Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Health Phys ; 122(5): 607-613, 2022 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35195087

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: The word "measurand" means "the quantity intended to be measured." The authors argue that health physicists should distinguish between measurands and measurement results because the former exist in the domain of theory, while the latter exist in the domain of reality in which we make measurements and observations. The authors demonstrate the importance of separating the quantities used in theory and those used in experiment, clearing up conceptual confusions in three examples of problems routinely encountered in health physics: (1) detection and quantification of radioactive material; (2) multiple definitions of "activity," and (3) the relationship between radiation and health effects. The first example looks into probabilities of various measurement results (mi) given the measurand (µ) in comparison with the inverse problem: determining probable values of the measurand (µ) based on observed measurement results (mi). The second example addresses the distinction between measurands and measurement results given two definitions of activity A provided by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Additional consideration is given to use of N + 1 counts in (activity) calculations when we have observed N counts, which results from correctly stating and solving the inverse problem. This makes our measurement uncertainties more accurate and our detection decisions more reliable. The last example emphasizes how the observational results of epidemiology, animal experiments, and other radiation biology studies are used to estimate the probability of a particular cancer in an individual-a measurand that is not otherwise accessible to direct observation. Our measurement results, and our use of those results, are more easily understood when we understand the difference between a measurand and a measurement result and can choose the best calculational approach.


Subject(s)
Uncertainty , Animals , Probability
3.
Radiat Environ Biophys ; 58(2): 227-235, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30627772

ABSTRACT

A recently proposed system of models for plutonium decorporation (SPD) was developed using data from an individual occupationally exposed to plutonium via a wound [from United States Transuranium and Uranium Registries (USTUR) Case 0212]. The present study evaluated the SPD using chelation treatment data, urine measurements, and post-mortem plutonium activities in the skeleton and liver from USTUR Case 0269. This individual was occupationally exposed to moderately soluble plutonium via inhalation and extensively treated with chelating agents. The SPD was linked to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 66 Human Respiratory Tract Model (HRTM) and the ICRP Publication 30 Gastrointestinal Tract model to evaluate the goodness-of-fit to the urinary excretion data and the predictions of post-mortem plutonium retention in the skeleton and liver. The goodness-of-fit was also evaluated when the SPD was linked to the ICRP Publication 130 HRTM and the ICRP Publication 100 Human Alimentary Tract Model. The present study showed that the proposed SPD was useful for fitting the entire, chelation-affected and non-affected, urine bioassay data, and for predicting the post-mortem plutonium retention in the skeleton and liver at time of death, 38.5 years after the accident. The results of this work are consistent with the conclusion that Ca-EDTA is less effective than Ca-DTPA for enhancing urinary excretion of plutonium.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Radioactive/urine , Chelating Agents/therapeutic use , Edetic Acid/therapeutic use , Inhalation Exposure , Models, Biological , Pentetic Acid/therapeutic use , Plutonium/urine , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Air Pollutants, Radioactive/pharmacokinetics , Bone and Bones/metabolism , Gastrointestinal Tract/metabolism , Humans , Liver/metabolism , Occupational Exposure , Plutonium/pharmacokinetics , Respiratory System/metabolism
4.
Radiat Res ; 191(2): 201-210, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30566387

