ACNPs in the U.S. Army-Medical Force Multipliers for Large-Scale Combat Operations.

Operations in the Middle East have slowed, and near-peer tensions escalate. The U.S. Military has directed its attention from combating insurgencies toward preparedness for large-scale combat operations (LSCOs). The threat of LSCO demands a dramatic shift in strategy and resource and has raised questions about how the military will pivot from the counter-insurgency operations of the previous two decades. Innovation and change are needed to adequately receive, treat, hold, and transport the high volume of anticipated casualties in LSCO. Review of the current deployed medical structure has identified needs to increase emergency medical capabilities near the point of injury, increase patient holding capacity (particularly in critical care) in field hospitals and expeditionary medical facilities, and address likely delayed and prolonged medical evacuation. To address these new challenges, the authors offer recommendations for the addition of Acute Care Nurse Practitioners (ACNPs) to the U.S. Army Medical Department. ACNPs are advanced practice providers, specialized in acute and critical care. ACNPs are a potential medical force multiplier not currently utilized in the U.S. Army. If adapted, ACNPs could contribute significantly to meeting the demands of LSCO medical needs via multiple roles. Recommendations are provided by the authors, such as utilizing the ACNP within the Forward Resuscitative Surgical Detachment, Field Hospital intensive care unit, aeromedical evacuation, and/or Prolonged Care Augmentation Detachment. With support from the U.S. Army Nurse Corp and Army Medical Department, ACNPs could be integrated into the Army healthcare model, emulating the civilian standard of care for every soldier deployed. Furthermore, use of ACNPs in theater could advance deployed medical capabilities and help conserve the fighting force of the U.S. Military and its partners.

Methylprednisolone may be associated with improved lung compliance in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

INTRODUCTION: Methylprednisolone has been used for acute respiratory distress syndrome with variable results. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in acute respiratory distress syndrome has increased. Occasionally, both are used. We hypothesized that methylprednisolone could improve lung compliance and ease weaning from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients in our veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation unit treated with methylprednisolone over a 20 month period. Methylprednisolone was initiated for inability to wean off veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Dynamic compliance (Cdyn) was calculated at cannulation, methylprednisolone initiation, and decannulation. Demographics, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-specific data, and ventilator data were collected. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to test for differences in dynamic compliance. RESULTS: A total of 12 veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients received methylprednisolone. Mean age was 50 (±15) years. Seven had influenza. Methylprednisolone was started on median Day 16 (interquartile range: 11-22) of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In total, 10 patients had veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation on median Day 12 (7-22) after methylprednisolone initiation. Two patients died before decannulation. The 10 decannulated patients had initial median dynamic compliance (mL × cm H2O-1) of 12 (7-23), then 16 (10-24) at methylprednisolone initiation, and then 44 (34-60) at decannulation. Dynamic compliance was higher at decannulation than methylprednisolone initiation (p = 0.002), and unchanged from cannulation to methylprednisolone initiation for all patients (p = 0.97). A total of 10 patients had significant infections. None had significant gastrointestinal bleed or wound healing issues. CONCLUSION: Methylprednisolone may be associated with improved compliance in acute respiratory distress syndrome allowing for decannulation from veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. High rates of infection are associated with methylprednisolone use in veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Further studies are required to identify appropriate patient selection for methylprednisolone use in patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Respiratory Failure: How Long Is Too Long?

The use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) in adults with respiratory failure has steadily increased during the past decade. Recent literature has demonstrated variable outcomes with the use of extended ECMO. The purpose of this study is to evaluate survival to hospital discharge in patients with extended ECMO runs compared with patients with short ECMO runs at a tertiary care ECMO referral center. We retrospectively reviewed all patients on VV ECMO for respiratory failure between August 2014 and February 2017. Bridge to lung transplant, post-lung transplant, and post-cardiac surgery patients were excluded. Patients were stratified by duration of ECMO: extended ECMO, defined as >504 hours; short ECMO as ≤504 hours. Demographics, pre-ECMO data, ECMO-specific data, and outcomes were analyzed. One hundred and thirty-nine patients with respiratory failure were treated with VV ECMO. Overall survival to discharge was 76%. Thirty-one (22%) patients had extended ECMO runs with an 87% survival to discharge. When compared with patients with short ECMO runs, there was no difference in median age, body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/ fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) (P/F), and survival to discharge. However, time from intubation to cannulation for ECMO was significantly longer in patients with extended ECMO runs. (p = 0.008). Our data demonstrate that patients with extended ECMO runs have equivalent outcomes to those with short ECMO runs. Although the decision to continue ECMO support in this patient population is multifactorial, we suggest that time on ECMO should not be the sole factor in this challenging decision.