Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 17(4): e0266339, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35413062

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The strong association between atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma is well established, but data on the risk of atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma in Danish women with non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia are almost non-existent. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of atypical hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma diagnosed within 3 months of initial diagnosis (defined as concurrent disease) and the risk of atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma more than 3 months after initial diagnosis (classified as progressive disease) in Danish women initially diagnosed with non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia. DESIGN: This cohort study recruited 102 women diagnosed with non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia at Randers Regional Hospital in Randers, Denmark, between 2000 and 2015. METHODS: The endometrium was evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound examination and office mini-hysteroscopy with biopsies in all non-hysterectomized women. Data regarding subsequent hysterectomy or endometrial sampling were obtained from medical records and the Danish Pathology Registry (Patobank). RESULTS: A total of 15 women were diagnosed with atypical hyperplasia or carcinoma during follow-up. Concurrent atypical hyperplasia or carcinoma was seen in 2.9% (3/102), and among women who remained at risk for more than 3 months after initial diagnosis of non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia (n = 94), progression to atypical hyperplasia or carcinoma was seen in 13% (median follow-up 5.2 years, range 3.6 months to 15.1 years). Sixty-six percent of the women with progressive disease were diagnosed with atypical hyperplasia or carcinoma more than 1 year after initial diagnosis, but only two were diagnosed later than 5 years (5.2 and 9 years). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of being diagnosed with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial carcinoma more than 5 years after an initial diagnosis of non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia seems to be low in Danish women. Specialized follow-up more than 5 years after diagnosis of non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia may not be warranted.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma , Endometrial Hyperplasia , Endometrial Neoplasms , Precancerous Conditions , Cohort Studies , Endometrial Hyperplasia/diagnostic imaging , Endometrial Hyperplasia/pathology , Endometrial Neoplasms/diagnosis , Endometrial Neoplasms/epidemiology , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hyperplasia , Retrospective Studies
2.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 172(46): 3166-70, 2010 Nov 15.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21073829

ABSTRACT

Views and policies about eating and drinking in labour vary widely across the world. There is an increasing trend towards allowing food and fluids during labour, although little scientific data exist on its influence on the course of labour. Evidence-based recommendations in the form of a guideline on eating and drinking in labour is still lacking. Thus, the purpose of the present paper was to review the current literature to establish whether there is evidence for restricting or allowing food and fluids during normal labour.


Subject(s)
Drinking , Eating , Labor, Obstetric , Cesarean Section , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Nausea/etiology , Obstetric Labor Complications/etiology , Obstetric Labor Complications/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Aspiration/etiology , Pneumonia, Aspiration/prevention & control , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Vomiting/etiology
3.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 168(48): 4188-95, 2006 Nov 27.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17147942

ABSTRACT

The influence of physical work conditions on adverse pregnancy outcomes is in Denmark guided by recommendations from the Danish Labour Inspection. In this review, the literature on physically demanding work and its influence on pregnancy outcomes is examined. There is no evidence for posing accurate weight limits designed for pregnant women carrying heavy loads. In relation to work with standing or walking postures, it seems that especially prolonged standing is critical for pregnant women. There is no study that deals with the influence of pulling or pushing on pregnancy outcomes.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Pregnancy Outcome , Workload , Ergonomics , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Lifting , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Physical Exertion , Posture , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Walking
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...