Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33670337

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review of systematic reviews was to identify, summarise, and synthesise the available evidence of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) on the preventative and therapeutic psychological and physical effects of forest-based interventions. Methods: Both bibliographic databases and grey literature sources were searched for SRs and MAs published until May 2020. Eight databases were searched for relevant articles: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PsycInfo, CiNii, EBSCO, and Scopus. Grey literature was sourced from Google Scholar and other web-based search tools. SRs and MAs that included randomised controlled (RCT), non-randomised controlled (NRCT), and non-controlled trials (NCT) on health-related effects of forest-based interventions were eligible if they had searched at least two databases. The methodological quality of eligible reviews was assessed by AMSTAR-2. Results: We evaluated 11 systematic reviews covering 131 different primary intervention studies, mostly from Asian countries, three of which included supplementary meta-analyses. The quality assessment resulted in moderate confidence in the results of two reviews, low confidence in six, and critically low confidence in three. The results of the eight moderate and low-rated reviews indicated that forest-based interventions are beneficial to the cardiovascular system, immune system, and mental health (in the areas of stress, depression, anxiety, and negative emotions). Evidence for the effectiveness of forest-based interventions on metabolic parameters in adults, the severity of atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents, and social skills and sociality in healthy primary school children was weak. Discussion/Conclusions: Evidence suggests beneficial therapeutic effects of forest-based interventions on hypertension, stress, and mental-health disorders, such as depression and anxiety. Changes in immunological and inflammatory parameters after forest therapy should be verified in bio-geographically native forests. In the future, more attention should be paid to careful planning, implementation, and reporting of primary studies and to systematic reviews on the effects of forest-based interventions.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Mental Health , Adolescent , Adult , Anxiety/prevention & control , Asia , Child , Forests , Humans , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Systematic Reviews as Topic
2.
Altern Ther Health Med ; 27(S1): 61-71, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33609340

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The "Oberstaufen Schrothkur," a traditional naturopathic treatment, has been shown to lead to metabolic improvement in adults with type 2 diabetes. However, data concerning its benefits are still limited. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the effects of an Oberstaufen Schrothkur compared to a diabetes-friendly holiday in adults with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: The study was a single-center, 2-arm randomized controlled trial with 6-month follow-up. SETTING: The interventions were carried out in the Oberstaufen health resort in Bavaria, Germany. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-eight overweight or obese volunteers (mean age 61.5; 51% female) with type 2 diabetes received the randomly allocated intervention (Oberstaufen Schrothkur = 51; diabetes-friendly holiday = 47). Three participants were lost to follow-up. INTERVENTION: The Oberstaufen Schrothkur included a low-calorie diet, daily changes between a higher or lower fluid intake, daily alternation in physical activities, and daily application of cold and damp body packs. The diabetes-friendly holiday included a holiday stay specifically tailored to diabetics. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in hemoglobin A1c at 6 months post intervention. Secondary outcomes included body weight, body mass index, blood pressure, levels of cholesterol and triglycerides, well-being (WHO-5), and general health status (EQ-5D and SF-36). RESULTS: Significant within-group improvements at 6 months were observed in both groups: sustained reductions in hemoglobin A1c (Oberstaufen Schrothkur: -0.67%; diabetes-friendly holiday: -0.55%) and weight reduction of 4.65% (-4.71 kg) in the Oberstaufen Schrothkur group and 3.91% (-3.95 kg) in the diabetes-friendly holiday group (P < .001), with no statistically significant difference between groups. The proportion of obese participants decreased by 13.8 (Oberstaufen Schrothkur) and 6.3 (diabetes-friendly holiday) percentage points. Compared to baseline, 80.4% (Oberstaufen Schrothkur) and 85.1% (diabetes-friendly holiday) of the participants reported no changes in hyperglycemia medication intake at 6 months. A medication decrease was observed in 9 (17.7%) participants in the Oberstaufen Schrothkur group and 6 (12.8%) participants in the diabetes-friendly holiday group. CONCLUSION: Adults with type 2 diabetes undergoing one of two 3-week interventions (Oberstaufen Schrothkur or diabetes-friendly holiday) had significant within-group improvements in glycemic control, weight reduction, blood pressure, well-being, and quality of life at 6 months while between-group differences did not reach significance.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Quality of Life , Adult , Body Weight , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/complications , Obesity/therapy , Overweight/complications , Overweight/therapy
3.
Complement Med Res ; 28(2): 146-159, 2021.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33049739

