Surgical management of rare tumors (Part 1).

With an annual cumulative occurrence of approximately 15,000 in North America, all childhood cancers are rare. Very rare cancers as defined by both the European Cooperative Study Group for Rare Pediatric Cancers and the Children's Oncology Group fall into two principal categories: those so uncommon (fewer than 2 cases/million) that their study is challenging even through cooperative group efforts (e.g., pleuropulmonary blastoma and desmoplastic small round cell tumor) and those that are far more common in adults and therefore rarely studied in children (e.g., thyroid, melanoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor). Treatment strategies for these latter tumors are typically based on adult guidelines, although the pediatric variants of these tumors may harbor different genetic signatures and demonstrate different behavior. If melanoma and differentiated thyroid cancer are excluded, other rare cancer types account for only 2% of the cancers in children aged 0 to 14. This article highlights several of the most common rare tumor types.

Comparison of Outcomes of Myeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Pediatric Patients with Bone Marrow Failure, Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia with and without Germline GATA2 Mutations.

Germline mutations in GATA2 are associated with an inherited predisposition to bone marrow failure (BMF), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative therapy. However, patients may be at an increased risk for transplant-related toxicity (TRT) and transplant-related mortality (TRM) due to their underlying disease biology. We performed a retrospective case-control study of pediatric patients with BMF/MDS/AML with germline GATA2 mutations, comparing HSCT outcomes to randomly selected patients without germline GATA2 mutations and BMF/MDS (control A) and acute leukemia (control B). The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates in the GATA2 cohort (65%, 51%) were similar to control A (58%, 49%) and B (45%, 43%) cohorts. In contrast, the 5-year event-free survival rate was significantly lower in the GATA2 cohort (7% ± 6%, 28% ± 10%, and 33% ± 8% for GATA2, A, and B, respectively), due to an increased number of unique TRTs. Specifically, neurologic toxicities occurred significantly more frequently in GATA2 patients than in the control groups, and post-HSCT thrombotic events occurred only in the GATA2 cohort. There was no difference in TRM, infections, or graft-versus-host disease across groups. The higher incidence of thrombotic and neurologic events specific to GATA2 patients warrants further investigation and has potential treatment ramifications.

Toy Guns, Real Danger: An Update on Pediatric Injury Patterns Related to Nonpowder Weapons.

BACKGROUND: Design changes of nonpowder guns, including BB and air guns, have significantly increased their potential to injure. We sought to characterize the demographics of children injured with nonpowder weapons and the specific injuries suffered. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of the study years 2006, 2009, and 2012 was performed by combining the Kids' Inpatient Database into a single dataset. We identified cases (age < 21 years) of air gun injuries using external cause of injury codes. Patient characteristics and injuries were analyzed using ICD-9 codes, and national estimates were obtained using case weighting. RESULTS: There were 1028 pediatric admissions for nonpowder weapon related injuries. The victims were predominately male (87.0%), non-Hispanic white (52.3%), resided in the South (47.3%), and in the lowest income quartile (39.2%). Half required a major surgical procedure. The predominant injuries were open wounds to the head, neck, or trunk (40.3%), and contusion (22.5%). Notable other injuries were intracranial injury (9.1%) and blindness or vision defects (3.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The nonpowder weapons available to this generation can paralyze, blind, and cause lasting injury to children. Injuries frequently require surgical intervention, and these weapons should no longer be considered toys. Further research and legislation should be aimed at limiting children's access to these weapons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Young Female Donors Do Not Increase the Risk of Graft-versus-Host Disease or Impact Overall Outcomes in Pediatric HLA-Matched Sibling Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Optimal donor selection is critical in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Donor-recipient sex mismatch, donor age, and female donor-donor parity are known to impact graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and outcomes in adults. Minor histocompatibility antigens encoded by the human Y chromosome can result in specific antibody formation in some female donors, may increase in frequency with increasing donor age, and may be contributory to the increased incidence of GVHD. To better understand the role of donor age/sex and sex matching in HSCT outcomes, we conducted a retrospective study of pediatric patients receiving their first myeloablative sibling donor HSCT (n = 244) from 1998 to 2012. Observed rates of GVHD were low: 17% of patients surviving past engraftment (n = 243) developed grades II to IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) and 14% surviving ≥ 100 days (n = 229) developed chronic GVHD (cGVHD). On multivariate analysis the risk of aGVHD, cGVHD, and death increased with patient age as expected. Female donor sex and sex mismatch (female donor-male recipient) had no impact on the development of aGVHD. cGVHD was increased with female donors only if the donor was ≥12 years old. No cGVHD was observed among 109 patients aged < 10 years who received a 6/6 HLA-matched marrow HSCT, regardless of donor age or sex. Survival was mostly driven by diagnosis. Results suggest that in pediatric HSCT, young HLA-matched siblings are equivalently good donors regardless of sex or donor-recipient sex mismatch.

Safety of peritoneal and pleural drain placement in pediatric stem cell transplant recipients with severe veno-occlusive disease.

Hepatic VOD (veno-occlusive disease) is a serious complication of HSCT (hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) and has historically been associated with high mortality. This obstruction to hepatic flow often results in fluid collections in the peritoneal and pleural cavities. Catheter placement to drain ascites or pleural fluid may reduce intra-abdominal hypertension and/or improve respiratory parameters. The safety of these interventions among critically ill, immunocompromised children is unknown. Among 32 HSCT recipients (2000-2012) with severe VOD, we assessed the primary outcome of procedural complication from peritoneal drain placement. Twenty-four (75%) patients underwent peritoneal drain placement. No patient sustained visceral perforation or hemorrhage with drain placement. Overall mortality was 47% (n = 15). The procedure was not associated with increased overall mortality (p > 0.99). Eight (25%) peritoneal drains required replacement for malfunction. Of 24 patients with peritoneal drains, one (4%) patient had a positive culture from ascitic fluid. Eight (25%) patients underwent pleural drain placement. No pleural drain-related procedural complication or infection occurred. Four (50%) of the eight patients with pleural drains had de-escalation in oxygen requirement at drain removal, compared to time of placement. In this study, peritoneal and pleural drains were safe interventions for children with severe VOD.