Axial Pain and Arthritis in Diagnosed Inflammatory Bowel Disease: US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data.

Objective: To estimate the nationally representative prevalence of chronic axial pain, inflammatory back pain (IBP), axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), and peripheral arthritis in persons diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients and Methods: US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from the 1976-1980 and 2009-2010 survey cycles. Results: In NHANES 1976-1980, the chronic axial pain prevalence in participants with diagnosed ulcerative colitis (UC) was 19.5% vs 7.2% in the general population (P<.01). Neck or upper back, lower back, and Amor criteria-based axial pain were also significantly increased (11.2%, 14.5%, and 13.0%, respectively, vs 3%-5% in the general population (P<.01). In those with diagnosed UC, 40% had axial pain onset at an age older than 45 years; 30.2% reported peripheral arthralgias, and 12.2% reported peripheral arthritis. Arthritis findings on examination were uncommon. In NHANES 2009-2010, axial pain in those diagnosed with IBD had similar patterns. Conclusion: Despite high rates of chronic axial pain in those with IBD, few cases met the IBP and axSpA classification criteria. This apparent discrepancy is unexplained. However, in IBD, axial pain onset at an age older than 45 years is common; and these may not meet IBP and axSpA age criteria. Also, neck pain was increased in those with IBD but is not included in most IBP and axSpA criteria. Peripheral arthralgias and chronic arthritis symptoms were common, but examination findings were not, suggesting that tenosynovitis or enthesitis is more likely than frank arthritis to occur in patients with UC.

An Ounce of Prevention, a Pound of Complications: A Case of Statin-Induced Necrotizing Myopathy in a Frail Elderly Patient.

The use of statins for primary prevention in older adults remains controversial. In this manuscript, we present a case of an 81-year-old woman with a history of HTN, HLD, Alzheimer's dementia and osteoporosis, who presented to a geriatrics clinic with profound muscle weakness accompanied by new functional deficits in the setting of taking double her prescribed dose of atorvastatin. She was admitted to the hospital where she was found to have rhabdomyolysis. Muscle biopsy and serologic work up revealed anti-HMG statin co-reductase myopathy as the cause of her symptoms. The patient was treated with steroids IVIG and immunomodulators with marked improvement in her weakness; however, her course was complicated by delirium and multiple falls, resulting in several fragility fractures. This case highlights the need to conduct a risk-benefit analysis prior to initiating new therapies in patients with limited life expectancy, including the consideration of the potential for medication errors.

Insights From Twitter Conversations on Lupus and Reproductive Health: Protocol for a Content Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the most common form of lupus. It is a chronic autoimmune disease that predominantly affects women of reproductive age, impacting contraception, fertility, and pregnancy. Although clinic-based studies have contributed to an increased understanding of reproductive health care needs of patients with SLE, misinformation abounds and perspectives on reproductive health issues among patients with lupus remain poorly understood. Social networks such as Twitter may serve as a data source for exploring how lupus patients communicate about their health issues, thus adding a dimension to enrich our understanding of communication regarding reproductive health in this unique patient population. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to conduct a content analysis of Twitter data published by users in English in the United States from September 1, 2017, to October 31, 2018, in order to examine people's perspectives on reproductive health among patients with lupus. METHODS: This study will analyze user-generated posts that include keywords related to lupus and reproductive health from Twitter. To access public Twitter user data, we will use Symplur Signals, a health care social media analytics platform. Text classifiers will be used to identify topics in posts. Posts will be classified manually into the a priori and emergent categories. Based on the information available in a user's Twitter profile (ie, username, description, and profile image), we will further attempt to characterize the user who generated the post. We will use descriptive statistics to analyze the data and identify the most prevalent topics in the Twitter content among patients with lupus. RESULTS: This study has been funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) through their Clinical and Translational Science Awards program. The Institutional Review Board at the University of Southern California approved the study (HS-18-00912). Data extraction and cleaning are complete. We obtained 47,715 Twitter posts containing terms related to "lupus" from users in the United States, published in English between September 1, 2017, and October 31, 2018. We will include 40,885 posts in the analysis, which will be completed in fall 2020. This study was supported by funds from the has been funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) through their Clinical and Translational Science Awards program. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study will provide pilot data on the use of Twitter among patients with lupus. Our findings will shed light on whether Twitter is a promising data source for learning about reproductive health issues expressed among patients with lupus. The data will also help to determine whether Twitter can serve as a potential outreach platform for raising awareness of lupus and reproductive health and for implementing relevant health interventions. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/15623.

Nonbeneficial Intensive Care: Misalignments Between Provider Assessments of Benefit and Use of Invasive Treatments.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine how frequently invasive intensive care unit (ICU) treatments are delivered to critically ill patients despite clinicians' impressions that ICU care may be nonbeneficial. METHODS: Patients admitted to the medical ICU of an academic public hospital were prospectively categorized according to guidelines from the Society of Critical Care Medicine which classifies patients based on severity of illness and likelihood of recovery (categories 1-4). Clinical data and use of ICU treatments in patients with high (category 1) and low (category 3) likelihoods of benefit were collected by chart review. Multivariable regression analyses examined associations between use of invasive treatments and patient categories, and clinical factors associated with receiving invasive ICU treatments despite low likelihood of benefit. RESULTS: There were 533 patients (369 in category 1 and 164 in category 3) in the study. A total of 19.8%, 29.9%, and 28.9% of patient-days on mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, and renal replacement therapy, respectively, were delivered to patients who were considered unlikely to benefit from ICU treatments (category 3) and ultimately did not survive hospitalization. These patients also received 35.2% of cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempts and 22.6% of central venous catheter placements. Clinicians' impressions of likelihood of benefit (category 1 vs 3) were not associated with odds of receiving invasive ICU treatments. Clinical characteristics associated with greater odds of receiving potentially nonbeneficial treatments included older age, presence of dementia or malignancy, and higher Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation score. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive ICU treatments are frequently delivered to patients who are not expected to benefit from ICU care and die during hospitalization. These findings highlight the need to improve utilization of ICU services among patients with advanced medical illnesses.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection in an Immunocompromised Patient.

INTRODUCTION: To report on the first recorded case of necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) in an immunocompromised individual caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in the Western Hemisphere and highlight the challenges that medical providers face in promptly diagnosing and treating NSTI in this highly vulnerable patient population. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of NSTI caused by S. maltophilia in a neutropenic patient admitted for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The patient presented with laboratory and clinical findings atypical for a NSTI that may have confounded its diagnosis and delayed surgical intervention. Despite aggressive medical care and surgical debridement, the patient unfortunately passed away due to overwhelming septic shock. CONCLUSIONS: Providers should consider atypical organisms as causative in NSTI in immunocompromised patients and recognize that these patients may present without classic clinical and laboratory findings.