ABSTRACT

Einleitung: Ziel dieser systematischen Übersicht war die Bewertung der verfügbaren Evidenz zur Wirkung der Kneipp-Therapie. Methoden: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane-Library und CAMbase wurden nach relevanten Artikeln, veröffentlicht zwischen 2000 und 2019, durchsucht. Graue Literatur wurde über Google Scholar und andere Tools bezogen. Studien mit jeglicher Art von Studiendesign, die die Effekte der Kneipp-Therapie untersuchten, wurden eingeschlossen. Die Qualitätsbewertung erfolgte mittels EPHPP-QAT. Ergebnisse: 25 Quellen, darunter 14 kontrol-lierte Studien, wurden eingeschlossen. Gemäß EPHPP-QAT wurden 3 Studien "stark", 13 "moderat" und 9 "schwach" bewertet. Neun (64%) der kontrollierten Studien berichteten signifikante Verbesserungen nach Kneipp-Therapie im Gruppenvergleich bei chronisch-venöser Insuffizienz, Hypertonie, leichter Herzinsuffizienz, menopausalen Be-schwerden und Schlafstörungen in verschiedenen Patientenkollektiven sowie verbesserte Immunparameter bei gesunden Probanden. Im Hinblick auf Depression und Angst bei Mammakarzinom-Patientinnen mit klimakterischen Beschwerden, Lebensqualität bei Post-Polio-Syndrom, krankheitsbedingten polyneuropathischen Beschwerden und Inzidenz von Erkältungsepisoden bei Kindern konnten keine signifikanten Gruppenunterschiede festgestellt werden. Elf unkontrollierte Studien berichteten Verbesse-rungen bei allergischen Symptomen, Dyspepsie, Lebens-qualität, Herzratenvariabilität, Infekten, Hypertonie, Wohlbefinden, Schmerz und polyneuropathischen Beschwerden. Diskussion/Schlussfolgerung: Die Kneipp-Therapie scheint bei zahlreichen Beschwerdebildern in verschiedenen Patientenkollektiven positive Effekte zu bewirken. Zukünftige Studien sollten noch stärker auf eine methodisch sorgfältige Studienplanung achten (Kontrollgruppen, Randomisierung, adäquate Fallzahlen, Verblindung), um Verzerrungen entgegenzuwirken. INTRODUCTION: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available evidence on the effect of Kneipp therapy. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and CAMbase were searched for relevant articles published between 2000 and 2019. Grey literature was obtained through Google Scholar and other tools. Studies with any kind of study design that examined the effects of Kneipp therapy were included. The quality assessment was carried out using EPHPP-QAT. RESULTS: 25 sources, including 14 controlled studies, were included. According to EPHPP-QAT, 3 studies were rated as "strong," 13 as "moderate" and 9 as "weak." Nine (64%) of the controlled studies reported significant improvements after Kneipp therapy in a between-group comparison in chronic venous insufficiency, hypertension, mild heart failure, menopausal complaints, and sleep disorders in different patient collectives as well as improved immune parameters in healthy subjects. Regarding depression and anxiety in breast cancer patients with climacteric complaints, quality of life in post-polio syndrome, disease-related polyneuropathic complaints and incidence of cold episodes in children, no significant group differences were found. Eleven uncontrolled studies reported improvements in allergic symptoms, dyspepsia, quality of life, heart rate variability, infections, hypertension, well-being, pain and polyneuropathic complaints. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Kneipp therapy seems to be beneficial for numerous symptoms in different patient groups. Future studies should pay even more attention to methodologically careful study planning (control groups, randomisation, adequate case numbers, blinding) to counteract bias.