ABSTRACT

Individuals with significant intakes of plutonium (Pu) are typically treated with chelating agents, such as the trisodium salt form of calcium diethylenetriaminepentaacetate (CaNa3-DTPA, referred to hereafter as Ca-DTPA). Currently, there is no recommended approach for simultaneously modeling plutonium biokinetics during and after chelation therapy. In this study, an improved modeling system for plutonium decorporation was developed. The system comprises three individual model structures describing, separately, the distinct biokinetic behaviors of systemic plutonium, intravenously injected Ca-DTPA and in vivo-formed Pu-DTPA chelate. The system was linked to ICRP Publication 100, "Human Alimentary Tract Model for Radiological Protection" and NCRP Report 156, Development of a Biokinetic Model for Radionuclide-Contaminated Wounds and Procedures for Their Assessment, Dosimetry and Treatment." Urine bioassay and chelation treatment data from an occupationally-exposed individual were used for model development. Chelation was assumed to occur in the blood, soft tissues, liver and skeleton. The coordinated network for radiation dosimetry approach to decorporation modeling was applied using a chelation constant describing the secondorder, time-dependent kinetics of the in vivo chelation reaction. When using the proposed system of models for plutonium decorporation, a significant improvement of the goodness-of-fit to the urinary excretion data was observed and more accurate predictions of postmortem plutonium retention in the skeleton, liver and wound site were achieved.


Subject(s)
Chelating Agents/chemistry , Models, Chemical , Pentetic Acid/chemistry , Plutonium/chemistry , Biological Assay , Chelating Agents/administration & dosage , Chelating Agents/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Models, Biological , Occupational Exposure , Pentetic Acid/administration & dosage , Pentetic Acid/pharmacokinetics , Plutonium/pharmacokinetics , Plutonium/urine , Postmortem Changes , Radiation Dosage , Tissue Distribution
5.
Health Phys ; 110(6): 606-11, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27115228

ABSTRACT

The distance dependence of air kerma or dose rate of the primary radiation beam is not obvious for security scanners of cargo and people in which there is relative motion between a collimated source and the person or object being imaged. To study this problem, one fixed line source and three moving-source scan-geometry cases are considered, each characterized by radiation emanating perpendicular to an axis. The cases are 1) a stationary line source of radioactive material, e.g., contaminated solution in a pipe; 2) a moving, uncollimated point source of radiation that is shuttered or off when it is stationary; 3) a moving, collimated point source of radiation that is shuttered or off when it is stationary; and 4) a translating, narrow "pencil" beam emanating in a flying-spot, raster pattern. Each case is considered for short and long distances compared to the line source length or path traversed by a moving source. The short distance model pertains mostly to dose to objects being scanned and personnel associated with the screening operation. The long distance model pertains mostly to potential dose to bystanders. For radionuclide sources, the number of nuclear transitions that occur a) per unit length of a line source or b) during the traversal of a point source is a unifying concept. The "universal source strength" of air kerma rate at 1 m from the source can be used to describe x-ray machine or radionuclide sources. For many cargo and people scanners with highly collimated fan or pencil beams, dose varies as the inverse of the distance from the source in the near field and with the inverse square of the distance beyond a critical radius. Ignoring the inverse square dependence and using inverse distance dependence is conservative in the sense of tending to overestimate dose.


Subject(s)
Radiation Exposure/analysis , Radiography/instrumentation , Security Measures , Whole Body Imaging/instrumentation , Whole-Body Counting/methods , Computer Simulation , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Humans , Models, Statistical , Reproducibility of Results , Scattering, Radiation , Sensitivity and Specificity , X-Rays
6.
Radiat Res ; 178(5): 447-67, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22998225

ABSTRACT

Seven groups of 8-24 Beagle dogs, exposed to (239)PuO(2) aerosols by inhalation [mean initial lung depositions (ILD) of 0.0, 0.14, 0.63, 3.2, 13, 44 and 210 kBq] were observed throughout their lives to determine tissues at risk and dose-effect relationships. The mean average pulmonary retention half-time of (239)Pu was 1,192 days. Most (70%) of the plutonium recovered at death in dogs surviving >10 years after exposure was found in the thoracic lymph nodes with ∼15% in lung, ∼10% in liver and ∼2% in bone. Eight dogs at the highest exposure levels died from radiation pneumonitis prior to a minimal 3-year latency period after exposure for the observation of lung tumors, with the first succumbing 337 days after exposure. Of 108 plutonium-exposed Beagles with ILD <100 kBq, 51 (47%) had lung tumors with significantly increased incidence in those dogs with total lung dose of ≥1.1 Gy at death. The primary non-neoplastic effects observed were lymphopenia, atrophy and fibrosis of the thoracic lymph nodes, radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis, and bacterial pneumonia. Lesions of the thoracic lymph nodes were observed in 98 of 108 exposed dogs, but there were no primary neoplasms of the lymph nodes. Bacterial pneumonia was observed in 13 plutonium-exposed dogs and was the most notable non-neoplastic cause of death, with survival nearly the same as that of controls. Setting of dose limits on the basis of detrimental effects commonly considers and differentiates between stochastic and deterministic effects, raising the question of whether the non-neoplastic effects found in this study were deterministic. The International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP), National Council on Radiation Protection & Measurements (NCRP), and similar organizations generally consider effects that increase in incidence and severity to meet the definition of deterministic. We demonstrated the radiation dose-related nature of effects such as pneumonitis and fibrosis graphically and lymphopenia numerically, rather than by quantified estimates. It is clear, however, that both incidence and severity increased with ILD and radiation dose and should be considered as deterministic effects.


Subject(s)
Bone and Bones , Liver , Lung , Lymph Nodes , Plutonium/toxicity , Administration, Inhalation , Animals , Bone and Bones/pathology , Bone and Bones/radiation effects , Dogs , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Liver/pathology , Liver/radiation effects , Lung/pathology , Lung/radiation effects , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/radiation effects , Radiation , Radiation Pneumonitis/pathology , Survival Analysis , Tissue Distribution
7.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 149(3): 251-67, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21693467

ABSTRACT

In making low-level radioactivity measurements of populations, it is commonly observed that a substantial portion of net results is negative. Furthermore, the observed variance of the measurement results arises from a combination of measurement uncertainty and population variability. This paper presents a method for disaggregating measurement uncertainty from population variability to produce a probability density function (PDF) of possibly true results. To do this, simple, justifiable and reasonable assumptions are made about the relationship of the measurements to the measurands (the 'true values'). The measurements are assumed to be unbiased, that is, that their average value is the average of the measurands. Using traditional estimates of each measurement's uncertainty, a likelihood PDF for each individual's measurand is produced. Then using the same assumptions and all the data from the population of individuals, a prior PDF of measurands for the population is produced. The prior PDF is non-negative, and the average is equal to the average of the measurement results for the population. Using Bayes's theorem, posterior PDFs of each individual measurand are calculated. The uncertainty in these bayesian posterior PDFs appears to be all Berkson with no remaining classical component. The method is applied to baseline bioassay data from the Hanford site. The data include (90)Sr urinalysis measurements of 128 people, (137)Cs in vivo measurements of 5337 people and (239)Pu urinalysis measurements of 3270 people. The method produces excellent results for the (90)Sr and (137)Cs measurements, since there are non-zero concentrations of these global fallout radionuclides in people who have not been occupationally exposed. The method does not work for the (239)Pu measurements in non-occupationally exposed people because the population average is essentially zero relative to the sensitivity of the measurement technique. The method is shown to give results similar to classical statistical inference when the measurements have relatively small uncertainty.


Subject(s)
Biological Assay/methods , Radiometry/methods , Algorithms , Bayes Theorem , Cesium Radioisotopes/chemistry , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Environmental Exposure , Humans , Isotopes/analysis , Models, Statistical , Plutonium/analysis , Probability , Radiation Dosage , Regression Analysis , Strontium Radioisotopes/chemistry , Uncertainty
8.
Health Phys ; 100(4): 359-76, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21350344

ABSTRACT

This paper is Part 1 of a three-part series investigating steady-state effective dose rates to residents of the United States from intakes of ubiquitous radionuclides, including radionuclides occurring naturally, radionuclides whose concentrations are technologically enhanced, and anthropogenic radionuclides. This series of papers explicitly excludes intakes from inhaling (222)Rn, (220)Rn, and their short-lived decay products; it also excludes intakes of radionuclides in occupational and medical settings. In this work, it is assumed that instantaneous dose rates in target organs are proportional to steady-state radionuclide concentrations in source regions. The goal of Part 1 of this work was to review, summarize, and characterize all published and some unpublished data for U.S. residents on ubiquitous radionuclide concentrations in tissues and organs. Forty-five papers and reports were obtained and their data reviewed, and three data sets were obtained via private communication. The 45 radionuclides of interest are the (238)U series (14 nuclides), the actinium series (headed by (235)U; 11 nuclides), and the (232)Th series (11 nuclides); primordial radionuclides (87)Rb and (40)K; cosmogenic and fallout radionuclides (14)C and (3)H; and purely anthropogenic radionuclides (137)Cs-(137m)Ba, (129)I, and (90)Sr-(90)Y. Measurements judged to be relevant were available for only 15 of these radionuclides: (238)U, (235)U, (234)U, (232)Th, (230)Th, (228)Th, (228)Ra, (226)Ra, (210)Pb, (210)Po, (137)Cs, (87)Rb, (40)K, (14)C, and (3)H. Recent and relevant measurements were not available for (129)I and (90)Sr-(90)Y. A total of 11,741 radionuclide concentration measurements were found in one or more tissues or organs from 14 states. Data on age, gender, geographic locations, height, and weight of subjects were available only sporadically. Too often authors did not provide meaningful values of uncertainty of measurements, so that variability in data sets is confounded with measurement uncertainty. The following papers detail how these shortcomings are overcome to achieve the goals of the three-part series.


Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Radioisotopes/analysis , Autopsy , Humans , Quality Control , Radioisotopes/pharmacokinetics , Statistics as Topic , United States
9.
Health Phys ; 100(4): 377-401, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21350345

ABSTRACT

This paper is Part 2 of a three-part series investigating effective dose rates to residents of the United States from intakes of ubiquitous radionuclides, including radionuclides occurring naturally, radionuclides whose concentrations are technologically enhanced, and anthropogenic radionuclides. This series of papers explicitly excludes intakes from inhaling (222)Rn, (220)Rn, and their short-lived decay products; it also excludes intakes of radionuclides in occupational and medical settings. In this work, it is assumed that instantaneous dose rates in target organs are proportional to steady-state radionuclide concentrations in source regions. Part 1 reviewed, summarized, characterized, and grouped all published and some unpublished data for U.S. residents on ubiquitous radionuclide concentrations in tissues and organs. Assumptions about equilibrium with long-lived parents are made for the 28 other radionuclides in these series lacking data. This paper describes the methods developed to group the collected data into source regions described in the Radiation Dose Assessment Resource (RADAR) dosimetric methodology. Methods for converting the various units of data published over 50 y into a standard form are developed and described. Often, meaningful values of uncertainty of measurements were not published, so that variability in data sets is confounded with measurement uncertainty. A description of the methods developed to estimate variability is included in this paper. The data described in Part 1 are grouped by gender and age to match the RADAR dosimetric phantoms. Within these phantoms, concentration values are grouped into source tissue regions by radionuclide, and they are imputed for source regions lacking tissue data. Radionuclide concentrations are then imputed for the source regions of other phantoms with missing concentration values, and the uncertainties of the imputed values are increased. The concentrations of hollow organs' contents are calculated, and activities are apportioned to the bone source regions using assumptions about each radionuclide's bone-seeking behavior. The data sets are then ready to be used to estimate equivalent dose rates to target tissues from these source regions. The target tissues are then mapped to lists of tissues with International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) tissue weighting factors, or they are mapped to surrogate tissue regions when there is no direct match. Effective dose rates, using ICRP tissue weighting factors recommended in 1977, 1990, and 2007, can be calculated from the tissue and organ equivalent dose rates. These effective dose rates are reported in Part 3 of this series.


Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Radioisotopes/analysis , Radiometry/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Quality Control , Radiometry/standards , Statistics as Topic , United States , Young Adult
10.
Health Phys ; 100(4): 402-16, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21350346

ABSTRACT

This paper is Part 3 of a three-part series investigating effective dose rates to residents of the United States from intakes of ubiquitous radionuclides, including radionuclides occurring naturally, radionuclides whose concentrations are technologically enhanced, and anthropogenic radionuclides. The radionuclides of interest are the (238)U series (14 nuclides), the actinium series (headed by (235)U; 11 nuclides), and the (232)Th series (11 nuclides); primordial radionuclides (87)Rb and (40)K; cosmogenic and fallout radionuclides (14)C and (3)H; and purely anthropogenic radionuclides (137)Cs-(137m)Ba, (129)I and (90)Sr-(90)Y. This series of papers explicitly excludes intakes from inhaling (222)Rn, (220)Rn, and their short-lived decay products; it also excludes intakes of radionuclides in occupational and medical settings. In this work, it is assumed that instantaneous dose rates in target organs are proportional to steady-state radionuclide concentrations in source regions. Part 1 reviewed, summarized, characterized, and grouped all published and some unpublished data for U.S. residents on ubiquitous radionuclide concentrations in tissues and organs. Part 2 described the methods used to organize the data collected in Part 1 and segregate it into the ages and genders defined by the study, including imputed missing values from the existing data, apportioned activity in bone, and imputed activity in hollow organ contents and the remainder of the body. This paper estimates equivalent dose rates to target tissues from source regions and maps target tissues to lists of tissues with International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) tissue-weighting factors or to surrogate tissue regions when there is no direct match. Effective dose rates using ICRP tissue-weighting factors recommended in 1977, 1990, and 2007, are then calculated, and an upper bound of variability of the effective dose rate is estimated by calculating the average coefficients of variation (CV), assuming all variance is due to variability. Most of the data were for adult males, whose average effective dose rate is estimated to be 337 µSv y(-1) (CV = 0.65, geometric mean = 283 µSv y(-1), geometric standard deviation s(G) = 1.81) using 2007 ICRP tissue-weighting factors. This result is between the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements' 1987 estimate of 390 µSv y(-1) (using 1977 w(T)s) and its 2009 estimate of 285 µSv y(-1) (using 2007 w(T)s) and is higher than the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation's 2000 estimate of 310 µSv y(-1) (using 1990 w(T)s). The methods and software developed for this project are sufficiently detailed and sufficiently general to be usable with autopsy data from any or all countries.


Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Radioisotopes/analysis , Uncertainty , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , United States
11.
Health Phys ; 94(2): 145-60, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18188049

ABSTRACT

Beginning around 1940, private companies began processing of uranium and thorium ore, compounds, and metals for the Manhattan Engineer District and later the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). Personnel from the AEC's Health and Safety Laboratory (HASL) visited many of the plants to assess worker exposures to radiation and radioactive materials. They developed a time-and-task approach to estimating "daily weighted average" (DWA) concentrations of airborne uranium, thorium, radon, and radon decay products. While short-term exposures greater than 10(5) dpm m(-3) of uranium and greater than 10(5) pCi L(-1) of radon were observed, DWA concentrations were much lower. The HASL-reported DWA values may be used as inputs for dose reconstruction in support of compensation decisions, but they have no numerical uncertainties associated with them. In this work, Monte Carlo methods are used retrospectively to assess the uncertainty and variability in the DWA values for 63 job titles from five different facilities that processed U, U ore, Th, or 226Ra-222Rn between 1948 and 1955. Most groups of repeated air samples are well described by lognormal distributions. Combining samples associated with different tasks often results in a reduction of the geometric standard deviation (GSD) of the DWA to less than those GSD values typical of individual tasks. Results support the assumption of a GSD value of 5 when information on uncertainty in DWA exposures is unavailable. Blunders involving arithmetic, transposition, and transcription are found in many of the HASL reports. In 5 out of the 63 cases, these mistakes result in overestimates of DWA values by a factor of 2 to 2.5, and in 2 cases DWA values are underestimated by factors of 3 to 10.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Radioactive , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Uncertainty , Environmental Exposure , Humans , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. , Nuclear Energy , Radiation Dosage , Reproducibility of Results , United States
12.
Radiat Res ; 164(5): 695-700, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16238449

ABSTRACT

We have designed and constructed a low-cost, variable-energy low-LET electron microbeam that uses energetic electrons to mimic radiation damage produced by gamma and X rays. The microbeam can access lower regions of the LET spectrum, similar to conventional X-ray or 60Co gamma-ray sources. The device has two operating modes, as a conventional microbeam targeting single cells or subpopulations of cells or as a pseudo broad-beam source allowing for direct comparison with conventional sources. By varying the incident electron energy, the target cells can be selectively exposed to different parts of the energetic electron tracks, including the track ends.


Subject(s)
Electrons , Radiobiology/instrumentation , Linear Energy Transfer
14.
Health Phys ; 83(2): 155-64, 2002 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12132704

ABSTRACT

The attack on the United States on 11 September 2001 resulted in an increased awareness of the need for safety and security measures to protect against terrorism. The potential use of radiation sources in terrorism, in particular radioactive sources, was recognized prior to 11 September 2001, but has taken on new significance since. The planning of security measures for radioactive sources must take greater account of the potential for deliberate acts to attack or use radioactive sources to expose people and cause contamination. The potential consequences of an act of terrorism using radioactive sources can be gauged from the consequences of serious accidents that have occurred involving radioactive sources. These include fatal and injurious radiation exposures, contamination of the environment, and serious economic and psychosocial costs the total effect of which is mass disruption. Steps are being taken to improve security for radioactive sources but strategic approaches that can minimize the threat of radiological terrorism should be considered. When justifying a practice that uses radioactive sources, the potential for diversion or use in terrorism should be considered to be a detriment. In this regard, the consideration and development of alternatives to radioactive sources, such as radiation producing machines, have been recommended by terrorism experts as measures to reduce the threat of radiological terrorism. If a practice using radioactive sources is determined to be justified, the need for special security measures to protect against terrorism should then become part of the safety assessment.


Subject(s)
Radiation Protection , Safety Management , Terrorism , Humans , Radioactive Hazard Release , Radioactive Waste , Risk Assessment
15.
Health Phys ; 82(3): 373-86, 2002 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11845840

ABSTRACT

While much of the language used to express the concepts of radiation protection works effectively, there are many ill-chosen names and phrases and much jargon that permeate our professional speech and writing. From the oxymoron "internal exposure" to the "snarl word" "decay," there is much room for improvement. This essay identifies many of the problems and suggests solutions. We examine the kinds of confusions that can result from using familiar words with unfamiliar meanings and the need for neology. We offer insights into specific and unambiguous naming of physical quantities and explore the seemingly unlimited kinds of "dose." We disaggregate exposure from irradiation following intakes, and unmask units like "gram rad per microcurie hour." We call for a definition of radiation weighting factor that doesn't result in a violation of the law of conservation of energy. We examine the subtleties of distinguishing between radiation and radioactive materials. Some words, such as "exposure," have multiple meanings, while at other times there are different words or phrases with the same meaning, such as "critical level" and "decision level" or "detection level" and "minimum detectable amount." Sometimes phrases are used whose meaning is unclear or not agreed upon, such as "lower limit of detection." Sometimes there are words that are simply not apt, such as "disintegration" applied to the emission of a subatomic particle from a nucleus.


Subject(s)
Nuclear Medicine/methods , Radiation Protection , Terminology as Topic , Humans , Occupational Exposure
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL