ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Current literature presents a variety of surgical interventions aimed at modifying the iliotibial band (ITB) at the hip to relieve lateral hip pain (LHP). However, a focus towards the hip abductors as a main driver in LHP has evolved in the last decade, which could influence the indications for isolated ITB surgery. No previous review has been undertaken to evaluate isolated ITB surgery in LHP cases. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate isolated ITB surgery in LHP patients in relation to pain, snapping, use of non-surgical treatments postoperatively, and repeated surgery. METHODS: The study was reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The study was registered in Prospero (CRD42021216707) prior to initiation. A systematic search of literature on PubMed and Embase as well as bibliography screening on adult patients undergoing isolated ITB surgery with or without additional bursectomies was performed. Due to the lack of reliable data, no meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies (360 patients) were considered eligible for inclusion. The snapping and non-snapping group consisted of 150 and 210 patients, respectively. The mean follow-up time in the snapping group was 30 months and 19 months in the non-snapping group. Utilizing different surgical techniques, complete pain relief was not achieved in 12% of patients in the snapping group and 36% of the patients in the non-snapping group. In the snapping group, snapping was eliminated in 95% of patients, and five of 150 patients (3%) had repeated surgery. Eight of nine non-snapping studies reported information regarding repeated surgery, in which seven of 205 patients (3%) received repeated surgery. CONCLUSION: ITB surgery at the hip remains widely adopted, although only level 4 studies are available, and little information exists on the long-term clinical, as well as patient reported outcomes. Based on the available data, we found indication of a positive short-term outcome in LHP with snapping regarding elimination of snapping, pain reduction, reuse of non-surgical treatment, and repeated surgery. In LHP with no snapping, we found limited evidence supporting ITB surgery based on current literature.
Subject(s)
Arthralgia , Orthopedic Procedures , Adult , Humans , Arthralgia/surgery , Hip Joint/surgery , Orthopedic Procedures/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the results of apical surgery (AS) in patients receiving high-dose antiresorptive medication (HDAR). METHODS: Retrospective descriptive quality control study conducted in an Oral and Maxillofacial Department at a University Hospital. Fourteen patients on HDAR met the inclusion criteria. Only descriptive statistics were applied. RESULTS: Fourteen patients had operation on seventeen teeth. Mean HDAR treatment period before apical surgery: 25 months (SD, ± 24.27; range, 1-78 months). Drug holiday during surgery and initial healing: mean, 8 months (SD, ± 5.96; range, 0.4-22 months). Sixteen out of seventeen teeth healed clinically and showed complete or ongoing radiographic healing. All patients except one became free of symptoms. Mean follow-up: 13 months (SD, ± 9.05; range, 2-31 months). Radiographic healing according to Molven and Rud: 7, complete; 6, uncertain; 1, unsatisfactory. Three patients died during follow-up and were considered drop-outs. CONCLUSIONS: The present case series suggest that apical surgery is a valid treatment option for apical periodontitis in patients on HDAR, where orthograde endodontic retreatment is not possible. None of the patients developed medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Further studies in larger study groups and with longer follow-up periods are needed. The regional scientific ethical committee provided a document exemption, registration date 20 November 2013, and the local data protection agency approved handling of the recorded data (No. 2012-41-0045), registration date 11 January 2012.