Subject(s)
Hydrotherapy , Phytotherapy , Quality of Life , Humans
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33321849

ABSTRACT

This study compared the effectiveness of a 12-day stress-prevention program (SGS) supplemented by individualized, structured, four-session telephone-coaching to that of an SGS without telephone-coaching in entrepreneurs from the green professions presenting with increased stress levels. All participants went through the SGS before being randomized either to the telephone-coaching group (TC) or to the control group without telephone-coaching (noTC). SGS included four key therapeutic elements: stress-management intervention, relaxation, physical exercise, and balneotherapy. The primary outcome was the current degree of subjectively experienced stress assessed with the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) at a 9-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included burnout symptoms, well-being, health status, sleep disorders, expectation of self-efficacy, depression, anxiety, ability to work, pain, and days of sick leave. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 12 days (end of program), and 1 (start telephone-coaching), 3, 6 (end of telephone-coaching), and 9 months. Data from 103 adults (TC = 51; noTC = 52), mostly fulltime farmers, were available for analysis (mean age: 55.3; 49.1% female). Participants experienced significant immediate improvement in all outcome measurements, which declined somewhat during the first three months after the end of SGS and then remained stable for at least another six months. While within-group changes from baseline to 9 months showed significant improvements at medium to large effect sizes for all target variables (PSQ-total, TC: -13.38 (±14.98); 95%-CI: (-17.68; -9.07); noTC: -11.09 (±14.15); 95%-CI: (-15.11; -7.07)), no statistically significant differences were found between the groups at any time and for any target variable (between-group ANCOVA for PSQ-total at 9 months, parameter estimator for the group: -1.58; 95%-CI: (-7.29; 4.13)). The stress-prevention program SGS is a feasible, effective, and practical way to reduce perceived stress and improve participants' resources. Four subsequent telephone-coaching sessions do not seem to contribute to a further improvement in the results.


Subject(s)
Counseling , Farmers , Mentoring , Stress, Psychological , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy , Counseling/methods , Counseling/standards , Exercise Therapy , Farmers/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Mentoring/methods , Mentoring/standards , Middle Aged , Relaxation/psychology , Stress, Psychological/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Telephone , Treatment Outcome
5.
Behav Med ; 46(2): 120-129, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31339815

ABSTRACT

Chronic psychological distress appears to be increasing markedly among the working population. A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) supported the effectiveness of a three-week outpatient burnout prevention program-comprised of stress management interventions, relaxation, physical exercise, and moor baths followed by massage-in reducing perceived stress and emotional exhaustion. However, the effectiveness of treatments in the real world that were shown to be efficacious in RCTs is related to the appropriate selection of individuals who are most likely to yield sustainable gains. Therefore, factors predicting the intensity of response and nonresponse of individuals to treatment are of interest. This secondary data analysis aims to explore predictors of response to the outpatient burnout prevention program in a sample of eighty employed persons at high risk of burnout. Hierarchical linear regression was performed to identify predictors of successful response-defined by lower perceived stress at last follow up. Nutritional behavior, symptoms of eating disorder syndrome, and well-being were significant predictors of perceived stress at last follow up, when adjusted for age, sex, education level, baseline stress values, and timing of intervention. Persons with low levels of well-being, poor nutritional behavior, and higher symptoms of eating disorders should be given special care and attention to ensure that they respond well to the outpatient burnout prevention program.


