From safety to frustration: The neural substrates of inhibitory learning in aversive and appetitive conditioning procedures.

Inhibitory associative learning counters the effects of excitatory learning, whether appetitively or aversively motivated. Moreover, the affective responses accompanying the inhibitory associations are of opponent valence to the excitatory conditioned responses. Inhibitors for negative aversive outcomes (e.g. shock) signal safety, while inhibitors for appetitive outcomes (e.g. food reward) elicit frustration and/or disappointment. This raises the question as to whether studies using appetitive and aversive conditioning procedures should demonstrate the same neural substrates for inhibitory learning. We review the neural substrates of appetitive and aversive inhibitory learning as measured in different procedural variants and in the context of the underpinning excitatory conditioning on which it depends. The mesocorticolimbic dopamine pathways, retrosplenial cortex and hippocampus are consistently implicated in inhibitory learning. Further neural substrates identified in some procedural variants may be related to the specific motivation of the learning task and modalities of the learning cues. Finally, we consider the translational implications of our understanding of the neural substrates of inhibitory learning, for obesity and addictions as well as for anxiety disorders.

Strain comparisons in inhibitory discrimination learning and novel object recognition procedures.

Strain differences in visual abilities and exploratory tendencies can confound rats' performance in cognitive tests of learning and memory. In the present study we compared the performance of albino Wistar and pigmented Lister Hooded rats in appetitive conditioning and recognition memory procedures, specifically within-subjects inhibitory learning (A+ /AX-) and novel object recognition (NOR) variants. The inhibition task included an excitatory training stage and summation and retardation tests. Difference scores were used to help control for individual variation in baseline nosepoke responding. NOR was tested after a 10 min delay, following 24hr delay and using a recency variant. Discrimination ratios were used to control for individual variation in exploratory activity. In the inhibitory learning procedure, Lister Hooded showed more magazine activity prior to stimulus presentations than Wistar rats but this was a transient effect restricted to day 1 of excitatory training. There was no strain difference in associative learning at the excitatory training stage. The Wistars went on to show some performance advantage at the inhibitory discrimination stage and marginally stronger retardation test performance. In the NOR tasks, there was no significant effect of strain on cognitive performance, but the Wistars showed some advantage in the 10 min delay variant, whereas in the 24hr delay and relative recency NOR variants, the Lister Hooded rats showed some advantage. Overall the results of the present study confirm the suitability of Wistar rats for use in associative learning and basic NOR procedures.

Medial prefrontal cortex circuit function during retrieval and extinction of associative learning under anesthesia.

Associative learning is encoded under anesthesia and involves the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Neuronal activity in mPFC increases in response to a conditioned stimulus (CS+) previously paired with an unconditioned stimulus (US) but not during presentation of an unpaired stimulus (CS-) in anesthetized animals. Studies in conscious animals have shown dissociable roles for different mPFC subregions in mediating various memory processes, with the prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic (IL) cortex involved in the retrieval and extinction of conditioned responding, respectively. Therefore PL and IL may also play different roles in mediating the retrieval and extinction of discrimination learning under anesthesia. Here we used in vivo electrophysiology to examine unit and local field potential (LFP) activity in PL and IL before and after auditory discrimination learning and during later retrieval and extinction testing in anesthetized rats. Animals received repeated presentations of two distinct sounds, one of which was paired with footshock (US). In separate control experiments animals received footshocks without sounds. After discrimination learning the paired (CS+) and unpaired (CS-) sounds were repeatedly presented alone. We found increased unit firing and LFP power in PL and, to a lesser extent, IL after discrimination learning but not after footshocks alone. After discrimination learning, unit firing and LFP power increased in PL and IL in response to presentation of the first CS+, compared to the first CS-. However, PL and IL activity increased during the last CS- presentation, such that activity during presentation of the last CS+ and CS- did not differ. These results confirm previous findings and extend them by showing that increased PL and IL activity result from encoding of the CS+/US association rather than US presentation. They also suggest that extinction may occur under anesthesia and might be represented at the neural level in PL and IL.

Basolateral amygdala activity during the retrieval of associative learning under anesthesia.

Associative learning can occur under anesthesia and its neural correlates have begun to be elucidated. During discrimination learning under anesthesia in rats, lateral amygdala excitability increases in response to a conditioned stimulus (CS+) previously paired with electrical stimulation of the paw but not to another stimulus presented alone (CS-). Similarly, medial prefrontal cortex activity increases selectively during CS+ presentation after discrimination learning but this occurs only in neurons receiving input from the basolateral amygdala (BLA), the main source of amygdaloid projections to this region. However, BLA activity during discrimination learning under anesthesia has not been investigated. Here we used in vivo electrophysiology to examine BLA activity before and after associative learning and during later memory retrieval in anesthetized rats. We examined extracellular unit and local field potential (LFP) activity using an auditory discrimination learning paradigm. Rats were repeatedly presented with two distinct sounds, one of which was paired with electrical stimulation of the paw. One hour later, the paired sound (CS+) was presented alone along with the sound not paired with electrical stimulation (CS-). We found increased unit firing late (1 h) but not early (5 min) after learning. LFP power was increased both early and late after learning. In control experiments we also found increased unit and LFP activity late after electrical stimulation alone. After discrimination learning, unit firing increased in response to CS+, but not CS-, presentation. LFP power also showed a modest increase during CS+, compared to CS-, presentation. These findings suggest that discrimination learning under anesthesia can occur at the neural level in BLA. The potential relevance of these results is discussed in relation to previous studies examining neural activity during fear learning and memory processing in conscious animals.

Early life programming of hemispheric lateralization and synchronization in the adult medial prefrontal cortex.

Neonatal maternal separation (MS) in the rat increases the vulnerability to stressors later in life. In contrast, brief handling (H) in early life confers resilience to stressors in adulthood. Early life programming of stress reactivity may involve the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), a region which modulates various stress responses. Moreover, hemispheric specialization in mPFC may mediate adaptive coping responses to stress. In the present study, neuronal activity was examined simultaneously in left and right mPFC in adult rats previously subjected to MS, H or animal facility rearing (AFR). In vivo electrophysiology, under isoflurane anesthesia, was used to conduct acute recordings of unit and local field potential (LFP) activity in response to systemic administration of N-methyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxamide (FG-7142), a benzodiazepine receptor partial inverse agonist which mimics various stress responses. MS decreased basal unit activity selectively in right mPFC. Basal LFP activity was reduced with MS in left and right mPFC, compared to AFR and H, respectively. Hemispheric synchronization of basal LFP activity was also attenuated by MS at lower frequencies. FG-7142 elicited lateralized effects on mPFC activity with different early rearing conditions. Activity in left mPFC was greater with AFR and MS (AFR>MS), whereas activity was predominantly greater with H in right mPFC. Finally, compared to AFR, MS reduced and H enhanced hemispheric synchronization of LFP activity with FG-7142 treatment in a dose-dependent manner. These results indicate that functionally-relevant alterations in mPFC GABA transmission are programmed by the early rearing environment in a hemisphere-dependent manner. These findings may model the hemispheric specialization of mPFC function thought to mediate adaptive coping responses to stressors. They also suggest the possibility that early environmental programming of hemispheric functional coupling in mPFC is involved in conferring vulnerability or resilience to stressors later in life.

Basolateral amygdala dopamine receptor antagonism modulates initial reactivity to but not habituation of the acoustic startle response.

Although the basolateral amygdala (BLA) plays a role in the habituation to sensory stimuli, the receptor mechanisms mediating this process remain unclear. In the present study, we investigated the role of BLA dopamine (DA) in the habituation of the acoustic startle response (ASR) with intra-BLA infusions of DA receptor antagonists. Male Long Evans rats were subjected to startle pulses over two consecutive once-daily sessions. Prior to testing on Day 1, separate groups of animals received bilateral intra-BLA infusions of a D1 (SCH 23390: 0, 3.2, 6.4 microg per side) or a D2/D3 (raclopride: 0, 2.5, 5.0 microg per side) receptor antagonist. Animals were retested 24h later (Day 2) without prior drug infusion in order to assess possible treatment effects on within- and between-session habituation of the ASR. As expected, within- and between-session habituation was observed in vehicle-treated controls. Within-session habituation was also seen in SCH 23390- and raclopride-treated animals both on Day 1 as well as 24h later (Day 2). Evidence of between-session habituation was observed in SCH 23390-treated animals. However, compared to vehicle, intra-BLA SCH 23390 or raclopride attenuated the initial startle response on Day 1, but not Day 2. No evidence of between-session habituation was found in raclopride-treated animals, although this probably reflected the attenuated initial response to the startling stimulus on Day 1 rather than a reduced rate of habituation on Day 2. The present study suggests that while BLA DA is not involved in habituation of the ASR, it may mediate the perceived aversive nature of the initially startling stimuli.

Role of basolateral amygdala dopamine in modulating prepulse inhibition and latent inhibition in the rat.

