Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Hand Surg Am ; 44(6): 443-453, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31005463

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine physician and hospital reimbursement for digit and thumb replantation compared with revision amputation. METHODS: Using the 2009-2016 Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases, we identified patients with a digit or thumb amputation. Following application of our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we divided patients into replantation and revision amputation groups. We extracted the mean physician and hospital reimbursement associated with each patient encounter. For comparison, we examined the work Relative Value Unit (wRVU) and Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) for the respective procedures in addition to several common hand surgery procedures. RESULTS: We identified 51,716 patients. Following application of our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 219 replantation and 6,209 revision amputation patients were included in our analysis. For replantation, the mean physician and hospital reimbursements ranged from $3,938 to $7,753 and $30,683 to $56,256, respectively. For revision amputation, the mean physician and hospital reimbursements ranged from $1,030 to $1,206 and $2,877 to $4,188, respectively. On multivariable analysis, hospitals performing replantation earned $37,788 more per case compared with revision amputation. Using the wRVU and MPFS data, we determined that replantation reimburses at $78/wRVU compared with higher earnings for revision amputation ($108), carpal tunnel release ($101), cubital tunnel release ($97), trigger finger release ($116), open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) distal radius fracture ($87), flexor tendon repair ($98), extensor tendon repair ($122), repair of digital nerve ($89), and ORIF articular fracture ($82), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Low physician reimbursement for replantation compared with less complex hand procedures makes it difficult to recruit and retain hand surgeons for this purpose. By understanding the wRVU and MPFS system, hand surgeons and professional societies can explore ways to promote change in the way replantation is valued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as well as by hospital administrators. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic/Decision Analysis III.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Traumatic/surgery , Finger Injuries/surgery , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/economics , Replantation/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Amputation, Surgical , Child , Child, Preschool , Economics, Hospital , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Medicare/economics , Middle Aged , Orthopedic Procedures/economics , Physicians/economics , United States , Young Adult
2.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 143(3): 951-961, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30817669

ABSTRACT

Maintaining a competitive edge is increasingly imperative for surgical research teams. To publish as efficiently and effectively as possible, research teams should apply business strategies and theories in everyday practice. Drawing from concrete examples in both the corporate and nonprofit worlds, and by reflecting on the practices of the Michigan Comprehensive Hand Center for Innovation Research, this article identifies important business theories that can be applied to plastic surgery research. These theories can potentially be applied in practice and include (1) development of a realistic vision and strategies, (2) effective execution of these strategies, and (3) reflective evaluation for continual improvement.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/organization & administration , Interdisciplinary Research/organization & administration , Models, Organizational , Surgery, Plastic/organization & administration , Biomedical Research/economics , Interdisciplinary Research/economics , Michigan , Organizational Innovation/economics , Strategic Planning , Surgery, Plastic/economics
3.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 143(2): 340e-349e, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30531621

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Economic conditions affect surgical volumes, particularly for elective procedures. In this study, the authors aimed to identify the effects of the 2008 U.S. economic downturn on hand surgery volumes to guide surgeons and managers when facing future economic crises. METHODS: The authors used the California State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database from January of 2005 to December of 2011, which includes the entire period of the Great Recession (December of 2007 to June of 2009). The authors abstracted the monthly volume of five common hand procedures using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Pearson statistics were used to identify the correlation between unemployment rate and surgical volume for each procedure. RESULTS: The total number of operative cases was 345,583 during the 7-year study period. Most common elective hand procedures, such as carpal tunnel release and trigger finger release, had a negative correlation with unemployment rate, but the volume of distal radius fracture surgery did not show any correlation. Compared with carpal tunnel release (r = -0.88) or trigger finger release volumes (r = -0.85), thumb arthroplasty/arthrodesis volumes (r = -0.45) showed only a moderate correlation. CONCLUSIONS: The economic downturn decreased elective hand procedure surgical volumes. This may be detrimental to small surgical practices that rely on revenue from elective procedures. Taking advantage of the principle that increased volume reduces unit cost may mitigate the lost revenue from these elective procedures. In addition, consolidating hand surgery services at larger, regional centers may reduce the effect of the economic environment on individual hand surgeons.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Cost Savings , Decompression, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Economic Recession , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/economics , California , Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/surgery , Databases, Factual , Decompression, Surgical/economics , Elective Surgical Procedures/economics , Elective Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Medicaid/economics , Medicare/economics , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Procedures, Operative/economics , Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data , United States
4.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 142(5): 1267-1274, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30511980