Subject(s)
Balneology , Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Exercise Therapy , Massage , Mindfulness , Relaxation Therapy , Stress, Psychological/therapy , Adult , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Feeding Behavior/psychology , Feeding and Eating Disorders/psychology , Female , Germany , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Program Evaluation , Psychotherapy, Group , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Stress, Psychological/psychology
6.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 274(6): 2589-2599, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28236010

ABSTRACT

The "Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Head and Neck Cancer" (ICF-HNC) is an application of the "International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health" (ICF), representing the characteristic spectrum of issues in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Our primary aim was to evaluate which categories of the ICF-HNC are dealt with by speech and language therapists (SLTs) in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. The secondary aim was to identify outcome measures used by SLTs to measure the categories of the ICF-HNC in clinical practice. SLTs experienced in the treatment of HNC patients evaluated the categories of the ICF-HNC in a three-round Delphi survey. They were asked whether the listed categories represented issues treated by SLTs in HNC patients, and what outcome measures were used to assess them. Altogether, 31 SLTs completed the survey. 47 of 108 previously selected categories of the ICF-HNC achieved the cut-off value. Out of these, 40.4% were derived from the component "Body Functions", 36.2% from "Body Structures", 12.8% from "Environmental Factors", and 10.6% from "Activities and Participation". Altogether, 82 of the mentioned outcome measures were considered as reasonable from the perspective of SLTs. Of these, only 37 achieved more than 50% approval. This study emphasises the importance of "Body Structures" and "Body Functions" for SLTs in Germany and Switzerland in treating patients with HNC. Moreover, the results highlighted the need to agree on evidence-based outcome measures in speech and language therapy.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons/classification , Head and Neck Neoplasms/rehabilitation , Speech Disorders/classification , Speech-Language Pathology , Adult , Austria , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Disability Evaluation , Female , Germany , Humans , Language , Male , Middle Aged , Speech Disorders/etiology , Speech Disorders/rehabilitation , Speech Therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Switzerland
7.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 274(2): 1035-1043, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27695934

ABSTRACT

The assessment and evaluation of functioning and quality of life after tumor treatment in head and neck cancer (HNC) are considered as essential aspects of clinical routine and studies. A huge number of instruments are available that have been designed to evaluate functioning and quality of life after HNC treatment. The diversity of these instruments in terms of content, response options and administration hinders the comparability of available studies and the performance of meta-analyses. The objective of this paper is to inform about the development of a screening tool for the standardized assessment and evaluation of functioning based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for HNC. We followed a multi-step approach including (1) preparatory studies to identify and preselect suitable instruments for the assessment of functioning, (2) a decision-making process to agree on an ICF-based clinical guideline including instruments assessing functioning and (3) the development of a computer-based standardized screening tool to assess and evaluate functioning based on this guideline in clinical routine. Twenty-one experts participated in a consensus meeting and decided on instruments to be included in an ICF-based clinical guideline and screening tool for the assessment and evaluation of functioning in HNC patients in cancer treatment. The chosen instruments cover all aspects of the ICF Core Set for HNC addressing therapy control, pain, food intake/swallowing, voice/speech/breathing, other somatic complaints and psychosocial aspects. The screening tool contains patient-reported outcome measures and a clinician's checklist. It has to be further tested in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Disability Evaluation , Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Head and Neck Neoplasms/rehabilitation , Mass Screening/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Quality of Life
8.
Dtsch Arztebl Int ; 113(46): 781-788, 2016 11 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27989278

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic psychological distress appears to have increased in recent years, mainly among the working population. The data available indicate that mental and behavioral disorders, including burnout syndrome, represent not only a personal problem for those afflicted, but also a serious public health issue. This study aimed at evaluating the effects of an outpatient burnout prevention program in a mono-center health resort setting. METHODS: Adults experiencing an above-average level of stress and thus being at an increased risk of burnout were randomized either to the intervention group (IG) or the waiting control group (WG). The 3-week program included stress management intervention, relaxation, physical exercise and moor applications. The primary outcome was change in perceived stress (PSQ) at 6 months post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included burnout symptoms, well-being, health status, psychological symptoms, back pain, and number of sick days. Participants were examined at baseline, post-intervention (3 weeks) and after 1, 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Data from 88 adults (IG=43; WG=45) were available for (per protocol) analysis (mean age: 50.85; 76.1% female). Participants in the IG experienced significant immediate improvement in all outcome measures, which declined somewhat during the first three months post-intervention and then remained stable for at least another three months. Those in the WG did not experience substantial change across time. For the 109 randomized persons, results for PSQ were confirmed in an intention-to-treat analysis with missing values replaced by last observation carried forward (between-group ANCOVA for PSQScore at 6 months, parameter estimator for the group: -20.57; 95% CI: [-26.09; -15.04]). Large effect sizes (Cohen's d for PSQ: 1.09-1.72) indicate the superiority of the intervention. CONCLUSION: The program proved to be effective in reducing perceived stress, emotional exhaustion and other targets. Future research should examine the long-term impact of the program and the effect of occasional refresher training.


Subject(s)
Behavior Therapy , Burnout, Professional/therapy , Psychotherapy , Relaxation Therapy , Exercise , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care
9.
Int J Biometeorol ; 59(10): 1523-44, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25605408

ABSTRACT

Health resort medicine (HRM; in German: Kurortmedizin) is a field of medicine with long-lasting tradition in several European countries. A number of systematic reviews have shown the effectiveness of HRM in musculoskeletal conditions. Reviews focusing on the effectiveness of HRM in non-musculoskeletal disorders are rare. This systematic review aims to provide an overview about all types of health resort treatments applied in non-musculoskeletal conditions, to summarize evidence for its effectiveness and to assess the quality of published studies. MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge and Embase were searched for articles published between January 2002 and December 2013. We used a broad search strategy in order to find studies investigating the effects of HRM in non-musculoskeletal disorders. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed quality using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies (EPHPP-QAT). Forty-one studies (19 of them with control group) from eight countries examining the efficacy of various forms of spa treatment for 12 disease groups were included. The studies are markedly heterogeneous regarding study design, population and treatment. HRM treatment is associated with clinical improvement in diseases of the skin, respiratory, circulatory, digestive and nervous system among others. However, small samples, the lack of control groups and an insufficient follow-up often limit the generated evidence. The scientific literature of the last decade has shown that a number of non-musculoskeletal disorders are treated with different kinds of HRM. The challenge for the future will be to carry out thoroughly designed studies in larger patient populations to corroborate the impact of HRM treatment on non-musculoskeletal disorders.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies , Health Resorts , Balneology , Humans , Hydrotherapy , Treatment Outcome
10.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 271(7): 2021-44, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24114063

ABSTRACT

The goals of the present publication are (a) to identify standardised methods and tools applied in clinical trials and cohort studies to assess key functional aspects in HNC, using the Brief ICF Core Set for head and neck cancer (ICF-HNC) as a reference and (b) to propose a set of sound standardised methods and tools suitable to assess functional problems in HNC. This work contributed to the development of practical ICF-HNC based guidelines targeting the standardised measurement of functional outcomes in HNC follow-up and clinical research in Germany. A systematic review of randomised and clinical controlled trials, and observational studies in HNC were carried out to identify standardised methods and tools. Suitable methods and tools were then selected based on pre-defined criteria. 210 assessment methods and tools were identified in 136 studies: 146 patients reported outcomes (PRO) and 64 tools rated by health professionals. Altogether 59 tools were considered suitable to be included in guidelines: four side effects classifications, two performance status scales, 31 PROs, 10 assessment criteria for clinical examinations, seven assessment methods and tools for the evaluation of technical, equipment-based procedures and five technical, equipment-based procedures. It was possible to identify and select sound and standardised assessment methods and tools for almost all functioning areas defined in the ICF-HNC. Since no tool sufficiently covers support provision by immediate family and by health professionals as well as economic self-sufficiency, we recommend a corresponding update of existing tools.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Head and Neck Neoplasms/physiopathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/psychology , Patient Outcome Assessment , Recovery of Function , Clinical Trials as Topic , Cohort Studies , Disability Evaluation , Germany , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 270(12): 3133-42, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23543319

ABSTRACT

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for Head and Neck Cancer (ICF-HNC) covers the typical spectrum of problems in functioning experienced by patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). The major goal of the present work was to evaluate patients' priorities using the brief ICF-HNC as a starting point. A priorities assessment checklist consisting of 15 statements was created based on the 14 validated categories of the brief ICF-HNC. In a cross-sectional study, patients were requested to select up to 5 items that were especially important to them. The checklist was sent by mail to 465 patients at different time points of cancer follow-up and handed out to 56 patients with recent HNC diagnosis. Altogether 300 (64.51 %) patients returned the checklist. The top priority of our sample was "I want to survive the cancer", followed by "I want that all the expenses for cancer treatment, cancer care and any additional follow-up treatments be covered by my health insurance or by the welfare system", "I want to be able to continue performing all daily life tasks well", "I want to have trusting relationships with my doctors, nurses and therapists" and "I want to be able to speak clearly". Although survival was, as expected, the top priority for patients enrolled in the study, we show that the weight given to survival and further symptoms or daily life activities meaningfully changes when the biopsychosocial perspective proposed in the ICF is adopted.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/psychology , Health Priorities , Quality of Life , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disability Evaluation , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Staging , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Recovery of Function , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
Br J Health Psychol ; 18(4): 707-28, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23252844

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There is a current need for interventions that provide information to stroke survivors in a patient-centred, interactive, personalized and flexible manner. To this purpose, a standardized but content-flexible patient education programme based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was developed. This study evaluated the effect of this programme on perceived self-efficacy. DESIGN: Single-blind, randomized, multi-centre controlled trial. METHODS: Stroke patients undergoing neurological rehabilitation were enrolled. Perceived self-efficacy was measured with the Liverpool Self-Efficacy Scale. Secondary outcomes were life satisfaction and self-perception of the impact of the stroke on life, measured with the WHOQOL and the Stroke Impact Scale, respectively. Data obtained at baseline, post-intervention and 6-month follow-up were analysed using multi-level models of change. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirteen patients received either the ICF-based patient education (n = 110) or an attention-placebo (n = 103) control intervention. Over time, patients' self-efficacy (p < .01) and participation (p < .01) improved, while emotional functioning (p < .01) deteriorated, although no significant between-group differences were observed. Explorative analyses showed that gender, loci of control, difficulty in accessing health services after discharge and life satisfaction were significant predictors of self-efficacy. CONCLUSION: There was no significant benefit of the ICF-based patient education in comparison with an attention-placebo control group. Considering the importance of the programme for the further implementation of the ICF and the need of developing effective health education interventions for stroke, the methodology used was reviewed and an updated version proposed.


Subject(s)
Patient Education as Topic/methods , Personal Satisfaction , Self Efficacy , Stroke Rehabilitation , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Single-Blind Method , Stroke/psychology , Treatment Outcome
13.
J Rehabil Med ; 43(2): 92-101, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21234510

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relevance and completeness of the comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Sets for patients with rehabilitation needs in acute hospital care. DESIGN: Multi-centre cohort study. PATIENTS: A total of 391 patients (50.1% female, mean age 63.4 years) from 4 university hospitals in Austria, Germany and Switzerland and one Austrian general hospital. METHODS: Data on functioning were collected using the respective comprehensive acute ICF Core Sets. Data were extracted from patients' medical record sheets and interviews with health professionals and patients. RESULTS: Most of the categories of the comprehensive ICF Core Sets describing impairments, limitations or restrictions occurred in a considerable proportion of the study population. The most outstanding limitations and restrictions of the patients were problems with sleep and blood vessel functions, walking and moving and self-care. Thirty-eight aspects of functioning not previously covered by the comprehensive ICF Core Sets were ranked as relevant. CONCLUSION: Categories of the comprehensive ICF Core Sets for the acute hospital situation were confirmed. Some additional categories not covered by the Set in its present version emerged from the interviews, and should be considered for inclusion in a finalized version.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Disability Evaluation , Disabled Persons/classification , Aged , Austria , Cohort Studies , Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Heart Diseases/rehabilitation , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/rehabilitation , Nervous System Diseases/rehabilitation , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Tract Diseases/rehabilitation , Switzerland
14.
J Rehabil Med ; 43(2): 102-12, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21234511

