The overall prevalence of avian influenza (AI) in samples from live-ringed birds during this period was 0.48% whereas it was 6.12% in hunter-harvested samples. While the ringing sampling targeted a large number of bird species and was realized over the years, the hunting sampling was mainly concentrated on mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) during the hunting season, from mid-August to late January. Even when using just AI prevalence for live-ringed A. platyrhynchos during the hunting season, the value remained significantly lower (2.10%) compared to that detected for hunter-harvested mallards. One explanation for this significant difference in viroprevalence in hunter-harvested mallards was the game restocking practice, which released captive-bred birds in the wild before the hunting period. Indeed, the released game restocking birds, having an AI-naïve immune status, could act as local amplifiers of AI viruses already circulating in the wild, and this could affect AI epidemiology. Also, the release into the wild of noncontrolled restocking birds might lead to the introduction of new strains in the natural environment, leading to increased AI presence in the environment. Consequently, the release of naïve or infected restocking birds may affect AI dynamics.


Subject(s)
Anseriformes/virology , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza in Birds/virology , Animals , Animals, Wild/classification , Animals, Wild/virology , Anseriformes/classification , Belgium , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/classification , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/genetics , Seasons
3.
Animal ; 10(9): 1493-500, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27221983

ABSTRACT

Early detection of post-calving health problems is critical for dairy operations. Separating sick cows from the herd is important, especially in robotic-milking dairy farms, where searching for a sick cow can disturb the other cows' routine. The objectives of this study were to develop and apply a behaviour- and performance-based health-detection model to post-calving cows in a robotic-milking dairy farm, with the aim of detecting sick cows based on available commercial sensors. The study was conducted in an Israeli robotic-milking dairy farm with 250 Israeli-Holstein cows. All cows were equipped with rumination- and neck-activity sensors. Milk yield, visits to the milking robot and BW were recorded in the milking robot. A decision-tree model was developed on a calibration data set (historical data of the 10 months before the study) and was validated on the new data set. The decision model generated a probability of being sick for each cow. The model was applied once a week just before the veterinarian performed the weekly routine post-calving health check. The veterinarian's diagnosis served as a binary reference for the model (healthy-sick). The overall accuracy of the model was 78%, with a specificity of 87% and a sensitivity of 69%, suggesting its practical value.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Cattle/physiology , Decision Trees , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Body Weight , Cattle Diseases/etiology , Digestion , Lactation , Milk/metabolism , Models, Theoretical , Parturition , Physical Conditioning, Animal , Robotics
4.
Animal ; 10(9): 1525-32, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26234298

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate if a multi-sensor system (milk, activity, body posture) was a better classifier for lameness than the single-sensor-based detection models. Between September 2013 and August 2014, 3629 cow observations were collected on a commercial dairy farm in Belgium. Human locomotion scoring was used as reference for the model development and evaluation. Cow behaviour and performance was measured with existing sensors that were already present at the farm. A prototype of three-dimensional-based video recording system was used to quantify automatically the back posture of a cow. For the single predictor comparisons, a receiver operating characteristics curve was made. For the multivariate detection models, logistic regression and generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) were developed. The best lameness classification model was obtained by the multi-sensor analysis (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC)=0.757±0.029), containing a combination of milk and milking variables, activity and gait and posture variables from videos. Second, the multivariate video-based system (AUC=0.732±0.011) performed better than the multivariate milk sensors (AUC=0.604±0.026) and the multivariate behaviour sensors (AUC=0.633±0.018). The video-based system performed better than the combined behaviour and performance-based detection model (AUC=0.669±0.028), indicating that it is worthwhile to consider a video-based lameness detection system, regardless the presence of other existing sensors in the farm. The results suggest that Θ2, the feature variable for the back curvature around the hip joints, with an AUC of 0.719 is the best single predictor variable for lameness detection based on locomotion scoring. In general, this study showed that the video-based back posture monitoring system is outperforming the behaviour and performance sensing techniques for locomotion scoring-based lameness detection. A GLMM with seven specific variables (walking speed, back posture measurement, daytime activity, milk yield, lactation stage, milk peak flow rate and milk peak conductivity) is the best combination of variables for lameness classification. The accuracy on four-level lameness classification was 60.3%. The accuracy improved to 79.8% for binary lameness classification. The binary GLMM obtained a sensitivity of 68.5% and a specificity of 87.6%, which both exceed the sensitivity (52.1%±4.7%) and specificity (83.2%±2.3%) of the multi-sensor logistic regression model. This shows that the repeated measures analysis in the GLMM, taking into account the individual history of the animal, outperforms the classification when thresholds based on herd level (a statistical population) are used.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Dairying/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Lameness, Animal/diagnosis , Video Recording/methods , Animals , Belgium , Cattle , Female , Lactation , Milk/metabolism , Multivariate Analysis , Physical Conditioning, Animal , Posture , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
J Dairy Sci ; 97(8): 4852-63, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24931530

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of hoof trimming on cow behavior (ruminating time, activity, and locomotion score) and performance (milk yield) over time. Data were gathered from a commercial dairy farm in Israel where routine hoof trimming is done by a trained hoof trimmer twice per year on the entire herd. In total, 288 cows spread over 6 groups with varying production levels were used for the analysis. Cow behavior was measured continuously with a commercial neck activity logger and a ruminating time logger (HR-Tag, SCR Engineers Ltd., Netanya, Israel). Milk yield was recorded during each milking session with a commercial milk flow sensor (Free Flow, SCR Engineers Ltd.). A trained observer assigned on the spot 5-point locomotion scores during 19 nighttime milking occasions between 22 October 2012 and 4 February 2013. Behavioral and performance data were gathered from 1wk before hoof trimming until 1wk after hoof trimming. A generalized linear mixed model was used to statistically test all main and interactive effects of hoof trimming, parity, lactation stage, and hoof lesion presence on ruminating time, neck activity, milk yield, and locomotion score. The results on locomotion scores show that the proportional distribution of cows in the different locomotion score classes changes significantly after trimming. The proportion of cows with a locomotion score ≥3 increases from 14% before to 34% directly after the hoof trimming. Two months after the trimming, the number of cows with a locomotion score ≥3 reduced to 20%, which was still higher than the baseline values 2wk before the trimming. The neck activity level was significantly reduced 1d after trimming (380±6 bits/d) compared with before trimming (389±6 bits/d). Each one-unit increase in locomotion score reduced cow activity level by 4.488 bits/d. The effect of hoof trimming on ruminating time was affected by an interaction effect with parity. The effect of hoof trimming on locomotion scores was affected by an interaction effect with lactation stage and tended to be affected by interaction effects with hoof lesion presence, indicating that cows with a lesion reacted different to the trimming than cows without a lesion did. The results show that the routine hoof trimming affected dairy cow behavior and performance in this farm.


Subject(s)
Digestion , Hoof and Claw/metabolism , Locomotion , Milk/metabolism , Animals , Behavior, Animal/physiology , Cattle , Female , Israel , Lactation
6.
Avian Pathol ; 40(6): 613-28, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22107096

ABSTRACT

As part of a long-term wild bird monitoring programme, five different low pathogenic (LP) avian influenza viruses (AIVs) were isolated from wild mallards (subtypes H1N1, H4N6, H5N1, H5N3, and H10N7). A LP H5N1 and two co-circulating (same location, same time period) viruses were selected for full genome sequencing. An H1N1 (A/Anas platyrhynchos/Belgium/09-762/2008) and an H5N1 virus (A/Anas platyrhynchos/Belgium/09-762-P1/2008) were isolated on the same day in November 2008, then an H5N3 virus (A/Anas platyrhynchos/09-884/2008) 5 days later in December 2008. All genes of these co-circulating viruses shared common ancestors with recent (2001 to 2007) European wild waterfowl influenza viruses. The H5N1 virus shares genome segments with both the H1N1 (PB1, NA, M) and the H5N3 (PB2, HA) viruses, and all three viruses share the same NS sequence. A double infection with two different PA segments from H5N1 and from H5N3 could be observed for the H1N1 sample. The observed gene constellations resulted from multiple reassortment events between viruses circulating in wild birds in Eurasia. Several internal gene segments from these 2008 viruses and the N3 sequence from the H5N3 show homology with sequences from 2003 H7 outbreaks in Italy (LP) and the Netherlands (highly pathogenic). These data contribute to the growing sequence evidence of the dynamic nature of the avian influenza natural reservoir in Eurasia, and underline the importance of monitoring AIV in wild birds. Genetic information of potential hazard to commercial poultry continues to circulate in this reservoir, including H5 and H7 subtype viruses and genes related to previous AIV outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Bird Diseases/epidemiology , Bird Diseases/virology , Ducks , Environmental Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Genome, Viral/genetics , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/genetics , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Animals , Base Sequence , Belgium/epidemiology , Cloning, Molecular , Cluster Analysis , Computational Biology , Epidemiological Monitoring , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/genetics , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Models, Genetic , Molecular Sequence Data , Phylogeny , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Sequence Analysis, DNA/veterinary
7.
Avian Dis ; 54(1 Suppl): 246-52, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20521640

ABSTRACT

Systematic vaccination can be applied when a disease has become enzootic in a country or region. The final goal of the approach is to control or eradicate the disease within the country. This is a long-term vaccination plan that could be applied nationwide to all commercial and backyard poultry. However, after several months of vaccination in enzootic areas, maternally derived antibody (MDA) is present in young chicks, providing some protection and/or interference with vaccination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of protection afforded by MDA against challenge with highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV), and its suspected interference with current inactivated vaccines in broilers under controlled laboratory conditions. In the first set of experiments, broilers were vaccinated with inactivated vaccines containing H5N2 subtype antigens in the presence or absence of homologue MDAs and challenged with a clade 2.2 H5N1 HPAIV. In the second set of experiments, day-old broilers, either with or without avian influenza MDA, received a regular-type monovalent H5N2 AI vaccine (0.5 ml) or a concentrated (0.2 ml) AL-Newcastle disease virus combined inactivated vaccine subcutaneously. They were then challenged at 11 or 35 days of age. In conclusion, our results indicate that protection induced by day-old administration of inactivated vaccine (regular or concentrated) in the presence or absence of MDA to H5N2 AIV induces poor protection against challenge with H5N1 HPAIV and should not be recommended. Based on our results, vaccination of MDA-positive chickens at a later age (10 days) seems to be a valuable recommendation, although MDAs may still interfere with vaccination to a lesser extent because they are present up to 3 wk posthatch. Therefore, in areas with high infection pressure, when possible, two vaccinations are recommended for optimal protection. Also, it might be advisable to take into account day-old AI MDA titers when one is determining the optimal age of vaccination.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Chickens , Immunity, Maternally-Acquired , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza in Birds/prevention & control , Aging , Animals , Influenza in Birds/immunology , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology
8.
Rev Sci Tech ; 28(1): 307-18, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19618634

ABSTRACT

Most avian influenza (AI) vaccination and field studies have focused on chickens and turkeys because of their high death rates and the large amounts of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus that they excrete into the environment when infected. Data on vaccination of other species against HPAI remain limited. An increasing number of studies have been conducted to test the efficacy of inactivated vaccines in ducks and geese since it became clear that these species are a source of HPAI H5N1. One problem is the varying susceptibility of waterfowl to H5N1 in general, and to different H5N1 clades in particular. This makes the extrapolation of protection results obtained for a particular waterfowl species against a particular viral strain very difficult. At present, the vaccine industry only produces and licenses products for chickens and turkeys. Since the market for other birds is small, it does not invest heavily in testing products in other species. Most information on vaccination in other birds comes from zoo vaccination, and consists solely of serological data. Whenever experimental challenge was performed in birds other than chickens and turkeys, vaccination using inactivated vaccines always protected against disease and mortality, provided the vaccine was sufficiently matched antigenically with the challenge virus. Inactivated vaccines induce good antibody titres in most species when applied twice and when body weight is taken into account. Until the advent of more specific waterfowl vaccines that can be used in day-old chicks, inactivated vaccines can be applied to protect not only chickens and turkeys but also ducks and other valuable and/or endangered bird species.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza in Birds/prevention & control , Vaccination/veterinary , Animals , Animals, Wild , Animals, Zoo , Birds , Vaccination/methods , Vaccination/standards , Vaccines, Inactivated , Vaccines, Synthetic
9.
Vaccine ; 27(5): 646-54, 2009 Jan 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19056442

ABSTRACT

The efficacy of different vaccination schedules was evaluated in 17-day-old Pekin ducks using an experimental inactivated whole virus vaccine based on the H5N9 A/chicken/Italy/22A/98 isolate (H5N9-It) and/or a fowlpox recombinant (vFP-H5) expressing a synthetic HA gene from an Asian H5N1 isolate (A/chicken/Indonesia/7/2003). Full protection against clinical signs and shedding was induced by the different vaccination schemes. However, the broadest antibody response and the lowest antibody increase after challenge were observed in the group of ducks whose immune system was primed with the fowlpox vectored vaccine and boosted with the inactivated vaccine, suggesting that this prime-boost strategy induced optimal immunity against H5N1 and minimal viral replication after challenge in ducks. In addition, this prime-boost vaccination scheme was shown to be immunogenic in 1-day-old ducklings.


Subject(s)
Fowlpox virus/genetics , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza in Birds/prevention & control , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Chick Embryo , Cloaca/virology , Ducks , Female , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Immunization, Secondary , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/genetics , Influenza Vaccines/genetics , Influenza in Birds/immunology , Mouth/virology , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology , Virus Shedding/immunology
10.
Avian Dis ; 51(1 Suppl): 213-20, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17494556

ABSTRACT

Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RRT-PCR) is becoming an established first-line diagnostic assay as well as a precise quantification tool for avian influenza virus detection. However, there remain some limitations. First, we show that the sensitivity of RRT-PCR influenza detection can be 10- to 100-fold inhibited in oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs. Adding 0.5 U of heat-activated Taq DNA polymerase successfully reverses PCR inhibition. Second, an excellent strategy for detecting false negative samples is the coamplification of an internal control from each sample. We developed a universal avian endogenous internal control (bird beta-actin) and apply it to influenza A diagnosis. Moreover, this internal control proves useful as a normalizer control for virus quantification, because beta-actin gene expression does not change in infected vs. uninfected ducks. A combined panel of wild bird cloacal swabs, wild bird tissue samples, experimental duck swabs, and experimental duck and chicken tissue samples was used to validate the endogenous control. The application of an endogenous internal control proves an excellent strategy both for avoiding false negative diagnostic results and for standardizing virus quantification studies.


Subject(s)
Influenza in Birds/diagnosis , Influenza in Birds/virology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Animals , Birds/virology , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/genetics , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity
11.
Avian Dis ; 51(1 Suppl): 221-6, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17494557

ABSTRACT

Vaccination programs for the control of avian influenza (AI) in birds have restrictions because of some limited efficacy and the difficulty of discriminating between vaccinated and virus-infected poultry. We studied M2e, the highly conserved external domain of the influenza A M2 protein, as a potential differential diagnostic marker for influenza virus infection. The M2 protein is an integral membrane protein, scarcely present on virus particles, but abundantly expressed on virus-infected cells. M2e-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for different avian influenza strains were developed by coating the peptides corresponding to the first 18 amino acids, without the first methionine, of the universal human consensus M2e sequence and the specific M2e sequence of two highly pathogenic AI (HPAI) strains, H7N7 and H5N1. Using the M2e ELISAs, M2e-specific antibodies were observed in chickens and ducks experimentally infected with H7 or H5 HPAI, respectively, that correlated well with hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibodies. Conversely, sera from chicken and ducks inoculated with inactivated AI vaccines were positive for HI test but negative for the M2e ELISAs. Moreover, ducks inoculated with inactivated vaccine and challenged with a HPAI H5N1 seroconverted for antibodies to the M2e peptide, with significantly different levels from those measured between the vaccinated and infected groups. These results indicate the potential benefit of a simple and specific M2e ELISA in the assessment of the efficacy of vaccination as well as for diagnostic and survey applications.


Subject(s)
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H7N7 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza in Birds/diagnosis , Influenza in Birds/immunology , Viral Matrix Proteins/chemistry , Viral Matrix Proteins/immunology , Animals , Chickens/immunology , Ducks/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Humans , Influenza in Birds/prevention & control , Influenza in Birds/virology , Protein Structure, Tertiary , Sensitivity and Specificity
12.
Avian Dis ; 51(1 Suppl): 325-31, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17494576

ABSTRACT

The efficacy of an inactivated vaccine containing the Eurasian isolate A/chicken/Italy/22A/98 H5N9 (H5N9-It) was compared with that of the fowlpox-vectored TROVACTM-AIV H5 (rFP-AIV-H5) vaccine against an H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza challenge. Five-week-old Muscovy ducks were vaccinated with either H5N9-It (0.5 ml) or rFP-AIV-H5 (5 log10 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50)/dose), followed by a boost at 7 wk of age with the same vaccine (1.0 ml of H5N9-It or 5 log10 TCID50/dose rFP-AIV-H5), and a challenge at 9 wk of age with 10(7) egg infectious dose (lethality 50%) of A/crested eagle/ Belgium/01/2004 (H5N1). All unvaccinated challenged birds showed severe nervous signs (loss of balance, torticollis) starting 7 days postinfection (dpi). None of the vaccinated ducks showed these nervous signs. Shedding was measured in oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs, sampled from 3 to 19 dpi by titration in chicken embryo fibroblasts and by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Virus shedding was significantly higher in oropharyngeal compared to cloacal swabs. Both vaccines reduced the percentage of positive swabs and the viral load in the swabs, but the reduction was higher with the H5N9-It vaccine. The inactivated vaccine induced hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers (5.4 log2) that were boosted after the second administration (7.5 log2). rFP-AIV-H5-induced HI titers were lower (3 log2 only after the second administration), most probably because the fowlpox vector does not replicate in ducks. Altogether, these results indicate that significant protection from clinical signs and reduction in virus shedding may be achieved in ducks with conventional inactivated or fowlpox-vectored vaccine as compared with nonvaccinated challenged control birds.


Subject(s)
Ducks/virology , Fowlpox virus , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza in Birds/prevention & control , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza in Birds/virology , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology , Virus Shedding
13.
Avian Dis ; 51(1 Suppl): 401-7, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17494594

ABSTRACT

On October 18, 2004, two crested hawk eagles, Spizaetus nipalensis, smuggled into Europe from Thailand were seized at Brussels International Airport. A highly pathogenic avian influenza virus, denominated A/crested eagle/Belgium/01/2004, was isolated from these birds and antigenically characterized as H5N1. Here we report on the molecular characterization of A/crested eagle/Belgium/01/2004 (H5N1). We completely sequenced all eight genome segments. The hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) sequences clustered within the Z genotype and were closely related to strains circulating in Thailand during 2004, although some mutations in the HA were evident, notably a unique arginine (R) > lysine (K) replacement in the cleaving site. The HA cleavage site contained six basic amino acids, confirming its high pathogenicity (intravenous pathogenicity index = 2.94). The 20-amino acid deletion in the NA stalk region is consistent with its Thai-Viet origin. We further discuss the assembled genetic information in the light of currently known host adaptation, virulence, and antiviral resistance factors. Using infection experiments, we show that pathogenicity in chickens depends on breed, inoculation route (oculonasal vs. intramuscular), and dose. Additionally, in Muscovy ducks, pathogenicity proved to be age dependent.


Subject(s)
Eagles/virology , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/genetics , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza in Birds/virology , Animals , Chickens , Crime , Ducks , Europe , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Phylogeny , Thailand/epidemiology , Virulence
14.
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg ; 68(2): 103-20, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16800241

ABSTRACT

Avian influenza (AI) is a highly contagious disease for birds, which can easily take epidemic proportions when appropriate and efficacious measures are not taken immediately. Influenza viruses can vary in pathogenicity from low to medium or highly pathogenic. A low pathogenic strain can become highly pathogenic by introduction of new mutations (insertions, deletions or substitutions) in the cleavage site of the haemagglutinin during circulation in chickens. Up till now only H5 and H7 strains gave rise to highly pathogenic strains in this manner. At present the avian H5N1 influenza virus is endemic in Southeast Asia (47) and is expanding westward. In addition, its virulence is extremely higher than other HPAI, like H7N7. Moreover, the avian host range is expanding, as species previously considered resistant, now get infected and can contribute to the dissemination of the virus. In the context of H5N1, all movements (trade, high international mobility, migration and smuggling) can become high risk factors of spreading the disease. In most European countries eradication measures are applied when an outbreak occurs. But such measures have great economical and social implications, and are no longer generally accepted. The combination of prophylactic measures (vaccination and medicines), hygienic measures and surveillance could offer an acceptable alternative.


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control , Influenza A virus/genetics , Influenza A virus/pathogenicity , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Influenza in Birds/prevention & control , Animals , Asia/epidemiology , Birds , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Europe/epidemiology , Humans , Influenza in Birds/transmission , Mutation , Risk Factors , Species Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...