RATIONALE: The dopamine (DA) projection to the basolateral amygdala (BLA) modulates nucleus accumbens (NAc) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) DA transmission. Given the involvement of the BLA, and of NAc and mPFC DA, in select forms of information processing, we sought to determine the role of BLA DA in modulating prepulse inhibition (PPI) and latent inhibition (LI). OBJECTIVE: The effects of BLA D1 (SCH 23390) and D2/D3 (raclopride) receptor blockade on PPI and LI were examined. METHODS: Separate groups of male Long-Evans rats received bilateral intra-BLA infusions of SCH 23390 (3.2 or 6.4 microg/0.5 microl per side), raclopride (2.5 or 5.0 microg/0.5 microl per side) or saline prior to testing. In two experiments, the effects of BLA DA receptor antagonism on PPI of the acoustic startle response (ASR) and LI of conditioned taste aversion were determined. A control group received bilateral intra-striatal infusions of SCH 23390 or raclopride prior to PPI testing. RESULTS: Intra-BLA SCH 23390 or raclopride had no effect on the ASR. Intra-BLA SCH 23390 enhanced and raclopride disrupted PPI, both in a dose-related manner. Intra-striatal SCH 23390 or raclopride had no effect on PPI or ASR magnitude. Finally, BLA DA receptor blockade had no effect on LI. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that PPI is modulated by BLA DA and suggest that this modulation occurs independently of changes in NAc and/or mPFC DA transmission. They also suggest that BLA DA is not involved in modulating LI and add to evidence indicating that PPI and LI are mediated by different neural substrates.

Basolateral amygdala modulation of the nucleus accumbens dopamine response to stress: role of the medial prefrontal cortex.

The basolateral amygdala (BLA) is involved in modulating affective responses to stress and, along with the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), receives a stress-responsive dopamine (DA) projection from the ventral tegmental area. The present study was undertaken to characterize the role of BLA DA D1 and D2/D3 receptor subtypes in modulating the NAc and mPFC DA responses to stress. Voltammetry was used to monitor, in freely behaving rats, stress-induced DA release in NAc or mPFC after injection of D1 (SCH 23390) or D2/D3 (raclopride) receptor antagonist into BLA. Intra-BLA SCH 23390 injection potentiated stress-induced NAc DA release but attenuated the mPFC DA stress response; raclopride had no effect on either the NAc or mPFC DA responses to stress. Based on these results, we also examined the possibility that BLA can indirectly modulate the NAc DA stress response via its projection to mPFC. To do so we studied the effects of intra-mPFC co-administration of D1 (SKF 38393) and D2/D3 (quinpirole) receptor agonists on the potentiated NAc DA stress response resulting from intra-BLA SCH 23390 injection. Alone, mPFC D1 and D2/D3 receptor co-activation had no effect on stress-induced NAc DA release, but did prevent the potentiated NAc DA stress response produced by BLA D1 receptor blockade. These findings indicate that BLA DA modulates the NAc and mPFC DA stress responses via activation of the D1 receptor subtype. They also suggest that BLA DA modulates stress-induced NAc DA release indirectly by modulating the mPFC DA response to stress.

Effects of basolateral amygdala dopamine depletion on the nucleus accumbens and medial prefrontal cortical dopamine responses to stress.

In vivo voltammetry was used to study the effects of basolateral amygdala dopamine depletion on stress-induced dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens and medial prefrontal cortex. Male Long-Evans rats received bilateral microinjections of 6-hydroxydopamine or vehicle into the basolateral amygdala. Changes in dopamine signal were monitored in the nucleus accumbens and in the right and left hemispheres of medial prefrontal cortex, in lesioned animals and shams. Animals were subjected to a physical stressor (tail pinch) and a species-typical threat (fox odour); each stressor was presented twice over four consecutive daily sessions. The results indicate that the nucleus accumbens dopamine responses to both stressors are significantly potentiated by dopamine-depleting lesions to basolateral amygdala. In contrast, while the dopamine stress response in the left medial prefrontal cortex did not differ between lesioned animals and shams, the right medial prefrontal cortical dopamine response to tail pinch, but not fox odour stress, was significantly attenuated in lesioned animals. Therefore, basolateral amygdala dopamine depletion had opposite effects on the nucleus accumbens and medial prefrontal cortical dopamine responses to stress, although the effect on the latter is lateralized to the right hemisphere in a stressor-specific manner. These data indicate that stress-induced activation of meso-amygdaloid dopamine exerts an inhibitory influence on the nucleus accumbens dopamine response to stress. They also suggest the possibility that meso-amygdaloid dopamine influences the nucleus accumbens dopamine response to stress indirectly by modulating stress-induced dopamine release in medial prefrontal cortex. These findings add to a growing body of evidence of a preferential involvement of right medial prefrontal cortical dopamine in a wide range of physiological responses to stress.