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relevance and completeness of the comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Sets for patients in post-acute rehabilitation facilities. DESIGN: Multi-centre cohort study. PATIENTS: A total of 165 patients (46% female; mean age 67.5 years) from post-acute rehabilitation facilities in 2 Austrian and 7 German hospitals. METHODS: Data on functioning were collected using the respective comprehensive post-acute ICF Core Sets. Data was extracted from patients' medical record sheets and interviews with health professionals and patients. RESULTS: Most of the categories of the comprehensive ICF Core Sets describing impairments, limitations or restrictions occurred in a considerable proportion of the study population. The most outstanding limitations and restrictions of the patients were problems with sleep and blood vessel functions, walking and moving and self-care. Twenty-six aspects of functioning not previously covered by the comprehensive ICF Core Sets were ranked as relevant. CONCLUSION: Most categories of the comprehensive ICF Core Set for patients in post-acute rehabilitation facilities were confirmed. No significant gaps in the established set could be identified.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Disabled Persons/classification , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Aged , Austria , Cohort Studies , Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Female , Germany , Health Services for the Aged/standards , Heart Diseases/rehabilitation , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/rehabilitation , Nervous System Diseases/rehabilitation , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Rehabilitation Centers/standards , Respiratory Tract Diseases/rehabilitation
15.
Patient Educ Couns ; 84(2): e13-7, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20705411

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of an ICF-based patient education program, to present the results of its pilot test and to present the adaptations and final version of the program. METHODS: The education program was developed in five steps: (1) definition of relevant areas of functioning, (2) development of strategies to enhance self-efficacy in these areas, (3) development of material and instructions, (4) definition of modules and setting and (5) performance of a pilot test targeting acceptability and feasibility of the program. RESULTS: Eleven stroke patients were enrolled in the pilot test. The intervention was well accepted on the part of participants. The developed patient education program is structured in three modules. Module 1 targets to increase patients' understanding of their current level of functioning. Module 2 targets to identify concrete problems and corresponding solutions regarding limited areas. Module 3 is a refresher session. CONCLUSION: Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention were verified and a final version of the patient education program was developed. The effectiveness of the program will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Due to the universality of the ICF and availability of ICF tools, it is possible to adapt the intervention to different chronic conditions.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , International Classification of Diseases , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Rehabilitation/education , Stroke Rehabilitation , Adult , Communication , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Program Development , Reproducibility of Results , Self Efficacy
16.
J Rehabil Med ; 43(2): 102-12, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21042699

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relevance and completeness of the comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for patients in geriatric post-acute rehabilitation facilities. DESIGN: Multi-centre cohort study. PATIENTS: A total of 209 patients (67% female, mean age 80.4 years) in geriatric wards of 2 Austrian and 3 German hospitals. METHODS: Data on functioning were collected using the respective comprehensive ICF Core Set. Data were extracted from patients' medical record sheets and interviews with health professionals and patients. RESULTS: Most of the categories of the comprehensive ICF Core Set describing impairments, limitations or restrictions occurred in a considerable proportion of the study population. The most outstanding limitations and restrictions of the patients were problems with walking and moving around, and difficulties with self-care. Fourteen aspects of functioning not previously covered by the comprehensive ICF Core Set were reported as relevant. CONCLUSION: Most categories of the comprehensive ICF Core Set could be confirmed. Limitations in categories of intellectual and seeing functions appeared less frequently than might have been expected for a population of older hospitalized people. Some additional categories not covered by the present version of the comprehensive ICF Core Set emerged from the interviews and should be considered for inclusion in the final version.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Disability Evaluation , Disabled Persons/classification , Health Services for the Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Austria , Cohort Studies , Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Female , Geriatric Assessment , Germany , Heart Diseases/rehabilitation , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Male , Musculoskeletal Diseases/rehabilitation , Nervous System Diseases/rehabilitation , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies , Rehabilitation Centers/standards , Respiratory Tract Diseases/rehabilitation
17.
Clin J Pain ; 25(1): 29-38, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19158543

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To introduce the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as conceptual model and classification and the ICF Core Sets as a way to specify functioning for a specific health condition such as Low Back Pain, and to illustrate the application of the ICF and ICF Core Sets in the context of clinical practice, the planning and reporting of studies and the comparison of health status measures. METHODS: A decision-making and consensus process was performed to develop the ICF Core Sets for Low Back Pain, the linking procedure was applied as basis for the content comparison of health-status measures and the Rehab-Cycle was used to exemplify the application of the ICE and ICF Core Sets in clinical practice. RESULTS: Two different ICF Core Sets, namely, a comprehensive and a brief, are presented, three different health-status measures were linked to the ICF and compared and a case example of a patient with Low back Pain was described based on the Rehab-Cycle. DISCUSSION: The ICF is a promising new framework and classification to assess the impact of Low Back Pain. The ICF and practical tools, such as the ICF Core Sets for Low Back Pain, are useful for clinical practice, outcome and rehabilitation research, education, health statistics, and regulation.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Low Back Pain/classification , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Reference Standards
18.
Disabil Rehabil ; 27(7-8): 389-95, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16040541

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this consensus process was to decide on a first version of the ICF Core Set for neurological patients in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. METHODS: The ICF Core Set development involved a formal decision-making and consensus process, integrating evidence gathered from preliminary studies including focus groups of health professionals, a systematic review of the literature and empiric data collection from patients. RESULTS: Seventeen experts selected a total of 116 second-level categories. The largest number of categories was selected from the ICF component Body Functions (54 categories or 47%). Eleven (9%) of the categories were selected from the component Body Structures, 34 (29%) were of the categories from the component Activities and Participation, and 17 (15%) from the component Environmental Factors. CONCLUSION: The Post-acute ICF Core Set for neurological patients is a clinical framework to comprehensively assess patients in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities, particularly in an interdisciplinary setting. This first ICF Core Set will be further tested through empiric studies in German-speaking countries and internationally.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living/classification , Disability Evaluation , Nervous System Diseases/rehabilitation , Rehabilitation Centers/standards , Health Status Indicators , Humans , World Health Organization
19.
Disabil Rehabil ; 27(7-8): 353-9, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16040536

ABSTRACT

Patients hospitalized for an acute illness or injury are at risk of experiencing a significant loss of functioning as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The risk of a significant loss of functioning is increased in critically ill patients, in patients with complications or long-term intensive care stays, in persons with disabilities or with pre-existing chronic conditions and in the elderly. Early identification of rehabilitation needs and early start of rehabilitation can reduce healthcare costs by reducing dependence and nursing care, length of stay and prevention of disability. Two principles of rehabilitation for acute and early post-acute care can be distinguished. First, the provision of rehabilitation by health professionals who are generally not specialized in rehabilitation in the acute hospital. And second, specialized rehabilitation care provided by an interdisciplinary team. There is large variation how this specialized, typically post-acute rehabilitation care is organized, provided, and reimbursed in different countries, regions, and settings. For instance, it may be provided either in the acute hospital or in a rehabilitation or nursing setting. Most in-patients do not receive specialized rehabilitation at all during their whole stay in the acute hospital. But, it is important to point out that health professionals working in acute hospitals and who are not specialized in rehabilitation need to be able to recognize patients' needs for rehabilitation care and to perform rehabilitation interventions themselves or to assign patients to appropriate rehabilitation care settings. The principles outlined in this paper can serve as a basis for the development of clinical assessment instruments to describe and classify functioning, health and disability of patients receiving acute or early post-acute rehabilitation care.


Subject(s)
Acute Disease/rehabilitation , Disability Evaluation , Wounds and Injuries/rehabilitation , Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Humans , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...