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although national efforts to minimize gender biases exist, gender differences in surgery persist. This study aims to investigate gender differences in preoperative resource use of patients undergoing wrist arthroscopy for nontraumatic wrist pain. METHODS: Patients who underwent a wrist arthroscopy for nontraumatic pain from 2009 to 2015 were selected from the Truven MarketScan databases. Demographic and preoperative resource use data were recorded. Multivariable regression models were performed to examine the relationship between gender and preoperative resource use and to investigate the cost of these services. RESULTS: A total of 8792 patients, 3805 men and 4987 women, met our inclusion criteria. Women were less likely to use imaging modalities preoperatively (OR, 0.08; 95 percent CI, 0.07 to 1.00; p = 0.02). However, women used more occupational therapy (OR, 1.2; 95 percent CI, 1.1 to 1.3; p = 0.002), nonnarcotic analgesia (OR, 1.2; 95 percent CI, 1.1 to 1.3; p = 0.001), and narcotic analgesia (OR, 1.6; 95 percent CI, 1.5 to 1.8; p < 0.001). Preoperative costs during the 12 months before surgery were similar between genders ($1308 versus $1367, respectively; p = 0.07). However, women accrued more costs from occupational therapy ($130 versus $93; p = 0.003), and nonnarcotic ($65 versus $46; p < 0.001) and narcotic medications ($568 versus $197; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Significant gender differences exist in the preoperative care for patients undergoing wrist arthroscopy. Men use more imaging, implying more intense preoperative investigation for wrist pain, whereas women use more conservative measures, highlighting possible implicit provider biases in preoperative management and potential gender differences in disease presentation.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Musculoskeletal Pain/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Facilities and Services Utilization , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Preoperative Care/statistics & numerical data , Sex Distribution , United States , Wrist/surgery , Young Adult
5.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 141(4): 1056-1062, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29595741

ABSTRACT

A well-organized, thoughtful study design is essential for creating an impactful study. However, pressures promoting high output from researchers can lead to rushed study proposals that overlook critical weaknesses in the study design that can affect the validity of the conclusions. Researchers can benefit from thorough review of past failed proposals when crafting new research ideas. Conceptual frameworks and root cause analysis are two innovative techniques that can be used during study development to identify flaws and prevent study failures. In addition, conceptual frameworks and root cause analysis can be combined to complement each other to provide both a big picture and detailed view of a study proposal. This article describes these two common analytical methods and provides an example of how they can be used to evaluate and improve a study design by critically examining a previous failed research idea.


Subject(s)
Research Design , Root Cause Analysis , Humans , Plastic Surgery Procedures
6.
Hand Clin ; 33(4): 593-605, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28991572

ABSTRACT

This article shows trends in triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) repair since 1990 by geographic area and year. The repair methods presented in the literature were inside-out, outside-in, all-inside, and open repair. The outside-in technique was reported most often for ulnar-side tears, whereas the inside-out technique was reported most frequently for radial-side tears. Recently, a foveal reattachment technique for ulnar-side tears has garnered attention and has been reported with increasing frequency, especially in Asia, because the deepest portion of TFCC, attached to fovea, plays a key role in stabilizing the distal radioulnar joint. Understanding these trends can help clinicians best treat TFCC tears.


Subject(s)
Triangular Fibrocartilage/injuries , Triangular Fibrocartilage/surgery , Arthroscopy/methods , Bibliometrics , Humans , Publishing/statistics & numerical data , Suture Techniques , Triangular Fibrocartilage/anatomy & histology , Wrist Injuries/classification , Wrist Injuries/surgery , Wrist Joint/anatomy & histology , Wrist Joint/surgery
7.
Qual Manag Health Care ; 26(4): 177-183, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28991812

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) shifted the focus in medical care from quantity to quality. This qualitative systematic review aimed to determine the key skills necessary for effective physician leaders after the implementation of the ACA, and to compare them with key skills identified prior to its implementation. METHODS: A qualitative systematic review was conducted. A systematic literature search on leadership skills for physicians returned 26 articles published between 2009 and 2016. Thematic analysis was used to categorize the data presented in each article. The results from the thematic analysis were then compared with a similar article published before the implementation of the ACA. RESULTS: Teamwork and team-building, communication, and self-awareness skills were mentioned most often. The percentage of articles mentioning teamwork and team-building skills (61.5%) was significantly greater than the percentage (25%) reported before the implementation of the ACA (P ≤ .04). CONCLUSION: With the shift toward quality of patient care, health care workers at all levels should strive to work as a team to provide the best quality of care at all stages of patient care.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Health Facility Administration , Leadership , Physicians , Communication , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Patient Care Team , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Professional Competence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL