Abdominal Instillation of Crystalloid Fluid Decreases the Recurrence of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction.

Peritoneal adhesion is a common cause of small bowel obstruction (SBO). In this study, we included 40 adult patients who had SBO, or partial obstructive symptoms. In the abdominal instillation of crystalloid fluid (AICF) cohort, 16 patients underwent lysis of adhesions and abdominal crystalloid fluid instillation at the end of the procedure. In the control (CO) group, 24 patients received lysis of adhesions without fluid instillation. AICF was achieved by the abdominal instillation of 1864 ± 97.5 mL of crystalloid fluid. We analyzed the recurrence of peritoneal adhesions resulting in reoperation for SBO within the 64.3 ± 9.15 months of follow-up time for the CO and the 70.5 ± 13.16-month follow-up for the AICF group. The AICF group had a lower SBO recurrence rate of 12.5% compared to the CO group's 41.6% rate (P = .049). Taken together, AICF decreased the recurrence of SBO requiring reoperation secondary to adhesion formation compared to the lysis of adhesions alone, as seen in the CO group.

Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Colectomies Using the 2019 ACS NSQIP Database.

OBJECTIVES: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (RLSs) have become increasingly common in the past decade alongside conventional laparoscopic surgeries (CLSs). In general, RLSs have been reported to be superior to CLSs; therefore, we compared both methods among patients undergoing an elective colectomy for differences in perioperative factors and postoperative complications. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the 2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. We stratified 5879 patients into two cohorts according to their preoperative diagnosis of either colon cancer or chronic diverticulitis. Patients within each group were further stratified by operative approach. RESULTS: Of the 5879 patients, 3210 colon cancer and 2669 chronic diverticulitis patients underwent an elective colectomy. There were no differences in length of stay and time from operation to discharge between RLSs and CLSs. RLSs, however, had significantly longer operation times (minutes; colon cancer: RLS 242.9 ± 91.0 vs CLS 177.4 ± 78.2, P < 0.001; chronic diverticulitis: RLS 226.2 ± 87.4 vs CLS 181.7 ± 74.4, P < 0.001). Among all of the colon cancer patients, RLS had higher rates of unplanned return to the operating room (P = 0.028) and organ space surgical site infection (P = 0.035). Among chronic diverticulitis patients, RLS was associated with higher rates of postoperative sepsis, anastomotic leak, organ space surgical site infection, and unplanned readmission (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CLS may be the more efficient operative technique because it was associated with a shorter average operation time and fewer postoperative complications. This paradigm, however, may change as the robotic technology develops and surgeons become more experienced with RLS.

Outcome and Cost Analysis of Hand-Sewn and Stapled Anastomoses in the Reversal of Loop Ileostomy.

Diverting loop ileostomies are common procedures for protecting high-risk anastomoses. There is little consensus on the most ideal technique both in terms of cost efficiency and outcome. Data for this study were collected from 101 patients who underwent loop ileostomy reversal between 2009 and 2014 at Morristown Medical Center. Of the 101 patients included in the review, 57 received a hand-sewn anastomosis (HS-A) and 44 received a stapled anastomosis (S-A). Average total hospital charges for stapled anastomoses were significantly greater than that for hand-sewn anastomoses, as were total operating room supply costs. When the total cost of the operation itself was considered, S-A cases were still found to be significantly greater than HS-A cases. Hospital room charges, total lab charges, pathology charges, and EKG/ECG charges were all greater for S-A cases than HS-A cases. Overall costs were greater for S-As than hand-sewn anastomoses and because of a lack of difference in procedure length, stapler supply costs were not offset. Complication rates and length of stay were also similar between the techniques. We found S-A cases to be more costly and have a greater cost/hour than HS-A cases.