Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Community Genet ; 14(3): 241-262, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37093545

ABSTRACT

Birth defects, also known as congenital disorders, are a significant health issue impacting at least five million births annually worldwide. For policymakers to mount a relevant healthcare response to care for those affected, the burden of disease of these conditions must be quantified. Estimates of the contribution of birth defects to under-5 child mortality and morbidity are generated by several groups globally. These estimates often differ, causing confusion for policymakers. While some differences may be attributed to the data sources and methods used, much is due to a lack of clarity in the terminology used for the group of disorders classed as "congenital". This study aimed to gain insight into the diversity of terms and definitions for birth defects, including those used routinely by relevant international/national organisations and in the peer-reviewed literature. This two-part study included (1) scoping review of peer-reviewed literature to identify terms and definitions in use for birth defects and (2) review of key websites and grey literature to identify terms and definitions used. The results of this study indicate a wide variety of terms being used, often interchangeably and undefined, in peer-reviewed publications, on institutional websites and related literature. This suggests a lack of clarity related to terminology and sets the scene for further discussion, recommending that the community of practice working on birth defects comes to a consensus on standard terminology and definitions for global uptake and implementation. Such standardisation will facilitate a common understanding of the burden of these disorders globally, regionally and within countries so that action can be taken to support affected children and their families.

2.
Drug Metab Dispos ; 24(11): 1263-71, 1996 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8937862

ABSTRACT

The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of L-751,164, an ethyl ester prodrug of a potent fibrinogen receptor antagonist, L-742,998, were studied in beagle dogs and rhesus monkeys. In both species, L-751,164 exhibited high clearance. After an intravenous dose, L-751,164 was converted to the parent L-742,998 to the extent of approximately 20% in dogs and 90% in monkeys. After oral administration of the prodrug, however, the bioavailability, measured either as the prodrug or as the active parent, was < 5% in both species. Several experiments were conducted subsequently to investigate possible causes for the observed similarities in the low oral bioavailability of the prodrug between species despite its differences in the in vivo conversion. In vitro metabolism studies using dog liver subcellular fractions indicated extensive metabolism of L-751,164 to metabolites other than L-742,998. Kinetically, L-742,998 formation accounted only for approximately 25% of the prodrug disappearance. In contrast, monkey liver preparations converted L-751,164 exclusively and rapidly to L-742,998. Good agreement between the in vitro hepatic metabolism and the in vivo observations suggests that liver was the major eliminating organ after intravenous administration of the prodrug in both species. In dogs, this suggestion was further supported by low bioavailability of the prodrug (20%) and the parent (below detection limit) after intraportal administration of the prodrug. In vitro metabolism of L-751,164 using intestinal S9 fractions revealed substantial metabolism in monkeys, but not in dogs. Several NADPH-dependent metabolites were observed with monkey intestinal preparation, with the parent L-742,998 being the minor product (approximately 25-30%). Furthermore, L-751,164 was shown, by means of an in vitro Caco-2 cell, and in situ rat intestinal loop models, to be highly permeable to intestinal barriers. Collectively, these results suggest that the apparent species differences in the prodrug conversion observed in vivo likely were due to species differences in the hepatic metabolism of the prodrug. In both species, the high first-pass metabolism of the prodrug, and the extensive conversion of the prodrug to metabolic products other than the parent contributed, at least in part, to the low bioavailability of the prodrug and active parent, respectively, obtained after an oral dose of the prodrug. The latter process was species-dependent, involving primarily the hepatic first-pass elimination in dogs and the intestinal first-pass metabolism in monkeys.


Subject(s)
Prodrugs/pharmacokinetics , Pyridines/pharmacokinetics , Animals , Biological Availability , Caco-2 Cells , Dogs , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Liver/metabolism , Macaca mulatta , Male , Species Specificity , Tissue Distribution
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL