Impact of a Coordinated Sepsis Response on Time to Treatment in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is responsible for 75 000 pediatric hospitalizations annually, with an associated mortality rate estimated between 11% and 19%. Evidence supports the use of timely fluid resuscitation and antibiotics to decrease morbidity and mortality. Our emergency department did not meet the timeliness goals for fluid and antibiotic administration suggested by the 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign. METHODS: In November 2018, we implemented a sepsis response team utilizing a scripted communication tool and a dedicated sepsis supply cart to address timeliness barriers. Performance was evaluated using statistical process control charts. We conducted observations to evaluate adherence to the new process. Our aim was to meet the Surviving Sepsis Campaign's timeliness goals for first fluid and antibiotic administration (20 and 60 minutes, respectively) within 8 months of our intervention. RESULTS: We observed sustained decreases in mean time to fluids. We also observed a shift in the proportion of patients receiving fluids within 20 minutes. No shifts were observed for timely antibiotic administration. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a dedicated emergency department sepsis response team with designated roles and responsibilities, directed communication, and easily accessible supplies can lead to improvements in the timeliness of fluid administration in the pediatric population.

Factors affecting pain scores during female urethral catheterization.

OBJECTIVES: To compare pain and discomfort ratings of female patients undergoing urethral catheterization randomized to topical application of plain lubricant versus lidocaine gel prior to the procedure. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study involving female patients requiring urethral catheterization at an urban university-based academic emergency department. A staff nurse blinded to the lubricant type injected 5 mL of sterile surgical lubricant or 2% lidocaine gel into the urinary meatus. After 1 minute, an 8-F (for specimen collection) or a 16-F (for continuous collection) catheter was inserted into the urethra. Each patient rated the pain of the procedure on a validated 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze associations between pain ratings, lubricant type, and catheter size. Logistic regression was used to identify the contribution of lubricant type, catheter size, age category, difficulty of insertion, preprocedural pain, and diagnosis of urinary tract infection to procedural pain rating. RESULTS: One hundred women were randomized to plain lubricant (n = 50) or lidocaine (n = 50). The overall mean ( +/- SD) pain score was 23.5 +/- 27.2 mm. No significant differences in pain ratings were found based on catheter size or lubricant type. Younger women, aged 18-59 years, experienced higher pain ratings than women aged 60-101 (mean pain difference 14.4 mm; 95% CI = 4.3 to 24.5; p < 0.006). Multiple logistic regression identified preprocedural pain as the only predictor of higher pain rating after catheterization (OR 1.02; 95% CI = 1.002 to 1.039, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Catheter size and lubricant type did not affect the severity of pain after urethral catheterization in women.

Undiagnosed hypertension in the ED setting--an unrecognized opportunity by emergency nurses.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension is often undiagnosed, untreated, undertreated, and poorly controlled. Many patients use the emergency department as their primary source of health care, and the emergency department represents an opportunity to identify undiagnosed hypertension. We sought to (1) identify the prevalence of elevated blood pressures in low-acuity patients and (2) describe the existing practice of reassessment, treatment, and referral of abnormal vital signs in these patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 88 ED patients at an academic medical center. All patients meeting Emergency Severity Index level 4 or 5 criteria (low acuity) were eligible. The following variables were recorded: triage level, medical history and medications, disposition, and all blood pressures. The investigators independently reviewed and reached consensus regarding the following outcome variables: the need for and actual treatment of elevated blood pressure, and the need for and referral for blood pressure recheck after discharge. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (45%) had hypertension by definition on arrival. Systolic hypertension was more common. Ten of the patients (27%) with elevated blood pressures had documented rechecks prior to discharge in the emergency department, and only one patient was referred for follow-up. Twenty-seven out of 37 low-acuity patients (73%) who presented with elevated blood pressures had no documentation of the blood pressure being rechecked and no documentation of the patient being referred. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that important opportunities for education and follow-up of hypertension are being missed.